AB 482 - An Act to Add Chapter 3.6 (Commencing with Section 1024.5) to Part 3 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.

Employment: credit reports. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that state laws are inconsistent with its… More
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that state laws are inconsistent with its provisions.

Existing federal and state law specify the procedures that an employer is required to follow before requesting a report and if adverse action is taken based on the report. Under existing law, an employer may request a credit report for employment purposes so long as he or she provides written notice of the request to the person for whom the report is sought. Existing law requires that the written notice inform the person for whom the consumer credit report was sought of the source of the report and contain space for the person to request a copy of the report. Existing law further requires an employer, whenever he or she bases an adverse employment decision on information contained in a consumer credit report, to advise the person for whom the report was sought that an adverse action was taken based upon information contained in the report and provide the person with the name and address of the consumer credit agency making the report.

This bill would prohibit an employer, with the exception of certain financial institutions, from obtaining a consumer credit report for employment purposes unless the information is (1) substantially job-related, meaning that the position of the person for whom the report is sought has access to money, other assets, or trade secrets or other confidential information, and (2) the position of the person for whom the report is sought is a position in the state Department of Justice, a managerial position, that of a sworn peace officer or other law enforcement position, or a position for which the information contained in the report is required to be disclosed by law or to be obtained by the employer. Hide
 
Status:
This bill was passed by both houses and vetoed by the Governor. It did not become law
Senate Vote: On Passage

DID NOT PASS on August 23, 2010.

voted YES: 19 voted NO: 16
4 voted present/not voting

An Act to Add Chapter 3.6 (Commencing with Section 1024.5) to Part 3 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.

AB 482 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that state laws are inconsistent with its provisions.

Existing federal and state law specify the procedures that an employer is required to follow before requesting a report and if adverse action is taken based on the report. Under existing law, an employer may request a credit report for employment purposes so long as he or she provides written notice of the request to the person for whom the report is sought. Existing law requires that the written notice inform the person for whom the consumer credit report was sought of the source of the report and contain space for the person to request a copy of the report. Existing law further requires an employer, whenever he or she bases an adverse employment decision on information contained in a consumer credit report, to advise the person for whom the report was sought that an… More
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that state laws are inconsistent with its provisions.

Existing federal and state law specify the procedures that an employer is required to follow before requesting a report and if adverse action is taken based on the report. Under existing law, an employer may request a credit report for employment purposes so long as he or she provides written notice of the request to the person for whom the report is sought. Existing law requires that the written notice inform the person for whom the consumer credit report was sought of the source of the report and contain space for the person to request a copy of the report. Existing law further requires an employer, whenever he or she bases an adverse employment decision on information contained in a consumer credit report, to advise the person for whom the report was sought that an adverse action was taken based upon information contained in the report and provide the person with the name and address of the consumer credit agency making the report.

