AB 1592 - An Act to Amend Sections 19999.3, 21353, 21354.1, 21363.1, 21363.4, and 21369.1 Of, and to Add Sections 19829.7, 19829.8, 19829.9, 19829.95, 20037.14, 20677.6, 20677.7, 20677.9, 20677.95, and 21369.2 To, the Government Code, Relating to State Employees, Making an Appropriation Therefor, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.

State employees: memorandum of understanding. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law provides that if any provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees requires the expenditure of funds, those provisions of the memorandum of understanding shall not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act.

This bill would… More
(1)Existing law provides that if any provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees requires the expenditure of funds, those provisions of the memorandum of understanding shall not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act.

This bill would approve provisions that require the expenditure of funds for memoranda of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Units 8, 16, and 19 and would provide that the provisions of any memorandum of understanding that require the expenditure of funds shall become effective even if the provisions of the memorandum of understanding are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act.

The bill would provide that provisions of the memoranda of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would authorize the state employer and the affected employee organizations to reopen negotiations on all or part of the memorandum of understanding if the memorandum of understanding that requires the expenditure of funds is not approved by the Legislature.

This bill would, with respect to salaries that are continuously appropriated prior to the enactment of the annual Budget Act, require the Director of Finance to reduce the necessary items for the payment of salaries from specified funds scheduled in that Budget Act to reflect the salaries paid prior to the enactment of the annual Budget Act.

(2)Existing law establishes an alternate retirement program and provides that state employees, as defined, who become new members of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) during their first 24 months of employment, do not make contributions to the system or receive service credit for their service, and the state employer shall not make contributions on their behalf. These members are instead required to contribute either 5% or 6% of their monthly compensation, as specified, to the alternate retirement program, administered by the Department of Personnel Administration, and these contributions cease when the state employees begin making their own contributions to PERS.

This bill would require all state employees participating in the alternate retirement system to contribute an amount equal to the same amount that employees in the same employment classifications in the same state bargaining units are required to contribute to PERS.

(3)The Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL) provides a comprehensive set of rights and benefits based upon age, service credit, and final compensation. Existing law defines final compensation variously for different member classifications and bargaining units and, in this regard, defines final compensation for a state member for the purpose of calculating retirement benefits as the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 12-month or 36-month period, depending upon the bargaining unit and classification of that employee. Currently the final compensation for members hired on or after July 1, 2006, who are represented by State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, means the final compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period.

This bill would provide that final compensation for a person who becomes a state member, as specified, on or after October 31, 2010, and who is represented by State Bargaining Units 5 and 8, means the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period.

(4)PERL provides that the contribution rate for state miscellaneous members and specified state safety members is 5% or 6% of the compensation in excess of $513. Existing law provides that the contribution rate for specified state firefighters is 8% of compensation in excess of $238 per month. Existing law provides that the contribution rate for specified state safety patrol members is 8% of the compensation in excess of $863 per month.

This bill would increase the contributions rates by 5% for state miscellaneous members of State Bargaining Units 5, 8, 12, 16, 18, and 19 and state safety members of State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, and by 2% for state firefighter members of State Bargaining Unit 8 and state patrol members of State Bargaining Unit 5. By increasing member contributions into a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation.

(5)PERL establishes various retirement formulas that apply to specified membership categories. Under PERL, state miscellaneous members are generally subject to a retirement formula commonly known as 2% at 55, which, if the member retires at 55 years of age, yields a benefit equal to 2% of the member’s final compensation multiplied by the member’s years of service credit, as specified. Under PERL, patrol members and specified state peace officer/firefighter members are generally subject to a 3% at 50 retirement formula. Under PERL, state safety members are generally subject to a 2.5% at 55 retirement formula.

This bill would provide that state miscellaneous members who are first employed on and after the date the act takes effect, are subject to a 2% at 60 retirement formula. The bill would also provide that patrol members and firefighter members in State Bargaining Units 5 and 8 who are first employed on and after October 31, 2010, are subject to a 3% at 55 retirement formula.

(6)The annual Budget Act appropriates specified amounts from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, and unallocated nongovernmental cost funds, for state employee compensation.

This bill would, in the event that the annual Budget Act is not enacted prior to July 1 of each year covered by the memoranda of understanding for State Bargaining Units 5, 8, 12, 16, 18, and 19, provide for a continuous appropriation for the amount necessary for the payment of compensation and benefits to members of those bargaining units.

(7)This bill would provide that its provisions would not become operative unless SB 846 of the 2009–10 Regular Session is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2011.

(8)This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 19, 2010.

voted YES: 73 voted NO: 4
2 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 19999.3, 21353, 21354.1, 21363.1, 21363.4, and 21369.1 Of, and to Add Sections 19829.7, 19829.8, 19829.9, 19829.95, 20037.14, 20677.6, 20677.7, 20677.9, 20677.95, and 21369.2 To, the Government Code, Relating to State Employees, Making an Appropriation Therefor, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.

AB 1592 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law provides that if any provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees requires the expenditure of funds, those provisions of the memorandum of understanding shall not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act.

