AB 469 - An Act to Amend Sections 98, 226, 240, 243, 1174, and 1197.1 Of, and to Add Sections 200.5, 1194.3, 1197.2, 1206, and 2810.5 To, the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.

Employees: wages. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate and enforce statutes and orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that, among other things, specify the requirements for the payment of wages by employers. Existing law provides for criminal and civil penalties for violations of statutes and orders of the commission regarding payment of wages.

This bill would provide… More
(1)Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate and enforce statutes and orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that, among other things, specify the requirements for the payment of wages by employers. Existing law provides for criminal and civil penalties for violations of statutes and orders of the commission regarding payment of wages.

This bill would provide that in addition to being subject to a civil penalty, any employer who pays or causes to be paid to any employee a wage less than the minimum fixed by an order of the commission shall be subject to paying restitution of wages to the employee.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor if an employer willfully violates specified wage statutes or orders, or willfully fails to pay a final court judgment or final order of the Labor Commissioner for wages due.

(2)Existing law provides that an action by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations for collection of a statutory penalty or fee must be commenced within one year after the penalty or fee became final.

This bill would extend the period within which the division may commence a collection action, as defined, from one year to 3 years.

(3)Existing law permits the Labor Commissioner to require an employer who has been convicted of a subsequent wage violation or who has failed to satisfy a judgment to post a bond in order to continue business operations.

This bill would extend the time required for a subsequently convicted employer to maintain a bond from 6 months to 2 years and would require that a subsequently convicted employer provide an accounting of assets, as specified, to the Labor Commissioner.

(4)Existing law requires an employer to post specified wage and hour information in a location where it can be viewed by employees.

This bill would require an employer to provide each employee, at the time of hiring, with a notice that specifies the rate and the basis, whether hourly, salary, commission, or otherwise, of the employee’s wages and to notify each employee in writing of any changes to the information set forth in the notice within 7 calendar days of the changes unless such changes are reflected on a timely wage statement or another writing, as specified. No notice would be required for an employee who is employed by the state or any subdivision thereof, exempt from the payment of overtime, or covered by a collective bargaining agreement containing specified information.

(5)In addition to the crime and employer obligations imposed by this bill, the Labor Code provides for other work-related standards and duties that, upon violation, are subject to specified penalties.

This bill would state that the Labor Code establishes minimum penalties for failure to comply with wage-related statutes and regulations.

Because this bill would create a new crime or expand the definition of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program.

(6)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 98 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 240, that would become operative only if AB 240 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

This bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 226 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 243, that would become operative only if AB 243 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on September 6, 2011.

voted YES: 51 voted NO: 27
2 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 98, 226, 240, 243, 1174, and 1197.1 Of, and to Add Sections 200.5, 1194.3, 1197.2, 1206, and 2810.5 To, the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.

AB 469 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate and enforce statutes and orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that, among other things, specify the requirements for the payment of wages by employers. Existing law provides for criminal and civil penalties for violations of statutes and orders of the commission regarding payment of wages.

This bill would provide that in addition to being subject to a civil penalty, any employer who pays or causes to be paid to any employee a wage less than the minimum fixed by an order of the commission shall be subject to paying restitution of wages to the employee.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor if an employer willfully violates specified wage statutes or orders, or willfully fails to pay a final court judgment or final order of the Labor Commissioner for wages due.

(2)Existing law provides that an action by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations for collection of a statutory penalty or fee must be commenced within one year after the penalty or fee became final.

This bill would extend the period within which the division… More
(1)Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate and enforce statutes and orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that, among other things, specify the requirements for the payment of wages by employers. Existing law provides for criminal and civil penalties for violations of statutes and orders of the commission regarding payment of wages.

This bill would provide that in addition to being subject to a civil penalty, any employer who pays or causes to be paid to any employee a wage less than the minimum fixed by an order of the commission shall be subject to paying restitution of wages to the employee.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor if an employer willfully violates specified wage statutes or orders, or willfully fails to pay a final court judgment or final order of the Labor Commissioner for wages due.

