SB 40 - An Act to Repeal and Add Section 1798.89 of the Civil Code, and to Amend Section 4506 of the Family Code, Relating to Social Security Numbers.

Personal information: social security numbers. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law requires any person, entity, or government agency that is presenting a document for recording or filing with a county recorder to only list the last 4 digits of a social security number. Existing law also requires a county recorder to use due diligence to truncate social security numbers in the public record version of official records.

This bill would provide that a… More
Existing law requires any person, entity, or government agency that is presenting a document for recording or filing with a county recorder to only list the last 4 digits of a social security number. Existing law also requires a county recorder to use due diligence to truncate social security numbers in the public record version of official records.

This bill would provide that a document containing more than the last 4 digits of a social security number is not entitled for recording. This bill would also provide that a recorder shall be deemed to be in compliance if he or she uses due diligence to truncate social security numbers in documents recorded, as provided.

Existing law requires an abstract of judgment ordering a party to pay spousal, child, or family support to contain the social security number of the party who is ordered to pay.

This bill would instead require an abstract of judgment to contain only the last 4 digits of the social security number of the party who is ordered to pay.

The provisions of this bill would not apply to documents created prior to January 1, 2010. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 20, 2009.

voted YES: 78 voted NO: 0
1 voted present/not voting

An Act to Repeal and Add Section 1798.89 of the Civil Code, and to Amend Section 4506 of the Family Code, Relating to Social Security Numbers.

SB 40 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
Existing law requires any person, entity, or government agency that is presenting a document for recording or filing with a county recorder to only list the last 4 digits of a social security number. Existing law also requires a county recorder to use due diligence to truncate social security numbers in the public record version of official records.

This bill would provide that a document containing more than the last 4 digits of a social security number is not entitled for recording. This bill would also provide that a recorder shall be deemed to be in compliance if he or she uses due diligence to truncate social security numbers in documents recorded, as provided.

Existing law requires an abstract of judgment ordering a party to pay spousal, child, or family support to contain the social security number of the party who is ordered to pay.

This bill would instead require an abstract of judgment to contain only the last 4 digits of the social security number of the party who is ordered to pay.

The provisions of this bill would not apply to documents created prior to January 1, 2010.
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Repeal and Add Section 1798.89 of the Civil Code, and to Amend Section 4506 of the Family Code, Relating to Social Security Numbers.
Author(s)
Lou Correa
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Personal information: social security numbers
    Major Actions
    Introduced1/06/2009
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary3/24/2009
    Passed Senate4/20/2009
    Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary6/23/2009
    Passed Assembly8/20/2009
    Passed Senate8/31/2009
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/04/2009
    Became law (chaptered).10/11/2009
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass as amended.3/24/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
    5 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB40 Correa4/20/2009This bill PASSED the Senate
    33 voted YES 0 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, to Consent Calendar.6/23/2009This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
    10 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedAssemblySB 40 Correa Senate Third Reading By DUVALL8/20/2009This bill PASSED the Assembly
    78 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateSpecial Consent #17 SB40 Correa8/31/2009This bill PASSED the Senate
    36 voted YES 0 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced1/06/2009
    1/06/2009Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
    1/07/2009From print. May be acted upon on or after February 6.
    1/29/2009To Com. on JUD.
    3/09/2009From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
    3/16/2009Set for hearing March 24.
    select this voteVote3/24/2009Do pass as amended.
    3/26/2009From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 340.)
    3/31/2009Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
    4/20/2009Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 541.) To Assembly.
    4/20/2009In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage4/20/2009Senate 3rd Reading SB40 Correa
    5/11/2009To Com. on JUD.
    6/23/2009From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (Heard in committee on June 23.)
    select this voteVote6/23/2009Do pass, to Consent Calendar.
    6/24/2009Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
    6/25/2009From Consent Calendar to third reading.
    8/17/2009Read third time. Amended. (Page 2608.) To third reading.
    8/20/2009Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2663.) To Senate.
    currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage8/20/2009SB 40 Correa Senate Third Reading By DUVALL
    8/24/2009In Senate. To unfinished business.
    8/26/2009To Special Consent Calendar.
    8/31/2009Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2022.) To enrollment.
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/31/2009Special Consent #17 SB40 Correa
    9/04/2009Enrolled. To Governor at 3:30 p.m.
    10/11/2009Approved by Governor.
    10/11/2009Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 552, Statutes of 2009.

    MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
    You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

    0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Repeal and Add Section 1798.89 of the Civil Code, and to Amend Section 4506 of the Family Code, Relating to Social Security Numbers.: SB 40 Correa Senate Third Reading By DUVALL

    0 organizations supported this bill

    0 organizations opposed this bill

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2010.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Anthony AdamsRCA-59$0$0Yes
    Tom AmmianoDCA-13$0$0Yes
    Joel AndersonRCA-77$0$0Yes
    Juan ArambulaICA-31$0$0Yes
    Karen BassDCA-47$0$0Yes
    Jim BeallDCA-24$0$0Yes
    Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$0Yes
    Tom BerryhillRCA-25$0$0Yes
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-33$0$0Yes
    Marty BlockDCA-78$0$0Yes
    Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$0$0Yes
    Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0Yes
    Joan BuchananDCA-15$0$0Yes
    Anna CaballeroDCA-28$0$0Yes
    Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0Not Voting
    Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0Yes
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$0$0Yes
    Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$0Yes
    Paul CookRCA-65$0$0Yes
    Joe CotoDCA-23$0$0Yes
    Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0Yes
    Hector De La TorreDCA-50$0$0Yes
    Kevin De LeonDCA-45$0$0Yes
    Chuck DeVoreRCA-70$0$0Yes
    Mike DuvallRCA-72$0$0Yes
    Bill EmmersonRCA-63$0$0Yes
    Mike EngDCA-49$0$0Yes
    Noreen EvansDCA-7$0$0Yes
    Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0Yes
    Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0Yes
    Paul FongDCA-22$0$0Yes
    Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0Yes
    Jean FullerRCA-32$0$0Yes
    Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0Yes
    Ted GainesRCA-4$0$0Yes
    Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$0Yes
    Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0Yes
    Danny GilmoreRCA-30$0$0Yes
    Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$0Yes
    Isadore HallDCA-52$0$0Yes
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$0Yes
    Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0Yes
    Ed HernandezDCA-57$0$0Yes
    Jerry HillDCA-19$0$0Yes
    Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0Yes
    Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0Yes
    Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0Yes
    Dave JonesDCA-9$0$0Yes
    Steve KnightRCA-36$0$0Yes
    Paul KrekorianDCA-43$0$0Yes
    Ted LieuDCA-53$0$0Yes
    Dan LogueRCA-3$0$0Yes
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$0$0Yes
    Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0Yes
    Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0Yes
    Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$0Yes
    Bill MonningDCA-27$0$0Yes
    Pedro NavaDCA-35$0$0Yes
    Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$0Yes
    Roger NielloRCA-5$0$0Yes
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$0Yes
    John PerezDCA-46$0$0Yes
    Manuel PerezDCA-80$0$0Yes
    Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0Yes
    Ira RuskinDCA-21$0$0Yes
    Mary SalasDCA-79$0$0Yes
    Lori SaldanaDCA-76$0$0Yes
    Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0Yes
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$0$0Yes
    Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0Yes
    Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0Yes
    Audra StricklandRCA-37$0$0Yes
    Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0Yes
    Tom TorlaksonDCA-11$0$0Yes
    Norma TorresDCA-61$0$0Yes
    Alberto TorricoDCA-20$0$0Yes
    Van TranRCA-68$0$0Yes
    Mike VillinesRCA-29$0$0Yes
    Mariko YamadaDCA-8$0$0Yes

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range