AB 1169 - An Act to Amend Section 1790 of the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Continuing Care Contracts.

Elderly care: continuing care contracts: financial reporting requirements. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law establishes the State Department of Social Services and sets forth its various powers and duties, including, but not limited to, its licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including, but not limited to, residential care facilities for the elderly. Existing law provides for the regulation by the department of continuing care contracts and providers of continuing care… More
Existing law establishes the State Department of Social Services and sets forth its various powers and duties, including, but not limited to, its licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including, but not limited to, residential care facilities for the elderly. Existing law provides for the regulation by the department of continuing care contracts and providers of continuing care and requires providers to submit an annual report of their financial condition. Existing law requires the report to include, among other things, a disclosure of funds accumulated for identified projects or purposes, and any funds maintained or designated for specific contingencies. Violation of certain of these provisions is a crime.

This bill would require that the report also disclose funds that are expended for identified projects or purposes. The bill would also specify that the disclosure requirement includes, but is not limited to, projects designated to meet the needs of the continuing care retirement community as permitted by a provider’s nonprofit status. This bill would require a disclosure made by a nonprofit provider to state how the project or purpose is consistent with the provider’s tax-exempt status. The bill would also require a disclosure made by a for-profit provider to identify amounts accumulated for specific projects or purposes and amounts maintained for contingencies. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on July 16, 2009.

voted YES: 35 voted NO: 0
5 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 1790 of the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Continuing Care Contracts.

AB 1169 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
Existing law establishes the State Department of Social Services and sets forth its various powers and duties, including, but not limited to, its licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including, but not limited to, residential care facilities for the elderly. Existing law provides for the regulation by the department of continuing care contracts and providers of continuing care and requires providers to submit an annual report of their financial condition. Existing law requires the report to include, among other things, a disclosure of funds accumulated for identified projects or purposes, and any funds maintained or designated for specific contingencies. Violation of certain of these provisions is a crime.

This bill would require that the report also disclose funds that are expended for identified projects or purposes. The bill would also specify that the disclosure requirement includes, but is not limited to, projects designated to meet the needs of the continuing care retirement community as permitted by a provider’s nonprofit status. This bill would require a disclosure made by a nonprofit provider to state how the project or purpose is consistent… More
Existing law establishes the State Department of Social Services and sets forth its various powers and duties, including, but not limited to, its licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including, but not limited to, residential care facilities for the elderly. Existing law provides for the regulation by the department of continuing care contracts and providers of continuing care and requires providers to submit an annual report of their financial condition. Existing law requires the report to include, among other things, a disclosure of funds accumulated for identified projects or purposes, and any funds maintained or designated for specific contingencies. Violation of certain of these provisions is a crime.

This bill would require that the report also disclose funds that are expended for identified projects or purposes. The bill would also specify that the disclosure requirement includes, but is not limited to, projects designated to meet the needs of the continuing care retirement community as permitted by a provider’s nonprofit status. This bill would require a disclosure made by a nonprofit provider to state how the project or purpose is consistent with the provider’s tax-exempt status. The bill would also require a disclosure made by a for-profit provider to identify amounts accumulated for specific projects or purposes and amounts maintained for contingencies. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 1790 of the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Continuing Care Contracts.
Author(s)
Ira Ruskin
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Elderly care: continuing care contracts: financial reporting requirements
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/27/2009
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Assembly Committee on Human Services4/14/2009
    Passed Assembly Committee on Aging and Long Term Care4/21/2009
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/13/2009
    Passed Assembly5/28/2009
    Passed Senate Committee on Human Services6/23/2009
    Passed Senate7/16/2009
    Passed Assembly8/20/2009
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)8/27/2009
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/25/2009
    Became law (chaptered).10/11/2009
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteAssembly Committee on Human ServicesDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Aging and Long€term Care.4/14/2009This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Human Services
    4 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on Aging and Long Term CareDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/21/2009This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Aging and Long Term Care
    4 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/13/2009This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    11 voted YES 4 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 1169 RUSKIN Assembly Third Reading5/28/2009This bill PASSED the Assembly
    51 voted YES 28 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on Human ServicesDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.6/23/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Human Services
    5 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB1169 Ruskin By Alquist7/16/2009This bill PASSED the Senate
    35 voted YES 0 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 1169 RUSKIN Concurrence in Senate Amendments8/20/2009This bill PASSED the Assembly
    74 voted YES 0 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/27/2009
    2/27/2009Introduced. To print.
    3/01/2009From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
    3/02/2009Read first time.
    3/26/2009Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and AGING & L.T.C.
    select this voteVote4/14/2009Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Aging and Long€term Care.
    4/16/2009From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on AGING & L.T.C. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 14).
    4/20/2009Read second time and amended.
    4/21/2009Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.
    select this voteVote4/21/2009Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    4/27/2009From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 21).
    4/28/2009Read second time and amended.
    4/29/2009Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    select this voteVote5/13/2009Do pass.
    5/14/2009From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 13).
    5/18/2009Read second time. To third reading.
    5/26/2009Action rescinded and record expunged whereby a final roll call vote was taken.
    5/28/2009Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 1718.)
    5/28/2009In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage5/28/2009AB 1169 RUSKIN Assembly Third Reading
    6/11/2009Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
    select this voteVote6/23/2009Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
    6/29/2009From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23).
    6/30/2009Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    7/14/2009From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
    7/15/2009Read second time. To third reading.
    7/16/2009Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1763.)
    7/16/2009In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 18 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
    currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage7/16/2009Assembly 3rd Reading AB1169 Ruskin By Alquist
    8/20/2009Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2655.)
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/20/2009AB 1169 RUSKIN Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    8/27/2009Enrolled and to the Governor at 3:15 p.m.
    9/08/2009Returned by the Governor at the request of the Assembly.
    9/25/2009Enrolled and to the Governor at 5 p.m.
    10/11/2009Approved by the Governor.
    10/11/2009Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 513, Statutes of 2009.

