SB 657 - An Act to Add Section 1714.43 to the Civil Code, and to Add Section 19547.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Human Trafficking.

Human trafficking. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
The federal Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 establishes an Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking, as specified.

Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime. Existing state law also allows a victim of human trafficking to bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any… More
The federal Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 establishes an Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking, as specified.

Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime. Existing state law also allows a victim of human trafficking to bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any combination of those, or any other appropriate relief.

Existing law generally regulates various business activities and practices, including those of retail sellers and manufacturers of products.

This bill would enact the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010, and would, beginning January 1, 2012, require retail sellers and manufacturers doing business in the state to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct supply chains for tangible goods offered for sale, as specified. That provision would not apply to a retail seller or manufacturer having less than $100,000,000 in annual worldwide gross receipts. The bill would also make a specified statement of legislative intent regarding slavery and human trafficking. The bill would also require the Franchise Tax Board to make available to the Attorney General a list of retail sellers and manufacturers required to disclose efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking pursuant to that provision, as specified. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 30, 2010.

voted YES: 22 voted NO: 14
3 voted present/not voting

An Act to Add Section 1714.43 to the Civil Code, and to Add Section 19547.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Human Trafficking.

SB 657 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
The federal Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 establishes an Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking, as specified.

Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime. Existing state law also allows a victim of human trafficking to bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any combination of those, or any other appropriate relief.

Existing law generally regulates various business activities and practices, including those of retail sellers and manufacturers of products.

This bill would enact the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010, and would, beginning January 1, 2012, require retail sellers and manufacturers doing business in the state to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct supply chains for tangible goods offered for sale, as specified. That provision would not apply to a retail seller or manufacturer having less than $100,000,000 in annual worldwide gross receipts. The bill would also make a specified statement of legislative intent regarding slavery and human trafficking. The bill… More
The federal Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 establishes an Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking, as specified.

Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime. Existing state law also allows a victim of human trafficking to bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, any combination of those, or any other appropriate relief.

Existing law generally regulates various business activities and practices, including those of retail sellers and manufacturers of products.

This bill would enact the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010, and would, beginning January 1, 2012, require retail sellers and manufacturers doing business in the state to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct supply chains for tangible goods offered for sale, as specified. That provision would not apply to a retail seller or manufacturer having less than $100,000,000 in annual worldwide gross receipts. The bill would also make a specified statement of legislative intent regarding slavery and human trafficking. The bill would also require the Franchise Tax Board to make available to the Attorney General a list of retail sellers and manufacturers required to disclose efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking pursuant to that provision, as specified. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add Section 1714.43 to the Civil Code, and to Add Section 19547.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Human Trafficking.
Author(s)
Darrell Steinberg
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Human trafficking
Major Actions
Introduced2/27/2009
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary4/21/2009
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/04/2009
Passed Senate1/28/2010
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary6/29/2010
Passed Assembly8/26/2010
Passed Senate8/30/2010
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/03/2010
Became law (chaptered).9/30/2010
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/21/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
3 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.5/04/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateSENATE 3RD READING SB657 STEINBERG1/28/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
24 voted YES 13 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass as amended.6/29/2010This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
7 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 657 Steinberg Senate Third Reading By FEUER8/26/2010This bill PASSED the Assembly
44 voted YES 24 voted NO 10 voted present/not voting
currently selectedSenateUnfinished Business SB657 Steinberg8/30/2010This bill PASSED the Senate
22 voted YES 14 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/27/2009
2/27/2009Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/28/2009From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
3/02/2009Read first time.
3/19/2009To Com. on JUD.
4/03/2009Set for hearing April 21.
select this voteVote4/21/2009Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/21/2009From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 586.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
4/24/2009Set for hearing May 4.
select this voteVote5/04/2009Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
5/04/2009Placed on APPR suspense file.
5/22/2009Set for hearing May 28. (Suspense - for vote only.)
5/28/2009Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
6/01/2009From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
1/04/2010Withdrawn from committee. Placed on second reading file.
1/05/2010Read second time. To third reading.
1/28/2010Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 2726.) To Assembly.
1/28/2010In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage1/28/2010SENATE 3RD READING SB657 STEINBERG
2/18/2010To Com. on JUD.
6/23/2010From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
6/29/2010From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (Heard in committee on June 29.)
select this voteVote6/29/2010Do pass as amended.
6/30/2010Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
7/01/2010Read second time. To third reading.
8/20/2010Read third time. Amended. (Page 6423.) To third reading.
8/23/2010Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6491.)
8/26/2010Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 44. Noes 24. Page 6755.) To Senate.
8/26/2010In Senate. To unfinished business.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/26/2010SB 657 Steinberg Senate Third Reading By FEUER
8/30/2010Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 5004.) To enrollment.
currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage8/30/2010Unfinished Business SB657 Steinberg
9/03/2010Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.
9/30/2010Approved by Governor.
9/30/2010Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 556, Statutes of 2010.

Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

$0
$112,730
$112,100
$0
$224,830
80% more
$101,555
$150,500
$124,531
$28,327
$0
$404,913
4 Organizations Supported and 5 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Add Section 1714.43 to the Civil Code, and to Add Section 19547.5 to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Human Trafficking.: Unfinished Business SB657 Steinberg

4 organizations supported this bill

Alliance to Stop Slavery and End Trafficking
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 27). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-27-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Labor Federation
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 27). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-27-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
Consumer Federation of California
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 27). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-27-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 27). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-27-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.

5 organizations opposed this bill

California Chamber of Commerce
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 27). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-27-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Grocers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 27). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-27-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 27). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-27-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
California Retailers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 27). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-27-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.
TechAmerica
Senate Rules Committee (2010, August 27). Bill Analysis SB 657 8-27-2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from Leg Info.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2010.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$6,750No
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$5,350$1,000Yes
Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0No
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$5,500No
Ron CalderonDCA-30$2,750$26,948Not Voting
Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$10,500$3,500Yes
Dave CogdillRCA-14$0$24,618No
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$20,700$3,500Yes
Lou CorreaDCA-34$3,500$33,035Yes
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$43,180$12,800Yes
Jeff DenhamRCA-12$0$4,500No
Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
Bob DuttonRCA-31$0$8,150No
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$0$9,400No
Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$0Yes
Loni HancockDCA-9$18,800$5,100Yes
Tom HarmanRCA-35$0$12,700No
Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$1,000No
Bob HuffRCA-29$0$10,805No
Christine KehoeDCA-39$10,200$3,000Yes
Mark LenoDCA-3$20,400$0Yes
Carol LiuDCA-21$3,000$1,500Yes
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$6,500$3,500Yes
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$9,000$15,970Yes
Jenny OropezaDCA-28$3,000$1,250Not Voting
Alex PadillaDCA-20$8,500$26,563Yes
Fran PavleyDCA-23$1,000$3,600Yes
Curren PriceDCA-26$5,000$7,000Yes
Gloria RomeroDCA-24$2,500$1,250Yes
George RunnerRCA-17$0$21,500No
Joe SimitianDCA-11$3,500$1,000Yes
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$13,400$19,950Yes
Tony StricklandRCA-19$0$43,900No
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$0$39,200No
Pat WigginsDCA-2$1,500$1,000Not Voting
Lois WolkDCA-5$21,250$1,000Yes
Rod WrightDCA-25$2,300$20,574Yes
Mark WylandRCA-38$0$5,500No
Leland YeeDCA-8$9,000$18,350Yes

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$6,750No
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$5,350$1,000Yes
Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0No
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$5,500No
Ron CalderonDCA-30$2,750$26,948Not Voting
Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$10,500$3,500Yes
Dave CogdillRCA-14$0$24,618No
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$20,700$3,500Yes
Lou CorreaDCA-34$3,500$33,035Yes
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$43,180$12,800Yes
Jeff DenhamRCA-12$0$4,500No
Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
Bob DuttonRCA-31$0$8,150No
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$0$9,400No
Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$0Yes
Loni HancockDCA-9$18,800$5,100Yes
Tom HarmanRCA-35$0$12,700No
Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$0$1,000No
Bob HuffRCA-29$0$10,805No
Christine KehoeDCA-39$10,200$3,000Yes
Mark LenoDCA-3$20,400$0Yes
Carol LiuDCA-21$3,000$1,500Yes
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$6,500$3,500Yes
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$9,000$15,970Yes
Jenny OropezaDCA-28$3,000$1,250Not Voting
Alex PadillaDCA-20$8,500$26,563Yes
Fran PavleyDCA-23$1,000$3,600Yes
Curren PriceDCA-26$5,000$7,000Yes
Gloria RomeroDCA-24$2,500$1,250Yes
George RunnerRCA-17$0$21,500No
Joe SimitianDCA-11$3,500$1,000Yes
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$13,400$19,950Yes
Tony StricklandRCA-19$0$43,900No
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$0$39,200No
Pat WigginsDCA-2$1,500$1,000Not Voting
Lois WolkDCA-5$21,250$1,000Yes
Rod WrightDCA-25$2,300$20,574Yes
Mark WylandRCA-38$0$5,500No
Leland YeeDCA-8$9,000$18,350Yes

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Teamsters unions$112,730
Labor unions$112,100
Consumer groups$0
Human rights$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Food stores$150,500
Manufacturing$124,531
Chambers of commerce$101,555
Retail trade$28,327
General business associations$0
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range