(2)Existing law provides that an action by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations for collection of a statutory penalty or fee must be commenced within one year after the penalty or fee became final.

This bill would extend the period within which the division may commence a collection action, as defined, from one year to 3 years.

(3)Existing law permits the Labor Commissioner to require an employer who has been convicted of a subsequent wage violation or who has failed to satisfy a judgment to post a bond in order to continue business operations.

This bill would extend the time required for a subsequently convicted employer to maintain a bond from 6 months to 2 years and would require that a subsequently convicted employer provide an accounting of assets, as specified, to the Labor Commissioner.

(4)Existing law requires an employer to post specified wage and hour information in a location where it can be viewed by employees.

This bill would require an employer to provide each employee, at the time of hiring, with a notice that specifies the rate and the basis, whether hourly, salary, commission, or otherwise, of the employee’s wages and to notify each employee in writing of any changes to the information set forth in the notice within 7 calendar days of the changes unless such changes are reflected on a timely wage statement or another writing, as specified. No notice would be required for an employee who is employed by the state or any subdivision thereof, exempt from the payment of overtime, or covered by a collective bargaining agreement containing specified information.

(5)In addition to the crime and employer obligations imposed by this bill, the Labor Code provides for other work-related standards and duties that, upon violation, are subject to specified penalties.

This bill would state that the Labor Code establishes minimum penalties for failure to comply with wage-related statutes and regulations.

Because this bill would create a new crime or expand the definition of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program.

(6)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 98 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 240, that would become operative only if AB 240 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

This bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 226 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 243, that would become operative only if AB 243 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 98, 226, 240, 243, 1174, and 1197.1 Of, and to Add Sections 200.5, 1194.3, 1197.2, 1206, and 2810.5 To, the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.
Author(s)
Sandre Swanson
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Employees: wages
Major Actions
Introduced2/15/2011
Referred to Committee
Passed Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment4/13/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary4/26/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/27/2011
Passed Assembly6/01/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations6/22/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary7/05/2011
Passed Senate8/31/2011
Passed Assembly9/06/2011
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/19/2011
Became law (chaptered).10/09/2011
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteAssembly Committee on Labor and EmploymentDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary.4/13/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment
5 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/26/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
6 voted YES 3 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/27/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
12 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblyAB 469 SWANSON Assembly Third Reading6/01/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
50 voted YES 25 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on Labor and Industrial RelationsDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.6/22/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations
5 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.7/05/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
3 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB469 Swanson By Lieu8/31/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
21 voted YES 14 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblyAB 469 SWANSON Concurrence in Senate Amendments9/06/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
51 voted YES 27 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/15/2011
2/15/2011Read first time. To print.
2/16/2011From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
3/31/2011Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
4/04/2011Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
4/07/2011From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
4/11/2011Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
select this voteVote4/13/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
4/14/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on JUD. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
4/25/2011Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote4/26/2011Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
5/02/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 26).
5/03/2011Read second time and amended.
5/04/2011Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
5/18/2011In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
5/27/2011From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27). Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
select this voteVote5/27/2011Do pass as amended.
5/31/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
6/01/2011Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 1725.)
6/01/2011In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage6/01/2011AB 469 SWANSON Assembly Third Reading
6/08/2011Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
6/14/2011From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
select this voteVote6/22/2011Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.
6/23/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 22).
6/27/2011Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote7/05/2011Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
7/06/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
7/12/2011From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/15/2011From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
8/16/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/29/2011Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
8/30/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/31/2011Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 2203.).
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/31/2011Assembly 3rd Reading AB469 Swanson By Lieu
9/01/2011In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
9/06/2011Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 2907.).
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage9/06/2011AB 469 SWANSON Concurrence in Senate Amendments
9/19/2011Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
10/09/2011Approved by the Governor.
10/09/2011Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 655, Statutes of 2011.

Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from Insurance agencies, brokers & agents, which…

opposed this bill

Insurance agencies, brokers & agents$269,151
$269,151

19 Organizations Supported and 15 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 98, 226, 240, 243, 1174, and 1197.1 Of, and to Add Sections 200.5, 1194.3, 1197.2, 1206, and 2810.5 To, the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.: AB 469 SWANSON Concurrence in Senate Amendments

19 organizations supported this bill

AFL-CIO
California Labor Federation (2011). Cracking Down on the Underground Economy. Retrieved April 6, 2011, from California Labor Federation.
Amalgamated Transit Union
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Employment Lawyers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Centro Legal de la Raza
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Engineers and Scientists of California
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
International Longshore & Warehouse Union
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Association of Working Women
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Lawyers Guild Labor & Employment Committee
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Nurses United
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Office of the Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, City of Los Angeles
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Professional & Technical Engineers, Local 21
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Small Business California
Hauge, Scott (2011, April 1). Paid Sick Leave/ SB 469/AB 52 . Retrieved April 18, 2011, from Small Business California.
UNITE HERE!
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Western States Council
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Young Workers United
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

15 organizations opposed this bill

Acclimation Insurance Management Services
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Allied Managed Care
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Associated Builders & Contractors
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Associated General Contractors of America
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Chapter of the American Fence Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Employment Law Council (unless amended)
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Farm Bureau Federation
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Fence Contractors’ Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Retailers Association
Dombrowski, Bill (2011, April 6). We Need Legislators to Focus on Growing Jobs, Not Anti-Job Legislation. Retrieved April 6, 2011, from Fox & Hounds Daily.
Construction Employers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Engineering Contractors’ Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Flasher Barricade Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Marin Builders’ Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Western Growers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Anything missing?

Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
How do you know they have this position? Please include a link to a newspaper article, organization's website, or other source.
We will use it only to contact you about this form. Your address will never appear on this site.

MapLight editors may add this organization after checking the sources you listed above. Thank you for helping to improve our site.

Cancel
Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from Insurance agencies, brokers & agents interest groups, May 20, 2010 – May 19, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$0$2,000
Luis AlejoDCA-28$0$1,000
Michael AllenDCA-7$0$0
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$0$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$0$6,900
Jim BeallDCA-24$0$0
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$3,000
Marty BlockDCA-78$0$2,000
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$0$3,000
Susan BonillaDCA-11$0$4,500
Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$3,000
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$0$0
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$0$0
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$4,900
Nora CamposDCA-23$0$3,000
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$2,000
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$4,900
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$0$1,000
Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$4,500
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$0$0
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$0$1,000
Mike EngDCA-49$0$3,900
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$0$1,000
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$2,000
Beth GainesRCA-4$0$16,300
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$1,000
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$9,200
Mike GattoDCA-43$0$6,500
Rich GordonDCA-21$0$3,000
Jeff GorellRCA-37$0$12,200
Shannon GroveRCA-32$0$4,900
Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$17,400
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$0$2,500
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$2,000
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$1,000
Roger HernandezDCA-57$0$7,900
Jerry HillDCA-19$0$6,900
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$4,000
Ben HuesoDCA-79$0$2,000
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$0$1,000
Steve KnightRCA-36$0$2,500
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$0$15,900
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$2,000
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$0$0
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$0$3,900
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$3,000
Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$4,000
Holly MitchellDCA-47$0$0
Bill MonningDCA-27$0$3,000
Mike MorrellRCA-63$0$7,800
Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$2,000
Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$0
Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$2,500
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$0$12,300
Richard PanDCA-5$0$2,500
Henry PereaDCA-31$0$6,000
John PerezDCA-46$0$13,551
Manuel PerezDCA-80$0$3,000
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$3,500
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$0$4,500
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$2,000
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$2,500
Norma TorresDCA-61$0$9,500
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$6,800
Don WagnerRCA-70$0$1,000
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$0$2,000
Das WilliamsDCA-35$0$2,000
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$0$0

