AB 2398 - An Act to Add Chapter 20 (Commencing with Section 42970) to Part 3 of Division 30 Of, and to Repeal Section 42980 Of, the Public Resources Code, Relating to Recycling.

Product stewardship: carpet. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, is required to reduce, recycle, and reuse solid waste generated in the state to the maximum extent feasible in an efficient cost-effective manner to conserve water, energy, and other natural resources.

The bill would require, by September 30, 2011, a… More
(1)The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, is required to reduce, recycle, and reuse solid waste generated in the state to the maximum extent feasible in an efficient cost-effective manner to conserve water, energy, and other natural resources.

The bill would require, by September 30, 2011, a manufacturer of carpets sold in this state, individually or through a carpet stewardship organization, to submit a carpet stewardship plan to the department, which would be required to include specified elements, including a funding mechanism that provides sufficient funding to carry out the plan, including administrative, operational, and capital costs of the plan, the payment of fees, and incentive payments. The bill would require the funding mechanism to establish and provide for, on and after January 1, 2013, a carpet stewardship assessment to be added to the purchase price of carpet sold in the state by a manufacturer to a California retailer or wholesaler or otherwise sold for use in the state and would require each retailer and wholesaler to add the assessment to the purchase price of all carpet sold in the state.

The bill would require, until April 1, 2015, the Carpet America Recovery Effort (CARE), a 3rd-party nonprofit carpet stewardship organization, to serve as the carpet stewardship organization and would allow, on and after April 1, 2015, a carpet stewardship organization appointed by one or more manufacturers, to submit a plan.

The bill would require, as of July 1, 2011, until January 1, 2013, a manufacturer of carpet to add an assessment of $0.05 per square yard upon the purchase price of all carpet sold in the state by that manufacturer. The bill would require the assessment to be remitted on a quarterly basis, as appropriate, to CARE or would allow the manufacturer to retain that assessment. The bill would require these revenues to be spent by CARE or by an individual manufacturer, prior to approval of its carpet stewardship plan, only to implement early action measures that are consistent to achieve measurable improvements in the landfill diversion and recycling of postconsumer carpet.

The department would be required to, among other things, within 60 days after the department receives a plan, review and determine whether the plan complies with the bill’s requirements and notify the submitter of its decision. The bill would specify that any plan not approved by March 31, 2012, is out of compliance until determined to be complete by the department.

The bill would provide that a manufacturer, wholesaler, or retailer, on and after April 1, 2012, that offers carpet for sale or promotional purposes without an approved plan for that carpet is not in compliance with the act’s requirements. The bill would require the department, by July 1, 2012, and not later than January 1 and July 1 annually thereafter, to post a notice on its Internet Web site listing manufacturers that are in compliance with the bill’s requirements. The bill would require a wholesaler or retailer that distributes or sells carpets to monitor the department’s Internet Web site to determine if the sale of a manufacturer’s carpet is in compliance.

The act would also require the carpet stewardship organization to demonstrate to the department that it has achieved continuous meaningful improvement in the rates of recycling and diversion and other specified goals in order to be in compliance.

Each manufacturer of carpet sold in the state, individually or through a carpet stewardship organization, would be required to prepare and submit to the department an annual report describing the activities carried out pursuant to the carpet stewardship plan.

A manufacturer or carpet stewardship organization submitting a carpet stewardship plan would be required to pay the department an annual administrative fee, as determined by the department. The bill would also require the department to identify the direct development or regulatory costs incurred by the department prior to the submittal of carpet stewardship plans and to establish a fee in an amount adequate to cover those costs, that would be required to be paid by a carpet stewardship organization that submits a carpet stewardship plan. The bill would provide for the imposition of administrative civil penalties upon a person who violates the bill and would provide that a plan submitter whose plan is not approved by the department by March 31, 2012, is subject to those penalties until the plan is approved. The bill would establish the Carpet Stewardship Account in the Integrated Waste Management Fund and would require the fees collected by the department to be deposited in that account, for expenditure by the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to cover the department’s cost to implement the bill’s provisions. The bill would also establish the Carpet Stewardship Penalty Subaccount in the Integrated Waste Management Fund and would require that the civil penalties collected by the department pursuant to the bill’s provisions be deposited in that subaccount, for expenditure by the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to cover the department’s costs to implement the bill’s provisions.

The bill would require the department and the Department of General Services to complete a study, by January 1, 2014, that examines the specifications for carpet purchases by the state, as provided in the NSF/ANSI 140-2007 Standard, Platinum Level, and to submit the study to the Governor and the Legislature, including recommendations for any appropriate changes to that standard.