This bill would prohibit an employer, with the exception of certain financial institutions, from obtaining a consumer credit report for employment purposes unless the information is (1) substantially job-related, meaning that the position of the person for whom the report is sought has access to money, other assets, or trade secrets or other confidential information, and (2) the position of the person for whom the report is sought is a position in the state Department of Justice, a managerial position, that of a sworn peace officer or other law enforcement position, or a position for which the information contained in the report is required to be disclosed by law or to be obtained by the employer. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add Chapter 3.6 (Commencing with Section 1024.5) to Part 3 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.
Author(s)
Tony Mendoza
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Employment: credit reports
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/24/2009
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Assembly Committee on Education4/15/2009
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/28/2009
    Passed Assembly6/03/2009
    Passed Senate Committee on Education7/15/2009
    Passed Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations6/09/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary6/29/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/02/2010
    Passed Senate8/23/2010
    Failed passage in Senate8/23/2010
    Passed Senate8/26/2010
    Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary8/30/2010
    Passed Assembly8/31/2010
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/15/2010
    Vetoed by Governor9/23/2010
    Vetoed by Governor9/23/2010
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteAssembly Committee on EducationDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/15/2009This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Education
    8 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/28/2009This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    12 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 482 MENDOZA Assembly Third Reading6/03/2009This bill PASSED the Assembly
    48 voted YES 30 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on EducationDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.7/15/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Education
    6 voted YES 1 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on Labor and Industrial RelationsDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.6/09/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations
    4 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.6/29/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
    3 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/02/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    7 voted YES 3 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB482 Mendoza Reconsider8/23/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
    36 voted YES 0 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB482 Mendoza By Leno8/23/2010This bill DID NOT PASS the Senate
    19 voted YES 16 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB482 Mendoza By Leno8/26/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
    21 voted YES 14 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciarySenate amendments be concurred in.8/30/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
    7 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 482 MENDOZA Concurrence in Senate Amendments8/31/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
    45 voted YES 30 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/24/2009
    2/24/2009Read first time. To print.
    2/25/2009From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
    3/12/2009Referred to Com. on ED.
    4/01/2009In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
    4/02/2009From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
    4/13/2009Re-referred to Com. on ED.
    select this voteVote4/15/2009Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    4/21/2009From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 15).
    4/22/2009Read second time and amended.
    4/23/2009Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    4/29/2009In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
    select this voteVote5/28/2009Do pass as amended.
    5/29/2009From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
    6/01/2009Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
    6/02/2009Read second time. To third reading.
    6/03/2009Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 30. Page 2061.)
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage6/03/2009AB 482 MENDOZA Assembly Third Reading
    6/04/2009In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
    6/18/2009Referred to Com. on ED.
    7/01/2009In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
    7/08/2009In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
    select this voteVote7/15/2009Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
    7/16/2009From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 15).
    8/17/2009From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    8/17/2009In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
    9/02/2009From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    4/08/2010From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    4/12/2010Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
    4/29/2010Re-referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
    6/09/2010From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 9).
    select this voteVote6/09/2010Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.
    6/16/2010In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
    select this voteVote6/29/2010Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
    7/15/2010From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 29). Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    select this voteVote8/02/2010Do pass.
    8/03/2010From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (August 2).
    8/04/2010Read second time. To third reading.
    8/23/2010Read third time, passage refused. (Ayes 19. Noes 16. Page 4803.) Motion to reconsider made by Senator Leno. Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4804.)
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/23/2010Assembly 3rd Reading AB482 Mendoza Reconsider
    currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage8/23/2010Assembly 3rd Reading AB482 Mendoza By Leno
    8/26/2010Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 4938.)
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/26/2010Assembly 3rd Reading AB482 Mendoza By Leno
    8/30/2010In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 6850.) From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (August 30).
    select this voteVote8/30/2010Senate amendments be concurred in.
    8/31/2010Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 45. Noes 30. Page 6918.)
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/31/2010AB 482 MENDOZA Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    9/15/2010Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.
    Vetoed9/23/2010Vetoed by Governor.

    Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

    $1,953
    $25,400
    $116,500
    $0
    $112,100
    $112,730
    $0
    $249,850
    $47,650
    $44,699
    $6,000
    $942,015
    $0
    $1,658,897
    93% more
    $996,984
    $217,097
    $90,239
    $0
    $287,196
    $64,100
    $101,555
    $12,000
    $163,600
    $282,350
    $124,531
    $222,600
    $30,327
    $13,650
    $146,817
    $200,348
    $70,800
    $0
    $3,000
    $163,314
    $15,000
    $3,205,508
    14 Organizations Supported and 21 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Add Chapter 3.6 (Commencing with Section 1024.5) to Part 3 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.: Assembly 3rd Reading AB482 Mendoza By Leno

    14 organizations supported this bill

    Amalgamated Transit Union
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    American Civil Liberties Union
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Commission on the Status of Women
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Labor Federation
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Consumer Action
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Engineers and Scientists of California
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Friends Committee on Legislation of California
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    IFPTE Local 21
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    International Brotherhood of Teamsters
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    International Longshore and Warehouse Union
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    National Employment Law Project
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Service Employees International Union
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    United Food and Commercial Workers International Union
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.

