Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

AB 22 - An Act to Amend Section 1785.20.5 of the Civil Code, and to Add Chapter 3.6 (Commencing with Section 1024.5) to Part 2 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.

Employment: credit reports. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that state laws are inconsistent with its… More
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that state laws are inconsistent with its provisions.

Existing federal and state law specify the procedures that an employer is required to follow before requesting a report and if adverse action is taken based on the report. Existing federal law provides that, subject to certain exceptions, an employer may not procure a report or cause one to be procured for employment purposes, unless prior disclosure of the procurement is made to the consumer and the consumer authorizes the procurement, as specified. Existing federal law further requires, subject to certain exceptions, an employer, before taking any adverse action based on the report, to provide the consumer with a copy of the report and a written description of certain rights of the consumer.

Under existing state law, an employer may request a credit report for employment purposes so long as he or she provides prior written notice of the request to the person for whom the report is sought. Existing state law also requires that the written notice inform the person for whom the consumer credit report is sought that a report will be used and of the source of the report and contain space for the person to request a copy of the report. Existing state law further requires an employer, whenever he or she bases an adverse employment decision on information contained in a consumer credit report, to advise the person for whom the report was sought that an adverse action was taken based upon information contained in the report and provide the person with the name and address of the consumer credit agency making the report. A consumer who suffers damages resulting from a violation of these state law provisions may bring a court action to recover monetary damages, as specified, but no person is liable for the violation if he or she shows reasonable procedures were maintained to assure compliance with the provisions, as specified.

This bill would prohibit an employer or prospective employer, with the exception of certain financial institutions, from obtaining a consumer credit report, as defined, for employment purposes unless the position of the person for whom the report is sought is (1) a position in the state Department of Justice, (2) a managerial position, as defined, (3) that of a sworn peace officer or other law enforcement position, (4) a position for which the information contained in the report is required by law to be disclosed or obtained, (5) a position that involves regular access to specified personal information for any purpose other than the routine solicitation and processing of credit card applications in a retail establishment, (6) a position in which the person is or would be a named signatory on the employer’s bank or credit card account, or authorized to transfer money or enter into financial contracts on the employer’s behalf, (7) a position that involves access to confidential or proprietary information, as specified, or (8) a position that involves regular access to $10,000 or more of cash, as specified.

This bill would also require the written notice informing the person for whom a consumer credit report is sought for employment purposes to also inform the person of the specific reason for obtaining the report, as specified. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on May 19, 2011.

voted YES: 45 voted NO: 29
6 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 1785.20.5 of the Civil Code, and to Add Chapter 3.6 (Commencing with Section 1024.5) to Part 2 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.

AB 22 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that state laws are inconsistent with its provisions.

Existing federal and state law specify the procedures that an employer is required to follow before requesting a report and if adverse action is taken based on the report. Existing federal law provides that, subject to certain exceptions, an employer may not procure a report or cause one to be procured for employment purposes, unless prior disclosure of the procurement is made to the consumer and the consumer authorizes the procurement, as specified. Existing federal law further requires, subject to certain exceptions, an employer, before taking any adverse action based on the report, to provide the consumer with a copy of the report and a written description of certain rights of the consumer.

Under existing state law, an employer may request a credit… More
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the state Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act define and regulate consumer credit reports and authorize the use of consumer credit reports for employment purposes, pursuant to specified requirements. The FCRA provides that it does not preempt state law, except as specifically provided or to the extent that state laws are inconsistent with its provisions.

Existing federal and state law specify the procedures that an employer is required to follow before requesting a report and if adverse action is taken based on the report. Existing federal law provides that, subject to certain exceptions, an employer may not procure a report or cause one to be procured for employment purposes, unless prior disclosure of the procurement is made to the consumer and the consumer authorizes the procurement, as specified. Existing federal law further requires, subject to certain exceptions, an employer, before taking any adverse action based on the report, to provide the consumer with a copy of the report and a written description of certain rights of the consumer.

Under existing state law, an employer may request a credit report for employment purposes so long as he or she provides prior written notice of the request to the person for whom the report is sought. Existing state law also requires that the written notice inform the person for whom the consumer credit report is sought that a report will be used and of the source of the report and contain space for the person to request a copy of the report. Existing state law further requires an employer, whenever he or she bases an adverse employment decision on information contained in a consumer credit report, to advise the person for whom the report was sought that an adverse action was taken based upon information contained in the report and provide the person with the name and address of the consumer credit agency making the report. A consumer who suffers damages resulting from a violation of these state law provisions may bring a court action to recover monetary damages, as specified, but no person is liable for the violation if he or she shows reasonable procedures were maintained to assure compliance with the provisions, as specified.

This bill would prohibit an employer or prospective employer, with the exception of certain financial institutions, from obtaining a consumer credit report, as defined, for employment purposes unless the position of the person for whom the report is sought is (1) a position in the state Department of Justice, (2) a managerial position, as defined, (3) that of a sworn peace officer or other law enforcement position, (4) a position for which the information contained in the report is required by law to be disclosed or obtained, (5) a position that involves regular access to specified personal information for any purpose other than the routine solicitation and processing of credit card applications in a retail establishment, (6) a position in which the person is or would be a named signatory on the employer’s bank or credit card account, or authorized to transfer money or enter into financial contracts on the employer’s behalf, (7) a position that involves access to confidential or proprietary information, as specified, or (8) a position that involves regular access to $10,000 or more of cash, as specified.