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$2,000$12,250
Luis AlejoDCA-28$31,025$6,000
Michael AllenDCA-7$24,100$1,300
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$20,350$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$29,600$33,624
Jim BeallDCA-24$35,850$1,000
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$9,250
Marty BlockDCA-78$38,500$15,300
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$28,400$11,500
Susan BonillaDCA-11$23,785$18,474
Steven BradfordDCA-51$16,400$17,250
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$5,500$2,000
Joan BuchananDCA-15$47,200$37,806
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$50,600$21,796
Charles CalderonDCA-58$2,000$9,900
Nora CamposDCA-23$24,400$6,474
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$3,000$3,000
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$14,300$10,400
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$11,008$3,000
Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$83,347
Paul CookRCA-65$4,900$5,900
Mike DavisDCA-48$1,500$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$31,400$7,200
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$0$4,500
Mike EngDCA-49$7,250$10,500
Mike FeuerDCA-42$2,000$6,900
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$24,247
Paul FongDCA-22$29,550$2,500
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$3,500$22,700
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$28,850$5,900
Beth GainesRCA-4$1,000$38,743
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$28,500$53,683
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$51,773
Mike GattoDCA-43$31,200$57,700
Rich GordonDCA-21$15,336$20,400
Jeff GorellRCA-37$0$35,500
Shannon GroveRCA-32$0$22,600
Curt HagmanRCA-60$1,600$57,350
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$3,900$8,000
Isadore HallDCA-52$14,300$31,503
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$1,000$15,500
Mary HayashiDCA-18$19,300$16,500
Roger HernandezDCA-57$32,116$37,030
Jerry HillDCA-19$18,597$28,834
Alyson HuberDCA-10$15,625$6,296
Ben HuesoDCA-79$28,297$11,650
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$6,500$250
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$6,150
Brian JonesRCA-77$0$6,000
Steve KnightRCA-36$0$12,600
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$45,900$34,700
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$52,830
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$39,200$9,000
Fiona MaDCA-12$3,800$17,700
Allan MansoorRCA-68$0$23,900
Tony MendozaDCA-56$9,900$13,000
Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$57,650
Holly MitchellDCA-47$37,850$8,474
Bill MonningDCA-27$31,250$26,563
Mike MorrellRCA-63$1,000$33,800
Brian NestandeRCA-64$3,900$24,200
Jim NielsenRCA-2$1,000$14,400
Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$21,750
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$1,000$48,269
Richard PanDCA-5$99,600$40,768
Henry PereaDCA-31$24,850$55,088
John PerezDCA-46$116,649$99,075
Manuel PerezDCA-80$30,100$25,950
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$13,250$8,000
Jim SilvaRCA-67$3,900$6,050
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$49,700$19,201
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$13,400
Jose SolorioDCA-69$8,750$15,000
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$31,300$5,000
Norma TorresDCA-61$16,500$23,777
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$43,334
Don WagnerRCA-70$1,000$8,600
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$33,120$5,500
Das WilliamsDCA-35$63,200$6,500
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$24,150$3,034

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Health worker unions$548,100
Other unions$354,100
Teamsters unions$140,645
Labor unions$114,922
Health & welfare policy$97,016
Transportation unions$51,250
Merchant marine & longshoremen unions$51,150
Minority & ethnic groups$30,000
Women's issues$29,450
Communications & hi-tech unions$8,450
Public official (elected or appointed)$25
Manufacturing unions$0
Food service & related unions$0
Human rights$0
Small business organizations$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Accident & health insurance$714,803
Builders associations$316,200
Insurance agencies, brokers & agents$269,151
Engineering, architecture & construction management services$94,976
Farm organizations & cooperatives$87,624
Farm Bureau/affiliated organizations & PACs$70,614
Manufacturing$51,211
Retail trade$43,412
Construction equipment$24,600
Special trade contractors$4,000
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range