Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

AB 2610 - An Act to Amend Section 2924.8 of the Civil Code, and to Amend Sections 415.46 and 1161b of the Code of Civil Procedure, Relating to Tenants.

Tenants: foreclosure and unlawful detainer. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law requires a notice of sale to be posted before any power of sale can be exercised under the power of sale contained in any deed of trust or mortgage. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be provided a specified notice advising the resident that, among other things, if the person is renting the property,… More
(1)Existing law requires a notice of sale to be posted before any power of sale can be exercised under the power of sale contained in any deed of trust or mortgage. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be provided a specified notice advising the resident that, among other things, if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may either give the tenant a new lease or rental agreement, or provide the tenant with a 60-day eviction notice, and that other laws may prohibit the eviction or provide the tenant with a longer notice before eviction. Existing law makes it an infraction to tear down the notice within 72 hours of posting. Existing law requires a state government entity to make translations of the notice available in 5 specified languages, for use by a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, in order to satisfy the notice requirements.

This bill would revise certain portions of the notice to instead require a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be advised that if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may either give the tenant a new lease or rental agreement, or provide the tenant with a 90-day eviction notice. The bill would require the notice to advise a tenant who has a lease that the new property owner is required to honor the lease unless the new owner will occupy the property as a primary residence or under other limited circumstances. The bill would require the Department of Consumer Affairs to make translations of the notice available, as described above. The bill would provide that these changes to the notice would become operative on March 1, 2013, or 60 days following posting of a dated notice incorporating those amendments on the Department of Consumer Affairs Internet Web site, whichever date is later. The bill would extend the operation of these provisions until December 31, 2019.

By extending the operation of provisions establishing a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(2)Existing law provides, that in an unlawful detainer action, if an owner or owner’s agent has obtained service of a prejudgment claim of right to possession, as specified, no occupant of the premises, whether or not that occupant is named in the judgment for possession, may object to the enforcement of the judgment, as specified.

This bill would provide that in any action for unlawful detainer resulting from a foreclosure sale of a rental housing unit pursuant to specified provisions, the above provisions regarding objection to the enforcement of a judgment do not limit the right of a tenant or subtenant to file a prejudgment claim of right of possession or to object to enforcement of a judgment for possession, regardless of whether the tenant or subtenant was served with a prejudgment claim of right to possession, as specified.

(3)Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit at the time that property is sold in foreclosure to be provided 60 days’ written notice to quit before the tenant or subtenant may be removed from the property, as specified.

This bill would instead require a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit under a month-to-month lease at the time that property is sold in foreclosure to be provided 90 days’ written notice to quit before the tenant or subtenant may be removed from the property. The bill would provide tenants or subtenants holding possession of a rental housing unit under a fixed-term residential lease entered into before transfer of title at the foreclosure sale the right to possession until the end of the lease term, except in specified circumstances. The bill would also extend the operation of these provisions until December 31, 2019.

(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on May 31, 2012.

voted YES: 56 voted NO: 14
10 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 2924.8 of the Civil Code, and to Amend Sections 415.46 and 1161b of the Code of Civil Procedure, Relating to Tenants.

AB 2610 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law requires a notice of sale to be posted before any power of sale can be exercised under the power of sale contained in any deed of trust or mortgage. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be provided a specified notice advising the resident that, among other things, if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may either give the tenant a new lease or rental agreement, or provide the tenant with a 60-day eviction notice, and that other laws may prohibit the eviction or provide the tenant with a longer notice before eviction. Existing law makes it an infraction to tear down the notice within 72 hours of posting. Existing law requires a state government entity to make translations of the notice available in 5 specified languages, for use by a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, in order to satisfy the notice requirements.

This bill would revise certain portions of the notice to instead require a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be advised that if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may… More
(1)Existing law requires a notice of sale to be posted before any power of sale can be exercised under the power of sale contained in any deed of trust or mortgage. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be provided a specified notice advising the resident that, among other things, if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may either give the tenant a new lease or rental agreement, or provide the tenant with a 60-day eviction notice, and that other laws may prohibit the eviction or provide the tenant with a longer notice before eviction. Existing law makes it an infraction to tear down the notice within 72 hours of posting. Existing law requires a state government entity to make translations of the notice available in 5 specified languages, for use by a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, in order to satisfy the notice requirements.

This bill would revise certain portions of the notice to instead require a resident of property upon which a notice of sale has been posted to be advised that if the person is renting the property, the new property owner may either give the tenant a new lease or rental agreement, or provide the tenant with a 90-day eviction notice. The bill would require the notice to advise a tenant who has a lease that the new property owner is required to honor the lease unless the new owner will occupy the property as a primary residence or under other limited circumstances. The bill would require the Department of Consumer Affairs to make translations of the notice available, as described above. The bill would provide that these changes to the notice would become operative on March 1, 2013, or 60 days following posting of a dated notice incorporating those amendments on the Department of Consumer Affairs Internet Web site, whichever date is later. The bill would extend the operation of these provisions until December 31, 2019.

