Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

AB 1729 - An Act to Amend Sections 48900 and 48900.5 of the Education Code, Relating to Pupil Rights.

Pupil rights: suspension or expulsion: alternatives and other means of correction. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law provides that a pupil shall not be suspended from school or recommended for expulsion unless the superintendent of the school district or the principal of the school in which the pupil is enrolled determines that the pupil has committed a specified act. Existing law also authorizes a superintendent of the school district or principal to use his or her discretion to provide… More
Existing law provides that a pupil shall not be suspended from school or recommended for expulsion unless the superintendent of the school district or the principal of the school in which the pupil is enrolled determines that the pupil has committed a specified act. Existing law also authorizes a superintendent of the school district or principal to use his or her discretion to provide alternatives to suspension or expulsion, including, but not limited to, counseling and an anger management program, for a pupil subject to discipline under this provision.

This bill would instead authorize a superintendent of the school district or principal of the school to use alternatives to suspension or expulsion that are age appropriate and designed to address and correct the pupil’s specific misbehavior, as specified.

Existing law requires the imposition of suspension only when other means of correction fail to bring about proper conduct but authorizes the suspension of a pupil, including an individual with exceptional needs, upon a first offense if the principal or superintendent of schools determines that specified offenses were committed or that the pupil’s presence causes a danger to persons or property or threatens to disrupt the instructional process.

This bill would authorize a school district to document the other means of correction used and place that documentation in the pupil’s record. The bill would also specify that other means of correction include, but are not limited to, among other things, a positive behavior support approach with tiered interventions that occur during the schoolday on campus, a conference between school personnel, the pupil’s parent or guardian, and the pupil, participation in a restorative justice program, and after-school programs that address specific behavioral issues or expose pupils to positive activities and behaviors.

This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 48900 of the Education Code proposed by AB 2242 that would become operative if this bill and AB 2242 are enacted, and this bill is enacted last. This bill would also incorporate changes to that section proposed by AB 1732, relating to bullying of pupils, which has been chaptered. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 28, 2012.

voted YES: 53 voted NO: 27
0 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 48900 and 48900.5 of the Education Code, Relating to Pupil Rights.

AB 1729 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
Existing law provides that a pupil shall not be suspended from school or recommended for expulsion unless the superintendent of the school district or the principal of the school in which the pupil is enrolled determines that the pupil has committed a specified act. Existing law also authorizes a superintendent of the school district or principal to use his or her discretion to provide alternatives to suspension or expulsion, including, but not limited to, counseling and an anger management program, for a pupil subject to discipline under this provision.

This bill would instead authorize a superintendent of the school district or principal of the school to use alternatives to suspension or expulsion that are age appropriate and designed to address and correct the pupil’s specific misbehavior, as specified.

Existing law requires the imposition of suspension only when other means of correction fail to bring about proper conduct but authorizes the suspension of a pupil, including an individual with exceptional needs, upon a first offense if the principal or superintendent of schools determines that specified offenses were committed or that the pupil’s… More
Existing law provides that a pupil shall not be suspended from school or recommended for expulsion unless the superintendent of the school district or the principal of the school in which the pupil is enrolled determines that the pupil has committed a specified act. Existing law also authorizes a superintendent of the school district or principal to use his or her discretion to provide alternatives to suspension or expulsion, including, but not limited to, counseling and an anger management program, for a pupil subject to discipline under this provision.

This bill would instead authorize a superintendent of the school district or principal of the school to use alternatives to suspension or expulsion that are age appropriate and designed to address and correct the pupil’s specific misbehavior, as specified.

Existing law requires the imposition of suspension only when other means of correction fail to bring about proper conduct but authorizes the suspension of a pupil, including an individual with exceptional needs, upon a first offense if the principal or superintendent of schools determines that specified offenses were committed or that the pupil’s presence causes a danger to persons or property or threatens to disrupt the instructional process.

This bill would authorize a school district to document the other means of correction used and place that documentation in the pupil’s record. The bill would also specify that other means of correction include, but are not limited to, among other things, a positive behavior support approach with tiered interventions that occur during the schoolday on campus, a conference between school personnel, the pupil’s parent or guardian, and the pupil, participation in a restorative justice program, and after-school programs that address specific behavioral issues or expose pupils to positive activities and behaviors.

