Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

AB 1602 - An Act to Amend Sections 2923.5 and 2924g Of, to Amend and Repeal Section 2924 Of, and to Add Sections 2923.6, 2924.9, 2924.10, 2924.11, 2924.12, 2924.13, 2924.14, 2924.15, and 2924.16 To, the Civil Code, Relating to Mortgages.

Mortgages and deeds of trust: foreclosure. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to contact the borrower prior to filing a notice of default to explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure, as specified. Existing law requires a notice of default to include a declaration stating that the trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent has contacted the borrower, or has… More
(1)Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to contact the borrower prior to filing a notice of default to explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure, as specified. Existing law requires a notice of default to include a declaration stating that the trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent has contacted the borrower, or has tried with due diligence to contact the borrower, or that no contact was required for a specified reason.

This bill would additionally require the borrower to be provided, if applicable, with a deadline for the borrower to submit an initial application for a loan modification. The bill would require the declaration to also state that the borrower was not a servicemember or dependent of a servicemember entitled to benefits under the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, that the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent has possession of the note and mortgage, or deed of trust, and other specified documents that evidence the right to foreclose, and has attached copies thereof to the declaration, as specified, or a separate declaration containing specified information, if the above described documents cannot be located. The bill would prescribe procedures and notices that must be sent by the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent if the notice of default was filed prior to January 1, 2013, and a notice of rescission was not subsequently recorded. The bill would prohibit recording a notice of default unless a specified written notice has been sent at least 14 days before a notice of default is recorded.

The bill would prohibit a notice of default from being recorded while a loan modification application is pending, under specified conditions, and would establish additional procedures to be followed regarding the loan modification application before a notice of default could be recorded.

(2)Existing law imposes various requirements that must be satisfied prior to exercising a power of sale under a mortgage or deed of trust, including, among other things, recording a notice of sale.

This bill would impose additional requirements pertaining to applications for loan modifications that must be satisfied prior to recording a notice of sale in order to exercise a power of sale. The bill would require a written notice to the borrower after the postponement of a foreclosure sale in order to advise the borrower of any new sale date, time, and location when the new sale date is at least 10 calendar days after the date of postponement, as specified.

The bill would establish procedures for a loan modification application process to be used after a notice of sale has been recorded.

The bill would prohibit a notice of sale from being recorded under certain conditions, including, among others, if the borrower is in compliance with a loan modification plan, forbearance, or loan repayment plan, as specified, or if a short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure has been approved, as specified. The bill would require mortgagees, trustees, beneficiaries, or authorized agents to track and record specified data pertaining to loan modification agreements. The bill would prohibit the collection of late fees while a loan modification or short sale is being considered, if certain criteria are met.

(3)The bill would repeal duplicate provisions of law.

(4)The bill would authorize a borrower to seek an injunction of a pending trustee’s sale if a notice of sale has been recorded and the borrower reasonably believes that the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent failed to comply with specified requirements. The bill would authorize the greater of actual damages or $10,000 in statutory damages if there is a failure to comply with specified requirements by the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent and the property is sold at a foreclosure sale. The bill would authorize the greater of treble damages or $50,000 in statutory damages if the failure to comply is found to be intentional or reckless or resulted from willful misconduct, as specified.

(5)The bill would establish the Office of Homeowner Protection, that would have responsibility, among other things, for responding to inquiries and complaints from individuals regarding foreclosures and other procedures and requirements as described above, attempting to seek compliance by mortgagees, trustees, beneficiaries, or authorized agents regarding foreclosures and other procedures and requirements as described above, and maintaining an Internet Web site that is capable of receiving inquiries and complaints from individuals and that provides information to the public about publicly available resources intended to help individuals avoid foreclosure. The bill would express the intent of the Legislature that the office be funded by payments made available to the Attorney General via the Special Deposit Fund, created pursuant to specified federal settlement agreements. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has been introduced. 
There have been no votes on this bill.