This bill would also require the written notice informing the person for whom a consumer credit report is sought for employment purposes to also inform the person of the specific reason for obtaining the report, as specified. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 1785.20.5 of the Civil Code, and to Add Chapter 3.6 (Commencing with Section 1024.5) to Part 2 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.
Author(s)
Tony Mendoza
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Employment: credit reports
Major Actions
Introduced12/06/2010
Referred to Committee
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary3/22/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment4/13/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/04/2011
Passed Assembly5/19/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations6/22/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary6/28/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/15/2011
Passed Senate9/08/2011
Passed Assembly9/08/2011
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/22/2011
Became law (chaptered).10/09/2011
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Labor and Employment.3/22/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
6 voted YES 4 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Labor and EmploymentDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/13/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment
5 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/04/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 6 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblyAB 22 MENDOZA Assembly Third Reading5/19/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
45 voted YES 29 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on Labor and Industrial RelationsDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.6/22/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations
5 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.6/28/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
3 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/15/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
6 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB22 Mendoza By DeSaulnier9/08/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
21 voted YES 17 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblyAB 22 MENDOZA Concurrence in Senate Amendments9/08/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
48 voted YES 28 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced12/06/2010
12/06/2010Read first time. To print.
12/07/2010From printer. May be heard in committee January 6.
2/10/2011Referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. & E.
3/08/2011From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
3/09/2011Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
3/15/2011In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
3/22/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (March 22). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
select this voteVote3/22/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Labor and Employment.
select this voteVote4/13/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/14/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote5/04/2011Do pass.
5/05/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (May 4).
5/09/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
5/12/2011Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1351.)
5/19/2011Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 29. Page 1458.)
5/19/2011In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage5/19/2011AB 22 MENDOZA Assembly Third Reading
6/02/2011Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
select this voteVote6/22/2011Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.
6/23/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
6/28/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote6/28/2011Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
select this voteVote8/15/2011Do pass.
8/16/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (August 15).
8/17/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
9/01/2011Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
9/02/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
9/08/2011Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 17. Page 2396.).
9/08/2011In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 48. Noes 28. Page 3124.).
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage9/08/2011Assembly 3rd Reading AB22 Mendoza By DeSaulnier
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage9/08/2011AB 22 MENDOZA Concurrence in Senate Amendments
9/22/2011Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:30 p.m.
10/09/2011Approved by the Governor.
10/09/2011Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 724, Statutes of 2011.

Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

112% more
$1,252,526
$2,179
$30,853
$87,299
$0
$0
$107,250
$453,700
$118,495
$0
$1,301,141
$79,008
$359,200
$0
$24,000
$21,100
$0
$0
$3,836,752
$197,362
$314,825
$31,800
$5,500
$0
$273,650
$62,400
$8,500
$0
$171,763
$233,034
$203,051
$41,479
$9,000
$103,695
$42,250
$17,700
$95,993
$1,812,001
22 Organizations Supported and 36 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Section 1785.20.5 of the Civil Code, and to Add Chapter 3.6 (Commencing with Section 1024.5) to Part 2 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.: AB 22 MENDOZA Assembly Third Reading

22 organizations supported this bill

Amalgamated Transit Union
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
American Civil Liberties Union
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Commission on the Status of Women
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Employment Lawyers Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Labor Federation
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Consumer Action
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Consumer Attorneys of California
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Consumer Federation of California
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
East Bay Community Law Center
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Engineers and Scientists of California
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
IATSE Local 80
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
IFPTE Local 21
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
National Consumer Law Center
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
National Nurses United
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Service Employees International Union
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
UNITE HERE!
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.

