Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

AB 26 - An Act to Add Section 53069.63 to the Government Code, to Add Part 5.5 (Commencing with Section 1550) to Division 2 of the Labor Code, and to Add Sections 653.65, 653.67, 653.69, 653.71, 653.73, and 653.74 to the Penal Code, Relating to Illegal Immigrants.

Illegal immigrants. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law, held unenforceable as preempted by federal law in the case of League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (1997) 997 F.Supp. 1244, prohibits any city, county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity from preventing or limiting the cooperation of any law enforcement agency with federal authorities regarding persons arrested and suspected of being present in the… More
Existing law, held unenforceable as preempted by federal law in the case of League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (1997) 997 F.Supp. 1244, prohibits any city, county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity from preventing or limiting the cooperation of any law enforcement agency with federal authorities regarding persons arrested and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, as specified.

This bill would prohibit public officials and agencies from adopting a policy that limits or restricts the enforcement of federal immigration laws or that restricts the sharing of a person’s immigration status, as specified. The bill would allow any person to bring an action against an entity to enforce these provisions.

Existing law generally regulates employment, including, but not limited to, the wages, hours, and working conditions of employees.

This bill would prohibit an employer from knowingly or intentionally employing an unauthorized alien, as specified. The bill would establish a process for persons to file complaints of violations of these provisions with the Attorney General or a district attorney. The bill would make it a misdemeanor to make a false and frivolous complaint alleging a violation of these provisions by an employer. The bill would provide for the investigation of these complaints and specify consequences, including the suspension of certain licenses, for employers that violate these provisions. The bill would require every employer to verify the employment eligibility of employees through the federal E-Verify program and require employers to participate in the federal E-Verify program in order to be eligible for economic development incentives, as specified. Because this bill would impose new duties on local governments and district attorneys, it would impose a state-mandated local program.

Existing law, held unenforceable as preempted by federal law in the case of League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (1997) 977 F.Supp. 1244, requires every law enforcement agency, with respect to any person who is arrested and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, to, among other things, attempt to verify the legal status of such person and notify the Attorney General and federal authorities of any apparent illegal status. Existing law makes it a felony, punishable in the state prison for 5 years and a fine of $25,000, for any person to use false documents to conceal his or her true citizenship or resident alien status.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor for a person to be present on any public or private land while at the same time the person is in violation of specified federal immigration laws. The bill would make it a felony to be in violation of this provision if the person is in possession of specified drugs, weapons, or property, as specified. The bill would make it a felony for a person to intentionally engage in the smuggling of a human being for profit or commercial purposes, as specified, and would provide differing penalties depending on the circumstances of the offense. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for an occupant of a motor vehicle to attempt to hire persons for work if the motor vehicle blocks or impedes the normal movement of traffic. The bill would also make it a misdemeanor to enter a motor vehicle in order to be hired by an occupant if the motor vehicle blocks or impedes the normal movement of traffic. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for a person who is unlawfully present in the United States and who is an unauthorized alien, as defined, to knowingly apply for or solicit work or perform work as an employee or independent contractor.

The bill would make it a misdemeanor to transport or move or attempt to transport or move an alien when the person knows, or recklessly disregards the fact, that the alien is in the United States unlawfully, as specified. The bill would make it a misdemeanor to conceal, harbor, or shield or attempt to conceal, harbor, or shield an alien from detection if the person knows, or recklessly disregards the fact, that the alien is in the United States unlawfully, as specified. The bill would make it a misdemeanor to encourage or induce an alien to come to, or reside in, this state if the person knows, or recklessly disregards the fact, that the alien would be entering or residing in this state unlawfully. The bill would make a violation of these provisions a felony if the violation involves 10 or more illegal aliens. Because this bill would create various new crimes, it would impose a state-mandated local program.

The bill would require a peace officer to cause the removal and either immobilization or impoundment of a vehicle if the peace officer determines that a person is driving the vehicle while the person is engaged in certain acts involving an alien unlawfully in the United States, as specified.

The bill would establish the Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement Mission Fund to be funded as specified, and administered by the Department of Justice to be used, upon appropriation, for gang and immigration enforcement and for county jail reimbursements relating to illegal immigration.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Hide
 
Status:
The bill was voted on by an Assembly committee on April 5, 2011. 
There have been no votes on passage on this bill.
Other Votes:

An Act to Add Section 53069.63 to the Government Code, to Add Part 5.5 (Commencing with Section 1550) to Division 2 of the Labor Code, and to Add Sections 653.65, 653.67, 653.69, 653.71, 653.73, and 653.74 to the Penal Code, Relating to Illegal Immigrants.

