SB 1169 - An Act to Amend Section 17516 of the Government Code, and to Amend Sections 175, 182, 186, 1055, 1055.2, 1228.5, 1228.7, 1241, 1241.6, 1410, 1675, 1701.3, 1703.6, 13176, 13193, 13204, 13220, 13261, 13274, 13285, 13291, 13304.1, 13320, 13330, 13376, 13392, 13392.5, 13395.5, 13396.7, 13426, 13442, 13521, 13522, 13523, 13523.1, 13528, 13540, 13552.4, 13553, 13576, 13578, 13580.9, 13627, 13627.4, 13755, 13800, 13801, 13903, 13904, and 13952.1 Of, to Amend the Headings of Article 1 (Commencing with Section 13300) and Article 2 (Commencing with Section 13320) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 Of, to Amend and Renumber Section 13274 Of, to Add Section 13248 To, and to Repeal Sections 1062 and 1241.5 Of, the Water Code, Relating to Water.

Water. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards (regional boards) as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a specified decision or order issued by the state board to obtain review of the order in superior court by… More
(1)Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards (regional boards) as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a specified decision or order issued by the state board to obtain review of the order in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after service of a copy of the state board’s decision or order. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a final decision or order of a regional board for which the state board denies review to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after the date on which the state board denies review.

This bill would provide that an aggrieved party must file a petition for reconsideration with the state board to exhaust that party’s administrative remedies only if the initial decision or order is issued under authority delegated to an officer or employee of the state board and the state board by regulation has authorized a petition for reconsideration. The bill, with respect to a decision or order of a regional board, would specify that the authorization to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board applies to a final decision or order of a regional board subject to review under a certain provision of law.

(2)The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prescribes various timelines for commencing an action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul acts or decisions of a public agency on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA.

This bill would provide that the time for filing an action or proceeding subject to these timelines for a person who seeks review of the regional board’s decision or order under a specified provision of law, or who seeks reconsideration under a state board regulation authorizing a petition for reconsideration, shall commence upon the state board’s completion of that review or reconsideration.

(3)Under existing law, each California regional water quality control board consists of 9 members who are appointed by the Governor and who serve 4-year terms.

This bill would extend the terms of 2 board members on each regional water quality control board, as specified, to September 30, 2014.

(4)Existing law requires that, prior to the indoor use of recycled water in a condominium project, the agency delivering the recycled water to the condominium project file a report with the regional board and receive written approval of the report from the State Department of Public Health.

This bill instead would require the agency to file the report with the State Department of Public Health.

(5)This bill would update cross-references in, and delete obsolete provisions of, the Water Code, and make various other technical or clarifying changes. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 30, 2010.

voted YES: 35 voted NO: 0
4 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 17516 of the Government Code, and to Amend Sections 175, 182, 186, 1055, 1055.2, 1228.5, 1228.7, 1241, 1241.6, 1410, 1675, 1701.3, 1703.6, 13176, 13193, 13204, 13220, 13261, 13274, 13285, 13291, 13304.1, 13320, 13330, 13376, 13392, 13392.5, 13395.5, 13396.7, 13426, 13442, 13521, 13522, 13523, 13523.1, 13528, 13540, 13552.4, 13553, 13576, 13578, 13580.9, 13627, 13627.4, 13755, 13800, 13801, 13903, 13904, and 13952.1 Of, to Amend the Headings of Article 1 (Commencing with Section 13300) and Article 2 (Commencing with Section 13320) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 Of, to Amend and Renumber Section 13274 Of, to Add Section 13248 To, and to Repeal Sections 1062 and 1241.5 Of, the Water Code, Relating to Water.

SB 1169 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards (regional boards) as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a specified decision or order issued by the state board to obtain review of the order in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after service of a copy of the state board’s decision or order. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a final decision or order of a regional board for which the state board denies review to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after the date on which the state board denies review.

This bill would provide that an aggrieved party must file a petition for reconsideration with the state board to exhaust that party’s administrative remedies only if the initial decision or order is issued under authority delegated to an officer or employee of the state board and the state board by regulation has authorized a petition for… More
(1)Existing law establishes the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards (regional boards) as the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a specified decision or order issued by the state board to obtain review of the order in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after service of a copy of the state board’s decision or order. Existing law authorizes a party aggrieved by a final decision or order of a regional board for which the state board denies review to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board in superior court by filing a petition for writ of mandate within 30 days after the date on which the state board denies review.

This bill would provide that an aggrieved party must file a petition for reconsideration with the state board to exhaust that party’s administrative remedies only if the initial decision or order is issued under authority delegated to an officer or employee of the state board and the state board by regulation has authorized a petition for reconsideration. The bill, with respect to a decision or order of a regional board, would specify that the authorization to obtain review of the decision or order of the regional board applies to a final decision or order of a regional board subject to review under a certain provision of law.

