AB 1844 - An Act to Amend Sections 220, 236.1, 264, 264.1, 286, 288, 288a, 289, 290.04, 290.05, 290.06, 290.46, 666, 667.61, 1203.067, 2962, 3000, 3000.1, 3008, and 13887 Of, and to Add Sections 290.09, 3053.8, and 9003 To, the Penal Code, and to Amend Section 18846.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Sex Crimes, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.

Chelsea King Law; minors; children; rape, assault, human trafficking - Sex offenders: punishment: parole. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Under existing law, an assault with the intent to commit mayhem, rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or with the intent to commit, by force, rape, spousal rape, or sexual penetration in concert with another, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years, except as specified.

This bill would provide that an assault of a person under 18 years of age with the intent to… More
Under existing law, an assault with the intent to commit mayhem, rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or with the intent to commit, by force, rape, spousal rape, or sexual penetration in concert with another, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years, except as specified.

This bill would provide that an assault of a person under 18 years of age with the intent to commit rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or with the intent to commit, by force, rape, spousal rape, or sexual penetration in concert with another, would be punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 5, 7, or 9 years.

Under existing law, any person who deprives or violates the personal liberty of another with the intent to effect or maintain a felony violation of specified sex crimes, extortion, or to obtain forced labor or services, is guilty of human trafficking. Existing law provides that a violation of this provision where the victim of the trafficking was under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 4, 6, or 8 years.

This bill would provide that any person who commits human trafficking involving a commercial sex act where the victim of the human trafficking was under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense shall be punished in addition by a fine of not more than $100,000, to be used as specified.

Under existing law, rape, sodomy accomplished against the victim’s will, oral copulation accomplished against the victim’s will, and sexual penetration accomplished against the victim’s will is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years. Rape, sodomy, and oral copulation committed in concert with another is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 5, 7, or 9 years.

This bill would provide that the punishment for these specified crimes upon a child who is under 14 years of age is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 9, 11, or 13 years, and if committed upon a minor who is 14 years of age or older is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 7, 9, or 11 years. This bill would provide that if these crimes are committed in concert with another person upon a child who is under 14 years of age they are punishable in state prison for 10, 12, or 14 years and if committed in concert upon a minor who is 14 years of age or older by imprisonment for 7, 9, or 11 years. By increasing the punishment for crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Under existing law, a person who commits an act of rape, rape or sexual penetration in concert, sodomy, oral copulation, or sexual penetration, when the act is committed upon a child who is under 14 years of age and 7 or more years younger than the person, is guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Aggravated sexual assault of a child under these circumstances is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 15 years to life.

This bill would provide that it does not preclude prosecution under this existing law.

Under existing law, a person who commits any lewd or lascivious act upon a child who is under 14 years of age by use of force or fear is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years.

This bill would increase the punishment for this crime to imprisonment in the state prison for 5, 8, or 10 years. By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Under existing law, a person who commits any lewd or lascivious act upon a dependent person, as defined, by use of force or fear is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years.

This bill would increase the punishment for this crime to imprisonment in the state prison for 5, 8, or 10 years. By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Existing law, as amended by Proposition 83 of the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, requires a person convicted of certain felonies under specified circumstances to be committed to prison for a term of years to life.

This bill would provide that these felonies committed under the above-specified circumstances upon a victim who is a child under 14 years of age shall be punished by imprisonment in state prison for life without the possibility of parole if the offender is 18 years of age or older or 25 years to life if the offender is under 18 years of age. This bill would add as a circumstance the infliction of bodily harm, as defined, on a victim who is a child under 14 years of age to the list of specified circumstances that would result in this imprisonment.

This bill would provide that when rape, spousal rape, rape in concert, or sexual penetration, sodomy, or oral copulation committed against the victim’s will are committed under 2 of a specified list of circumstances, upon a minor 14 years of age or older, the punishment shall be imprisonment in state prison for life without the possibility of parole if the offender is 18 years of age or older or 25 years to life if the offender is under 18 years of age, or for 25 years to life if committed under one of the specified circumstances.

Under existing law, a person convicted of certain felony sex offenses shall be committed to prison for a term of 15 years to life if during the commission of the felony the defendant inflicted great bodily injury on the victim.

This bill would provide that any person who is convicted of certain sex offenses under specified circumstances, upon a victim who is a child under 14 years of age, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life. The bill would provide a life term of imprisonment for any person convicted of a lewd or lascivious act where he or she inflicted bodily harm.

Existing law makes it unlawful for a person who is required to register as a sex offender to reside within 2,000 feet of a public or private school, or park where children regularly gather. Existing law also provides that any person required to register as a sex offender who comes into any school building or upon any school ground without lawful business and written permission is guilty of a misdemeanor.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor for a person who is on parole for specified sex offenses to enter any park where children regularly gather without express permission from the person’s parole agent.

Under existing law, a prisoner is generally released on parole for a period not exceeding 3 years, except that inmates sentenced for certain enumerated violent felonies are released on parole for a period not exceeding 5 years. Under existing law, the period of parole for an inmate who has received a life sentence for certain specified sex offenses is for a period not exceeding 10 years.

This bill would require lifetime parole for habitual sex offenders, persons convicted of kidnapping a child under 14 years of age with the intent to commit a specified sexual offense, and persons convicted of other specified sex crimes, including, among others, aggravated sexual assault of a child. The bill would, unless a longer period of parole applies, impose a 10-year parole period on inmates sentenced for kidnapping with the intent to commit specified sex offenses, specified lewd or lascivious acts, and other specified sexual offenses. The bill would impose a 20-year parole period on inmates convicted and required to register as sex offenders for rape, sodomy, lewd or lascivious acts, continuous sexual abuse of a child, and other specified sex crimes, in which one or more of the victims of the offense was a child under 14 years of age, as specified.