An Act to Amend Sections 2923.5 and 2924g Of, to Amend and Repeal Section 2924 Of, and to Add Sections 2923.6, 2924.9, 2924.10, 2924.11, 2924.12, 2924.13, 2924.14, 2924.15, and 2924.16 To, the Civil Code, Relating to Mortgages.

AB 1602 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to contact the borrower prior to filing a notice of default to explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure, as specified. Existing law requires a notice of default to include a declaration stating that the trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent has contacted the borrower, or has tried with due diligence to contact the borrower, or that no contact was required for a specified reason.

This bill would additionally require the borrower to be provided, if applicable, with a deadline for the borrower to submit an initial application for a loan modification. The bill would require the declaration to also state that the borrower was not a servicemember or dependent of a servicemember entitled to benefits under the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, that the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent has possession of the note and mortgage, or deed of trust, and other specified documents that evidence the right to foreclose, and has attached copies thereof to the declaration, as specified, or a separate declaration containing specified… More
(1)Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent to contact the borrower prior to filing a notice of default to explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure, as specified. Existing law requires a notice of default to include a declaration stating that the trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent has contacted the borrower, or has tried with due diligence to contact the borrower, or that no contact was required for a specified reason.

This bill would additionally require the borrower to be provided, if applicable, with a deadline for the borrower to submit an initial application for a loan modification. The bill would require the declaration to also state that the borrower was not a servicemember or dependent of a servicemember entitled to benefits under the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, that the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent has possession of the note and mortgage, or deed of trust, and other specified documents that evidence the right to foreclose, and has attached copies thereof to the declaration, as specified, or a separate declaration containing specified information, if the above described documents cannot be located. The bill would prescribe procedures and notices that must be sent by the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent if the notice of default was filed prior to January 1, 2013, and a notice of rescission was not subsequently recorded. The bill would prohibit recording a notice of default unless a specified written notice has been sent at least 14 days before a notice of default is recorded.

The bill would prohibit a notice of default from being recorded while a loan modification application is pending, under specified conditions, and would establish additional procedures to be followed regarding the loan modification application before a notice of default could be recorded.

(2)Existing law imposes various requirements that must be satisfied prior to exercising a power of sale under a mortgage or deed of trust, including, among other things, recording a notice of sale.

This bill would impose additional requirements pertaining to applications for loan modifications that must be satisfied prior to recording a notice of sale in order to exercise a power of sale. The bill would require a written notice to the borrower after the postponement of a foreclosure sale in order to advise the borrower of any new sale date, time, and location when the new sale date is at least 10 calendar days after the date of postponement, as specified.

The bill would establish procedures for a loan modification application process to be used after a notice of sale has been recorded.

The bill would prohibit a notice of sale from being recorded under certain conditions, including, among others, if the borrower is in compliance with a loan modification plan, forbearance, or loan repayment plan, as specified, or if a short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure has been approved, as specified. The bill would require mortgagees, trustees, beneficiaries, or authorized agents to track and record specified data pertaining to loan modification agreements. The bill would prohibit the collection of late fees while a loan modification or short sale is being considered, if certain criteria are met.

(3)The bill would repeal duplicate provisions of law.

(4)The bill would authorize a borrower to seek an injunction of a pending trustee’s sale if a notice of sale has been recorded and the borrower reasonably believes that the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent failed to comply with specified requirements. The bill would authorize the greater of actual damages or $10,000 in statutory damages if there is a failure to comply with specified requirements by the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent and the property is sold at a foreclosure sale. The bill would authorize the greater of treble damages or $50,000 in statutory damages if the failure to comply is found to be intentional or reckless or resulted from willful misconduct, as specified.

