SB 1169 - An Act to Amend Section 17516 of the Government Code, and to Amend Sections 175, 182, 186, 1055, 1055.2, 1228.5, 1228.7, 1241, 1241.6, 1410, 1675, 1701.3, 1703.6, 13176, 13193, 13204, 13220, 13261, 13274, 13285, 13291, 13304.1, 13320, 13330, 13376, 13392, 13392.5, 13395.5, 13396.7, 13426, 13442, 13521, 13522, 13523, 13523.1, 13528, 13540, 13552.4, 13553, 13576, 13578, 13580.9, 13627, 13627.4, 13755, 13800, 13801, 13903, 13904, and 13952.1 Of, to Amend the Headings of Article 1 (Commencing with Section 13300) and Article 2 (Commencing with Section 13320) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 Of, to Amend and Renumber Section 13274 Of, to Add Section 13248 To, and to Repeal Sections 1062 and 1241.5 Of, the Water Code, Relating to Water.

Water. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards (regional boards) as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a specified decision or order issued by the state board to obtain review of the order in superior court by… More
(1)Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards (regional boards) as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a specified decision or order issued by the state board to obtain review of the order in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after service of a copy of the state board’s decision or order. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a final decision or order of a regional board for which the state board denies review to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after the date on which the state board denies review.

This bill would provide that an aggrieved party must file a petition for reconsideration with the state board to exhaust that party’s administrative remedies only if the initial decision or order is issued under authority delegated to an officer or employee of the state board and the state board by regulation has authorized a petition for reconsideration. The bill, with respect to a decision or order of a regional board, would specify that the authorization to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board applies to a final decision or order of a regional board subject to review under a certain provision of law.

(2)The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prescribes various timelines for commencing an action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul acts or decisions of a public agency on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA.

This bill would provide that the time for filing an action or proceeding subject to these timelines for a person who seeks review of the regional board’s decision or order under a specified provision of law, or who seeks reconsideration under a state board regulation authorizing a petition for reconsideration, shall commence upon the state board’s completion of that review or reconsideration.

(3)Under existing law, each California regional water quality control board consists of 9 members who are appointed by the Governor and who serve 4-year terms.

This bill would extend the terms of 2 board members on each regional water quality control board, as specified, to September 30, 2014.

(4)Existing law requires that, prior to the indoor use of recycled water in a condominium project, the agency delivering the recycled water to the condominium project file a report with the regional board and receive written approval of the report from the State Department of Public Health.

This bill instead would require the agency to file the report with the State Department of Public Health.

(5)This bill would update cross-references in, and delete obsolete provisions of, the Water Code, and make various other technical or clarifying changes. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Committee on Appropriations Vote: Do pass.

PASSED on June 30, 2010.

voted YES: 12 voted NO: 5
0 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 17516 of the Government Code, and to Amend Sections 175, 182, 186, 1055, 1055.2, 1228.5, 1228.7, 1241, 1241.6, 1410, 1675, 1701.3, 1703.6, 13176, 13193, 13204, 13220, 13261, 13274, 13285, 13291, 13304.1, 13320, 13330, 13376, 13392, 13392.5, 13395.5, 13396.7, 13426, 13442, 13521, 13522, 13523, 13523.1, 13528, 13540, 13552.4, 13553, 13576, 13578, 13580.9, 13627, 13627.4, 13755, 13800, 13801, 13903, 13904, and 13952.1 Of, to Amend the Headings of Article 1 (Commencing with Section 13300) and Article 2 (Commencing with Section 13320) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 Of, to Amend and Renumber Section 13274 Of, to Add Section 13248 To, and to Repeal Sections 1062 and 1241.5 Of, the Water Code, Relating to Water.

SB 1169 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards (regional boards) as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a specified decision or order issued by the state board to obtain review of the order in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after service of a copy of the state board’s decision or order. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a final decision or order of a regional board for which the state board denies review to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after the date on which the state board denies review.

This bill would provide that an aggrieved party must file a petition for reconsideration with the state board to exhaust that party’s administrative remedies only if the initial decision or order is issued under authority delegated to an officer or employee of the state board and the state board by regulation has authorized a petition for… More
(1)Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards (regional boards) as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a specified decision or order issued by the state board to obtain review of the order in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after service of a copy of the state board’s decision or order. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a final decision or order of a regional board for which the state board denies review to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after the date on which the state board denies review.