Existing law provides that petty theft is a misdemeanor, except that every person who, having been convicted of petty theft, grand theft, auto theft, burglary, carjacking, robbery, or receiving stolen property and having served time in a penal institution therefor, is subsequently convicted of petty theft, is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison.

This bill would require that most persons be convicted 3 or more times of a qualifying offense to be subject to imprisonment in the state prison for petty theft. Persons required to register as sex offenders, or with a prior serious or violent felony conviction, who have been convicted and imprisoned for the commission of specified crimes, including, among others, petty theft, auto theft, burglary, carjacking, or robbery, would remain subject to imprisonment in the state prison with one prior qualifying offense.

Existing law provides that the sex offender risk assessment tool for use with selected populations shall be known as the State-Authorized Risk Assessment Tool for Sex Offenders (SARATSO). Existing law provides that the SARATSO for adult males required to register as sex offenders shall be the STATIC-99 risk assessment scale. Existing law requires the SARATSO Review Committee to determine whether the STATIC-99 should be supplemented with an actuarial instrument that measures dynamic risk factors or whether it should be replaced with a different risk assessment tool.

This bill would provide that the STATIC-99 shall be the SARATSO static tool for adult males. The bill would require the SARATSO Review Committee, on or before January 1, 2012, to select an actuarial instrument that measures dynamic risk factors and an actuarial instrument that measures risk of future sexual violence to be administered as specified. The bill would provide that persons who administer the dynamic SARATSO and the future violence SARATSO shall be trained, as specified. The bill would make other conforming changes.

Existing law provides that with respect to a person who has been convicted of specified sex crimes, the Department of Justice shall make available to the public via the department’s Internet Web site certain identifying and criminal history information.

This bill would require the department to also make available the person’s static SARATSO score and information on an elevated risk level based on the SARATSO future violence tool.

Existing law requires that persons convicted of certain sex crimes be evaluated by the county probation department and requires that if a defendant is granted probation, the court shall order the defendant to be placed in an appropriate treatment program designed to deal with child molestation or sexual offenders, if an appropriate program is available in the county.

This bill would remove the requirement that the defendant be placed in an appropriate treatment program but would instead impose specified conditions, including participation in an approved sex offender management program, on persons released on formal supervised probation for an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, as specified. By imposing additional requirements on county probation departments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would similarly require participation in an approved sex offender management program, as a condition of parole, for persons released on parole for an offense that requires registration as a sex offender, as specified.

Existing law requires that, as a condition of parole, prisoners who meet specified criteria be treated by the State Department of Mental Health. Existing law requires that prior to release on parole, these prisoners be evaluated, as specified. Existing law provides that only if both independent professionals who evaluate the prisoner, as required, concur with the chief psychiatrist’s certification shall treatment by the department be required.

This bill would instead make these provisions applicable to the prisoner if at least one of the independent professionals concurs with the chief psychiatrist’s certification.

Under the Personal Income Tax Law, individual taxpayers are allowed to contribute amounts in excess of their tax liability for the support of specified funds or accounts, including, among others, the California Sexual Violence Victim Services Fund. Existing law provides for the appearance of this fund on the tax return form until January 1, 2011, unless a later enacted statute deletes or extends that date.

This bill would delete the January 1, 2011, repeal date.

This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 290.06 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 1201 contingent on the prior enactment of that bill.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 24, 2010.

voted YES: 36 voted NO: 0
3 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 220, 236.1, 264, 264.1, 286, 288, 288a, 289, 290.04, 290.05, 290.06, 290.46, 666, 667.61, 1203.067, 2962, 3000, 3000.1, 3008, and 13887 Of, and to Add Sections 290.09, 3053.8, and 9003 To, the Penal Code, and to Amend Section 18846.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Sex Crimes, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.

AB 1844 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Keywords
Chelsea King Law; minors; children; rape, assault, human trafficking
Summary
Under existing law, an assault with the intent to commit mayhem, rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or with the intent to commit, by force, rape, spousal rape, or sexual penetration in concert with another, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years, except as specified.

This bill would provide that an assault of a person under 18 years of age with the intent to commit rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or with the intent to commit, by force, rape, spousal rape, or sexual penetration in concert with another, would be punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 5, 7, or 9 years.

Under existing law, any person who deprives or violates the personal liberty of another with the intent to effect or maintain a felony violation of specified sex crimes, extortion, or to obtain forced labor or services, is guilty of human trafficking. Existing law provides that a violation of this provision where the victim of the trafficking was under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 4, 6, or 8 years.

This bill would provide that any person who commits human trafficking… More
Under existing law, an assault with the intent to commit mayhem, rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or with the intent to commit, by force, rape, spousal rape, or sexual penetration in concert with another, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years, except as specified.

This bill would provide that an assault of a person under 18 years of age with the intent to commit rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or with the intent to commit, by force, rape, spousal rape, or sexual penetration in concert with another, would be punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 5, 7, or 9 years.

Under existing law, any person who deprives or violates the personal liberty of another with the intent to effect or maintain a felony violation of specified sex crimes, extortion, or to obtain forced labor or services, is guilty of human trafficking. Existing law provides that a violation of this provision where the victim of the trafficking was under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 4, 6, or 8 years.

This bill would provide that any person who commits human trafficking involving a commercial sex act where the victim of the human trafficking was under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense shall be punished in addition by a fine of not more than $100,000, to be used as specified.

