SB 695 - An Act to Amend Sections 327, 382, 739.1, and 747 Of, and to Add Sections 365.1, 739.9, 745, and 748 To, the Public Utilities Code, and to Amend Section 80110 of the Water Code, Relating to Energy, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.

Energy: rates. 2009-2010 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable.

This bill would prohibit the commission from requiring or… More
(1)Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable.

This bill would prohibit the commission from requiring or permitting an electrical corporation to do any of the following: (A) employ mandatory or default time-variant pricing, as defined, with or without bill protection, as defined, for residential customers prior to January 1, 2013, (B) employ mandatory or default time-variant pricing, without bill protection, for residential customers prior to January 1, 2014, or (C) employ mandatory or default real-time pricing, without bill protection, for residential customers prior to January 1, 2020. The bill would authorize the commission to authorize an electrical corporation to offer residential customers the option of receiving service pursuant to time-variant pricing and to participate in other demand response programs. The bill would require the commission to only approve an electrical corporation’s use of default time-variant pricing for residential customers, beginning January 1, 2014, if those residential customers have the option to not receive service pursuant to time-variant pricing and incur no additional charges, as specified, as a result of the exercise of that option. The bill would exempt certain customers from being subject to default time-variant pricing.

(2)Existing law requires the commission to establish a program of assistance to low-income electric and gas customers, referred to as the California Alternate Rates for Energy or CARE program, and prohibits the cost to be borne solely by any single class of customer.

This bill would require the commission to establish the CARE program to provide assistance to low-income electric and gas customers with annual household incomes that are no greater than 200% of the federal poverty guideline levels, and require that the cost of the program, with respect to electrical corporations, be recovered on an equal cents-per-kilowatthour basis from all classes of customers that were subject to the surcharge that funded the CARE program on January 1, 2008. For a public utility that is both an electrical corporation and a gas corporation, the bill would require that the cost of the program be recovered on an equal cents-per-kilowatthour or per-therm basis from all classes of customers that were subject to the surcharge that funded the CARE program on January 1, 2008.

(3)Existing law relative to electrical restructuring requires that the electrical corporations and gas corporations that participate in the CARE program administer low-income energy efficiency and rate assistance programs described in specified statutes, and undertake certain actions in administering specified energy efficiency and weatherization programs.

This bill would require that electrical corporations, in administering the specified energy efficiency and weatherization programs, target energy efficiency and solar programs to upper-tier and multifamily customers in a manner that will result in long-term permanent reductions in electricity usage at the dwelling units and develop programs that specifically target nonprofit affordable housing providers, including programs that promote weatherization of existing dwelling units and replacement of inefficient appliances. The bill would require the commission, by not later than December 31, 2020, to ensure that all eligible low-income electricity and gas customers are given the opportunity to participate in low-income energy efficiency programs, including customers occupying apartment houses or similar multiunit residential structures, and would require the commission and electrical corporations and gas corporations to expend all reasonable efforts to coordinate ratepayer-funded programs with other energy conservation and efficiency programs and to obtain additional federal funding to support actions undertaken pursuant to this requirement.

(4)Existing law relative to electrical restructuring requires the commission to authorize and facilitate direct transactions between electricity suppliers and retail end-use customers.

Existing law requires the commission to designate a baseline quantity of electricity and gas necessary for a significant portion of the reasonable energy needs of the average residential customer, and requires that electrical and gas corporations file rates and charges, to be approved by the commission, providing baseline rates and requires the commission, in establishing baseline rates, to avoid excessive rate increases for residential customers.

Existing law, enacted during the energy crisis of 2000–01, authorized the Department of Water Resources, until January 1, 2003, to enter into contracts for the purchase of electricity, and to sell electricity to retail end-use customers and, with specified exceptions, local publicly owned electric utilities, at not more than the department’s acquisition costs and to recover those costs through the issuance of bonds to be repaid by ratepayers. That law provides that the department is entitled to recover certain expenses resulting from its purchases and sales of electricity and authorizes the commission to enter into an agreement with the department relative to cost recovery. That law prohibits the commission from increasing the electricity charges in effect on February 1, 2001, for residential customers for existing baseline quantities or usage by those customers of up to 130% of then existing baseline quantities, until the department has recovered the costs of electricity it procured for electrical corporation retail end-use customers. That law also suspends the right of retail end-use customers, other than community choice aggregators and a qualifying direct transaction customer, to acquire service through a direct transaction until the Department of Water Resources no longer supplies electricity under that law.