By extending the operation of provisions establishing a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(2)Existing law provides, that in an unlawful detainer action, if an owner or owner’s agent has obtained service of a prejudgment claim of right to possession, as specified, no occupant of the premises, whether or not that occupant is named in the judgment for possession, may object to the enforcement of the judgment, as specified.

This bill would provide that in any action for unlawful detainer resulting from a foreclosure sale of a rental housing unit pursuant to specified provisions, the above provisions regarding objection to the enforcement of a judgment do not limit the right of a tenant or subtenant to file a prejudgment claim of right of possession or to object to enforcement of a judgment for possession, regardless of whether the tenant or subtenant was served with a prejudgment claim of right to possession, as specified.

(3)Existing law, until January 1, 2013, requires a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit at the time that property is sold in foreclosure to be provided 60 days’ written notice to quit before the tenant or subtenant may be removed from the property, as specified.

This bill would instead require a tenant or subtenant in possession of a rental housing unit under a month-to-month lease at the time that property is sold in foreclosure to be provided 90 days’ written notice to quit before the tenant or subtenant may be removed from the property. The bill would provide tenants or subtenants holding possession of a rental housing unit under a fixed-term residential lease entered into before transfer of title at the foreclosure sale the right to possession until the end of the lease term, except in specified circumstances. The bill would also extend the operation of these provisions until December 31, 2019.

(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 2924.8 of the Civil Code, and to Amend Sections 415.46 and 1161b of the Code of Civil Procedure, Relating to Tenants.
Author(s)
Nancy Skinner
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Tenants: foreclosure and unlawful detainer
Major Actions
Introduced2/24/2012
Referred to Committee
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary4/17/2012
Passed Assembly Committee on Housing and Community Development4/25/2012
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/16/2012
Passed Assembly5/31/2012
Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary7/03/2012
Passed Senate8/23/2012
Passed Assembly8/27/2012
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/10/2012
Became law (chaptered).9/25/2012
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Housing and Community Development.4/17/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
7 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Housing and Community DevelopmentDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/25/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Housing and Community Development
5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/16/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 5 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblyAB 2610 SKINNER Assembly Third Reading5/31/2012This bill PASSED the Assembly
56 voted YES 14 voted NO 10 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.7/03/2012This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
5 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB2610 Skinner By Hancock8/23/2012This bill PASSED the Senate
36 voted YES 0 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblyAB 2610 SKINNER Concurrence in Senate Amendments8/27/2012This bill PASSED the Assembly
69 voted YES 9 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/24/2012
2/24/2012Introduced. To print.
2/26/2012From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
2/27/2012Read first time.
3/29/2012Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
4/09/2012Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D. Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and H. & C.D. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
select this voteVote4/17/2012Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Housing and Community Development.
4/18/2012From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 17).
4/19/2012Read second time and amended.
4/23/2012Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
4/25/2012From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote4/25/2012Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
select this voteVote5/16/2012Do pass.
5/16/2012From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 16).
5/17/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
5/30/2012Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5139.)
5/31/2012Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 5176.) Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 56. Noes 14. Page 5203.)
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage5/31/2012AB 2610 SKINNER Assembly Third Reading
6/04/2012In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
6/14/2012Referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote7/03/2012Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
7/05/2012From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/06/2012From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
8/07/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/08/2012Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
8/09/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/20/2012Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
8/21/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/23/2012Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4750.).
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/23/2012Assembly 3rd Reading AB2610 Skinner By Hancock
8/24/2012In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
8/27/2012Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 69. Noes 9. Page 6386.). Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6357.)
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/27/2012AB 2610 SKINNER Concurrence in Senate Amendments
9/10/2012Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:25 a.m.
9/25/2012Approved by the Governor.
9/25/2012Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 562, Statutes of 2012.

Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

35 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Section 2924.8 of the Civil Code, and to Amend Sections 415.46 and 1161b of the Code of Civil Procedure, Relating to Tenants.: AB 2610 SKINNER Assembly Third Reading

35 organizations supported this bill

Amalgamated Transit Union
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California and Nevada Credit Union Leagues
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Apartment Association
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Bankers Association
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Chamber of Commerce
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Conference of Machinists
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Federation of Teachers
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Financial Services Association
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Independent Bankers
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Labor Federation
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Mortgage Association
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Mortgage Bankers Association
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Nurses Association
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Professional Firefighters
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California School Employees Association
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Consumers Union
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
County of Santa Cruz
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Engineers and Scientists of California
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
IFPTE Local 21
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Los Angeles County Democratic Party
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Housing Law Project
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Nurses Organizing Committee
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
PICO California
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Public Counsel
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
SEIU Local 1000
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
UFCW Western States Council
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
UNITE HERE!
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
United Trustees Association
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Utility Workers Union of America Local 132
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Western Center on Law and Poverty
Senate Committee on Judiciary (2012, July 2). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved July 3, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