Under existing law, rape, sodomy accomplished against the victim’s will, oral copulation accomplished against the victim’s will, and sexual penetration accomplished against the victim’s will is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years. Rape, sodomy, and oral copulation committed in concert with another is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 5, 7, or 9 years.

This bill would provide that the punishment for these specified crimes upon a child who is under 14 years of age is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 9, 11, or 13 years, and if committed upon a minor who is 14 years of age or older is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 7, 9, or 11 years. This bill would provide that if these crimes are committed in concert with another person upon a child who is under 14 years of age they are punishable in state prison for 10, 12, or 14 years and if committed in concert upon a minor who is 14 years of age or older by imprisonment for 7, 9, or 11 years. By increasing the punishment for crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Under existing law, a person who commits an act of rape, rape or sexual penetration in concert, sodomy, oral copulation, or sexual penetration, when the act is committed upon a child who is under 14 years of age and 7 or more years younger than the person, is guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Aggravated sexual assault of a child under these circumstances is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 15 years to life.

This bill would provide that it does not preclude prosecution under this existing law.

Under existing law, a person who commits any lewd or lascivious act upon a child who is under 14 years of age by use of force or fear is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years.

This bill would increase the punishment for this crime to imprisonment in the state prison for 5, 8, or 10 years. By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Under existing law, a person who commits any lewd or lascivious act upon a dependent person, as defined, by use of force or fear is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years.

This bill would increase the punishment for this crime to imprisonment in the state prison for 5, 8, or 10 years. By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Existing law, as amended by Proposition 83 of the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, requires a person convicted of certain felonies under specified circumstances to be committed to prison for a term of years to life.

This bill would provide that these felonies committed under the above-specified circumstances upon a victim who is a child under 14 years of age shall be punished by imprisonment in state prison for life without the possibility of parole if the offender is 18 years of age or older or 25 years to life if the offender is under 18 years of age. This bill would add as a circumstance the infliction of bodily harm, as defined, on a victim who is a child under 14 years of age to the list of specified circumstances that would result in this imprisonment.

This bill would provide that when rape, spousal rape, rape in concert, or sexual penetration, sodomy, or oral copulation committed against the victim’s will are committed under 2 of a specified list of circumstances, upon a minor 14 years of age or older, the punishment shall be imprisonment in state prison for life without the possibility of parole if the offender is 18 years of age or older or 25 years to life if the offender is under 18 years of age, or for 25 years to life if committed under one of the specified circumstances.

Under existing law, a person convicted of certain felony sex offenses shall be committed to prison for a term of 15 years to life if during the commission of the felony the defendant inflicted great bodily injury on the victim.

This bill would provide that any person who is convicted of certain sex offenses under specified circumstances, upon a victim who is a child under 14 years of age, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life. The bill would provide a life term of imprisonment for any person convicted of a lewd or lascivious act where he or she inflicted bodily harm.

Existing law makes it unlawful for a person who is required to register as a sex offender to reside within 2,000 feet of a public or private school, or park where children regularly gather. Existing law also provides that any person required to register as a sex offender who comes into any school building or upon any school ground without lawful business and written permission is guilty of a misdemeanor.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor for a person who is on parole for specified sex offenses to enter any park where children regularly gather without express permission from the person’s parole agent.

Under existing law, a prisoner is generally released on parole for a period not exceeding 3 years, except that inmates sentenced for certain enumerated violent felonies are released on parole for a period not exceeding 5 years. Under existing law, the period of parole for an inmate who has received a life sentence for certain specified sex offenses is for a period not exceeding 10 years.

This bill would require lifetime parole for habitual sex offenders, persons convicted of kidnapping a child under 14 years of age with the intent to commit a specified sexual offense, and persons convicted of other specified sex crimes, including, among others, aggravated sexual assault of a child. The bill would, unless a longer period of parole applies, impose a 10-year parole period on inmates sentenced for kidnapping with the intent to commit specified sex offenses, specified lewd or lascivious acts, and other specified sexual offenses. The bill would impose a 20-year parole period on inmates convicted and required to register as sex offenders for rape, sodomy, lewd or lascivious acts, continuous sexual abuse of a child, and other specified sex crimes, in which one or more of the victims of the offense was a child under 14 years of age, as specified.

Existing law provides that petty theft is a misdemeanor, except that every person who, having been convicted of petty theft, grand theft, auto theft, burglary, carjacking, robbery, or receiving stolen property and having served time in a penal institution therefor, is subsequently convicted of petty theft, is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison.

This bill would require that most persons be convicted 3 or more times of a qualifying offense to be subject to imprisonment in the state prison for petty theft. Persons required to register as sex offenders, or with a prior serious or violent felony conviction, who have been convicted and imprisoned for the commission of specified crimes, including, among others, petty theft, auto theft, burglary, carjacking, or robbery, would remain subject to imprisonment in the state prison with one prior qualifying offense.

Existing law provides that the sex offender risk assessment tool for use with selected populations shall be known as the State-Authorized Risk Assessment Tool for Sex Offenders (SARATSO). Existing law provides that the SARATSO for adult males required to register as sex offenders shall be the STATIC-99 risk assessment scale. Existing law requires the SARATSO Review Committee to determine whether the STATIC-99 should be supplemented with an actuarial instrument that measures dynamic risk factors or whether it should be replaced with a different risk assessment tool.

This bill would provide that the STATIC-99 shall be the SARATSO static tool for adult males. The bill would require the SARATSO Review Committee, on or before January 1, 2012, to select an actuarial instrument that measures dynamic risk factors and an actuarial instrument that measures risk of future sexual violence to be administered as specified. The bill would provide that persons who administer the dynamic SARATSO and the future violence SARATSO shall be trained, as specified. The bill would make other conforming changes.