The bill would provide that certain actions of a carpet stewardship organization or its members are not violations of the Cartwright Act or certain provisions regulating unfair business practices or unfair competition.

The bill would require the Department of General Services to revise relevant procurement rules to ensure that postconsumer carpet that is removed from state buildings is managed in a manner consistent with the purposes of the bill.

(2)Existing law requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to adopt regulations to establish a process to identify and prioritize chemicals or chemical ingredients in consumer products that may be considered as being a chemical of concern, as prescribed, and to establish a process for evaluating chemicals of concern in consumer products, and their potential alternatives, to determine how best to limit exposure or to reduce the level of hazard posed by a chemical of concern.

This bill would require the Department of Toxic Substances Control to fully consider the measures taken by the carpet industry pursuant to the program established by the bill, and the results of those measures, when considering whether to include carpet in the product registry adopted under those provisions or to otherwise regulate carpet pursuant to those provisions. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 31, 2010.

voted YES: 23 voted NO: 12
4 voted present/not voting

An Act to Add Chapter 20 (Commencing with Section 42970) to Part 3 of Division 30 Of, and to Repeal Section 42980 Of, the Public Resources Code, Relating to Recycling.

AB 2398 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
(1)The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, is required to reduce, recycle, and reuse solid waste generated in the state to the maximum extent feasible in an efficient cost-effective manner to conserve water, energy, and other natural resources.

The bill would require, by September 30, 2011, a manufacturer of carpets sold in this state, individually or through a carpet stewardship organization, to submit a carpet stewardship plan to the department, which would be required to include specified elements, including a funding mechanism that provides sufficient funding to carry out the plan, including administrative, operational, and capital costs of the plan, the payment of fees, and incentive payments. The bill would require the funding mechanism to establish and provide for, on and after January 1, 2013, a carpet stewardship assessment to be added to the purchase price of carpet sold in the state by a manufacturer to a California retailer or wholesaler or otherwise sold for use in the state and would require each retailer and wholesaler to add the assessment to the purchase price of all… More
(1)The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, is required to reduce, recycle, and reuse solid waste generated in the state to the maximum extent feasible in an efficient cost-effective manner to conserve water, energy, and other natural resources.

The bill would require, by September 30, 2011, a manufacturer of carpets sold in this state, individually or through a carpet stewardship organization, to submit a carpet stewardship plan to the department, which would be required to include specified elements, including a funding mechanism that provides sufficient funding to carry out the plan, including administrative, operational, and capital costs of the plan, the payment of fees, and incentive payments. The bill would require the funding mechanism to establish and provide for, on and after January 1, 2013, a carpet stewardship assessment to be added to the purchase price of carpet sold in the state by a manufacturer to a California retailer or wholesaler or otherwise sold for use in the state and would require each retailer and wholesaler to add the assessment to the purchase price of all carpet sold in the state.

The bill would require, until April 1, 2015, the Carpet America Recovery Effort (CARE), a 3rd-party nonprofit carpet stewardship organization, to serve as the carpet stewardship organization and would allow, on and after April 1, 2015, a carpet stewardship organization appointed by one or more manufacturers, to submit a plan.

The bill would require, as of July 1, 2011, until January 1, 2013, a manufacturer of carpet to add an assessment of $0.05 per square yard upon the purchase price of all carpet sold in the state by that manufacturer. The bill would require the assessment to be remitted on a quarterly basis, as appropriate, to CARE or would allow the manufacturer to retain that assessment. The bill would require these revenues to be spent by CARE or by an individual manufacturer, prior to approval of its carpet stewardship plan, only to implement early action measures that are consistent to achieve measurable improvements in the landfill diversion and recycling of postconsumer carpet.

The department would be required to, among other things, within 60 days after the department receives a plan, review and determine whether the plan complies with the bill’s requirements and notify the submitter of its decision. The bill would specify that any plan not approved by March 31, 2012, is out of compliance until determined to be complete by the department.

The bill would provide that a manufacturer, wholesaler, or retailer, on and after April 1, 2012, that offers carpet for sale or promotional purposes without an approved plan for that carpet is not in compliance with the act’s requirements. The bill would require the department, by July 1, 2012, and not later than January 1 and July 1 annually thereafter, to post a notice on its Internet Web site listing manufacturers that are in compliance with the bill’s requirements. The bill would require a wholesaler or retailer that distributes or sells carpets to monitor the department’s Internet Web site to determine if the sale of a manufacturer’s carpet is in compliance.

The act would also require the carpet stewardship organization to demonstrate to the department that it has achieved continuous meaningful improvement in the rates of recycling and diversion and other specified goals in order to be in compliance.