(2)The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prescribes various timelines for commencing an action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul acts or decisions of a public agency on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA.

This bill would provide that the time for filing an action or proceeding subject to these timelines for a person who seeks review of the regional board’s decision or order under a specified provision of law, or who seeks reconsideration under a state board regulation authorizing a petition for reconsideration, shall commence upon the state board’s completion of that review or reconsideration.

(3)Under existing law, each California regional water quality control board consists of 9 members who are appointed by the Governor and who serve 4-year terms.

This bill would extend the terms of 2 board members on each regional water quality control board, as specified, to September 30, 2014.

(4)Existing law requires that, prior to the indoor use of recycled water in a condominium project, the agency delivering the recycled water to the condominium project file a report with the regional board and receive written approval of the report from the State Department of Public Health.

This bill instead would require the agency to file the report with the State Department of Public Health.

(5)This bill would update cross-references in, and delete obsolete provisions of, the Water Code, and make various other technical or clarifying changes. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 17516 of the Government Code, and to Amend Sections 175, 182, 186, 1055, 1055.2, 1228.5, 1228.7, 1241, 1241.6, 1410, 1675, 1701.3, 1703.6, 13176, 13193, 13204, 13220, 13261, 13274, 13285, 13291, 13304.1, 13320, 13330, 13376, 13392, 13392.5, 13395.5, 13396.7, 13426, 13442, 13521, 13522, 13523, 13523.1, 13528, 13540, 13552.4, 13553, 13576, 13578, 13580.9, 13627, 13627.4, 13755, 13800, 13801, 13903, 13904, and 13952.1 Of, to Amend the Headings of Article 1 (Commencing with Section 13300) and Article 2 (Commencing with Section 13320) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 Of, to Amend and Renumber Section 13274 Of, to Add Section 13248 To, and to Repeal Sections 1062 and 1241.5 Of, the Water Code, Relating to Water.
Author(s)
Alan Lowenthal
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Water
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/18/2010
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Senate Committee on Health4/14/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/10/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/27/2010
    Passed Senate6/01/2010
    Passed Assembly Committee on Health6/15/2010
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations6/30/2010
    Passed Assembly8/23/2010
    Passed Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Water8/27/2010
    Passed Senate8/30/2010
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/08/2010
    Became law (chaptered).9/24/2010
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteSenate Committee on HealthDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/14/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Health
    7 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.5/10/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    9 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/27/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    7 voted YES 3 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB1169 Lowenthal6/01/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
    24 voted YES 11 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on HealthDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.6/15/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Health
    12 voted YES 5 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.6/30/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    12 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblySB 1169 Lowenthal Senate Third Reading By FULLER8/23/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
    74 voted YES 1 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on Natural Resources and WaterFrom committee: That the Assembly Amendments be concurred in.8/27/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Water
    9 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedSenateUnfinished Business SB1169 Lowenthal8/30/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
    35 voted YES 0 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/18/2010
    2/18/2010Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
    2/19/2010From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
    3/04/2010To Com. on HEALTH.
    3/11/2010Set for hearing March 24. Hearing postponed by committee.
    3/12/2010Set for hearing April 14.
    select this voteVote4/14/2010Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
    4/22/2010From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3210.)
    4/26/2010Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    4/30/2010Set for hearing May 10.
    5/10/2010Placed on APPR suspense file.
    select this voteVote5/10/2010Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
    5/21/2010Set for hearing May 27. (Suspense - for vote only.)
    5/27/2010From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3672.)
    select this voteVote5/27/2010Do pass as amended.
    5/28/2010Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
    6/01/2010Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 11. Page 3702.) To Assembly.
    6/01/2010In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage6/01/2010Senate 3rd Reading SB1169 Lowenthal
    6/03/2010To Com. on HEALTH.
    select this voteVote6/15/2010Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    6/16/2010From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Heard in committee on June 15.)
    select this voteVote6/30/2010Do pass.
    6/30/2010From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (Heard in committee on June 30).
    7/01/2010Read second time. To third reading.
    8/02/2010Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
    8/12/2010Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
    8/16/2010From inactive file to third reading file.
    8/20/2010Read third time. Amended. (Page 6430.) To third reading.
    8/23/2010Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 6463.) Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 1. Page 6511.) To Senate.
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/23/2010SB 1169 Lowenthal Senate Third Reading By FULLER
    8/24/2010In Senate. To unfinished business.
    8/25/2010Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4858.) Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
    8/26/2010Set for hearing August 27.
    select this voteVote8/27/2010From committee: That the Assembly Amendments be concurred in.
    8/27/2010From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 4985.)
    8/30/2010Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 5004.) To enrollment.
    currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage8/30/2010Unfinished Business SB1169 Lowenthal
    9/08/2010Enrolled. To Governor at 3:30 p.m.
    9/23/2010Approved by Governor.
    9/24/2010Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 288, Statutes of 2010.