Existing law provides that with respect to a person who has been convicted of specified sex crimes, the Department of Justice shall make available to the public via the department’s Internet Web site certain identifying and criminal history information.

This bill would require the department to also make available the person’s static SARATSO score and information on an elevated risk level based on the SARATSO future violence tool.

Existing law requires that persons convicted of certain sex crimes be evaluated by the county probation department and requires that if a defendant is granted probation, the court shall order the defendant to be placed in an appropriate treatment program designed to deal with child molestation or sexual offenders, if an appropriate program is available in the county.

This bill would remove the requirement that the defendant be placed in an appropriate treatment program but would instead impose specified conditions, including participation in an approved sex offender management program, on persons released on formal supervised probation for an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, as specified. By imposing additional requirements on county probation departments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would similarly require participation in an approved sex offender management program, as a condition of parole, for persons released on parole for an offense that requires registration as a sex offender, as specified.

Existing law requires that, as a condition of parole, prisoners who meet specified criteria be treated by the State Department of Mental Health. Existing law requires that prior to release on parole, these prisoners be evaluated, as specified. Existing law provides that only if both independent professionals who evaluate the prisoner, as required, concur with the chief psychiatrist’s certification shall treatment by the department be required.

This bill would instead make these provisions applicable to the prisoner if at least one of the independent professionals concurs with the chief psychiatrist’s certification.

Under the Personal Income Tax Law, individual taxpayers are allowed to contribute amounts in excess of their tax liability for the support of specified funds or accounts, including, among others, the California Sexual Violence Victim Services Fund. Existing law provides for the appearance of this fund on the tax return form until January 1, 2011, unless a later enacted statute deletes or extends that date.

This bill would delete the January 1, 2011, repeal date.