This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 48900 of the Education Code proposed by AB 2242 that would become operative if this bill and AB 2242 are enacted, and this bill is enacted last. This bill would also incorporate changes to that section proposed by AB 1732, relating to bullying of pupils, which has been chaptered. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 48900 and 48900.5 of the Education Code, Relating to Pupil Rights.
Author(s)
Tom Ammiano
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Pupil rights: suspension or expulsion: alternatives and other means of correction
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/16/2012
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Assembly Committee on Education4/11/2012
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/25/2012
    Passed Assembly5/30/2012
    Failed passage in Senate Committee on Education6/27/2012
    Passed Senate Committee on Education6/27/2012
    Passed Senate Committee on Education7/03/2012
    Passed Senate8/23/2012
    Passed Assembly8/28/2012
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/10/2012
    Became law (chaptered).9/21/2012
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteAssembly Committee on EducationDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/11/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Education
    6 voted YES 4 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/25/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    12 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 1729 AMMIANO Assembly Third Reading5/30/2012This bill PASSED the Assembly
    53 voted YES 25 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on EducationDo pass.6/27/2012This motion DID NOT PASS the Senate Committee on Education
    5 voted YES 3 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on EducationSet, first hearing. Failed passage in Committee. Reconsideration granted.6/27/2012This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Education
    8 voted YES 0 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on EducationDo pass.7/03/2012This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Education
    6 voted YES 3 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB1729 Ammiano By Price8/23/2012This bill PASSED the Senate
    21 voted YES 14 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedAssemblyAB 1729 AMMIANO Concurrence in Senate Amendments8/28/2012This bill PASSED the Assembly
    53 voted YES 27 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/16/2012
    2/16/2012Read first time. To print.
    2/17/2012From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
    3/01/2012Referred to Com. on ED.
    select this voteVote4/11/2012Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    4/23/2012From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (April 11).
    4/24/2012Read second time and amended.
    4/25/2012Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    5/07/2012From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
    5/08/2012Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    5/16/2012In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
    select this voteVote5/25/2012Do pass as amended.
    5/25/2012From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25). Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
    5/29/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    5/30/2012Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 25. Page 5113.)
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage5/30/2012AB 1729 AMMIANO Assembly Third Reading
    5/31/2012In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
    6/14/2012Referred to Com. on ED.
    6/27/2012In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
    select this voteVote6/27/2012Do pass.
    select this voteVote6/27/2012Set, first hearing. Failed passage in Committee. Reconsideration granted.
    7/03/2012From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 3).
    select this voteVote7/03/2012Do pass.
    7/05/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    8/20/2012Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
    8/21/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    8/23/2012Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 4750.).
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/23/2012Assembly 3rd Reading AB1729 Ammiano By Price
    8/24/2012In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
    8/27/2012Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6357.)
    8/28/2012Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 27. Page 6408.).
    currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage8/28/2012AB 1729 AMMIANO Concurrence in Senate Amendments
    9/10/2012Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5:10 p.m.
    9/21/2012Approved by the Governor.
    9/21/2012Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 425, Statutes of 2012.

    Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

    36 Organizations Supported and 1 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Sections 48900 and 48900.5 of the Education Code, Relating to Pupil Rights.: AB 1729 AMMIANO Concurrence in Senate Amendments

    36 organizations supported this bill

    Advancement Project
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    American Civil Liberties Union
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Black Organizing Project
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Black Parallel School Board
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Association for Parent-Child Advocacy
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California State Conference of the NAACP
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Children Now
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Children's Defense Fund - California
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Community Asset Development Re-defining Education
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Community Coalition
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Congregations Building Community
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Disability Rights California
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Disability Rights Legal Center
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Fight Crime: Invest in Kids
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Gay-Straight Alliance Network
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    InnerCity Struggle
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Labor/Community Strategy Center
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Legal Advocates For Children & Youth
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Legal Services for Children
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Los Angeles Unified School District
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    National Association of Social Workers - California Chapter
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    National Center for Youth Law
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Northern California Association of Counsel for Children
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    PICO California
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    PolicyLink
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Public Counsel
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Restorative Schools Vision Project
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Youth and Education Law Project, Mills Legal Clinic
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Youth Justice Coalition
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Youth Law Center
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    1 organization opposed this bill