This bill would delete the prohibition that the commission not increase the electricity charges in effect on February 1, 2001, for residential customers for existing baseline quantities or usage by those customers of up to 130% of then existing baseline quantities. The bill would authorize the commission to increase the rates charged residential customers for electricity usage up to 130% of the baseline quantities by the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index from the prior year plus 1%, but not less than 3% and not more than 5% per year. This authorization would be subject to the limitation that rates charged residential customers for electricity usage up to the baseline quantities, including any customer charge revenues, not exceed 90% of the system average rate, as defined. The bill would authorize the commission to increase the rates for participants in the CARE program, subject to certain limitations. The bill would delete the existing suspension of direct transactions in the Water Code that was adopted during the energy crisis of 2000–01, and would instead require the commission to authorize direct transactions subject to a reopening schedule that commences immediately and will phase in over a period of not less than 3 years and not more than 5 years, and subject to an annual maximum allowable total kilowatthour limit established, as specified, for each electrical corporation. The bill would continue the suspension of direct transactions except as expressly authorized, until the Legislature, by statute, repeals the suspension or otherwise authorizes direct transactions.

(5)Existing law requires the commission to prepare and submit to the Governor and the Legislature a written report on an annual basis before February 1 of each year on the costs of programs and activities conducted by an electrical corporation or gas corporation that has more than a specified number of customers in California.

This bill would change the reporting date to April 1 of each year. The bill would require that by May 1, 2010, and by May 1 of each year thereafter, the commission also report to the Governor and Legislature with its recommendations for actions that can be undertaken during the upcoming year to limit utility cost and rate increases, consistent with the state’s energy and environmental goals, including the state’s goals for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. The bill would require the commission to annually require electrical and gas corporations to study and report to the commission on measures that they recommend be undertaken to limit costs and rate increases.

(6)Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.

Because certain of the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime.

(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

(8)This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on June 1, 2009.

voted YES: 37 voted NO: 0
2 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 327, 382, 739.1, and 747 Of, and to Add Sections 365.1, 739.9, 745, and 748 To, the Public Utilities Code, and to Amend Section 80110 of the Water Code, Relating to Energy, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.

SB 695 — 2009-2010 Legislature

Summary
(1)Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable.

This bill would prohibit the commission from requiring or permitting an electrical corporation to do any of the following: (A) employ mandatory or default time-variant pricing, as defined, with or without bill protection, as defined, for residential customers prior to January 1, 2013, (B) employ mandatory or default time-variant pricing, without bill protection, for residential customers prior to January 1, 2014, or (C) employ mandatory or default real-time pricing, without bill protection, for residential customers prior to January 1, 2020. The bill would authorize the commission to authorize an electrical corporation to offer residential customers the option of receiving service pursuant to time-variant pricing and to participate in other demand response programs. The bill would require the commission to only approve an electrical… More
(1)Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable.

This bill would prohibit the commission from requiring or permitting an electrical corporation to do any of the following: (A) employ mandatory or default time-variant pricing, as defined, with or without bill protection, as defined, for residential customers prior to January 1, 2013, (B) employ mandatory or default time-variant pricing, without bill protection, for residential customers prior to January 1, 2014, or (C) employ mandatory or default real-time pricing, without bill protection, for residential customers prior to January 1, 2020. The bill would authorize the commission to authorize an electrical corporation to offer residential customers the option of receiving service pursuant to time-variant pricing and to participate in other demand response programs. The bill would require the commission to only approve an electrical corporation’s use of default time-variant pricing for residential customers, beginning January 1, 2014, if those residential customers have the option to not receive service pursuant to time-variant pricing and incur no additional charges, as specified, as a result of the exercise of that option. The bill would exempt certain customers from being subject to default time-variant pricing.