    21 organizations opposed this bill

    Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Association of California Water Agencies
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Advocates
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Apartment Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Association of Licensed Investigators
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Chamber of Commerce
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Chapter American Fence Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Grocers Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Hospital Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Manufacturers & Technology Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California New Car Dealers Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Retailers Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California State Association of Counties
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Consumer Data Industry Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Engineering Contractors' Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    First American Corporation
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Flasher Barricade Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Independent Maintenance Contractors Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Life Technologies
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    National Federation of Independent Business
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Property Casualty Insurers Association of America
    Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 4). Bill Analysis AB 482 8-4-2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from Leg Info.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2010.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$47,550No
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$43,626$16,850Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0No
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$12,300$38,599No
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$39,650$192,801Yes
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$46,800$21,450Yes
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$5,850$114,468No
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$77,600$29,751Yes
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$61,100$199,670No
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$139,170$52,024Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$1,500$89,600No
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$9,900$98,849No
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$12,650$77,000No
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$7,900Yes
    Loni HancockDCA-9$106,100$13,100Yes
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$12,900$152,250Not Voting
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$29,000No
    Bob HuffRCA-29$7,400$115,936No
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$70,800$53,435Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$119,753$36,725Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$46,000$36,850Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$66,450$49,200Yes
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$51,000$114,670No
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$32,500$25,750Not Voting
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$64,750$187,213Not Voting
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$50,000$18,050Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$52,900$75,900Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$28,500$15,849Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$6,900$151,998No
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$61,600$37,000Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$113,450$219,150Yes
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$10,100$272,799No
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$8,600$169,225No
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$33,250$19,350Not Voting
    Lois WolkDCA-5$126,703$77,200No
    Rod WrightDCA-25$45,000$129,167Yes
    Mark WylandRCA-38$2,500$71,329No
    Leland YeeDCA-8$91,595$147,850Yes

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$47,550No
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$43,626$16,850Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0No
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$12,300$38,599No
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$39,650$192,801Yes
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$46,800$21,450Yes
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$5,850$114,468No
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$77,600$29,751Yes
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$61,100$199,670No
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$139,170$52,024Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$1,500$89,600No
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$9,900$98,849No
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$12,650$77,000No
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$7,900Yes
    Loni HancockDCA-9$106,100$13,100Yes
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$12,900$152,250Not Voting
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$29,000No
    Bob HuffRCA-29$7,400$115,936No
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$70,800$53,435Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$119,753$36,725Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$46,000$36,850Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$66,450$49,200Yes
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$51,000$114,670No
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$32,500$25,750Not Voting
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$64,750$187,213Not Voting
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$50,000$18,050Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$52,900$75,900Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$28,500$15,849Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$6,900$151,998No
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$61,600$37,000Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$113,450$219,150Yes
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$10,100$272,799No
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$8,600$169,225No
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$33,250$19,350Not Voting
    Lois WolkDCA-5$126,703$77,200No
    Rod WrightDCA-25$45,000$129,167Yes
    Mark WylandRCA-38$2,500$71,329No
    Leland YeeDCA-8$91,595$147,850Yes

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    State & local government employee unions$942,015
    Other unions$249,850
    Transportation unions$116,500
    Teamsters unions$112,730
    Labor unions$112,100
    Merchant marine & longshoremen unions$47,650
    Health & welfare policy$44,699
    Women's issues$25,400
    Communications & hi-tech unions$6,000
    Democratic-based groups (but not official party committees) and generic liberal/progressive ones$1,953
    Food service & related unions$0
    Consumer groups$0
    Manufacturing unions$0

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Property & casualty insurance$996,984
    Building operators & managers$287,196
    Hospitals$282,350
    Auto dealers, new & used$222,600
    Life insurance$217,097
    Engineering, architecture & construction management services$200,348
    Food stores$163,600
    Biotech products & research$163,314
    Credit agencies & finance companies$146,817
    Manufacturing$124,531
    Chambers of commerce$101,555
    Water utilities$90,239
    Title insurance & title abstract offices$70,800
    Security services$64,100
    Retail trade$30,327
    Small business organizations$15,000
    Municipal & county government organizations$13,650
    Building materials$12,000
    Miscellaneous repair services$3,000
    Lawyers & lobbyists$0
    General business associations$0
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range