SB 657 - An Act to Add Section 1714.43 to the Civil Code, and to Add Section 19547.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Human Trafficking.

Human trafficking. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
The federal Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 establishes an Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking, as specified.

Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime. Existing state law also allows a victim of human trafficking to bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any… More
The federal Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 establishes an Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking, as specified.

Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime. Existing state law also allows a victim of human trafficking to bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any combination of those, or any other appropriate relief.

Existing law generally regulates various business activities and practices, including those of retail sellers and manufacturers of products.

This bill would enact the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010, and would, beginning January 1, 2012, require retail sellers and manufacturers doing business in the state to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct supply chains for tangible goods offered for sale, as specified. That provision would not apply to a retail seller or manufacturer having less than $100,000,000 in annual worldwide gross receipts. The bill would also make a specified statement of legislative intent regarding slavery and human trafficking. The bill would also require the Franchise Tax Board to make available to the Attorney General a list of retail sellers and manufacturers required to disclose efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking pursuant to that provision, as specified. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 26, 2010.

voted YES: 44 voted NO: 24
10 voted present/not voting

An Act to Add Section 1714.43 to the Civil Code, and to Add Section 19547.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Human Trafficking.

SB 657 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
The federal Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 establishes an Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking, as specified.

Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime. Existing state law also allows a victim of human trafficking to bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any combination of those, or any other appropriate relief.

Existing law generally regulates various business activities and practices, including those of retail sellers and manufacturers of products.

This bill would enact the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010, and would, beginning January 1, 2012, require retail sellers and manufacturers doing business in the state to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct supply chains for tangible goods offered for sale, as specified. That provision would not apply to a retail seller or manufacturer having less than $100,000,000 in annual worldwide gross receipts. The bill would also make a specified statement of legislative intent regarding slavery and human trafficking. The bill… More
The federal Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 establishes an Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking, as specified.

Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime. Existing state law also allows a victim of human trafficking to bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any combination of those, or any other appropriate relief.

Existing law generally regulates various business activities and practices, including those of retail sellers and manufacturers of products.

This bill would enact the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010, and would, beginning January 1, 2012, require retail sellers and manufacturers doing business in the state to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct supply chains for tangible goods offered for sale, as specified. That provision would not apply to a retail seller or manufacturer having less than $100,000,000 in annual worldwide gross receipts. The bill would also make a specified statement of legislative intent regarding slavery and human trafficking. The bill would also require the Franchise Tax Board to make available to the Attorney General a list of retail sellers and manufacturers required to disclose efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking pursuant to that provision, as specified. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add Section 1714.43 to the Civil Code, and to Add Section 19547.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Human Trafficking.
Author(s)
Darrell Steinberg
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Human trafficking
Major Actions
Introduced2/27/2009
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary4/21/2009
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/04/2009
Passed Senate1/28/2010
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary6/29/2010
Passed Assembly8/26/2010
Passed Senate8/30/2010
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/03/2010
Became law (chaptered).9/30/2010
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/21/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
3 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.5/04/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateSENATE 3RD READING SB657 STEINBERG1/28/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
24 voted YES 13 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass as amended.6/29/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
7 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblySB 657 Steinberg Senate Third Reading By FEUER8/26/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
44 voted YES 24 voted NO 10 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateUnfinished Business SB657 Steinberg8/30/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
22 voted YES 14 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/27/2009
2/27/2009Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/28/2009From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
3/02/2009Read first time.
3/19/2009To Com. on JUD.
4/03/2009Set for hearing April 21.
select this voteVote4/21/2009Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/21/2009From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 586.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
4/24/2009Set for hearing May 4.
select this voteVote5/04/2009Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
5/04/2009Placed on APPR suspense file.
5/22/2009Set for hearing May 28. (Suspense - for vote only.)
5/28/2009Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
6/01/2009From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
1/04/2010Withdrawn from committee. Placed on second reading file.
1/05/2010Read second time. To third reading.
1/28/2010Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 2726.) To Assembly.
1/28/2010In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage1/28/2010SENATE 3RD READING SB657 STEINBERG
2/18/2010To Com. on JUD.
6/23/2010From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
6/29/2010From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (Heard in committee on June 29.)
select this voteVote6/29/2010Do pass as amended.
6/30/2010Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
7/01/2010Read second time. To third reading.
8/20/2010Read third time. Amended. (Page 6423.) To third reading.
8/23/2010Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6491.)
8/26/2010Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 44. Noes 24. Page 6755.) To Senate.
8/26/2010In Senate. To unfinished business.
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage8/26/2010SB 657 Steinberg Senate Third Reading By FEUER
8/30/2010Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 5004.) To enrollment.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/30/2010Unfinished Business SB657 Steinberg
9/03/2010Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.
9/30/2010Approved by Governor.
9/30/2010Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 556, Statutes of 2010.

Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

$0
$183,388
$190,115
$0
$373,503
12% more
$68,775
$190,313
$118,223
$41,188
$0
$418,500
4 Organizations Supported and 5 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Add Section 1714.43 to the Civil Code, and to Add Section 19547.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Human Trafficking.: SB 657 Steinberg Senate Third Reading By FEUER

4 organizations supported this bill

California Labor Federation
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 26). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-26-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 26). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-26-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
Consumer Federation of California
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 26). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-26-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 26). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-26-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.

5 organizations opposed this bill

California Chamber of Commerce
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 26). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-26-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Grocers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 26). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-26-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 26). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-26-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Retailers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 26). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-26-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
TechAmerica
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 26). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-26-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2010.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Anthony AdamsRCA-59$0$0No
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$5,250$100Yes
Joel AndersonRCA-77$2,500$5,500No
Juan ArambulaICA-31$0$0Yes
Karen BassDCA-47$5,000$3,000Yes
Jim BeallDCA-24$4,750$0Yes
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$21,600No
Tom BerryhillRCA-25$0$15,700No
Marty BlockDCA-78$4,900$0Yes
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$2,000$3,000Yes
Steven BradfordDCA-51$1,500$5,500Yes
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$5,500$5,000Yes
Joan BuchananDCA-15$9,100$0Not Voting
Anna CaballeroDCA-28$16,200$0Not Voting
Charles CalderonDCA-58$500$9,400Not Voting
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$2,500$0Yes
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$2,000$3,000Yes
Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$1,000No
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0No
Joe CotoDCA-23$0$0Yes
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$1,000Not Voting
Hector De La TorreDCA-50$1,000$11,100Yes
Kevin De LeonDCA-45$5,500$7,000Yes
Chuck DeVoreRCA-70$0$0No
Mike EngDCA-49$5,050$1,200Yes
Noreen EvansDCA-7$8,000$1,000Yes
Mike FeuerDCA-42$2,500$0Yes
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$24,123Not Voting
Paul FongDCA-22$8,600$1,000Yes
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$500$15,800Yes
Jean FullerRCA-32$0$4,000No
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$13,650$500Yes
Ted GainesRCA-4$0$4,500No
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$12,025Yes
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$26,823No
Mike GattoDCA-43$3,900$3,000Yes
Danny GilmoreRCA-30$0$0Not Voting
Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$8,900No
Isadore HallDCA-52$4,000$10,413Yes
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$4,000No
Mary HayashiDCA-18$4,000$11,900Yes
Ed HernandezDCA-57$10,800$10,200Yes
Jerry HillDCA-19$6,900$2,000Yes
Alyson HuberDCA-10$2,815$2,500Not Voting
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$13,300$0Yes
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$500No
Dave JonesDCA-9$58,000$8,390Yes
Steve KnightRCA-36$0$4,000No
Ted LieuDCA-53$1,500$5,546Yes
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$6,000No
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$5,400$0Yes
Fiona MaDCA-12$2,900$14,800Yes
Tony MendozaDCA-56$6,500$1,000Yes
Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$5,500No
Bill MonningDCA-27$6,600$1,500Yes
Pedro NavaDCA-35$100$5,367Yes
Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$500No
Roger NielloRCA-5$0$5,000No
Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$8,000No
Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$1,500No
John PerezDCA-46$14,700$26,113Yes
Manuel PerezDCA-80$18,700$8,800Not Voting
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$7,500$5,300Yes
Ira RuskinDCA-21$0$0Yes
Mary SalasDCA-79$11,538$0Yes
Lori SaldanaDCA-76$0$0Yes
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$2,000No
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$10,500$13,800Yes
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$15,900No
Jose SolorioDCA-69$7,900$3,500Yes
Audra StricklandRCA-37$0$0No
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$25,600$3,500Yes
Tom TorlaksonDCA-11$34,350$3,750Yes
Norma TorresDCA-61$4,500$0Not Voting
Alberto TorricoDCA-20$2,000$600Yes
Van TranRCA-68$0$0Not Voting
Mike VillinesRCA-29$0$31,850No
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$3,000$0Yes