(5)The bill would establish the Office of Homeowner Protection, that would have responsibility, among other things, for responding to inquiries and complaints from individuals regarding foreclosures and other procedures and requirements as described above, attempting to seek compliance by mortgagees, trustees, beneficiaries, or authorized agents regarding foreclosures and other procedures and requirements as described above, and maintaining an Internet Web site that is capable of receiving inquiries and complaints from individuals and that provides information to the public about publicly available resources intended to help individuals avoid foreclosure. The bill would express the intent of the Legislature that the office be funded by payments made available to the Attorney General via the Special Deposit Fund, created pursuant to specified federal settlement agreements. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 2923.5 and 2924g Of, to Amend and Repeal Section 2924 Of, and to Add Sections 2923.6, 2924.9, 2924.10, 2924.11, 2924.12, 2924.13, 2924.14, 2924.15, and 2924.16 To, the Civil Code, Relating to Mortgages.
Author(s)
Mike Eng, Mike Feuer
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Mortgages and deeds of trust: foreclosure
Major Actions
Introduced2/06/2012
Referred to Committee
Bill History

There have been no votes on this bill.

ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/06/2012
2/06/2012Read first time. To print.
2/07/2012From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
3/29/2012Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
4/09/2012From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
4/10/2012Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
4/16/2012In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

42 Organizations Supported and 10 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 2923.5 and 2924g Of, to Amend and Repeal Section 2924 Of, and to Add Sections 2923.6, 2924.9, 2924.10, 2924.11, 2924.12, 2924.13, 2924.14, 2924.15, and 2924.16 To, the Civil Code, Relating to Mortgages.

42 organizations supported this bill

AFL-CIO
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Asian & Pacific Islanders California Action Network
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Asian Law Caucus
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Church IMPACT
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Labor Federation
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Nurses Association
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Reinvestment Coalition
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 2, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California School Employees Association
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California State Attorney General
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Cambridge Credit Counseling
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Center for Responsible Lending
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Clearpoint Financial Services
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Coalition for Quality Credit Counseling
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 2, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Orange County
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Consumer Credit Counseling Service Of San Francisco
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Consumer Credit Counseling Service Of The North Coast
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Consumer Credit Counseling Service Of The Twin Cities
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 2, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Consumers Union
McCauley, Michael (2012, April 12). Consumers Union Urges California Lawmakers To Protect Homeowners From Foreclosure Abuses. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Consumers Union .
Contra Costa Interfaith Supporting Community Organization
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
East Los Angeles Community Corporation
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Greenlining Institute
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
GreenPath
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Home Strong USA
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
IFPTE Local 21
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
InCharge
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Korean Churches for Community Development
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Lutheran Office of Public Policy - California
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Money Management International
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Montebello Housing Development Corporation
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Asian American Coalition
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Council of La Raza
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Novadebt
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
PICO California
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
SEIU California
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
SEIU Local 1000
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Springboard Nonprofit Consumer Credit Management
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
SurePath Financial Solutions
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Thai Community Development Center
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
United Democratic Club Of Monterey Park
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 2, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

10 organizations opposed this bill

California and Nevada Credit Union Leagues
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Bankers Association
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Chamber of Commerce
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Financial Services Association
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Independent Bankers
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Land Title Association
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Mortgage Association
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Mortgage Bankers Association
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
United Trustees Association
Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance (2012, April 13). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office during the 2011-2012 California State Legislature, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$16,800$20,400
Luis AlejoDCA-28$109,181$3,500
Michael AllenDCA-7$265,600$6,800
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$66,100$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$104,650$10,500
Jim BeallDCA-24$196,450$1,000
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$1,000$28,760
Marty BlockDCA-78$223,050$10,000
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$132,900$2,000
Susan BonillaDCA-11$120,990$7,600
Steven BradfordDCA-51$78,300$11,900
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$114,750$12,900
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$260,050$5,600
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$144,600$10,500
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$54,721$4,000
Connie ConwayRCA-34$45,300$41,000
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$139,000$11,200
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$8,800$0
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$124,950$0
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$36,400$14,100
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$271,530$7,660
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$161,950$38,300
Rich GordonDCA-21$109,436$10,500
Jeff GorellRCA-37$30,900$12,500
Shannon GroveRCA-32$4,000$7,000
Curt HagmanRCA-60$29,150$22,300
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$83,300$11,600
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$24,100$31,200
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$135,266$23,800
Jerry HillDCA-19$199,060$23,608
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$104,797$8,000
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$19,100$12,200
Steve KnightRCA-36$20,600$1,000
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$132,600$26,900
Dan LogueRCA-3$15,700$12,100
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$39,750$1,000
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$4,000$4,250
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$44,600$17,800
Holly MitchellDCA-47$63,077$4,000
Bill MonningDCA-27$177,853$4,500
Mike MorrellRCA-63$23,625$29,997
Brian NestandeRCA-64$79,100$7,500
Jim NielsenRCA-2$25,500$1,000
Chris NorbyRCA-72$12,300$2,500
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$18,200$28,450
Richard PanDCA-5$189,046$8,500
Henry PereaDCA-31$80,400$30,800
John PerezDCA-46$312,199$39,000
Manuel PerezDCA-80$68,900$14,900
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$143,000$6,000
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$94,750$29,100
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$23,100$19,700
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$98,680$6,100
Das WilliamsDCA-35$168,039$10,500
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$70,975$1,000

