AB 2072 - An Act to Add Sections 124121 and 124122 to the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Public Health.

Hearing screening: resources and services. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law, the Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening, Tracking, and Intervention Act, requires every general acute care hospital with licensed perinatal services to offer every newborn a hearing screening test for the identification of hearing loss, as specified, and provide written information on the availability of community resources and services for children with hearing loss to the parents… More
Existing law, the Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening, Tracking, and Intervention Act, requires every general acute care hospital with licensed perinatal services to offer every newborn a hearing screening test for the identification of hearing loss, as specified, and provide written information on the availability of community resources and services for children with hearing loss to the parents of those who are diagnosed with a hearing loss.

Existing law, the California Early Intervention Services Act, commonly known as the Early Start Program, provides various early intervention services for infants and toddlers who have disabilities to enhance their development and to minimize the potential for developmental delays.

This bill would also require that the State Department of Education develop an informational pamphlet, as specified, for newborns and infants identified as deaf or hard of hearing, that is about visual and auditory communication and language options and that would help a parent make informed decisions for his or her child. This bill would require the department to convene an advisory stakeholder panel, composed as prescribed, to develop and revise the informational pamphlet, as specified, until January 1, 2017. This bill would require that the informational pamphlet be provided to parents of all newborns and infants identified as deaf or hard of hearing by an audiologist immediately upon identification of a newborn or infant as deaf or hard of hearing, and by a local provider for the Early Start Program upon initial contact with the parents of a newborn or infant newly identified as deaf or hard of hearing. This bill would require the audiologist to note in the newborn’s or infant’s record that the parent has received the informational pamphlet and, during the course of evaluation and treatment, to inform and counsel the parent of all available communication options. This bill would require the informational pamphlet to be made available in Cantonese, English, Spanish, and Vietnamese, and be made available on the department’s Internet Web site, as prescribed.

This bill would provide that these provisions would be implemented only upon determination by the Director of Finance that sufficient donations have been collected and deposited into the Language and Communication for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children Fund, which this bill would create in the State Treasury, and upon the appropriation of that fund. This bill would provide that no state funds shall be used to implement these provisions.

This bill would also state the intent of the Legislature that every newborn or infant who does not pass his or her preliminary hearing screening test receive a followup hearing screening no later than 3 months of age, and that the Legislature strongly encourages the State Department of Health Care Services to work toward this goal. Hide
 
Status:
This bill was passed by both houses and vetoed by the Governor. It did not become law
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 24, 2010.

voted YES: 23 voted NO: 11
5 voted present/not voting

An Act to Add Sections 124121 and 124122 to the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Public Health.

AB 2072 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
Existing law, the Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening, Tracking, and Intervention Act, requires every general acute care hospital with licensed perinatal services to offer every newborn a hearing screening test for the identification of hearing loss, as specified, and provide written information on the availability of community resources and services for children with hearing loss to the parents of those who are diagnosed with a hearing loss.

Existing law, the California Early Intervention Services Act, commonly known as the Early Start Program, provides various early intervention services for infants and toddlers who have disabilities to enhance their development and to minimize the potential for developmental delays.

This bill would also require that the State Department of Education develop an informational pamphlet, as specified, for newborns and infants identified as deaf or hard of hearing, that is about visual and auditory communication and language options and that would help a parent make informed decisions for his or her child. This bill would require the department to convene an advisory stakeholder panel, composed as prescribed, to develop and… More
Existing law, the Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening, Tracking, and Intervention Act, requires every general acute care hospital with licensed perinatal services to offer every newborn a hearing screening test for the identification of hearing loss, as specified, and provide written information on the availability of community resources and services for children with hearing loss to the parents of those who are diagnosed with a hearing loss.

Existing law, the California Early Intervention Services Act, commonly known as the Early Start Program, provides various early intervention services for infants and toddlers who have disabilities to enhance their development and to minimize the potential for developmental delays.

This bill would also require that the State Department of Education develop an informational pamphlet, as specified, for newborns and infants identified as deaf or hard of hearing, that is about visual and auditory communication and language options and that would help a parent make informed decisions for his or her child. This bill would require the department to convene an advisory stakeholder panel, composed as prescribed, to develop and revise the informational pamphlet, as specified, until January 1, 2017. This bill would require that the informational pamphlet be provided to parents of all newborns and infants identified as deaf or hard of hearing by an audiologist immediately upon identification of a newborn or infant as deaf or hard of hearing, and by a local provider for the Early Start Program upon initial contact with the parents of a newborn or infant newly identified as deaf or hard of hearing. This bill would require the audiologist to note in the newborn’s or infant’s record that the parent has received the informational pamphlet and, during the course of evaluation and treatment, to inform and counsel the parent of all available communication options. This bill would require the informational pamphlet to be made available in Cantonese, English, Spanish, and Vietnamese, and be made available on the department’s Internet Web site, as prescribed.

This bill would provide that these provisions would be implemented only upon determination by the Director of Finance that sufficient donations have been collected and deposited into the Language and Communication for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children Fund, which this bill would create in the State Treasury, and upon the appropriation of that fund. This bill would provide that no state funds shall be used to implement these provisions.