This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 290.06 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 1201 contingent on the prior enactment of that bill.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 220, 236.1, 264, 264.1, 286, 288, 288a, 289, 290.04, 290.05, 290.06, 290.46, 666, 667.61, 1203.067, 2962, 3000, 3000.1, 3008, and 13887 Of, and to Add Sections 290.09, 3053.8, and 9003 To, the Penal Code, and to Amend Section 18846.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Sex Crimes, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.
Author(s)
Nathan Fletcher
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Sex offenders: punishment: parole
Major Actions
Introduced2/12/2010
Referred to Committee
Passed Assembly Committee on Public Safety4/20/2010
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/28/2010
Passed Assembly6/03/2010
Passed Senate Committee on Public Safety6/29/2010
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/09/2010
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/12/2010
Passed Senate8/24/2010
Passed Assembly8/30/2010
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/07/2010
Became law (chaptered).9/09/2010
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteAssembly Committee on Public SafetyDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/20/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Public Safety
5 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/28/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
13 voted YES 0 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblyAB 1844 FLETCHER Assembly Third Reading6/03/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
71 voted YES 0 voted NO 8 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on Public SafetyDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.6/29/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Public Safety
7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.8/09/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
10 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.8/12/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
currently selectedSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB1844 Fletcher Urgency Clause8/24/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
36 voted YES 0 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblyAB 1844 FLETCHER Concurrence- Urgency Added8/30/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
74 voted YES 0 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/12/2010
2/12/2010Read first time. To print.
2/16/2010From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
2/25/2010Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
3/23/2010In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
4/06/2010In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
4/13/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
4/14/2010Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
select this voteVote4/20/2010Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/27/2010From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 20).
4/28/2010Read second time and amended.
4/29/2010Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
5/19/2010In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
select this voteVote5/28/2010Do pass.
5/28/2010From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (May 28). Read second time. To third reading.
6/02/2010Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading. (Page 5447.).
6/03/2010Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 5549.) Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 5562.)
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage6/03/2010AB 1844 FLETCHER Assembly Third Reading
6/07/2010In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
6/10/2010Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
select this voteVote6/29/2010Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
7/15/2010From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29). Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/02/2010In committee: Hearing postponed by committee. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote8/09/2010Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
8/09/2010In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
select this voteVote8/12/2010Do pass as amended.
8/16/2010From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 12).
8/17/2010Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
8/20/2010Read third time, amended. To second reading.
8/23/2010Read second time. To third reading.
8/24/2010Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4832.)
8/24/2010In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage8/24/2010Assembly 3rd Reading AB1844 Fletcher Urgency Clause
8/25/2010Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6644.)
8/30/2010Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 6826.)
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/30/2010AB 1844 FLETCHER Concurrence- Urgency Added
9/07/2010Enrolled and to the Governor at 12 p.m.
9/09/2010Approved by the Governor.
9/09/2010Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 219, Statutes of 2010.
ContributorInterest groupAmountDatesort iconSenate memberPartyDistrictVote
Rickard, NathanielAttorneys & law firms$4003/1/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/3/08Alex PadillaDCA-20Yes
Chatten-Brown, JanAttorneys & law firms$5003/3/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/3/08Jenny OropezaDCA-28Not Voting
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/3/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Levey, JonathanAttorneys & law firms$2503/3/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$5003/3/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/4/08Christine KehoeDCA-39Yes
Gibson, Jeffrey GAttorneys & law firms$5003/4/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Gusukuma, EmiAttorneys & law firms$1003/4/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Linebarger Goggan Blair & SampsonAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/4/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Millhouse, Keith FAttorneys & law firms$2503/4/08Tony StricklandRCA-19Yes
Remy Thomas Moose & ManleyAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/4/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Barr, MichaelAttorneys & law firms$5003/5/08Carol LiuDCA-21Yes
Berke, RobertAttorneys & law firms$1003/5/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/5/08Lou CorreaDCA-34Yes
Law Offices of Richard F MossAttorneys & law firms$2503/5/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Mcnitt, RogerAttorneys & law firms$2003/5/08Ron CalderonDCA-30Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$5,0003/5/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,5003/5/08Tom HarmanRCA-35Not Voting
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/5/08Alex PadillaDCA-20Yes
California Correctional Peace Officers AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/6/08Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/6/08Curren PriceDCA-26Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/6/08Sam BlakesleeRCA-15Yes
California Correctional Peace Officers AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,1003/7/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$2,0003/7/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/7/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Jelinek & Associates a Law CorpAttorneys & law firms$5003/7/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Law Offices of Tina a ThomasAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/7/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Vinatieri, Joseph aAttorneys & law firms$1253/7/08Bob HuffRCA-29Yes
Huard, David LAttorneys & law firms$1003/8/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Corey, JohnAttorneys & law firms$1003/9/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Berkeley Fire Fighters Association Local 1227Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/10/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/10/08Pat WigginsDCA-2Not Voting
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/10/08Pat WigginsDCA-2Not Voting
Wilkinson, DagAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/10/08Mimi WaltersRCA-33Yes
Bogaard, William JAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/11/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Brownstein Hyatt Farber & SchreckAttorneys & law firms$3,6003/11/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/11/08Ellen CorbettDCA-10Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/11/08Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/11/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
David, Anthony PAttorneys & law firms$5003/11/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Gatto, MichaelAttorneys & law firms$5003/11/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/12/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/12/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
California Defense CounselAttorneys & law firms$1,1003/12/08Ellen CorbettDCA-10Yes
California Defense CounselAttorneys & law firms$4003/12/08Ellen CorbettDCA-10Yes
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/12/08Carol LiuDCA-21Yes
Hakimi, MahsaAttorneys & law firms$1003/12/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Holen, Marvin LAttorneys & law firms$2003/12/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/12/08Ellen CorbettDCA-10Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/12/08George RunnerRCA-17Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/12/08Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32Yes
Samsel, WilliamAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/12/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Siegal, Joel HAttorneys & law firms$2503/12/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Thorndal, Paul WAttorneys & law firms$1503/12/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
California Correctional Peace Officers AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$2,5003/13/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
California Correctional Peace Officers AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,1003/13/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Consumer Attorneys Association of Los AngelesAttorneys & law firms$3,6003/13/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/13/08Alex PadillaDCA-20Yes
Freeman, Thomas RAttorneys & law firms$2,1003/13/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/14/08Pat WigginsDCA-2Not Voting
Chavez & GertlerAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/14/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Hodge, Gregory EAttorneys & law firms$1503/14/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Hyden, Cary KAttorneys & law firms$2503/14/08Mimi WaltersRCA-33Yes