AB 26 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
Existing law, held unenforceable as preempted by federal law in the case of League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (1997) 997 F.Supp. 1244, prohibits any city, county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity from preventing or limiting the cooperation of any law enforcement agency with federal authorities regarding persons arrested and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, as specified.

This bill would prohibit public officials and agencies from adopting a policy that limits or restricts the enforcement of federal immigration laws or that restricts the sharing of a person’s immigration status, as specified. The bill would allow any person to bring an action against an entity to enforce these provisions.

Existing law generally regulates employment, including, but not limited to, the wages, hours, and working conditions of employees.

This bill would prohibit an employer from knowingly or intentionally employing an unauthorized alien, as specified. The bill would establish a process for persons to file complaints of violations of these provisions with the Attorney… More
Existing law, held unenforceable as preempted by federal law in the case of League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (1997) 997 F.Supp. 1244, prohibits any city, county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity from preventing or limiting the cooperation of any law enforcement agency with federal authorities regarding persons arrested and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, as specified.

This bill would prohibit public officials and agencies from adopting a policy that limits or restricts the enforcement of federal immigration laws or that restricts the sharing of a person’s immigration status, as specified. The bill would allow any person to bring an action against an entity to enforce these provisions.

Existing law generally regulates employment, including, but not limited to, the wages, hours, and working conditions of employees.

This bill would prohibit an employer from knowingly or intentionally employing an unauthorized alien, as specified. The bill would establish a process for persons to file complaints of violations of these provisions with the Attorney General or a district attorney. The bill would make it a misdemeanor to make a false and frivolous complaint alleging a violation of these provisions by an employer. The bill would provide for the investigation of these complaints and specify consequences, including the suspension of certain licenses, for employers that violate these provisions. The bill would require every employer to verify the employment eligibility of employees through the federal E-Verify program and require employers to participate in the federal E-Verify program in order to be eligible for economic development incentives, as specified. Because this bill would impose new duties on local governments and district attorneys, it would impose a state-mandated local program.

Existing law, held unenforceable as preempted by federal law in the case of League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson (1997) 977 F.Supp. 1244, requires every law enforcement agency, with respect to any person who is arrested and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, to, among other things, attempt to verify the legal status of such person and notify the Attorney General and federal authorities of any apparent illegal status. Existing law makes it a felony, punishable in the state prison for 5 years and a fine of $25,000, for any person to use false documents to conceal his or her true citizenship or resident alien status.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor for a person to be present on any public or private land while at the same time the person is in violation of specified federal immigration laws. The bill would make it a felony to be in violation of this provision if the person is in possession of specified drugs, weapons, or property, as specified. The bill would make it a felony for a person to intentionally engage in the smuggling of a human being for profit or commercial purposes, as specified, and would provide differing penalties depending on the circumstances of the offense. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for an occupant of a motor vehicle to attempt to hire persons for work if the motor vehicle blocks or impedes the normal movement of traffic. The bill would also make it a misdemeanor to enter a motor vehicle in order to be hired by an occupant if the motor vehicle blocks or impedes the normal movement of traffic. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for a person who is unlawfully present in the United States and who is an unauthorized alien, as defined, to knowingly apply for or solicit work or perform work as an employee or independent contractor.

The bill would make it a misdemeanor to transport or move or attempt to transport or move an alien when the person knows, or recklessly disregards the fact, that the alien is in the United States unlawfully, as specified. The bill would make it a misdemeanor to conceal, harbor, or shield or attempt to conceal, harbor, or shield an alien from detection if the person knows, or recklessly disregards the fact, that the alien is in the United States unlawfully, as specified. The bill would make it a misdemeanor to encourage or induce an alien to come to, or reside in, this state if the person knows, or recklessly disregards the fact, that the alien would be entering or residing in this state unlawfully. The bill would make a violation of these provisions a felony if the violation involves 10 or more illegal aliens. Because this bill would create various new crimes, it would impose a state-mandated local program.

The bill would require a peace officer to cause the removal and either immobilization or impoundment of a vehicle if the peace officer determines that a person is driving the vehicle while the person is engaged in certain acts involving an alien unlawfully in the United States, as specified.