    California County Superintendents Educational Services
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 21). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved October 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$9,000$0
    Luis AlejoDCA-28$7,135$0
    Michael AllenDCA-7$25,150$0
    Tom AmmianoDCA-13$3,500$0
    Toni AtkinsDCA-76$29,250$0
    Jim BeallDCA-24$11,500$0
    Bill BerryhillRCA-26$7,700$0
    Marty BlockDCA-78$14,900$0
    Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$2,300$0
    Susan BonillaDCA-11$9,835$0
    Steven BradfordDCA-51$5,000$0
    Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
    Joan BuchananDCA-15$7,900$1,000
    Betsy ButlerDCA-53$9,200$0
    Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
    Nora CamposDCA-23$2,000$750
    Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$6,500$0
    Connie ConwayRCA-34$21,800$3,900
    Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
    Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
    Roger DickinsonDCA-9$4,200$0
    Tim DonnellyRCA-59$0$0
    Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
    Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
    Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
    Paul FongDCA-22$5,800$0
    Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
    Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
    Beth GainesRCA-4$7,500$0
    Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$12,900$0
    Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
    Mike GattoDCA-43$16,000$0
    Rich GordonDCA-21$14,436$0
    Jeff GorellRCA-37$4,500$0
    Shannon GroveRCA-32$2,500$0
    Curt HagmanRCA-60$14,800$0
    Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
    Isadore HallDCA-52$4,300$0
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$14,800$0
    Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
    Roger HernandezDCA-57$12,516$0
    Jerry HillDCA-19$14,200$0
    Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
    Ben HuesoDCA-79$14,297$0
    Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
    Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
    Brian JonesRCA-77$9,800$0
    Steve KnightRCA-36$0$0
    Ricardo LaraDCA-50$2,500$0
    Dan LogueRCA-3$4,000$0
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$3,500$0
    Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
    Allan MansoorRCA-68$1,000$0
    Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
    Jeff MillerRCA-71$11,400$0
    Holly MitchellDCA-47$5,352$0
    Bill MonningDCA-27$10,800$0
    Mike MorrellRCA-63$2,250$0
    Brian NestandeRCA-64$3,500$0
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$0
    Chris NorbyRCA-72$3,000$0
    Kristin OlsenRCA-25$8,400$2,750
    Richard PanDCA-5$20,950$0
    Henry PereaDCA-31$14,600$0
    John PerezDCA-46$34,599$7,800
    Manuel PerezDCA-80$3,100$0
    Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
    Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$5,000$0
    Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
    Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
    Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
    Norma TorresDCA-61$5,500$0
    David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
    Don WagnerRCA-70$10,800$0
    Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$5,000$3,900
    Das WilliamsDCA-35$17,539$1,000
    Mariko YamadaDCA-8$20,775$0

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$9,000$0
    Luis AlejoDCA-28$7,135$0
    Michael AllenDCA-7$25,150$0
    Tom AmmianoDCA-13$3,500$0
    Toni AtkinsDCA-76$29,250$0
    Jim BeallDCA-24$11,500$0
    Bill BerryhillRCA-26$7,700$0
    Marty BlockDCA-78$14,900$0
    Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$2,300$0
    Susan BonillaDCA-11$9,835$0
    Steven BradfordDCA-51$5,000$0
    Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
    Joan BuchananDCA-15$7,900$1,000
    Betsy ButlerDCA-53$9,200$0
    Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
    Nora CamposDCA-23$2,000$750
    Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$6,500$0
    Connie ConwayRCA-34$21,800$3,900
    Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
    Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
    Roger DickinsonDCA-9$4,200$0
    Tim DonnellyRCA-59$0$0
    Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
    Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
    Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
    Paul FongDCA-22$5,800$0
    Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
    Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
    Beth GainesRCA-4$7,500$0
    Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$12,900$0
    Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
    Mike GattoDCA-43$16,000$0
    Rich GordonDCA-21$14,436$0
    Jeff GorellRCA-37$4,500$0
    Shannon GroveRCA-32$2,500$0
    Curt HagmanRCA-60$14,800$0
    Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
    Isadore HallDCA-52$4,300$0
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$14,800$0
    Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
    Roger HernandezDCA-57$12,516$0
    Jerry HillDCA-19$14,200$0
    Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
    Ben HuesoDCA-79$14,297$0
    Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
    Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
    Brian JonesRCA-77$9,800$0
    Steve KnightRCA-36$0$0
    Ricardo LaraDCA-50$2,500$0
    Dan LogueRCA-3$4,000$0
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$3,500$0
    Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
    Allan MansoorRCA-68$1,000$0
    Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
    Jeff MillerRCA-71$11,400$0
    Holly MitchellDCA-47$5,352$0
    Bill MonningDCA-27$10,800$0
    Mike MorrellRCA-63$2,250$0
    Brian NestandeRCA-64$3,500$0
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$0
    Chris NorbyRCA-72$3,000$0
    Kristin OlsenRCA-25$8,400$2,750
    Richard PanDCA-5$20,950$0
    Henry PereaDCA-31$14,600$0
    John PerezDCA-46$34,599$7,800
    Manuel PerezDCA-80$3,100$0
    Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
    Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$5,000$0
    Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
    Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
    Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
    Norma TorresDCA-61$5,500$0
    David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
    Don WagnerRCA-70$10,800$0
    Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$5,000$3,900
    Das WilliamsDCA-35$17,539$1,000
    Mariko YamadaDCA-8$20,775$0

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    Psychiatrists & psychologists$156,400
    Education$124,000
    Health & welfare policy$79,008
    Chambers of commerce$62,400
    Municipal & county government organizations$31,800
    Minority & ethnic groups$31,600
    Welfare & social work$28,175
    Gay & lesbian rights and issues$5,400
    Children's rights$0
    Human rights$0

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Public school teachers, administrators & officials$21,100
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range