Mayer Brown Rowe & MawAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/14/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Turman, Julius LAttorneys & law firms$5003/15/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Bryant, GuyAttorneys & law firms$4003/16/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
California Association of Highway PatrolmenPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$2,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
California Defense CounselAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
California Department of Forestry Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
California Department of Forestry Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$6,2003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
California State Fire Fighters AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Carroll, CandaceAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/17/08Christine KehoeDCA-39Yes
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Consumer Attorneys of CaliforniaAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Contra Costa County Deputy Sheriffs AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$2503/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Contra Costa County Deputy Sheriffs AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Ernst, DonAttorneys & law firms$5003/17/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Fire Fighters Local 1230Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,5003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Fire Fighters Local 1230Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Fire Fighters Local 1230Police & fire fighters unions and associations$5003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Gearheart & OtisAttorneys & law firms$2503/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Girardi, Thomas VAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/17/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Goldstein Gellman Melbostad Gibson & HarrisAttorneys & law firms$5003/17/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Hagan, Michele EAttorneys & law firms$1003/17/08Leland YeeDCA-8Yes
Law Offices of Jon WebsterAttorneys & law firms$5003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Law Offices of Victoria Robinson SmithAttorneys & law firms$1003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Los Angeles Police Protective LeaguePolice & fire fighters unions and associations$2,6003/17/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Los Angeles Police Protective LeaguePolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/17/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$3,6003/17/08Dave CogdillRCA-14Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Ritch, JoeAttorneys & law firms$3,6003/17/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/17/08Leland YeeDCA-8Yes
San Jose Fire Fighters Local 230Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,5003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
San Ramon Valley Fire Fighters AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,5003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Scranton, Michael CAttorneys & law firms$5003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Scranton, Michael CAttorneys & law firms$5003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Serra, LawrenceAttorneys & law firms$2503/17/08Christine KehoeDCA-39Yes
Sumner, ScottAttorneys & law firms$5003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Sumner, ScottAttorneys & law firms$1003/17/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Sumner, Scott H ZAttorneys & law firms$2503/17/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
California Association of Highway PatrolmenPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,2503/18/08Bill EmmersonRCA-37Yes
California Association of Highway PatrolmenPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$9993/18/08Ellen CorbettDCA-10Yes
California Association of Highway PatrolmenPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$9993/18/08Pat WigginsDCA-2Not Voting
Deputy Sheriffs Association of Alameda CountyPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/18/08Ellen CorbettDCA-10Yes
Stover, GlennAttorneys & law firms$1003/18/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Haas, James WAttorneys & law firms$3503/19/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/20/08Leland YeeDCA-8Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/20/08Leland YeeDCA-8Yes
California State Fire Fighters AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$4,5003/20/08Jeff DenhamRCA-12Yes
California State Fire Fighters AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$5003/20/08Jeff DenhamRCA-12Yes
Ehrenpreis, RalphAttorneys & law firms$1503/20/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Pritzker, Lisa SAttorneys & law firms$1,3003/20/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
United Fire Fighters of Los Angeles City Local 112Police & fire fighters unions and associations$5003/20/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Averill Jr, Janet BAttorneys & law firms$1003/21/08Bob HuffRCA-29Yes
Harvey, Frederic LAttorneys & law firms$1003/21/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/21/08Dean FlorezDCA-16Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/24/08Dean FlorezDCA-16Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$2003/24/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Gagen Mccoy Mcmahon Koss Markowitz & RainesAttorneys & law firms$5003/24/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Gagen Mccoy Mcmahon Koss Markowitz & RainesAttorneys & law firms$2503/24/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Herzog, WendyAttorneys & law firms$2503/24/08Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7Yes
Fire Fighters for Better GovernmentPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$5003/25/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Law Offices of Raymond M BuddieAttorneys & law firms$2503/25/08Alex PadillaDCA-20Yes
Miller, JosephAttorneys & law firms$5003/25/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Burbank Fire Fighters Local 778Police & fire fighters unions and associations$5003/26/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/26/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Segal, RichardAttorneys & law firms$1003/26/08Christine KehoeDCA-39Yes
Baum, CariAttorneys & law firms$1003/27/08Tom HarmanRCA-35Not Voting
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$4323/27/08Elaine AlquistDCA-13Yes
Chytilo, MarcAttorneys & law firms$2003/27/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Grantham, RobertAttorneys & law firms$1003/27/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/27/08Elaine AlquistDCA-13Yes
Rosenmund, FredAttorneys & law firms$2503/27/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Ferruzzo & FerruzzoAttorneys & law firms$1,5003/28/08Mimi WaltersRCA-33Yes
Glickfeld, BruceAttorneys & law firms$3,6003/28/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Mayer Brown Rowe & MawAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/28/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Storm, LucindaAttorneys & law firms$5003/28/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Wade, EsteyAttorneys & law firms$503/28/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Dolan Law FirmAttorneys & law firms$5003/29/08Alex PadillaDCA-20Yes
San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0003/29/08Alex PadillaDCA-20Yes
Berger, HarveyAttorneys & law firms$1003/31/08Christine KehoeDCA-39Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,0003/31/08Alan LowenthalDCA-27Yes
Rowland, YvetteAttorneys & law firms$2503/31/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Van Winkle, WesleyAttorneys & law firms$1003/31/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Kallick, IvanAttorneys & law firms$1004/1/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Guite, RobAttorneys & law firms$504/2/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Burmeister, RobertAttorneys & law firms$2504/3/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/3/08Carol LiuDCA-21Yes
California Department of Forestry Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,5004/3/08Sam BlakesleeRCA-15Yes
Los Angeles County Professional Peace OfficersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,8004/3/08Bob HuffRCA-29Yes
Oneil, DennisAttorneys & law firms$2004/3/08Tom HarmanRCA-35Not Voting
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/3/08Carol LiuDCA-21Yes
Sturdevant, James CAttorneys & law firms$2504/3/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Berra, RichardAttorneys & law firms$2504/4/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1954/4/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
California Correctional Peace Officers AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$3,6004/4/08Dave CogdillRCA-14Yes
California Correctional Peace Officers AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$3,6004/4/08Dave CogdillRCA-14Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,5004/4/08Dave CogdillRCA-14Yes
Duffy, PamelaAttorneys & law firms$2504/4/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Marin Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$3,6004/5/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
California Applicants Attorneys AssociationAttorneys & law firms$1,2004/7/08Curren PriceDCA-26Yes
Holland & KnightAttorneys & law firms$1,5004/7/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Long Beach Police Officers AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$2,0004/7/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Ordin, AndreaAttorneys & law firms$2504/7/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Solomon, ScottAttorneys & law firms$5004/7/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Barratt-Brown, ElizabethAttorneys & law firms$2504/8/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
California State Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,5004/8/08Tom HarmanRCA-35Not Voting
Lefcourt, RoyAttorneys & law firms$2504/8/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Orange County Professional Fire Fighters Local 3631Police & fire fighters unions and associations$3,6004/8/08Mimi WaltersRCA-33Yes
Pingel Steven R Law Offices ofAttorneys & law firms$2504/8/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Duckor, MichaelAttorneys & law firms$1254/9/08Christine KehoeDCA-39Yes
Erskine, JohnAttorneys & law firms$5004/9/08Tom HarmanRCA-35Not Voting