0 organizations opposed this bill

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$59,500$0
Luis AlejoDCA-28$153,981$0
Michael AllenDCA-7$405,300$0
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$112,823$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$149,450$0
Jim BeallDCA-24$346,244$0
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$41,160$0
Marty BlockDCA-78$363,450$0
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$167,700$0
Susan BonillaDCA-11$180,130$0
Steven BradfordDCA-51$124,000$0
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$174,100$0
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$393,050$0
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$208,951$0
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$86,821$0
Connie ConwayRCA-34$74,900$0
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$181,150$0
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$4,250$0
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$211,784$0
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$26,100$0
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$384,590$0
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$231,750$0
Rich GordonDCA-21$153,136$0
Jeff GorellRCA-37$51,700$0
Shannon GroveRCA-32$8,500$0
Curt HagmanRCA-60$54,250$0
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$146,700$0
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$49,600$0
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$172,866$0
Jerry HillDCA-19$268,205$0
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$146,397$0
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$17,200$0
Steve KnightRCA-36$16,700$0
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$200,850$0
Dan LogueRCA-3$24,600$0
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$70,450$0
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$8,500$0
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$44,800$0
Holly MitchellDCA-47$106,683$0
Bill MonningDCA-27$226,000$0
Mike MorrellRCA-63$41,121$0
Brian NestandeRCA-64$90,600$0
Jim NielsenRCA-2$15,400$0
Chris NorbyRCA-72$15,750$0
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$43,500$0
Richard PanDCA-5$273,992$0
Henry PereaDCA-31$137,200$0
John PerezDCA-46$473,499$0
Manuel PerezDCA-80$115,300$0
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$191,755$0
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$150,914$0
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$29,200$0
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$151,080$0
Das WilliamsDCA-35$242,039$0
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$86,703$0

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$59,500$0
Luis AlejoDCA-28$153,981$0
Michael AllenDCA-7$405,300$0
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$112,823$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$149,450$0
Jim BeallDCA-24$346,244$0
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$41,160$0
Marty BlockDCA-78$363,450$0
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$167,700$0
Susan BonillaDCA-11$180,130$0
Steven BradfordDCA-51$124,000$0
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$174,100$0
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$393,050$0
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$208,951$0
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$86,821$0
Connie ConwayRCA-34$74,900$0
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$181,150$0
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$4,250$0
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$211,784$0
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$26,100$0
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$384,590$0
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$231,750$0
Rich GordonDCA-21$153,136$0
Jeff GorellRCA-37$51,700$0
Shannon GroveRCA-32$8,500$0
Curt HagmanRCA-60$54,250$0
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$146,700$0
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$49,600$0
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$172,866$0
Jerry HillDCA-19$268,205$0
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$146,397$0
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$17,200$0
Steve KnightRCA-36$16,700$0
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$200,850$0
Dan LogueRCA-3$24,600$0
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$70,450$0
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$8,500$0
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$44,800$0
Holly MitchellDCA-47$106,683$0
Bill MonningDCA-27$226,000$0
Mike MorrellRCA-63$41,121$0
Brian NestandeRCA-64$90,600$0
Jim NielsenRCA-2$15,400$0
Chris NorbyRCA-72$15,750$0
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$43,500$0
Richard PanDCA-5$273,992$0
Henry PereaDCA-31$137,200$0
John PerezDCA-46$473,499$0
Manuel PerezDCA-80$115,300$0
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$191,755$0
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$150,914$0
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$29,200$0
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$151,080$0
Das WilliamsDCA-35$242,039$0
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$86,703$0

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Construction unions$2,395,833
Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,293,027
State & local government employee unions$1,252,526
Teachers unions$795,150
Health worker unions$453,700
Other unions$359,200
Commercial banks & bank holding companies$356,283
Building operators & managers$197,362
Credit unions$134,595
Teamsters unions$118,495
Labor unions$107,250
Transportation unions$87,299
Mortgage bankers & brokers$82,697
Health & welfare policy$79,008
Financial services & consulting$75,750
Chambers of commerce$62,400
Municipal & county government organizations$31,800
Merchant marine & longshoremen unions$24,000
Energy-related unions (non-mining)$0
Other real estate services, appraisals$0
Food service & related unions$0
Human rights$0
Manufacturing unions$0
Banks & lending institutions$0
Commercial service unions$0
Consumer groups$0
General commercial unions$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range