SB 1275 - An Act to Amend Section 2923.5 Of, and to Add and Repeal Sections 2923.4, 2923.7, 2923.73, 2923.75, and 2923.77 Of, the Civil Code, Relating to Mortgages.

Mortgages: foreclosures. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law, until January 1, 2013, and as applied to mortgages and deeds of trust recorded between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2007, that are secured by owner-occupied residential real property containing no more than 4 dwelling units, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to contact the borrower, as defined, prior to filing a notice of default, in order to… More
Existing law, until January 1, 2013, and as applied to mortgages and deeds of trust recorded between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2007, that are secured by owner-occupied residential real property containing no more than 4 dwelling units, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to contact the borrower, as defined, prior to filing a notice of default, in order to assess the borrower’s financial situation and explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure. Existing law requires the notice of default to include a specified declaration from the mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent regarding its contact with the borrower.

This bill would, until January 1, 2013, extend those requirements for those types of dwellings to apply to mortgages or deeds of trust recorded prior to January 1, 2009, if the loans are required to be reviewed under federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) guidelines, or between January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2009, if the loans are not required to be reviewed under HAMP guidelines. The bill would require a mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, within a specified time period prior to the filing of a notice of default, to provide the borrower with written information regarding loan modifications and a specified notice regarding the borrower’s rights during the foreclosure process, subject to specified exceptions. The bill would require an unspecified state entity to make that notice available in English and specified languages. The bill would further revise the borrower contact requirements described above by requiring a mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to make reasonable borrower solicitation efforts, as specified, to explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure. The bill would prohibit a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from filing a notice of default until the borrower has been evaluated and determined to be ineligible for a loan modification or the borrower has failed to submit an application prior to the passing of the deadline. The bill would specify minimum time periods in which the borrower may submit an application or supplemental information for a loan modification, and would require the mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, if it denies the application, to send a denial explanation letter within a specified time period. These requirements would not apply to a mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent that has no loan modification option available to the borrower or to a grandfathered party, as defined.

This bill would further require, until January 1, 2013, with respect to those properties described above, that a mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, concurrently with the filing of a notice of default, record a declaration of compliance that attests to specified facts relating to its borrower solicitation and foreclosure avoidance efforts, except as provided. The bill would authorize the borrower to bring an action within one year of the trustee sale to void the foreclosure or request an injunction if, among other things, the mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent records a notice of default without completing reasonable borrower solicitation efforts, or to recover specified damages if the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent fails to record a declaration of compliance or materially comply with specified provisions, if specified conditions exist. The bill would provide that a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent shall have no civil liability if it satisfies specified requirements prior to the initiation of legal action by the borrower. Hide
 
Status:
The bill was voted on by the Assembly on August 30, 2010. 
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance and Insurance Vote: Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.

PASSED on April 7, 2010.

voted YES: 7 voted NO: 2
3 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 2923.5 Of, and to Add and Repeal Sections 2923.4, 2923.7, 2923.73, 2923.75, and 2923.77 Of, the Civil Code, Relating to Mortgages.

SB 1275 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
Existing law, until January 1, 2013, and as applied to mortgages and deeds of trust recorded between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2007, that are secured by owner-occupied residential real property containing no more than 4 dwelling units, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to contact the borrower, as defined, prior to filing a notice of default, in order to assess the borrower’s financial situation and explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure. Existing law requires the notice of default to include a specified declaration from the mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent regarding its contact with the borrower.

This bill would, until January 1, 2013, extend those requirements for those types of dwellings to apply to mortgages or deeds of trust recorded prior to January 1, 2009, if the loans are required to be reviewed under federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) guidelines, or between January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2009, if the loans are not required to be reviewed under HAMP guidelines. The bill would require a mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, within a specified time period prior to the… More
Existing law, until January 1, 2013, and as applied to mortgages and deeds of trust recorded between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2007, that are secured by owner-occupied residential real property containing no more than 4 dwelling units, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to contact the borrower, as defined, prior to filing a notice of default, in order to assess the borrower’s financial situation and explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure. Existing law requires the notice of default to include a specified declaration from the mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent regarding its contact with the borrower.