This bill would provide that an aggrieved party must file a petition for reconsideration with the state board to exhaust that party’s administrative remedies only if the initial decision or order is issued under authority delegated to an officer or employee of the state board and the state board by regulation has authorized a petition for reconsideration. The bill, with respect to a decision or order of a regional board, would specify that the authorization to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board applies to a final decision or order of a regional board subject to review under a certain provision of law.

(2)The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prescribes various timelines for commencing an action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul acts or decisions of a public agency on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA.

This bill would provide that the time for filing an action or proceeding subject to these timelines for a person who seeks review of the regional board’s decision or order under a specified provision of law, or who seeks reconsideration under a state board regulation authorizing a petition for reconsideration, shall commence upon the state board’s completion of that review or reconsideration.

(3)Under existing law, each California regional water quality control board consists of 9 members who are appointed by the Governor and who serve 4-year terms.

This bill would extend the terms of 2 board members on each regional water quality control board, as specified, to September 30, 2014.

(4)Existing law requires that, prior to the indoor use of recycled water in a condominium project, the agency delivering the recycled water to the condominium project file a report with the regional board and receive written approval of the report from the State Department of Public Health.

This bill instead would require the agency to file the report with the State Department of Public Health.

(5)This bill would update cross-references in, and delete obsolete provisions of, the Water Code, and make various other technical or clarifying changes. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 17516 of the Government Code, and to Amend Sections 175, 182, 186, 1055, 1055.2, 1228.5, 1228.7, 1241, 1241.6, 1410, 1675, 1701.3, 1703.6, 13176, 13193, 13204, 13220, 13261, 13274, 13285, 13291, 13304.1, 13320, 13330, 13376, 13392, 13392.5, 13395.5, 13396.7, 13426, 13442, 13521, 13522, 13523, 13523.1, 13528, 13540, 13552.4, 13553, 13576, 13578, 13580.9, 13627, 13627.4, 13755, 13800, 13801, 13903, 13904, and 13952.1 Of, to Amend the Headings of Article 1 (Commencing with Section 13300) and Article 2 (Commencing with Section 13320) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 Of, to Amend and Renumber Section 13274 Of, to Add Section 13248 To, and to Repeal Sections 1062 and 1241.5 Of, the Water Code, Relating to Water.
Author(s)
Alan Lowenthal
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Water
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/18/2010
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Senate Committee on Health4/14/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/10/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/27/2010
    Passed Senate6/01/2010
    Passed Assembly Committee on Health6/15/2010
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations6/30/2010
    Passed Assembly8/23/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Water8/27/2010
    Passed Senate8/30/2010
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/08/2010
    Became law (chaptered).9/24/2010
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteSenate Committee on HealthDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/14/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Health
    7 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.5/10/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    9 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/27/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    7 voted YES 3 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB1169 Lowenthal6/01/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
    24 voted YES 11 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on HealthDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.6/15/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Health
    12 voted YES 5 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.6/30/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    12 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblySB 1169 Lowenthal Senate Third Reading By FULLER8/23/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
    74 voted YES 1 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on Natural Resources and WaterFrom committee: That the Assembly Amendments be concurred in.8/27/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Water
    9 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateUnfinished Business SB1169 Lowenthal8/30/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
    35 voted YES 0 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/18/2010
    2/18/2010Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
    2/19/2010From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
    3/04/2010To Com. on HEALTH.
    3/11/2010Set for hearing March 24. Hearing postponed by committee.
    3/12/2010Set for hearing April 14.
    select this voteVote4/14/2010Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
    4/22/2010From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3210.)
    4/26/2010Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    4/30/2010Set for hearing May 10.
    5/10/2010Placed on APPR suspense file.
    select this voteVote5/10/2010Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
    5/21/2010Set for hearing May 27. (Suspense - for vote only.)
    5/27/2010From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3672.)
    select this voteVote5/27/2010Do pass as amended.
    5/28/2010Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
    6/01/2010Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 11. Page 3702.) To Assembly.
    6/01/2010In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage6/01/2010Senate 3rd Reading SB1169 Lowenthal
    6/03/2010To Com. on HEALTH.
    select this voteVote6/15/2010Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    6/16/2010From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Heard in committee on June 15.)
    currently selectedVote6/30/2010Do pass.
    6/30/2010From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (Heard in committee on June 30).
    7/01/2010Read second time. To third reading.
    8/02/2010Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
    8/12/2010Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
    8/16/2010From inactive file to third reading file.
    8/20/2010Read third time. Amended. (Page 6430.) To third reading.
    8/23/2010Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 6463.) Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 1. Page 6511.) To Senate.
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/23/2010SB 1169 Lowenthal Senate Third Reading By FULLER
    8/24/2010In Senate. To unfinished business.
    8/25/2010Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4858.) Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
    8/26/2010Set for hearing August 27.
    select this voteVote8/27/2010From committee: That the Assembly Amendments be concurred in.
    8/27/2010From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 4985.)
    8/30/2010Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 5004.) To enrollment.
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/30/2010Unfinished Business SB1169 Lowenthal
    9/08/2010Enrolled. To Governor at 3:30 p.m.
    9/23/2010Approved by Governor.
    9/24/2010Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 288, Statutes of 2010.