36 organizations opposed this bill

Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Apartment Association of Orange County
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Apartment Association, Southern California Cities
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Associated General Contractors of America
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Association of California Healthcare Districts
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Association of California Water Agencies
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Apartment Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Association for Health Services at Home
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Association of Joint Powers Authorities
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Association of Licensed Investigators
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Automotive Wholesalers Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Chamber of Commerce
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Chapter American Fence Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Employment Law Council
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Fence Contractors' Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Framing Contractors Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Grocers Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Hospital Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Independent Grocers Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California New Car Dealers Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Retailers Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Special Districts Association
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California State Association of Counties
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
CoreLogic
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Engineering Contractors' Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Experian
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Flasher Barricade Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
League of California Cities
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Marin Builders Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
National Federation of Independent Business
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
National Restaurant Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Regional Council of Rural Counties
Assembly Committee on Labor & Employment (2011, April 12). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
San Diego County Apartment Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Santa Barbara Rental Property Association
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
TechAmerica
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.
TransUnion
Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, March 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved March 24, 2011, from Leg. Info.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$6,350$24,300
Luis AlejoDCA-28$66,533$9,900
Michael AllenDCA-7$227,935$17,600
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$58,574$1,300
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$61,150$48,074
Jim BeallDCA-24$247,400$15,400
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$16,370$56,400
Marty BlockDCA-78$191,950$13,300
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$94,200$30,550
Susan BonillaDCA-11$48,905$22,074
Steven BradfordDCA-51$75,900$23,900
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$54,950$38,068
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$360,909$30,224
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$55,950$20,474
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$30,170$17,500
Connie ConwayRCA-34$11,650$98,225
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$107,600$8,050
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$8,375$12,750
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$84,072$16,850
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$6,200$54,371
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$175,959$35,783
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$154,071$64,000
Rich GordonDCA-21$60,099$38,168
Jeff GorellRCA-37$7,400$31,300
Shannon GroveRCA-32$15,500$15,650
Curt HagmanRCA-60$11,800$60,550
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$33,000$47,550
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$5,600$41,600
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$57,016$28,000
Jerry HillDCA-19$103,705$57,363
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$59,997$19,000
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$1,000$27,800
Steve KnightRCA-36$2,000$9,750
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$83,500$27,200
Dan LogueRCA-3$5,365$31,150
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$21,300$12,000
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$6,850$27,475
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$9,480$104,850
Holly MitchellDCA-47$49,841$18,903
Bill MonningDCA-27$146,678$19,400
Mike MorrellRCA-63$16,175$30,741
Brian NestandeRCA-64$26,100$30,150
Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$14,882
Chris NorbyRCA-72$11,575$40,334
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$16,125$54,300
Richard PanDCA-5$136,371$33,718
Henry PereaDCA-31$39,100$73,434
John PerezDCA-46$343,349$114,401
Manuel PerezDCA-80$20,600$18,600
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$80,100$21,201
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$41,248$31,888
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$7,875$35,700
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$127,500$15,750
Das WilliamsDCA-35$98,361$12,500
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$46,970$7,600

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$6,350$24,300
Luis AlejoDCA-28$66,533$9,900
Michael AllenDCA-7$227,935$17,600
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$58,574$1,300
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$61,150$48,074
Jim BeallDCA-24$247,400$15,400
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$16,370$56,400
Marty BlockDCA-78$191,950$13,300
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$94,200$30,550
Susan BonillaDCA-11$48,905$22,074
Steven BradfordDCA-51$75,900$23,900
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$54,950$38,068
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$360,909$30,224
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$55,950$20,474
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$30,170$17,500
Connie ConwayRCA-34$11,650$98,225
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$107,600$8,050
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$8,375$12,750
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$84,072$16,850
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$6,200$54,371
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$175,959$35,783
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$154,071$64,000
Rich GordonDCA-21$60,099$38,168
Jeff GorellRCA-37$7,400$31,300
Shannon GroveRCA-32$15,500$15,650
Curt HagmanRCA-60$11,800$60,550
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$33,000$47,550
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$5,600$41,600
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$57,016$28,000
Jerry HillDCA-19$103,705$57,363
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$59,997$19,000
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$1,000$27,800
Steve KnightRCA-36$2,000$9,750
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$83,500$27,200
Dan LogueRCA-3$5,365$31,150
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$21,300$12,000
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$6,850$27,475
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$9,480$104,850
Holly MitchellDCA-47$49,841$18,903
Bill MonningDCA-27$146,678$19,400
Mike MorrellRCA-63$16,175$30,741
Brian NestandeRCA-64$26,100$30,150
Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$14,882
Chris NorbyRCA-72$11,575$40,334
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$16,125$54,300
Richard PanDCA-5$136,371$33,718
Henry PereaDCA-31$39,100$73,434
John PerezDCA-46$343,349$114,401
Manuel PerezDCA-80$20,600$18,600
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$80,100$21,201
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$41,248$31,888
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$7,875$35,700
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$127,500$15,750
Das WilliamsDCA-35$98,361$12,500
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$46,970$7,600

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Attorneys & law firms$1,301,141
State & local government employee unions$1,252,526
Health worker unions$453,700
Other unions$359,200
Teamsters unions$118,495
Labor unions$107,250
Transportation unions$87,299
Health & welfare policy$79,008
Civil servant/public employee$30,853
Merchant marine & longshoremen unions$24,000
Communications & hi-tech unions$21,100
Democratic-based groups (but not official party committees) and generic liberal/progressive ones$2,179
Food service & related unions$0
Manufacturing unions$0
Lawyers & lobbyists$0
Consumer groups$0
Entertainment unions$0
Commercial service unions$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Builders associations$314,825
Auto dealers, new & used$273,650
Hospitals$233,034
Restaurants & drinking establishments$203,051
Building operators & managers$197,362
Food stores$171,763
Engineering, architecture & construction management services$103,695
Electronics manufacturing & services$95,993
Chambers of commerce$62,400
Credit reporting services & collection agencies$42,250
Retail trade$41,479
Municipal & county government organizations$31,800
Small business organizations$17,700
Business services$9,000
Building materials$8,500
Home care services$5,500
General business associations$0
Security services$0
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range