This bill would approve provisions that require the expenditure of funds for memoranda of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Units 8, 16, and 19 and would provide that the provisions of any memorandum of understanding that require the expenditure of funds shall become effective even if the provisions of the memorandum of understanding are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act.

The bill would provide that provisions of the memoranda of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would authorize the state employer and the affected employee organizations to reopen negotiations on all… More
(1)Existing law provides that if any provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees requires the expenditure of funds, those provisions of the memorandum of understanding shall not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act.

This bill would approve provisions that require the expenditure of funds for memoranda of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Units 8, 16, and 19 and would provide that the provisions of any memorandum of understanding that require the expenditure of funds shall become effective even if the provisions of the memorandum of understanding are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act.

The bill would provide that provisions of the memoranda of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would authorize the state employer and the affected employee organizations to reopen negotiations on all or part of the memorandum of understanding if the memorandum of understanding that requires the expenditure of funds is not approved by the Legislature.

This bill would, with respect to salaries that are continuously appropriated prior to the enactment of the annual Budget Act, require the Director of Finance to reduce the necessary items for the payment of salaries from specified funds scheduled in that Budget Act to reflect the salaries paid prior to the enactment of the annual Budget Act.

(2)Existing law establishes an alternate retirement program and provides that state employees, as defined, who become new members of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) during their first 24 months of employment, do not make contributions to the system or receive service credit for their service, and the state employer shall not make contributions on their behalf. These members are instead required to contribute either 5% or 6% of their monthly compensation, as specified, to the alternate retirement program, administered by the Department of Personnel Administration, and these contributions cease when the state employees begin making their own contributions to PERS.

This bill would require all state employees participating in the alternate retirement system to contribute an amount equal to the same amount that employees in the same employment classifications in the same state bargaining units are required to contribute to PERS.

(3)The Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL) provides a comprehensive set of rights and benefits based upon age, service credit, and final compensation. Existing law defines final compensation variously for different member classifications and bargaining units and, in this regard, defines final compensation for a state member for the purpose of calculating retirement benefits as the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 12-month or 36-month period, depending upon the bargaining unit and classification of that employee. Currently the final compensation for members hired on or after July 1, 2006, who are represented by State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, means the final compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period.

This bill would provide that final compensation for a person who becomes a state member, as specified, on or after October 31, 2010, and who is represented by State Bargaining Units 5 and 8, means the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period.

(4)PERL provides that the contribution rate for state miscellaneous members and specified state safety members is 5% or 6% of the compensation in excess of $513. Existing law provides that the contribution rate for specified state firefighters is 8% of compensation in excess of $238 per month. Existing law provides that the contribution rate for specified state safety patrol members is 8% of the compensation in excess of $863 per month.

This bill would increase the contributions rates by 5% for state miscellaneous members of State Bargaining Units 5, 8, 12, 16, 18, and 19 and state safety members of State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, and by 2% for state firefighter members of State Bargaining Unit 8 and state patrol members of State Bargaining Unit 5. By increasing member contributions into a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation.

(5)PERL establishes various retirement formulas that apply to specified membership categories. Under PERL, state miscellaneous members are generally subject to a retirement formula commonly known as 2% at 55, which, if the member retires at 55 years of age, yields a benefit equal to 2% of the member’s final compensation multiplied by the member’s years of service credit, as specified. Under PERL, patrol members and specified state peace officer/firefighter members are generally subject to a 3% at 50 retirement formula. Under PERL, state safety members are generally subject to a 2.5% at 55 retirement formula.

This bill would provide that state miscellaneous members who are first employed on and after the date the act takes effect, are subject to a 2% at 60 retirement formula. The bill would also provide that patrol members and firefighter members in State Bargaining Units 5 and 8 who are first employed on and after October 31, 2010, are subject to a 3% at 55 retirement formula.

(6)The annual Budget Act appropriates specified amounts from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, and unallocated nongovernmental cost funds, for state employee compensation.

This bill would, in the event that the annual Budget Act is not enacted prior to July 1 of each year covered by the memoranda of understanding for State Bargaining Units 5, 8, 12, 16, 18, and 19, provide for a continuous appropriation for the amount necessary for the payment of compensation and benefits to members of those bargaining units.

(7)This bill would provide that its provisions would not become operative unless SB 846 of the 2009–10 Regular Session is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2011.