    Average contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

    supported this motion

    Psychiatrists & psychologists [About]
    Mental health services [About]
    Average given to Assemblymembers who voted:
    39% more
    $0
    $1,267
    YES$1,267
    $0
    $910
    NO$910

    opposed this motion

    Life insurance [About]
    HMOs [About]
    Average given to Assemblymembers who voted:
    $1,340
    $2,167
    YES$3,506
    63% more
    $2,900
    $2,800
    NO$5,700
    2 Organizations Supported and 2 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Section 17516 of the Government Code, and to Amend Sections 175, 182, 186, 1055, 1055.2, 1228.5, 1228.7, 1241, 1241.6, 1410, 1675, 1701.3, 1703.6, 13176, 13193, 13204, 13220, 13261, 13274, 13285, 13291, 13304.1, 13320, 13330, 13376, 13392, 13392.5, 13395.5, 13396.7, 13426, 13442, 13521, 13522, 13523, 13523.1, 13528, 13540, 13552.4, 13553, 13576, 13578, 13580.9, 13627, 13627.4, 13755, 13800, 13801, 13903, 13904, and 13952.1 Of, to Amend the Headings of Article 1 (Commencing with Section 13300) and Article 2 (Commencing with Section 13320) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 Of, to Amend and Renumber Section 13274 Of, to Add Section 13248 To, and to Repeal Sections 1062 and 1241.5 Of, the Water Code, Relating to Water.: Do pass.

    2 organizations supported this motion

    American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
    Assembly Committee on Appropriations (2010, June 29). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-29-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Psychiatric Association
    Assembly Committee on Appropriations (2010, June 29). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-29-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.

    2 organizations opposed this motion

    Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies
    Assembly Committee on Appropriations (2010, June 29). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-29-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Association of Health Plans
    Assembly Committee on Appropriations (2010, June 29). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-29-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2010.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$1,000Yes
    Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$9,000Yes
    Connie ConwayRCA-34$3,000$11,000No
    Joe CotoDCA-23$0$0Yes
    Mike DavisDCA-48$0$1,000Yes
    Kevin De LeonDCA-45$2,000$7,000Yes
    Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$3,000Yes
    Mike GattoDCA-43$1,500$100Yes
    Isadore HallDCA-52$0$5,000Yes
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$550$5,000No
    Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$3,000No
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$8,500No
    Chris NorbyRCA-72$1,000$1,000No
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$3,100$4,500Yes
    Jose SolorioDCA-69$1,000$11,000Yes
    Tom TorlaksonDCA-11$1,000$375Yes
    Alberto TorricoDCA-20$6,600$100Yes

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$1,000Yes
    Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$9,000Yes
    Connie ConwayRCA-34$3,000$11,000No
    Joe CotoDCA-23$0$0Yes
    Mike DavisDCA-48$0$1,000Yes
    Kevin De LeonDCA-45$2,000$7,000Yes
    Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$3,000Yes
    Mike GattoDCA-43$1,500$100Yes
    Isadore HallDCA-52$0$5,000Yes
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$550$5,000No
    Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$3,000No
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$8,500No
    Chris NorbyRCA-72$1,000$1,000No
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$3,100$4,500Yes
    Jose SolorioDCA-69$1,000$11,000Yes
    Tom TorlaksonDCA-11$1,000$375Yes
    Alberto TorricoDCA-20$6,600$100Yes

    Interest Groups that supported this motion

    $ Donated
    Psychiatrists & psychologists$19,750
    Mental health services$0

    Interest Groups that opposed this motion

    $ Donated
    Life insurance$40,000
    HMOs$30,575
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range