(2)Existing law requires the commission to establish a program of assistance to low-income electric and gas customers, referred to as the California Alternate Rates for Energy or CARE program, and prohibits the cost to be borne solely by any single class of customer.

This bill would require the commission to establish the CARE program to provide assistance to low-income electric and gas customers with annual household incomes that are no greater than 200% of the federal poverty guideline levels, and require that the cost of the program, with respect to electrical corporations, be recovered on an equal cents-per-kilowatthour basis from all classes of customers that were subject to the surcharge that funded the CARE program on January 1, 2008. For a public utility that is both an electrical corporation and a gas corporation, the bill would require that the cost of the program be recovered on an equal cents-per-kilowatthour or per-therm basis from all classes of customers that were subject to the surcharge that funded the CARE program on January 1, 2008.

(3)Existing law relative to electrical restructuring requires that the electrical corporations and gas corporations that participate in the CARE program administer low-income energy efficiency and rate assistance programs described in specified statutes, and undertake certain actions in administering specified energy efficiency and weatherization programs.

This bill would require that electrical corporations, in administering the specified energy efficiency and weatherization programs, target energy efficiency and solar programs to upper-tier and multifamily customers in a manner that will result in long-term permanent reductions in electricity usage at the dwelling units and develop programs that specifically target nonprofit affordable housing providers, including programs that promote weatherization of existing dwelling units and replacement of inefficient appliances. The bill would require the commission, by not later than December 31, 2020, to ensure that all eligible low-income electricity and gas customers are given the opportunity to participate in low-income energy efficiency programs, including customers occupying apartment houses or similar multiunit residential structures, and would require the commission and electrical corporations and gas corporations to expend all reasonable efforts to coordinate ratepayer-funded programs with other energy conservation and efficiency programs and to obtain additional federal funding to support actions undertaken pursuant to this requirement.

(4)Existing law relative to electrical restructuring requires the commission to authorize and facilitate direct transactions between electricity suppliers and retail end-use customers.

Existing law requires the commission to designate a baseline quantity of electricity and gas necessary for a significant portion of the reasonable energy needs of the average residential customer, and requires that electrical and gas corporations file rates and charges, to be approved by the commission, providing baseline rates and requires the commission, in establishing baseline rates, to avoid excessive rate increases for residential customers.

Existing law, enacted during the energy crisis of 2000–01, authorized the Department of Water Resources, until January 1, 2003, to enter into contracts for the purchase of electricity, and to sell electricity to retail end-use customers and, with specified exceptions, local publicly owned electric utilities, at not more than the department’s acquisition costs and to recover those costs through the issuance of bonds to be repaid by ratepayers. That law provides that the department is entitled to recover certain expenses resulting from its purchases and sales of electricity and authorizes the commission to enter into an agreement with the department relative to cost recovery. That law prohibits the commission from increasing the electricity charges in effect on February 1, 2001, for residential customers for existing baseline quantities or usage by those customers of up to 130% of then existing baseline quantities, until the department has recovered the costs of electricity it procured for electrical corporation retail end-use customers. That law also suspends the right of retail end-use customers, other than community choice aggregators and a qualifying direct transaction customer, to acquire service through a direct transaction until the Department of Water Resources no longer supplies electricity under that law.

This bill would delete the prohibition that the commission not increase the electricity charges in effect on February 1, 2001, for residential customers for existing baseline quantities or usage by those customers of up to 130% of then existing baseline quantities. The bill would authorize the commission to increase the rates charged residential customers for electricity usage up to 130% of the baseline quantities by the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index from the prior year plus 1%, but not less than 3% and not more than 5% per year. This authorization would be subject to the limitation that rates charged residential customers for electricity usage up to the baseline quantities, including any customer charge revenues, not exceed 90% of the system average rate, as defined. The bill would authorize the commission to increase the rates for participants in the CARE program, subject to certain limitations. The bill would delete the existing suspension of direct transactions in the Water Code that was adopted during the energy crisis of 2000–01, and would instead require the commission to authorize direct transactions subject to a reopening schedule that commences immediately and will phase in over a period of not less than 3 years and not more than 5 years, and subject to an annual maximum allowable total kilowatthour limit established, as specified, for each electrical corporation. The bill would continue the suspension of direct transactions except as expressly authorized, until the Legislature, by statute, repeals the suspension or otherwise authorizes direct transactions.