(8)This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 19999.3, 21353, 21354.1, 21363.1, 21363.4, and 21369.1 Of, and to Add Sections 19829.7, 19829.8, 19829.9, 19829.95, 20037.14, 20677.6, 20677.7, 20677.9, 20677.95, and 21369.2 To, the Government Code, Relating to State Employees, Making an Appropriation Therefor, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.
Author(s)
Joan Buchanan
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • State employees: memorandum of understanding
Major Actions
Introduced1/04/2010
Referred to Committee
Passed Assembly Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security4/07/2010
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/28/2010
Passed Assembly6/02/2010
Passed Senate Committee on Public Employment and Retirement8/03/2010
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/09/2010
Passed Senate8/18/2010
Passed Assembly Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security8/19/2010
Presented to the governor (enrolled)8/19/2010
Passed Assembly8/19/2010
Became law (chaptered).8/23/2010
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteAssembly Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social SecurityDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/07/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security
4 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/28/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
12 voted YES 0 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblyAB 1592 NAVA Assembly Third Reading6/02/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
49 voted YES 24 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on Public Employment and RetirementDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.8/03/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Public Employment and Retirement
6 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/09/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
8 voted YES 0 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB1592 Buchanan Urgency Clause8/18/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
31 voted YES 1 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social SecuritySenate amendments be concurred in.8/19/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security
5 voted YES 1 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblyAB 1592 BUCHANAN Concurrence- Urgency Added8/19/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
73 voted YES 4 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced1/04/2010
1/04/2010Read first time. To print.
1/05/2010From printer. May be heard in committee February 4.
1/14/2010Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
select this voteVote4/07/2010Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/07/2010From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 7).
4/21/2010In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
select this voteVote5/28/2010Do pass.
5/28/2010From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 28). Read second time. To third reading.
6/02/2010Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 24. Page 5507.)
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage6/02/2010AB 1592 NAVA Assembly Third Reading
6/03/2010In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
6/10/2010Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
8/02/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
select this voteVote8/03/2010Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
8/03/2010From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 3).
8/04/2010Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote8/09/2010Do pass.
8/10/2010From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 9).
8/11/2010Read second time. To third reading.
8/18/2010Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 1. Page 4588.)
8/18/2010In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 6339.)
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/18/2010Assembly 3rd Reading AB1592 Buchanan Urgency Clause
select this voteVote8/19/2010Senate amendments be concurred in.
8/19/2010From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 19). Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6374.) Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 73. Noes 4. Page 6374.)
8/19/2010Enrolled and to the Governor at 5:20 p.m.
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage8/19/2010AB 1592 BUCHANAN Concurrence- Urgency Added
8/23/2010Approved by the Governor.
8/23/2010Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 163, Statutes of 2010.

MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 19999.3, 21353, 21354.1, 21363.1, 21363.4, and 21369.1 Of, and to Add Sections 19829.7, 19829.8, 19829.9, 19829.95, 20037.14, 20677.6, 20677.7, 20677.9, 20677.95, and 21369.2 To, the Government Code, Relating to State Employees, Making an Appropriation Therefor, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.: AB 1592 BUCHANAN Concurrence- Urgency Added

0 organizations supported this bill

0 organizations opposed this bill

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2010.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Anthony AdamsRCA-59$0$0Yes
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$0$0Yes
Joel AndersonRCA-77$0$0Yes
Juan ArambulaICA-31$0$0Yes
Karen BassDCA-47$0$0Yes
Jim BeallDCA-24$0$0Yes
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$0Yes
Tom BerryhillRCA-25$0$0Yes
Sam BlakesleeRCA-33$0$0Yes
Marty BlockDCA-78$0$0Yes
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$0$0Yes
Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$0Yes
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0Yes
Joan BuchananDCA-15$0$0Yes
Anna CaballeroDCA-28$0$0Yes
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0Yes
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0Yes
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$0$0Yes
Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$0Yes
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0Yes
Joe CotoDCA-23$0$0Yes
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0Not Voting
Hector De La TorreDCA-50$0$0Yes
Kevin De LeonDCA-45$0$0Yes
Chuck DeVoreRCA-70$0$0No
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0Yes
Noreen EvansDCA-7$0$0Yes
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0Yes
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0Yes
Paul FongDCA-22$0$0Yes
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0Yes
Jean FullerRCA-32$0$0Yes
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0Yes
Ted GainesRCA-4$0$0No
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$0Yes
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0Yes
Mike GattoDCA-43$0$0Yes
Danny GilmoreRCA-30$0$0Yes
Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$0Yes
Isadore HallDCA-52$0$0Yes
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$0No
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0Yes
Ed HernandezDCA-57$0$0Yes
Jerry HillDCA-19$0$0Yes
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0Yes
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0Yes
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0Not Voting
Dave JonesDCA-9$0$0Yes
Steve KnightRCA-36$0$0Yes
Ted LieuDCA-53$0$0Yes
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$0Yes
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$0$0Yes
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0Yes
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0Yes
Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$0Yes
Bill MonningDCA-27$0$0Yes
Pedro NavaDCA-35$0$0Yes
Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$0Yes
Roger NielloRCA-5$0$0Yes
Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$0Yes
Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$0No
John PerezDCA-46$0$0Yes
Manuel PerezDCA-80$0$0Yes
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0Yes
Ira RuskinDCA-21$0$0Yes
Mary SalasDCA-79$0$0Yes
Lori SaldanaDCA-76$0$0Yes
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0Yes
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$0$0Yes
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0Yes
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0Yes
Audra StricklandRCA-37$0$0Yes
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0Yes
Tom TorlaksonDCA-11$0$0Yes
Norma TorresDCA-61$0$0Yes
Alberto TorricoDCA-20$0$0Yes
Van TranRCA-68$0$0Yes
Mike VillinesRCA-29$0$0Yes
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$0$0Yes

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range