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$16,800$20,400
Luis AlejoDCA-28$109,181$3,500
Michael AllenDCA-7$265,600$6,800
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$66,100$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$104,650$10,500
Jim BeallDCA-24$196,450$1,000
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$1,000$28,760
Marty BlockDCA-78$223,050$10,000
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$132,900$2,000
Susan BonillaDCA-11$120,990$7,600
Steven BradfordDCA-51$78,300$11,900
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$114,750$12,900
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$260,050$5,600
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$144,600$10,500
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$54,721$4,000
Connie ConwayRCA-34$45,300$41,000
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$139,000$11,200
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$8,800$0
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$124,950$0
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$36,400$14,100
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$271,530$7,660
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$161,950$38,300
Rich GordonDCA-21$109,436$10,500
Jeff GorellRCA-37$30,900$12,500
Shannon GroveRCA-32$4,000$7,000
Curt HagmanRCA-60$29,150$22,300
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$83,300$11,600
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$24,100$31,200
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$135,266$23,800
Jerry HillDCA-19$199,060$23,608
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$104,797$8,000
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$19,100$12,200
Steve KnightRCA-36$20,600$1,000
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$132,600$26,900
Dan LogueRCA-3$15,700$12,100
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$39,750$1,000
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$4,000$4,250
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$44,600$17,800
Holly MitchellDCA-47$63,077$4,000
Bill MonningDCA-27$177,853$4,500
Mike MorrellRCA-63$23,625$29,997
Brian NestandeRCA-64$79,100$7,500
Jim NielsenRCA-2$25,500$1,000
Chris NorbyRCA-72$12,300$2,500
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$18,200$28,450
Richard PanDCA-5$189,046$8,500
Henry PereaDCA-31$80,400$30,800
John PerezDCA-46$312,199$39,000
Manuel PerezDCA-80$68,900$14,900
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$143,000$6,000
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$94,750$29,100
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$23,100$19,700
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$98,680$6,100
Das WilliamsDCA-35$168,039$10,500
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$70,975$1,000

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Construction unions$2,395,833
State & local government employee unions$1,252,526
Real estate$589,100
Health worker unions$453,700
Finance, insurance & real estate$226,225
Credit agencies & finance companies$111,000
Labor unions$107,250
Health & welfare policy$79,008
Financial services & consulting$75,750
Municipal & county government organizations$31,800
Minority & ethnic groups$31,600
Welfare & social work$28,175
Courts & justice system$15,858
Nonprofit foundations$100
Civil service & government unions$0
Consumer groups$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Commercial banks & bank holding companies$356,283
Credit unions$134,595
Mortgage bankers & brokers$82,697
Title insurance & title abstract offices$81,050
Financial services & consulting$75,750
Chambers of commerce$62,400
Security brokers & investment companies$0
Banks & lending institutions$0
Other real estate services, appraisals$0
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range