    Total contributions given to Senators from Mental health services, which…

    supported this bill

    Mental health services$0
    $0

    7 Organizations Supported and 3 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Section 17516 of the Government Code, and to Amend Sections 175, 182, 186, 1055, 1055.2, 1228.5, 1228.7, 1241, 1241.6, 1410, 1675, 1701.3, 1703.6, 13176, 13193, 13204, 13220, 13261, 13274, 13285, 13291, 13304.1, 13320, 13330, 13376, 13392, 13392.5, 13395.5, 13396.7, 13426, 13442, 13521, 13522, 13523, 13523.1, 13528, 13540, 13552.4, 13553, 13576, 13578, 13580.9, 13627, 13627.4, 13755, 13800, 13801, 13903, 13904, and 13952.1 Of, to Amend the Headings of Article 1 (Commencing with Section 13300) and Article 2 (Commencing with Section 13320) of Chapter 5 of Division 7 Of, to Amend and Renumber Section 13274 Of, to Add Section 13248 To, and to Repeal Sections 1062 and 1241.5 Of, the Water Code, Relating to Water.: Unfinished Business SB1169 Lowenthal

    7 organizations supported this bill

    American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, California Division
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    American College of Emergency Physicians
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Academy of Family Physicians
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Hospital Association
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Medical Association
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Psychiatric Association
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons of California
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.

    3 organizations opposed this bill

    America's Health Insurance Plans
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.
    California Association of Health Plans
    Assembly Committee on Health (2010, June 11). Bill Analysis SB 1169 6-11-2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010, from Leg Info.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from Mental health services interest groups, January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2010.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$0Yes
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$0$0Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0Yes
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$0$0Not Voting
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$0$0Yes
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$0$0Yes
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$0$0Yes
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$0$0Yes
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$0$0Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$0$0Yes
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$0$0Yes
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$0$0Yes
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$0Yes
    Loni HancockDCA-9$0$0Yes
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$0$0Yes
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$0Yes
    Bob HuffRCA-29$0$0Yes
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$0$0Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$0$0Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$0$0Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0Yes
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$0$0Yes
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$0$0Not Voting
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$0$0Yes
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$0$0Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$0$0Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$0$0Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$0$0Yes
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$0$0Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$0$0Yes
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$0$0Yes
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$0$0Yes
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$0$0Not Voting
    Lois WolkDCA-5$0$0Yes
    Rod WrightDCA-25$0$0Yes
    Mark WylandRCA-38$0$0Yes
    Leland YeeDCA-8$0$0Not Voting

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Sam AanestadRCA-4$48,700$40,900Yes
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$20,400$24,030Yes
    Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$21,250$23,050Yes
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$25,150$63,900Not Voting
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$9,450$9,500Yes
    Dave CogdillRCA-14$33,300$46,100Yes
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$38,400$6,600Yes
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$54,400$72,432Yes
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$29,700$12,125Yes
    Jeff DenhamRCA-12$37,600$29,250Yes
    Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$34,150$50,050Yes
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$51,825$30,182Yes
    Dean FlorezDCA-16$6,900$2,500Yes
    Loni HancockDCA-9$27,750$7,800Yes
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$45,200$73,850Yes
    Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$1,500$12,000Yes
    Bob HuffRCA-29$27,450$51,454Yes
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$11,750$13,305Yes
    Mark LenoDCA-3$45,550$13,500Yes
    Carol LiuDCA-21$15,300$13,500Yes
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$9,350$17,100Yes
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$60,650$79,781Yes
    Jenny OropezaDCA-28$17,550$3,000Not Voting
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$72,750$52,293Yes
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$23,650$9,150Yes
    Curren PriceDCA-26$15,450$18,100Yes
    Gloria RomeroDCA-24$13,500$6,100Yes
    George RunnerRCA-17$70,498$51,075Yes
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$22,075$25,650Yes
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$115,701$64,750Yes
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$70,450$81,850Yes
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$57,450$81,150Yes
    Pat WigginsDCA-2$16,100$8,000Not Voting
    Lois WolkDCA-5$41,890$21,700Yes
    Rod WrightDCA-25$40,250$30,350Yes
    Mark WylandRCA-38$33,450$36,700Yes
    Leland YeeDCA-8$75,010$62,191Not Voting

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    Physicians$547,948
    Other physician specialists$326,951
    Hospitals$282,350
    Psychiatrists & psychologists$184,250
    Mental health services$0

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Accident & health insurance$765,163
    HMOs$262,708
    Life insurance$217,097
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range