Each manufacturer of carpet sold in the state, individually or through a carpet stewardship organization, would be required to prepare and submit to the department an annual report describing the activities carried out pursuant to the carpet stewardship plan.

A manufacturer or carpet stewardship organization submitting a carpet stewardship plan would be required to pay the department an annual administrative fee, as determined by the department. The bill would also require the department to identify the direct development or regulatory costs incurred by the department prior to the submittal of carpet stewardship plans and to establish a fee in an amount adequate to cover those costs, that would be required to be paid by a carpet stewardship organization that submits a carpet stewardship plan. The bill would provide for the imposition of administrative civil penalties upon a person who violates the bill and would provide that a plan submitter whose plan is not approved by the department by March 31, 2012, is subject to those penalties until the plan is approved. The bill would establish the Carpet Stewardship Account in the Integrated Waste Management Fund and would require the fees collected by the department to be deposited in that account, for expenditure by the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to cover the department’s cost to implement the bill’s provisions. The bill would also establish the Carpet Stewardship Penalty Subaccount in the Integrated Waste Management Fund and would require that the civil penalties collected by the department pursuant to the bill’s provisions be deposited in that subaccount, for expenditure by the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to cover the department’s costs to implement the bill’s provisions.

The bill would require the department and the Department of General Services to complete a study, by January 1, 2014, that examines the specifications for carpet purchases by the state, as provided in the NSF/ANSI 140-2007 Standard, Platinum Level, and to submit the study to the Governor and the Legislature, including recommendations for any appropriate changes to that standard.

The bill would provide that certain actions of a carpet stewardship organization or its members are not violations of the Cartwright Act or certain provisions regulating unfair business practices or unfair competition.

The bill would require the Department of General Services to revise relevant procurement rules to ensure that postconsumer carpet that is removed from state buildings is managed in a manner consistent with the purposes of the bill.

(2)Existing law requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to adopt regulations to establish a process to identify and prioritize chemicals or chemical ingredients in consumer products that may be considered as being a chemical of concern, as prescribed, and to establish a process for evaluating chemicals of concern in consumer products, and their potential alternatives, to determine how best to limit exposure or to reduce the level of hazard posed by a chemical of concern.

This bill would require the Department of Toxic Substances Control to fully consider the measures taken by the carpet industry pursuant to the program established by the bill, and the results of those measures, when considering whether to include carpet in the product registry adopted under those provisions or to otherwise regulate carpet pursuant to those provisions. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add Chapter 20 (Commencing with Section 42970) to Part 3 of Division 30 Of, and to Repeal Section 42980 Of, the Public Resources Code, Relating to Recycling.
Author(s)
John Perez
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Product stewardship: carpet
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/19/2010
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Assembly Committee on Natural Resources4/19/2010
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/28/2010
    Passed Assembly6/02/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Environmental Quality6/28/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/02/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/12/2010
    Passed Senate8/31/2010
    Passed Assembly8/31/2010
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/15/2010
    Became law (chaptered).9/30/2010
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteAssembly Committee on Natural ResourcesDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/19/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources
    6 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/28/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    12 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 2398 PEREZ, J. Assembly Third Reading6/02/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
    49 voted YES 27 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on Environmental QualityDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.6/28/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Environmental Quality
    5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.8/02/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    10 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.8/12/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    7 voted YES 4 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB2398 John A. Perez8/31/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
    23 voted YES 12 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 2398 PEREZ, J. Concurrence in Senate Amendments8/31/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
    49 voted YES 27 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/19/2010
    2/19/2010Introduced. To print.
    2/21/2010From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
    2/22/2010Read first time.
    3/11/2010Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
    4/12/2010In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
    4/14/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
    4/15/2010Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
    select this voteVote4/19/2010Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    4/20/2010From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 19).
    5/05/2010In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
    select this voteVote5/28/2010Do pass as amended.
    5/28/2010From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28). Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
    6/01/2010Read second time. To third reading.
    6/02/2010Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 5482.)
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage6/02/2010AB 2398 PEREZ, J. Assembly Third Reading
    6/03/2010In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
    6/10/2010Referred to Com. on EQ.
    6/23/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ. (Corrected June 30.)
    select this voteVote6/28/2010Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
    6/29/2010From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 28).
    7/15/2010In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
    select this voteVote8/02/2010Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
    8/02/2010In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.
    select this voteVote8/12/2010Do pass as amended.
    8/16/2010From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (August 12).
    8/17/2010Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
    8/20/2010Read third time, amended. To second reading.
    8/23/2010Read second time. To third reading.
    8/26/2010Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
    8/27/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS. Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Ayes 21. Noes 11. Page 4960.)
    8/30/2010Ordered to third reading. Withdrawn from committee.
    8/31/2010Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 12. Page 5086.)
    8/31/2010In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6979.)
    currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage8/31/2010Assembly 3rd Reading AB2398 John A. Perez
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/31/2010AB 2398 PEREZ, J. Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    9/15/2010Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.
    9/30/2010Approved by the Governor.
    9/30/2010Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 681, Statutes of 2010.

    Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

    19% more
    $13,650
    $44,390
    $30,327
    $88,367
    $0
    $74,000
    $74,000

    opposed this bill

    Fiscal & tax policy [About]
    Waste management (split) [About]
    Textiles & fabrics [About]
    4 Organizations Supported and 3 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Add Chapter 20 (Commencing with Section 42970) to Part 3 of Division 30 Of, and to Repeal Section 42980 Of, the Public Resources Code, Relating to Recycling.: Assembly 3rd Reading AB2398 John A. Perez

    4 organizations supported this bill

    California Retailers Association
    SENATE RULES COMMITTEE (2010, August 31). Bill Analysis AB 2398 8/31/2010. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from Official California Legislative Information.
    League of California Cities
    SENATE RULES COMMITTEE (2010, August 31). Bill Analysis AB 2398 8/31/2010. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from Official California Legislative Information.
    Sierra Club California
    SENATE RULES COMMITTEE (2010, August 31). Bill Analysis AB 2398 8/31/2010. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from Official California Legislative Information.
    Solid Waste Association of North America
    SENATE RULES COMMITTEE (2010, August 31). Bill Analysis AB 2398 8/31/2010. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from Official California Legislative Information.

    3 organizations opposed this bill

    California Taxpayers Association
    SENATE RULES COMMITTEE (2010, August 31). Bill Analysis AB 2398 8/31/2010. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from Official California Legislative Information.
    Carpet and Rug Institute
    SENATE RULES COMMITTEE (2010, August 31). Bill Analysis AB 2398 8/31/2010. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from Official California Legislative Information.
    Lassen Regional Solid Waste Management Authority
    SENATE RULES COMMITTEE (2010, August 31). Bill Analysis AB 2398 8/31/2010. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from Official California Legislative Information.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2010.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$1,500$4,000Not Voting
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$0$0Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0No
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$4,000Yes
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$3,598$0Yes
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$1,000$0Yes
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$10,065$5,500No
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$0$0Yes
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$1,500$0Not Voting
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$0$0Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$2,000$2,000No
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$1,500$7,000No
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$0$4,000No
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$0Yes
    Loni HancockDCA-9$350$0Yes
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$6,000$5,000No
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$4,000No
    Bob HuffRCA-29$990$3,000No
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$0$0Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$0$0Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$4,600$0Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0Yes
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$2,000$0Yes
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$1,250$0Not Voting
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$8,163$0Yes
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$14,850$0Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$0$0Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$1,000$0Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$0$18,000No
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$4,600$0Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$4,900$0Yes
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$0$5,000No
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$9,000$8,500No
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$0$0Not Voting
    Lois WolkDCA-5$6,000$0Yes
    Rod WrightDCA-25$1,500$0Yes
    Mark WylandRCA-38$0$4,000No
    Leland YeeDCA-8$2,000$0Yes

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$1,500$4,000Not Voting
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$0$0Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0No
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$4,000Yes
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$3,598$0Yes
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$1,000$0Yes
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$10,065$5,500No
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$0$0Yes
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$1,500$0Not Voting
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$0$0Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$2,000$2,000No
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$1,500$7,000No
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$0$4,000No
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$0Yes
    Loni HancockDCA-9$350$0Yes
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$6,000$5,000No
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$4,000No
    Bob HuffRCA-29$990$3,000No
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$0$0Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$0$0Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$4,600$0Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0Yes
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$2,000$0Yes
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$1,250$0Not Voting
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$8,163$0Yes
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$14,850$0Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$0$0Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$1,000$0Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$0$18,000No
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$4,600$0Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$4,900$0Yes
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$0$5,000No
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$9,000$8,500No
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$0$0Not Voting
    Lois WolkDCA-5$6,000$0Yes
    Rod WrightDCA-25$1,500$0Yes
    Mark WylandRCA-38$0$4,000No
    Leland YeeDCA-8$2,000$0Yes

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    Waste management$258,632
    Environmental policy$44,390
    Retail trade$30,327
    Municipal & county government organizations$13,650

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Waste management$258,632
    Fiscal & tax policy$74,000
    Textiles & fabrics$0
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range