The bill would establish the Gang and Immigration Intelligence Team Enforcement Mission Fund to be funded as specified, and administered by the Department of Justice to be used, upon appropriation, for gang and immigration enforcement and for county jail reimbursements relating to illegal immigration.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add Section 53069.63 to the Government Code, to Add Part 5.5 (Commencing with Section 1550) to Division 2 of the Labor Code, and to Add Sections 653.65, 653.67, 653.69, 653.71, 653.73, and 653.74 to the Penal Code, Relating to Illegal Immigrants.
Author(s)
Tim Donnelly
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Illegal immigrants
    Major Actions
    Introduced12/06/2010
    Referred to Committee
    Failed passage in Assembly Committee on Judiciary4/05/2011
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Public Safety.4/05/2011This motion DID NOT PASS the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
    3 voted YES 7 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced12/06/2010
    12/06/2010Read first time. To print.
    12/07/2010From printer. May be heard in committee January 6.
    1/27/2011Referred to Coms. on JUD. and PUB. S.
    3/15/2011In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
    3/22/2011In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
    4/05/2011In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.
    select this voteVote4/05/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Public Safety.
    5/26/2011From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

    Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

    5 Organizations Supported and 44 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Add Section 53069.63 to the Government Code, to Add Part 5.5 (Commencing with Section 1550) to Division 2 of the Labor Code, and to Add Sections 653.65, 653.67, 653.69, 653.71, 653.73, and 653.74 to the Penal Code, Relating to Illegal Immigrants.

    5 organizations supported this bill

    California Federation of Republican Women
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Californians for Population Stabilization
    CPS (n.d.). ALERT! New California bill would bar sanctuary cities, require businesses to use E-Verify system!. Retrieved February 2, 2011, from CPS.
    Capitol Resource Family Impact
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Concerned Women for America of California
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    We The People California's Crusade
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.

    44 organizations opposed this bill

    Amalgamated Transit Union
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    American Civil Liberties Union
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    American Federation of Teachers
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Anti-Defamation League
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Asian Americans for Civil Rights and Equality
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Asian Pacific American Legal Center
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    California Association of Health Facilities
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    California Chapter American Fence Association
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    California Employment Law Council
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    California Fence Contractors' Association
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    California Immigrant Policy Center
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    California Labor Federation
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    California Landscape Contractors Association
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    California Official Court Reporters Association
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    California State Attorney General
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Civil Justice Association of California
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    COFEM - Consejo De Federaciones Mexicanas En Norteamérica
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Colombian Alliance In The United States Of America
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Colombo Americans In Action
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Common Counsel Foundation
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Dioceses Of San Bernardino
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Engineering Contractors' Association
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Engineers and Scientists of California
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Flasher Barricade Association
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    IFPTE Local 21
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Immigrant Legal Resource Center
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    International Brotherhood of Teamsters
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    International Longshore and Warehouse Union
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Japanese American Citizens League
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Los Angeles County Sheriff
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Marin Builders Association
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    National Association of Social Workers
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    San Francisco Japanese American Citizens League
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Service Employees International Union
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Services, Immigrant Rights and Education Network
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    UNITE HERE!
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    United Food and Commercial Workers International Union
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.
    Utility Workers Union of America Local 132
    Assembly Committee on Judiciary (2011, April 4). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from Leg. Info.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office during the 2011-2012 California State Legislature, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$0$8,500
    Luis AlejoDCA-28$0$32,048
    Michael AllenDCA-7$0$96,800
    Tom AmmianoDCA-13$0$43,899
    Toni AtkinsDCA-76$0$44,324
    Jim BeallDCA-24$0$138,700
    Bill BerryhillRCA-26$2,500$21,508
    Marty BlockDCA-78$0$133,600
    Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$0$30,650
    Susan BonillaDCA-11$0$37,524
    Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$25,600
    Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
    Joan BuchananDCA-15$0$54,553
    Betsy ButlerDCA-53$0$87,224
    Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
    Nora CamposDCA-23$0$37,239
    Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$0$22,150
    Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$36,750
    Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
    Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
    Roger DickinsonDCA-9$0$30,950
    Tim DonnellyRCA-59$3,900$1,000
    Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
    Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
    Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
    Paul FongDCA-22$0$86,300
    Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
    Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
    Ted GainesRCA-4$7,800$16,900
    Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$125,104
    Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
    Mike GattoDCA-43$0$58,400
    Rich GordonDCA-21$0$47,928
    Jeff GorellRCA-37$0$7,500
    Shannon GroveRCA-32$0$1,000
    Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$21,000
    Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
    Isadore HallDCA-52$0$41,500
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$10,000
    Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
    Roger HernandezDCA-57$0$39,350
    Jerry HillDCA-19$0$50,808
    Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
    Ben HuesoDCA-79$0$30,631
    Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
    Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
    Brian JonesRCA-77$3,900$15,800
    Steve KnightRCA-36$1,000$4,500
    Ricardo LaraDCA-50$0$43,800
    Dan LogueRCA-3$7,800$9,900
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$0$21,800
    Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
    Allan MansoorRCA-68$7,800$6,025
    Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
    Jeff MillerRCA-71$5,500$41,450
    Holly MitchellDCA-47$0$24,374
    Bill MonningDCA-27$0$53,900
    Mike MorrellRCA-63$0$5,120
    Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$13,800
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$2,000
    Chris NorbyRCA-72$7,800$11,850
    Kristin OlsenRCA-25$0$8,000
    Richard PanDCA-5$0$82,851
    Henry PereaDCA-31$0$48,000
    John PerezDCA-46$0$131,455
    Manuel PerezDCA-80$0$22,200
    Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
    Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$0$40,450
    Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
    Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
    Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
    Norma TorresDCA-61$0$25,550
    David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
    Don WagnerRCA-70$0$7,000
    Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$0$28,650
    Das WilliamsDCA-35$0$47,387
    Mariko YamadaDCA-8$0$30,825