(5)Existing law requires the commission to prepare and submit to the Governor and the Legislature a written report on an annual basis before February 1 of each year on the costs of programs and activities conducted by an electrical corporation or gas corporation that has more than a specified number of customers in California.

This bill would change the reporting date to April 1 of each year. The bill would require that by May 1, 2010, and by May 1 of each year thereafter, the commission also report to the Governor and Legislature with its recommendations for actions that can be undertaken during the upcoming year to limit utility cost and rate increases, consistent with the state’s energy and environmental goals, including the state’s goals for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. The bill would require the commission to annually require electrical and gas corporations to study and report to the commission on measures that they recommend be undertaken to limit costs and rate increases.

(6)Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.

Because certain of the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime.

(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

(8)This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 327, 382, 739.1, and 747 Of, and to Add Sections 365.1, 739.9, 745, and 748 To, the Public Utilities Code, and to Amend Section 80110 of the Water Code, Relating to Energy, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.
Author(s)
Christine Kehoe
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Energy: rates
Major Actions
Introduced2/27/2009
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications4/21/2009
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/18/2009
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/28/2009
Passed Senate6/01/2009
Passed Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce6/29/2009
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations8/19/2009
Passed Assembly9/01/2009
Passed Senate9/08/2009
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/25/2009
Became law (chaptered).10/11/2009
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on Energy, Utilities and CommunicationsDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/21/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Communications
11 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.5/18/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
13 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/28/2009This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
currently selectedSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB695 Kehoe Urgency Clause6/01/2009This bill PASSED the Senate
37 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Utilities and CommerceDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.6/29/2009This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Utilities and Commerce
14 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/19/2009This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
16 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 695 Kehoe Third Reading Urgency By FUENTES9/01/2009This bill PASSED the Assembly
76 voted YES 1 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateUnfinished Business SB695 Kehoe9/08/2009This bill PASSED the Senate
39 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/27/2009
2/27/2009Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/28/2009From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
3/02/2009Read first time.
3/19/2009To Com. on E., U. & C.
3/25/2009Set for hearing April 21.
4/13/2009From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
select this voteVote4/21/2009Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/28/2009From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 584.)
4/29/2009Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
5/08/2009Set for hearing May 18.
select this voteVote5/18/2009Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
5/18/2009Placed on APPR suspense file.
5/22/2009Set for hearing May 28. (Suspense - for vote only.)
select this voteVote5/28/2009Do pass as amended.
5/28/2009From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 1074.) Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
6/01/2009Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1103.) To Assembly.
6/01/2009In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage6/01/2009Senate 3rd Reading SB695 Kehoe Urgency Clause
6/15/2009To Com. on U. & C.
6/22/2009Set, first hearing. Further hearing to be set.
6/24/2009From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C. (Corrected June 29.)
select this voteVote6/29/2009Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
6/30/2009From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Heard in committee on June 29.)
8/17/2009From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote8/19/2009Do pass.
8/20/2009From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (Heard in committee on August 19.)
8/24/2009Read second time. To third reading.
9/01/2009Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 1. Page 2857.) To Senate.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage9/01/2009SB 695 Kehoe Third Reading Urgency By FUENTES
9/02/2009In Senate. To unfinished business.
9/08/2009Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2282.) To enrollment.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage9/08/2009Unfinished Business SB695 Kehoe
9/25/2009Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
10/11/2009Approved by Governor.
10/11/2009Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 337, Statutes of 2009.

Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

$359,450
$0
$359,450
$0
2 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 327, 382, 739.1, and 747 Of, and to Add Sections 365.1, 739.9, 745, and 748 To, the Public Utilities Code, and to Amend Section 80110 of the Water Code, Relating to Energy, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.: Senate 3rd Reading SB695 Kehoe Urgency Clause

2 organizations supported this bill

PG&E
Senate Rules Committee (2009, June 1). Bill Analysis SB 695 6/01/2009. Retrieved November 9, 2010, from Official California Legislative Information.
The Utility Reform Network
Senate Rules Committee (2009, June 1). Bill Analysis SB 695 6/01/2009. Retrieved November 9, 2010, from Official California Legislative Information.