    Total contributions given to Senators from Health care services, which…

    supported this bill

    Health care services$172,878
    $172,878

    1 Organization Supported and 0 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Section 1790 of the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Continuing Care Contracts.: Assembly 3rd Reading AB1169 Ruskin By Alquist

    1 organization supported this bill

    California Continuing Care Residents Association
    Senate Human Services Committee (2009, June 19). AB 1169 6.19.2009. Retrieved October 22, 2010, from Leg Info.

    0 organizations opposed this bill

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from Health care services interest groups, January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2010.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$0Yes
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$7,600$0Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
    John BenoitRCA-37$10,000$0Not Voting
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$1,250$0Yes
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$1,000$0Yes
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$6,500$0Yes
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$600$0Yes
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$4,250$0Yes
    Dave CoxRCA-1$4,500$0Yes
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$2,250$0Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$2,500$0Yes
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$6,250$0Not Voting
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$0Not Voting
    Loni HancockDCA-9$1,000$0Yes
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$4,200$0Yes
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$0Yes
    Bob HuffRCA-29$0$0Yes
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$2,500$0Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$5,850$0Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$1,128$0Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0Yes
    Abel MaldonadoRCA-15$1,000$0Yes
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$4,600$0Yes
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$1,250$0Not Voting
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$8,850$0Not Voting
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$0$0Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$0$0Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$1,000$0Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$5,250$0Yes
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$0$0Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$42,950$0Yes
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$22,250$0Yes
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$12,400$0Yes
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$0$0Yes
    Lois WolkDCA-5$8,200$0Yes
    Rod WrightDCA-25$0$0Yes
    Mark WylandRCA-38$0$0Yes
    Leland YeeDCA-8$3,750$0Yes

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$0Yes
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$7,600$0Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
    John BenoitRCA-37$10,000$0Not Voting
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$1,250$0Yes
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$1,000$0Yes
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$6,500$0Yes
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$600$0Yes
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$4,250$0Yes
    Dave CoxRCA-1$4,500$0Yes
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$2,250$0Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$2,500$0Yes
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$6,250$0Not Voting
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$0Not Voting
    Loni HancockDCA-9$1,000$0Yes
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$4,200$0Yes
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$0Yes
    Bob HuffRCA-29$0$0Yes
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$2,500$0Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$5,850$0Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$1,128$0Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0Yes
    Abel MaldonadoRCA-15$1,000$0Yes
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$4,600$0Yes
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$1,250$0Not Voting
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$8,850$0Not Voting
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$0$0Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$0$0Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$1,000$0Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$5,250$0Yes
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$0$0Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$42,950$0Yes
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$22,250$0Yes
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$12,400$0Yes
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$0$0Yes
    Lois WolkDCA-5$8,200$0Yes
    Rod WrightDCA-25$0$0Yes
    Mark WylandRCA-38$0$0Yes
    Leland YeeDCA-8$3,750$0Yes

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    Health care services$172,878

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range