This bill would, until January 1, 2013, extend those requirements for those types of dwellings to apply to mortgages or deeds of trust recorded prior to January 1, 2009, if the loans are required to be reviewed under federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) guidelines, or between January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2009, if the loans are not required to be reviewed under HAMP guidelines. The bill would require a mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, within a specified time period prior to the filing of a notice of default, to provide the borrower with written information regarding loan modifications and a specified notice regarding the borrower’s rights during the foreclosure process, subject to specified exceptions. The bill would require an unspecified state entity to make that notice available in English and specified languages. The bill would further revise the borrower contact requirements described above by requiring a mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to make reasonable borrower solicitation efforts, as specified, to explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure. The bill would prohibit a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from filing a notice of default until the borrower has been evaluated and determined to be ineligible for a loan modification or the borrower has failed to submit an application prior to the passing of the deadline. The bill would specify minimum time periods in which the borrower may submit an application or supplemental information for a loan modification, and would require the mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, if it denies the application, to send a denial explanation letter within a specified time period. These requirements would not apply to a mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent that has no loan modification option available to the borrower or to a grandfathered party, as defined.

This bill would further require, until January 1, 2013, with respect to those properties described above, that a mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, concurrently with the filing of a notice of default, record a declaration of compliance that attests to specified facts relating to its borrower solicitation and foreclosure avoidance efforts, except as provided. The bill would authorize the borrower to bring an action within one year of the trustee sale to void the foreclosure or request an injunction if, among other things, the mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent records a notice of default without completing reasonable borrower solicitation efforts, or to recover specified damages if the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent fails to record a declaration of compliance or materially comply with specified provisions, if specified conditions exist. The bill would provide that a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent shall have no civil liability if it satisfies specified requirements prior to the initiation of legal action by the borrower. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 2923.5 Of, and to Add and Repeal Sections 2923.4, 2923.7, 2923.73, 2923.75, and 2923.77 Of, the Civil Code, Relating to Mortgages.
Author(s)
Mark Leno, Darrell Steinberg
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Mortgages: foreclosures
Major Actions
Introduced2/19/2010
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Banking, Finance and Insurance4/07/2010
Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary4/20/2010
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/24/2010
Passed Senate Committee on Banking, Finance and Insurance6/02/2010
Passed Senate6/03/2010
Passed Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance6/21/2010
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary6/29/2010
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations8/12/2010
Passed Assembly8/30/2010
Failed passage in Assembly8/30/2010
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
currently selectedSenate Committee on Banking, Finance and InsuranceDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.4/07/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Banking, Finance and Insurance
7 voted YES 2 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/20/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
3 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/24/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
6 voted YES 4 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on Banking, Finance and InsuranceFrom Committee: Amendments returned to Senate floor for consideration.6/02/2010This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Banking, Finance and Insurance
6 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB1275 Leno6/03/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
21 voted YES 12 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Banking and FinanceDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary.6/21/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance
7 voted YES 4 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.6/29/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
7 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.8/12/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
9 voted YES 7 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 1275 Leno Motion to Reconsider By NAVA8/30/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
47 voted YES 29 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 1275 Leno Senate Third Reading By NAVA8/30/2010This bill DID NOT PASS the Assembly
30 voted YES 36 voted NO 12 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/19/2010
2/19/2010Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/20/2010From print. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
3/04/2010To Coms. on B., F. & I. and JUD.
3/05/2010Set for hearing April 7.
currently selectedVote4/07/2010Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.
4/08/2010From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
4/09/2010Set for hearing April 20.
select this voteVote4/20/2010Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/27/2010From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 3305.)
4/28/2010Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
5/07/2010Set for hearing May 17.
5/11/2010Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
5/14/2010Set for hearing May 24.
5/18/2010From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote5/24/2010Do pass.
5/25/2010From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 4. Page 3594.)
5/26/2010Read second time. To third reading.
5/27/2010Read third time. Amended. To second reading.
5/28/2010Read second time. To third reading.
6/01/2010Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B., F. & I. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 3692.) Re-referred to Com. on B., F. & I.
select this voteVote6/02/2010From Committee: Amendments returned to Senate floor for consideration.
6/02/2010From committee: That the measure be returned to the Senate Floor for consideration. (Ayes 6. Noes 5. Page 3752.) Placed on third reading.
6/03/2010Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 12. Page 3785.) To Assembly.
6/03/2010In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage6/03/2010Senate 3rd Reading SB1275 Leno
6/10/2010To Coms. on B. & F. and JUD. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
select this voteVote6/21/2010Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
6/22/2010From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Heard in committee on June 21.)
6/23/2010From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote6/29/2010Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
6/29/2010From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Heard in committee on June 29.)
8/02/2010From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/05/2010Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
select this voteVote8/12/2010Do pass as amended.
8/13/2010From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 7.) (Heard in committe August 12.)
8/16/2010Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
8/17/2010Read second time. To third reading.
8/24/2010Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 27. Noes 38. Page 6610.) Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Nava.
8/25/2010Motion to reconsider continued to August 30.
8/30/2010Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 47. Noes. 29. Page 6841.) Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 30. Noes 36. Page 6873.) From Assembly without further action.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/30/2010SB 1275 Leno Motion to Reconsider By NAVA
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/30/2010SB 1275 Leno Senate Third Reading By NAVA
scale for bar graph of contributions