0 organizations opposed this bill

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2007 – December 31, 2010.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$0Yes
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$0$0Yes
Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
John BenoitRCA-37$10,400$0Yes
Ron CalderonDCA-30$21,000$0Yes
Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$7,000$0Yes
Dave CogdillRCA-14$8,850$0Yes
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$4,000$0Yes
Lou CorreaDCA-34$18,400$0Yes
Dave CoxRCA-1$8,500$0Yes
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$21,800$0Yes
Jeff DenhamRCA-12$0$0Yes
Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
Bob DuttonRCA-31$12,700$0Yes
Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$0Not Voting
Loni HancockDCA-9$7,200$0Yes
Tom HarmanRCA-35$18,950$0Yes
Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$3,600$0Yes
Bob HuffRCA-29$13,400$0Yes
Christine KehoeDCA-39$20,700$0Yes
Mark LenoDCA-3$3,000$0Yes
Carol LiuDCA-21$0$0Yes
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$4,100$0Yes
Abel MaldonadoRCA-15$14,650$0Yes
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$15,700$0Yes
Jenny OropezaDCA-28$5,000$0Yes
Alex PadillaDCA-20$20,400$0Yes
Fran PavleyDCA-23$8,450$0Yes
Gloria RomeroDCA-24$0$0Yes
George RunnerRCA-17$8,800$0Yes
Joe SimitianDCA-11$6,500$0Yes
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$12,700$0Yes
Tony StricklandRCA-19$15,700$0Yes
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$14,800$0Not Voting
Pat WigginsDCA-2$3,000$0Yes
Lois WolkDCA-5$11,700$0Yes
Rod WrightDCA-25$15,850$0Yes
Mark WylandRCA-38$13,200$0Yes
Leland YeeDCA-8$9,400$0Yes

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Sam AanestadRCA-4$0$0Yes
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$0$0Yes
Roy AshburnRCA-18$0$0Yes
John BenoitRCA-37$10,400$0Yes
Ron CalderonDCA-30$21,000$0Yes
Gilbert CedilloDCA-22$7,000$0Yes
Dave CogdillRCA-14$8,850$0Yes
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$4,000$0Yes
Lou CorreaDCA-34$18,400$0Yes
Dave CoxRCA-1$8,500$0Yes
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$21,800$0Yes
Jeff DenhamRCA-12$0$0Yes
Denise DuchenyDCA-40$0$0Yes
Bob DuttonRCA-31$12,700$0Yes
Dean FlorezDCA-16$0$0Not Voting
Loni HancockDCA-9$7,200$0Yes
Tom HarmanRCA-35$18,950$0Yes
Dennis HollingsworthRCA-36$3,600$0Yes
Bob HuffRCA-29$13,400$0Yes
Christine KehoeDCA-39$20,700$0Yes
Mark LenoDCA-3$3,000$0Yes
Carol LiuDCA-21$0$0Yes
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$4,100$0Yes
Abel MaldonadoRCA-15$14,650$0Yes
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$15,700$0Yes
Jenny OropezaDCA-28$5,000$0Yes
Alex PadillaDCA-20$20,400$0Yes
Fran PavleyDCA-23$8,450$0Yes
Gloria RomeroDCA-24$0$0Yes
George RunnerRCA-17$8,800$0Yes
Joe SimitianDCA-11$6,500$0Yes
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$12,700$0Yes
Tony StricklandRCA-19$15,700$0Yes
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$14,800$0Not Voting
Pat WigginsDCA-2$3,000$0Yes
Lois WolkDCA-5$11,700$0Yes
Rod WrightDCA-25$15,850$0Yes
Mark WylandRCA-38$13,200$0Yes
Leland YeeDCA-8$9,400$0Yes

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Gas & electric utilities$359,450
Consumer groups$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range