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Anthony AdamsRCA-59$0$0No
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$5,250$100Yes
Joel AndersonRCA-77$2,500$5,500No
Juan ArambulaICA-31$0$0Yes
Karen BassDCA-47$5,000$3,000Yes
Jim BeallDCA-24$4,750$0Yes
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$21,600No
Tom BerryhillRCA-25$0$15,700No
Marty BlockDCA-78$4,900$0Yes
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$2,000$3,000Yes
Steven BradfordDCA-51$1,500$5,500Yes
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$5,500$5,000Yes
Joan BuchananDCA-15$9,100$0Not Voting
Anna CaballeroDCA-28$16,200$0Not Voting
Charles CalderonDCA-58$500$9,400Not Voting
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$2,500$0Yes
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$2,000$3,000Yes
Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$1,000No
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0No
Joe CotoDCA-23$0$0Yes
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$1,000Not Voting
Hector De La TorreDCA-50$1,000$11,100Yes
Kevin De LeonDCA-45$5,500$7,000Yes
Chuck DeVoreRCA-70$0$0No
Mike EngDCA-49$5,050$1,200Yes
Noreen EvansDCA-7$8,000$1,000Yes
Mike FeuerDCA-42$2,500$0Yes
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$24,123Not Voting
Paul FongDCA-22$8,600$1,000Yes
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$500$15,800Yes
Jean FullerRCA-32$0$4,000No
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$13,650$500Yes
Ted GainesRCA-4$0$4,500No
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$12,025Yes
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$26,823No
Mike GattoDCA-43$3,900$3,000Yes
Danny GilmoreRCA-30$0$0Not Voting
Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$8,900No
Isadore HallDCA-52$4,000$10,413Yes
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$4,000No
Mary HayashiDCA-18$4,000$11,900Yes
Ed HernandezDCA-57$10,800$10,200Yes
Jerry HillDCA-19$6,900$2,000Yes
Alyson HuberDCA-10$2,815$2,500Not Voting
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$13,300$0Yes
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$500No
Dave JonesDCA-9$58,000$8,390Yes
Steve KnightRCA-36$0$4,000No
Ted LieuDCA-53$1,500$5,546Yes
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$6,000No
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$5,400$0Yes
Fiona MaDCA-12$2,900$14,800Yes
Tony MendozaDCA-56$6,500$1,000Yes
Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$5,500No
Bill MonningDCA-27$6,600$1,500Yes
Pedro NavaDCA-35$100$5,367Yes
Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$500No
Roger NielloRCA-5$0$5,000No
Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$8,000No
Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$1,500No
John PerezDCA-46$14,700$26,113Yes
Manuel PerezDCA-80$18,700$8,800Not Voting
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$7,500$5,300Yes
Ira RuskinDCA-21$0$0Yes
Mary SalasDCA-79$11,538$0Yes
Lori SaldanaDCA-76$0$0Yes
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$2,000No
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$10,500$13,800Yes
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$15,900No
Jose SolorioDCA-69$7,900$3,500Yes
Audra StricklandRCA-37$0$0No
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$25,600$3,500Yes
Tom TorlaksonDCA-11$34,350$3,750Yes
Norma TorresDCA-61$4,500$0Not Voting
Alberto TorricoDCA-20$2,000$600Yes
Van TranRCA-68$0$0Not Voting
Mike VillinesRCA-29$0$31,850No
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$3,000$0Yes

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Labor unions$190,115
Teamsters unions$183,388
Consumer groups$0
Human rights$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Food stores$190,313
Manufacturing$118,223
Chambers of commerce$68,775
Retail trade$41,188
General business associations$0
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range