Contributions

  1. January - February 2007 For $500 Against $13,700
  2. March - April 2007 For $6,000 Against $16,750
  3. May - June 2007 For $12,000 Against $62,985
  4. July - August 2007 For $1,500 Against $19,050
  5. September - October 2007 For $8,600 Against $36,828
  6. November - December 2007 For $0 Against $21,100
  7. January - February 2008 For $6,600 Against $15,950
  8. March - April 2008 For $6,750 Against $58,060
  9. May - June 2008 For $6,600 Against $38,450
  10. July - August 2008 For $10,000 Against $46,600
  11. September - October 2008 For $24,000 Against $47,920
  12. November - December 2008 For $2,000 Against $5,200
  13. January - February 2009 For $2,000 Against $5,600
  14. March - April 2009 For $500 Against $21,788
  15. May - June 2009 For $8,600 Against $38,942
  16. July - August 2009 For $2,000 Against $7,930
  17. September - October 2009 For $500 Against $8,333
  18. November - December 2009 For $0 Against $11,000
  19. January - February 2010 For $4,500 Against $13,200
  20. March - April 2010 For $6,200 Against $18,733
  21. May - June 2010 For $3,100 Against $23,500
  22. July - August 2010 For $2,000 Against $14,700
  23. September - October 2010 For $11,500 Against $49,800
  24. November - December 2010 For $0 Against $0

Votes

8 Organizations Supported and 8 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Section 2923.5 Of, and to Add and Repeal Sections 2923.4, 2923.7, 2923.73, 2923.75, and 2923.77 Of, the Civil Code, Relating to Mortgages.: Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.

8 organizations supported this motion

Amalgamated Transit Union
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Alliance for Retired Americans
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
City of Lakewood
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
Consumers Union
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
Engineers and Scientists of California, IFPTE Local 20
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
International Longshore and warehouse Union
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from California Senate.
Southern California Housing Rights Center
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.

8 organizations opposed this motion

California and Nevada Credit Union Leagues
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Bankers Association
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Chamber of Commerce
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Mortgage Association
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
Civil Justice Association of California
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
National Association of Home Builders
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.
United Trustees Association
Senate Committee on Banking, Finance & Insurance (2010, April 7). Bill Analysis SB 1275 4-7-2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010, from Leg Info.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Anything missing?

Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
How do you know they have this position? Please include a link to a newspaper article, organization's website, or other source.
We will use it only to contact you about this form. Your address will never appear on this site.

MapLight editors may add this organization after checking the sources you listed above. Thank you for helping to improve our site.

Cancel
Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2010.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

NamePartysort iconDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$23,000$25,164Yes
Alex PadillaDCA-20$19,500$78,210Yes
Carol LiuDCA-21$11,700$33,300Yes
Christine KehoeDCA-39$17,600$32,825Yes
Curren PriceDCA-26$5,700$49,368Yes
Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$2,000Yes
Lou CorreaDCA-34$23,200$105,281Not Voting
Ron CalderonDCA-30$20,600$94,760Yes
Dave CogdillRCA-14$3,150$70,350No
Dave CoxRCA-1$0$24,910Not Voting
George RunnerRCA-17$1,000$79,950No

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Ron CalderonDCA-30$20,600$94,760Yes
Dave CogdillRCA-14$3,150$70,350No
Lou CorreaDCA-34$23,200$105,281Not Voting
Dave CoxRCA-1$0$24,910Not Voting
Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$2,000Yes
Christine KehoeDCA-39$17,600$32,825Yes
Carol LiuDCA-21$11,700$33,300Yes
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$23,000$25,164Yes
Alex PadillaDCA-20$19,500$78,210Yes
Curren PriceDCA-26$5,700$49,368Yes
George RunnerRCA-17$1,000$79,950No

Interest Groups that supported this motion

$ Donated
Other unions$64,300
Transportation unions$28,600
Merchant marine & longshoremen unions$18,600
Health & welfare policy$9,300
Municipal & county government organizations$4,650
Elderly issues & Social Security$0
Manufacturing unions$0
Consumer groups$0

Interest Groups that opposed this motion

$ Donated
Commercial banks & bank holding companies$161,225
Builders associations$154,927
Real estate$115,300
Credit unions$55,150
Mortgage bankers & brokers$53,225
Chambers of commerce$38,700
Pro-business organizations$17,593
Security brokers & investment companies$0
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range