Hammon, Walter PierceAttorneys & law firms$2504/9/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Jackson, Warren TAttorneys & law firms$5004/9/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Oxnard Fire Fighters AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$5004/9/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Prendergast, Marlene HAttorneys & law firms$2504/9/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Steiner, FernAttorneys & law firms$5004/9/08Christine KehoeDCA-39Yes
Sultan, Sonya FAttorneys & law firms$1004/9/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Manatt Phelps & PhillipsAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/10/08Leland YeeDCA-8Yes
Peace Officers Research Association of CaliforniaPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/10/08Leland YeeDCA-8Yes
Rockwell, David NAttorneys & law firms$5004/10/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$5004/10/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
California Association of Highway PatrolmenPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$9994/11/08Alan LowenthalDCA-27Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$2,1004/11/08Dave CogdillRCA-14Yes
Denatale, RichardAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/11/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Gould, P HAttorneys & law firms$2504/11/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Klein, Anthony RAttorneys & law firms$2504/11/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Linebarger Goggan Blair & SampsonAttorneys & law firms$1,2504/11/08Jenny OropezaDCA-28Not Voting
Law Offices of Shawn SteelAttorneys & law firms$5004/12/08Tom HarmanRCA-35Not Voting
Los Angeles County Professional Peace OfficersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/12/08Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32Yes
Orton, CarolAttorneys & law firms$2504/12/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
California Correctional Peace Officers AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,2004/14/08Curren PriceDCA-26Yes
Catz, SarahAttorneys & law firms$2504/14/08Lou CorreaDCA-34Yes
Clouse, Richard RAttorneys & law firms$2504/14/08Bob DuttonRCA-31Yes
Edmunds Jr, Eric FAttorneys & law firms$2504/14/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Law Offices of Cleveland & MetzAttorneys & law firms$5004/14/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Devine, BrianAttorneys & law firms$5004/15/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Los Angeles County Professional Peace OfficersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/15/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Turman, Julius LAttorneys & law firms$5004/15/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Aftergood Greg G Law Offices ofAttorneys & law firms$2004/16/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Browne, RochelleAttorneys & law firms$2504/16/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$6004/16/08Bob HuffRCA-29Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$4004/16/08Bob HuffRCA-29Yes
Koehler, William DAttorneys & law firms$2504/16/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Mccloskey Jr, Paul NAttorneys & law firms$2504/16/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Orange County Professional Fire Fighters Local 3631Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/16/08Tom HarmanRCA-35Not Voting
Steen, LiasAttorneys & law firms$2504/16/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Strausz, William LAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/16/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/17/08Alan LowenthalDCA-27Yes
California Professional Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/17/08Curren PriceDCA-26Yes
Ozurovich & Schwartz Attorney at LawAttorneys & law firms$5004/17/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Robinson, StephenAttorneys & law firms$1004/17/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Salvas, AdamAttorneys & law firms$1004/17/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Sullivan, MichaelAttorneys & law firms$2004/17/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Wingard, KennethAttorneys & law firms$2004/17/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Association for Los Angeles Deputy SheriffsPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$3,6004/18/08Dave CogdillRCA-14Yes
Braje, KarenAttorneys & law firms$1004/18/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Grossman, Robert JayAttorneys & law firms$2504/18/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Law Offices of Holly Williams Dba AptoAttorneys & law firms$5004/18/08Mimi WaltersRCA-33Yes
Melbostad, Paul HAttorneys & law firms$5004/18/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Morse, PeterAttorneys & law firms$1004/18/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Shore, JeffreyAttorneys & law firms$2504/18/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Shugart, Teri L KAttorneys & law firms$2504/18/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Taylor, ScottAttorneys & law firms$5004/18/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Woodburn, JeremyAttorneys & law firms$1004/19/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Devine, BrianAttorneys & law firms$504/20/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Alameda Fire Fighters Local 689Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/21/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Law Offices of Jeremy SmithAttorneys & law firms$3004/21/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Los Angeles Police Protective LeaguePolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,6004/21/08Carol LiuDCA-21Yes
Ontario Fire FightersPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$5004/21/08Bob DuttonRCA-31Yes
Boucher, Raymond aAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/22/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
California Attorneys for Criminal JusticeAttorneys & law firms$2,0004/22/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Consumer Attorneys Association of Los AngelesAttorneys & law firms$2,6004/22/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Deblase, PatrickAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/22/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Eyerly, MichaelAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/22/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Kiesel, PaulAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/22/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Mandel, ElaineAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/22/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Meechan, Richard JAttorneys & law firms$5004/22/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Storper, JonathanAttorneys & law firms$2504/22/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Phillips, Steven CAttorneys & law firms$2,0004/23/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Rattner, Jonathan EAttorneys & law firms$2504/23/08Joe SimitianDCA-11Yes
Wisot, ValerieAttorneys & law firms$1004/23/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/24/08George RunnerRCA-17Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/24/08Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32Yes
Christian, SusanAttorneys & law firms$1254/24/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Law Offices of Clinton T IrvingAttorneys & law firms$1254/24/08Curren PriceDCA-26Yes
Ueda, KaraAttorneys & law firms$1004/24/08Lois WolkDCA-5Yes
Upland Fire Fighters AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$2504/24/08Bob DuttonRCA-31Yes
Gaines & StaceyAttorneys & law firms$2504/25/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Ross, Jeffrey SAttorneys & law firms$2334/25/08Loni HancockDCA-9Yes
Roth, Richard DAttorneys & law firms$2504/25/08Bob DuttonRCA-31Yes
Smith, Daniel UAttorneys & law firms$5004/25/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$2,0004/28/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Guite, RobAttorneys & law firms$504/28/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Kossoff, KennethAttorneys & law firms$1504/28/08Tony StricklandRCA-19Yes
Wade, EsteyAttorneys & law firms$504/28/08Mark LenoDCA-3Yes
Brown, Eric LAttorneys & law firms$1004/29/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Manatt Phelps & PhillipsAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/29/08Darrell SteinbergDCA-6Yes
Rapkin Michael Law Offices ofAttorneys & law firms$2504/29/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Refkin, MartinAttorneys & law firms$1504/29/08Fran PavleyDCA-23Yes
Womens Political CmteWomen's issues$3,6004/29/08Lois WolkDCA-5Yes
Appling, Dana SAttorneys & law firms$1004/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Bernheim, William SAttorneys & law firms$2004/30/08Lois WolkDCA-5Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,5004/30/08Mark WylandRCA-38Yes
California Statewide Law Enforcement AssociationPolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,0004/30/08Pat WigginsDCA-2Not Voting
Goodin Macbride Squeri Day & LampreyAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Goodin Macbride Squeri Day & LampreyAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Goodin Macbride Squeri Day & LampreyAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Goodin Macbride Squeri Day & LampreyAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Goodin Macbride Squeri Day & LampreyAttorneys & law firms$6004/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Goodin Macbride Squeri Day & LampreyAttorneys & law firms$4004/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Goodin Macbride Squeri Day & LampreyAttorneys & law firms$2504/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Goodin, Robert aAttorneys & law firms$2504/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Los Angeles Police Protective LeaguePolice & fire fighters unions and associations$1,6504/30/08Dave CogdillRCA-14Yes
Nossaman Guthner Knox & ElliottAttorneys & law firms$1,0004/30/08Dave CogdillRCA-14Yes
Oneill, Edward WAttorneys & law firms$2504/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
Watson, AnnAttorneys & law firms$1004/30/08Rod WrightDCA-25Yes
6 Organizations Supported and 5 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 220, 236.1, 264, 264.1, 286, 288, 288a, 289, 290.04, 290.05, 290.06, 290.46, 666, 667.61, 1203.067, 2962, 3000, 3000.1, 3008, and 13887 Of, and to Add Sections 290.09, 3053.8, and 9003 To, the Penal Code, and to Amend Section 18846.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Sex Crimes, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.: Assembly 3rd Reading AB1844 Fletcher Urgency Clause