This bill would also state the intent of the Legislature that every newborn or infant who does not pass his or her preliminary hearing screening test receive a followup hearing screening no later than 3 months of age, and that the Legislature strongly encourages the State Department of Health Care Services to work toward this goal. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add Sections 124121 and 124122 to the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Public Health.
Author(s)
Tony Mendoza
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Hearing screening: resources and services
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/18/2010
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Assembly Committee on Health4/20/2010
    Passed Assembly4/29/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Health6/23/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/09/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/12/2010
    Passed Senate8/24/2010
    Passed Assembly8/27/2010
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/09/2010
    Vetoed by Governor9/29/2010
    Vetoed by Governor9/29/2010
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteAssembly Committee on HealthDo pass as amended.4/20/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Health
    10 voted YES 4 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 2072 MENDOZA Assembly Third Reading4/29/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
    57 voted YES 7 voted NO 15 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on HealthDo pass as amended.6/23/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Health
    5 voted YES 1 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.8/09/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    10 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.8/12/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    10 voted YES 1 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB2072 Mendoza By Alquist8/24/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
    23 voted YES 11 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 2072 MENDOZA Concurrence in Senate Amendments8/27/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
    72 voted YES 2 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/18/2010
    2/18/2010Read first time. To print.
    2/19/2010From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
    3/04/2010Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
    4/05/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
    4/13/2010In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
    4/14/2010Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
    select this voteVote4/20/2010Do pass as amended.
    4/26/2010From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (April 20).
    4/27/2010Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
    4/28/2010Read second time. To third reading.
    4/29/2010Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 57. Noes 7. Page 4937.)
    4/29/2010In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage4/29/2010AB 2072 MENDOZA Assembly Third Reading
    5/13/2010Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
    6/09/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
    6/16/2010In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
    select this voteVote6/23/2010Do pass as amended.
    7/15/2010From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 23).
    8/02/2010Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
    8/03/2010Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
    8/09/2010In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
    select this voteVote8/09/2010Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
    select this voteVote8/12/2010Do pass as amended.
    8/16/2010From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (August 12).
    8/17/2010Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
    8/20/2010Read third time, amended. To second reading.
    8/23/2010Read second time. To third reading.
    8/24/2010Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 4847.)
    8/24/2010In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
    currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage8/24/2010Assembly 3rd Reading AB2072 Mendoza By Alquist
    8/25/2010Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6644.)
    8/26/2010Passed on file.
    8/27/2010Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 72. Noes 2. Page 6778.)
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/27/2010AB 2072 MENDOZA Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    9/09/2010Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
    Vetoed9/29/2010Vetoed by Governor.

    Total contributions given to Senators from Other non-physician health practitioners, which…

    supported this bill

    Other non-physician health practitioners$144,943
    $144,943

    4 Organizations Supported and 1 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Add Sections 124121 and 124122 to the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Public Health.: Assembly 3rd Reading AB2072 Mendoza By Alquist

    4 organizations supported this bill

    American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, June 23). Bill Analysis. Retrieved August 26, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Academy of Audiology
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved November 11, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Association of Private Special Education Schools
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 23). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved November 11, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Hospital Association
    Senate Rules Committee (n.d.). AB 2072. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from Leg Info.

    1 organization opposed this bill

    California Association of the Deaf
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, June 23). Bill Analysis. Retrieved August 26, 2010, from Leg Info.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Anything missing?

    Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
    How do you know they have this position? Please include a link to a newspaper article, organization's website, or other source.
    We will use it only to contact you about this form. Your address will never appear on this site.

    MapLight editors may add this organization after checking the sources you listed above. Thank you for helping to improve our site.

    Cancel
    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from Other non-physician health practitioners interest groups, January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2010.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Leland YeeDCA-8$9,520$0No
    Mark WylandRCA-38$2,000$0No
    Rod WrightDCA-25$0$0Yes
    Lois WolkDCA-5$1,500$0No
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$0$0Not Voting
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$13,050$0No
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$2,250$0Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$3,500$0Yes
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$5,000$0Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$2,375$0Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$3,000$0Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$7,500$0Yes
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$8,400$0Yes
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$3,500$0Not Voting
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$500$0Not Voting
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$13,650$0Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$1,250$0Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$0$0Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$5,050$0Yes
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$750$0Yes
    Bob HuffRCA-29$4,198$0Not Voting
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$0No
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$6,200$0Not Voting
    Loni HancockDCA-9$2,400$0No
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$1,000$0Yes
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$4,750$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$1,300$0No
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$5,000$0No
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$3,000$0Yes
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$4,400$0No
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$6,100$0No
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$0$0No
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$500$0Yes
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$3,350$0Yes
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$5,550$0Yes
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$14,400$0Yes

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$14,400$0Yes
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$45,300$1,826Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$11,300$0Yes
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$23,900$3,500Yes
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$30,900$0Yes
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$14,450$0No
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$42,950$0No
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$47,050$3,000No
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$68,590$0Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$11,000$0No
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$14,150$1,000No
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$17,150$2,250Yes
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$1,000$0Yes
    Loni HancockDCA-9$60,450$1,500No
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$18,800$1,500Not Voting
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$0No
    Bob HuffRCA-29$9,298$2,000Not Voting
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$50,850$0Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$73,850$4,600Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$31,928$0Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$39,200$0Yes
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$46,250$3,000Yes
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$18,750$0Not Voting
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$56,700$0Not Voting
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$46,300$0Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$51,700$1,800Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$18,100$0Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$13,525$1,000Yes
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$50,600$0Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$125,300$3,200Yes
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$35,000$5,600Yes
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$31,550$2,000No
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$21,250$0Not Voting
    Lois WolkDCA-5$70,475$1,428No
    Rod WrightDCA-25$33,300$1,000Yes
    Mark WylandRCA-38$12,799$1,000No
    Leland YeeDCA-8$69,370$3,495No

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    State & local government employee unions$942,015
    Health care services$159,378
    Other non-physician health practitioners$144,943
    Education$81,149

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Health & welfare policy$44,699
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range