AB 1050 - An Act to Amend Section 3042 of the Family Code, Relating to Child Custody.

Child custody: preferences of child. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law requires the family court, if a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody, to consider and give due weight to the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody.

This bill would, on and after January 1, 2012, require the family court to consider and give due weight to the wishes of a child… More
Existing law requires the family court, if a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody, to consider and give due weight to the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody.

This bill would, on and after January 1, 2012, require the family court to consider and give due weight to the wishes of a child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation, if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation. The bill would require the court to permit a child who is 14 years of age or older to address the court regarding custody or visitation, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the child’s best interests, and, in that case, the bill would require the court to state its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the child’s preferences if the court precludes the calling of any child as a witness. The bill would require the Judicial Council to, no later than January 1, 2012, promulgate a rule of court establishing procedures for the examination of a child witness, as specified. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Committee on Judiciary Vote: Do pass, to Consent Calendar.

PASSED on May 5, 2009.

voted YES: 10 voted NO: 0
0 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 3042 of the Family Code, Relating to Child Custody.

AB 1050 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
Existing law requires the family court, if a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody, to consider and give due weight to the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody.

This bill would, on and after January 1, 2012, require the family court to consider and give due weight to the wishes of a child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation, if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation. The bill would require the court to permit a child who is 14 years of age or older to address the court regarding custody or visitation, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the child’s best interests, and, in that case, the bill would require the court to state its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the child’s preferences if the court precludes the calling of any child as a witness. The bill would require the Judicial Council to, no later than January 1, 2012,… More
Existing law requires the family court, if a child is of sufficient age and capacity to reason so as to form an intelligent preference as to custody, to consider and give due weight to the wishes of the child in making an order granting or modifying custody.

This bill would, on and after January 1, 2012, require the family court to consider and give due weight to the wishes of a child in making an order granting or modifying custody or visitation, if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to form an intelligent preference as to custody or visitation. The bill would require the court to permit a child who is 14 years of age or older to address the court regarding custody or visitation, unless the court determines that doing so is not in the child’s best interests, and, in that case, the bill would require the court to state its reasons for that finding on the record. The bill would require the court to provide alternative means of obtaining input from the child and other information regarding the child’s preferences if the court precludes the calling of any child as a witness. The bill would require the Judicial Council to, no later than January 1, 2012, promulgate a rule of court establishing procedures for the examination of a child witness, as specified. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 3042 of the Family Code, Relating to Child Custody.
Author(s)
Fiona Ma
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Child custody: preferences of child
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/27/2009
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary5/05/2009
    Passed Assembly5/11/2009
    Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary6/29/2010
    Passed Senate8/05/2010
    Passed Assembly8/09/2010
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)8/16/2010
    Became law (chaptered).8/27/2010
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    currently selectedAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, to Consent Calendar.5/05/2009This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
    10 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 1050 MA Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session5/11/2009This bill PASSED the Assembly
    78 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations Recommend Consent.6/29/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
    4 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateConsent Calendar 2nd AB1050 Ma8/05/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
    33 voted YES 0 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 1050 MA Concurrence in Senate Amendments8/09/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
    78 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/27/2009
    2/27/2009Introduced. To print.
    3/01/2009From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
    3/02/2009Read first time.
    3/26/2009Referred to Com. on JUD. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
    3/27/2009Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
    4/16/2009From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
    4/20/2009Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
    currently selectedVote5/05/2009Do pass, to Consent Calendar.
    5/05/2009From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 5).
    5/06/2009Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
    5/11/2009Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1369.)
    5/11/2009In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage5/11/2009AB 1050 MA Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session
    5/21/2009Referred to Com. on JUD.
    6/21/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
    select this voteVote6/29/2010Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations Recommend Consent.
    6/30/2010From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 29).
    8/02/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and to Consent Calendar.
    8/03/2010Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
    8/05/2010Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4373.)
    8/05/2010In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/05/2010Consent Calendar 2nd AB1050 Ma
    8/09/2010Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6098.)
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/09/2010AB 1050 MA Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    8/16/2010Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:55 p.m.
    8/27/2010Approved by the Governor.
    8/27/2010Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 187, Statutes of 2010.

    MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
    You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

    0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Section 3042 of the Family Code, Relating to Child Custody.: Do pass, to Consent Calendar.

    0 organizations supported this motion

    0 organizations opposed this motion

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2010.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0Yes
    Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0Yes
    Dave JonesDCA-9$0$0Yes
    Steve KnightRCA-36$0$0Yes
    Paul KrekorianDCA-43$0$0Yes
    Ted LieuDCA-53$0$0Yes
    Bill MonningDCA-27$0$0Yes
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$0Yes
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$0$0Yes
    Van TranRCA-68$0$0Yes

    Interest Groups that supported this motion

    $ Donated

    Interest Groups that opposed this motion

    $ Donated
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range