6 organizations supported this bill

California State Attorney General
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .
California State PTA
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .
California State Sheriffs' Association
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .
Crime Victims United of California
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .
Junior Leagues of California State Public Affairs Committee
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .
Peace Officers Research Association of California
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .

5 organizations opposed this bill

American Civil Liberties Union
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .
California Attorneys for Criminal Justice
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .
California Public Defenders Association
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .
Friends Committee on Legislation of California
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .
Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Bill Analysis - Senate Rules Committee. Retrieved September 2, 2010, from .

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, March 1, 2008 – April 30, 2008.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$0Yes
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$1,432$0Yes
Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$2,500$0Yes
Ron CalderonDCA-30$0$200Yes
Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$0$0Yes
Dave CogdillRCA-14$19,650$1,000Yes
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$2,999$2,500Yes
Lou CorreaDCA-34$1,000$250Yes
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$25,550$8,450Yes
Jeff DenhamRCA-12$5,000$0Yes
Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
Bob DuttonRCA-31$750$500Yes
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$1,250$0Yes
Dean FlorezDCA-16$2,000$0Yes
Loni HancockDCA-9$3,000$8,677Yes
Tom HarmanRCA-35$4,000$1,300Not Voting
Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$0Yes
Bob HuffRCA-29$2,800$225Yes
Christine KehoeDCA-39$0$3,075Yes
Mark LenoDCA-3$3,600$19,725Yes
Carol LiuDCA-21$2,600$2,500Yes
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$1,999$1,000Yes
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$4,000$1,000Yes
Jenny OropezaDCA-28$0$2,250Not Voting
Alex PadillaDCA-20$3,000$1,750Yes
Fran PavleyDCA-23$6,100$17,000Yes
Curren PriceDCA-26$3,200$1,325Yes
Gloria RomeroDCA-24$0$0Yes
George RunnerRCA-17$2,000$0Yes
Joe SimitianDCA-11$200$3,250Yes
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$10,200$21,300Yes
Tony StricklandRCA-19$0$400Yes
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$3,600$3,250Yes
Pat WigginsDCA-2$2,999$2,000Not Voting
Lois WolkDCA-5$3,600$300Yes
Rod WrightDCA-25$1,000$7,800Yes
Mark WylandRCA-38$1,500$0Yes
Leland YeeDCA-8$3,000$2,100Yes

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$0Yes
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$1,432$0Yes
Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$2,500$0Yes
Ron CalderonDCA-30$0$200Yes
Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$0$0Yes
Dave CogdillRCA-14$19,650$1,000Yes
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$2,999$2,500Yes
Lou CorreaDCA-34$1,000$250Yes
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$25,550$8,450Yes
Jeff DenhamRCA-12$5,000$0Yes
Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
Bob DuttonRCA-31$750$500Yes
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$1,250$0Yes
Dean FlorezDCA-16$2,000$0Yes
Loni HancockDCA-9$3,000$8,677Yes
Tom HarmanRCA-35$4,000$1,300Not Voting
Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$0Yes
Bob HuffRCA-29$2,800$225Yes
Christine KehoeDCA-39$0$3,075Yes
Mark LenoDCA-3$3,600$19,725Yes
Carol LiuDCA-21$2,600$2,500Yes
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$1,999$1,000Yes
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$4,000$1,000Yes
Jenny OropezaDCA-28$0$2,250Not Voting
Alex PadillaDCA-20$3,000$1,750Yes
Fran PavleyDCA-23$6,100$17,000Yes
Curren PriceDCA-26$3,200$1,325Yes
Gloria RomeroDCA-24$0$0Yes
George RunnerRCA-17$2,000$0Yes
Joe SimitianDCA-11$200$3,250Yes
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$10,200$21,300Yes
Tony StricklandRCA-19$0$400Yes
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$3,600$3,250Yes
Pat WigginsDCA-2$2,999$2,000Not Voting
Lois WolkDCA-5$3,600$300Yes
Rod WrightDCA-25$1,000$7,800Yes
Mark WylandRCA-38$1,500$0Yes
Leland YeeDCA-8$3,000$2,100Yes

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Police & fire fighters unions and associations$120,929
Women's issues$3,600
Courts & justice system$1,750

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Attorneys & law firms$113,127
Courts & justice system$1,750
Human rights$0
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range