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$0$8,500
    Luis AlejoDCA-28$0$32,048
    Michael AllenDCA-7$0$96,800
    Tom AmmianoDCA-13$0$43,899
    Toni AtkinsDCA-76$0$44,324
    Jim BeallDCA-24$0$138,700
    Bill BerryhillRCA-26$2,500$21,508
    Marty BlockDCA-78$0$133,600
    Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$0$30,650
    Susan BonillaDCA-11$0$37,524
    Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$25,600
    Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
    Joan BuchananDCA-15$0$54,553
    Betsy ButlerDCA-53$0$87,224
    Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
    Nora CamposDCA-23$0$37,239
    Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$0$22,150
    Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$36,750
    Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
    Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
    Roger DickinsonDCA-9$0$30,950
    Tim DonnellyRCA-59$3,900$1,000
    Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
    Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
    Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
    Paul FongDCA-22$0$86,300
    Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
    Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
    Ted GainesRCA-4$7,800$16,900
    Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$125,104
    Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
    Mike GattoDCA-43$0$58,400
    Rich GordonDCA-21$0$47,928
    Jeff GorellRCA-37$0$7,500
    Shannon GroveRCA-32$0$1,000
    Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$21,000
    Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
    Isadore HallDCA-52$0$41,500
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$10,000
    Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
    Roger HernandezDCA-57$0$39,350
    Jerry HillDCA-19$0$50,808
    Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
    Ben HuesoDCA-79$0$30,631
    Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
    Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
    Brian JonesRCA-77$3,900$15,800
    Steve KnightRCA-36$1,000$4,500
    Ricardo LaraDCA-50$0$43,800
    Dan LogueRCA-3$7,800$9,900
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$0$21,800
    Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
    Allan MansoorRCA-68$7,800$6,025
    Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
    Jeff MillerRCA-71$5,500$41,450
    Holly MitchellDCA-47$0$24,374
    Bill MonningDCA-27$0$53,900
    Mike MorrellRCA-63$0$5,120
    Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$13,800
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$2,000
    Chris NorbyRCA-72$7,800$11,850
    Kristin OlsenRCA-25$0$8,000
    Richard PanDCA-5$0$82,851
    Henry PereaDCA-31$0$48,000
    John PerezDCA-46$0$131,455
    Manuel PerezDCA-80$0$22,200
    Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
    Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$0$40,450
    Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
    Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
    Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
    Norma TorresDCA-61$0$25,550
    David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
    Don WagnerRCA-70$0$7,000
    Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$0$28,650
    Das WilliamsDCA-35$0$47,387
    Mariko YamadaDCA-8$0$30,825

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    Christian Coalition, religious right$35,100
    Republican-based groups (but not official party committees) and generic conservative ones$12,900

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Teachers unions$795,150
    Other unions$359,200
    Builders associations$315,354
    Teamsters unions$118,495
    Labor unions$107,250
    Engineering, architecture & construction management services$102,195
    Transportation unions$87,299
    Pro-business organizations$70,592
    Schools & colleges$37,887
    Municipal & county government organizations$34,700
    Minority & ethnic groups$31,100
    Welfare & social work$29,175
    Merchant marine & longshoremen unions$24,000
    Landscaping & excavation services$9,300
    Building materials$8,500
    Special trade contractors$7,650
    Public official (elected or appointed)$3,500
    Health care institutions$2,600
    Democratic-based groups (but not official party committees) and generic liberal/progressive ones$2,179
    Energy-related unions (non-mining)$0
    Food service & related unions$0
    Human rights$0
    Manufacturing unions$0
    Civil service & government unions$0
    Commercial service unions$0
    General business associations$0
    General commercial unions$0
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range