AB 469 - An Act to Amend Sections 98, 226, 240, 243, 1174, and 1197.1 Of, and to Add Sections 200.5, 1194.3, 1197.2, 1206, and 2810.5 To, the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.

Employees: wages. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate and enforce statutes and orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that, among other things, specify the requirements for the payment of wages by employers. Existing law provides for criminal and civil penalties for violations of statutes and orders of the commission regarding payment of wages.

This bill would provide… More
(1)Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate and enforce statutes and orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that, among other things, specify the requirements for the payment of wages by employers. Existing law provides for criminal and civil penalties for violations of statutes and orders of the commission regarding payment of wages.

This bill would provide that in addition to being subject to a civil penalty, any employer who pays or causes to be paid to any employee a wage less than the minimum fixed by an order of the commission shall be subject to paying restitution of wages to the employee.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor if an employer willfully violates specified wage statutes or orders, or willfully fails to pay a final court judgment or final order of the Labor Commissioner for wages due.

(2)Existing law provides that an action by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations for collection of a statutory penalty or fee must be commenced within one year after the penalty or fee became final.

This bill would extend the period within which the division may commence a collection action, as defined, from one year to 3 years.

(3)Existing law permits the Labor Commissioner to require an employer who has been convicted of a subsequent wage violation or who has failed to satisfy a judgment to post a bond in order to continue business operations.

This bill would extend the time required for a subsequently convicted employer to maintain a bond from 6 months to 2 years and would require that a subsequently convicted employer provide an accounting of assets, as specified, to the Labor Commissioner.

(4)Existing law requires an employer to post specified wage and hour information in a location where it can be viewed by employees.

This bill would require an employer to provide each employee, at the time of hiring, with a notice that specifies the rate and the basis, whether hourly, salary, commission, or otherwise, of the employee’s wages and to notify each employee in writing of any changes to the information set forth in the notice within 7 calendar days of the changes unless such changes are reflected on a timely wage statement or another writing, as specified. No notice would be required for an employee who is employed by the state or any subdivision thereof, exempt from the payment of overtime, or covered by a collective bargaining agreement containing specified information.

(5)In addition to the crime and employer obligations imposed by this bill, the Labor Code provides for other work-related standards and duties that, upon violation, are subject to specified penalties.

This bill would state that the Labor Code establishes minimum penalties for failure to comply with wage-related statutes and regulations.

Because this bill would create a new crime or expand the definition of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program.

(6)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 98 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 240, that would become operative only if AB 240 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

This bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 226 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 243, that would become operative only if AB 243 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on September 6, 2011.

voted YES: 51 voted NO: 27
2 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 98, 226, 240, 243, 1174, and 1197.1 Of, and to Add Sections 200.5, 1194.3, 1197.2, 1206, and 2810.5 To, the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.

AB 469 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate and enforce statutes and orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that, among other things, specify the requirements for the payment of wages by employers. Existing law provides for criminal and civil penalties for violations of statutes and orders of the commission regarding payment of wages.

This bill would provide that in addition to being subject to a civil penalty, any employer who pays or causes to be paid to any employee a wage less than the minimum fixed by an order of the commission shall be subject to paying restitution of wages to the employee.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor if an employer willfully violates specified wage statutes or orders, or willfully fails to pay a final court judgment or final order of the Labor Commissioner for wages due.

(2)Existing law provides that an action by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations for collection of a statutory penalty or fee must be commenced within one year after the penalty or fee became final.

This bill would extend the period within which the division… More
(1)Existing law authorizes the Labor Commissioner to investigate and enforce statutes and orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission that, among other things, specify the requirements for the payment of wages by employers. Existing law provides for criminal and civil penalties for violations of statutes and orders of the commission regarding payment of wages.

This bill would provide that in addition to being subject to a civil penalty, any employer who pays or causes to be paid to any employee a wage less than the minimum fixed by an order of the commission shall be subject to paying restitution of wages to the employee.

This bill would make it a misdemeanor if an employer willfully violates specified wage statutes or orders, or willfully fails to pay a final court judgment or final order of the Labor Commissioner for wages due.

(2)Existing law provides that an action by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations for collection of a statutory penalty or fee must be commenced within one year after the penalty or fee became final.

This bill would extend the period within which the division may commence a collection action, as defined, from one year to 3 years.

(3)Existing law permits the Labor Commissioner to require an employer who has been convicted of a subsequent wage violation or who has failed to satisfy a judgment to post a bond in order to continue business operations.

This bill would extend the time required for a subsequently convicted employer to maintain a bond from 6 months to 2 years and would require that a subsequently convicted employer provide an accounting of assets, as specified, to the Labor Commissioner.

(4)Existing law requires an employer to post specified wage and hour information in a location where it can be viewed by employees.

This bill would require an employer to provide each employee, at the time of hiring, with a notice that specifies the rate and the basis, whether hourly, salary, commission, or otherwise, of the employee’s wages and to notify each employee in writing of any changes to the information set forth in the notice within 7 calendar days of the changes unless such changes are reflected on a timely wage statement or another writing, as specified. No notice would be required for an employee who is employed by the state or any subdivision thereof, exempt from the payment of overtime, or covered by a collective bargaining agreement containing specified information.

(5)In addition to the crime and employer obligations imposed by this bill, the Labor Code provides for other work-related standards and duties that, upon violation, are subject to specified penalties.

This bill would state that the Labor Code establishes minimum penalties for failure to comply with wage-related statutes and regulations.

Because this bill would create a new crime or expand the definition of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program.

(6)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 98 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 240, that would become operative only if AB 240 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

This bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 226 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 243, that would become operative only if AB 243 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

(7)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 98, 226, 240, 243, 1174, and 1197.1 Of, and to Add Sections 200.5, 1194.3, 1197.2, 1206, and 2810.5 To, the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.
Author(s)
Sandre Swanson
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Employees: wages
Major Actions
Introduced2/15/2011
Referred to Committee
Passed Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment4/13/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary4/26/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/27/2011
Passed Assembly6/01/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations6/22/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary7/05/2011
Passed Senate8/31/2011
Passed Assembly9/06/2011
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/19/2011
Became law (chaptered).10/09/2011
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteAssembly Committee on Labor and EmploymentDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary.4/13/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment
5 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/26/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
6 voted YES 3 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/27/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
12 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblyAB 469 SWANSON Assembly Third Reading6/01/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
50 voted YES 25 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on Labor and Industrial RelationsDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.6/22/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations
5 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.7/05/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
3 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB469 Swanson By Lieu8/31/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
21 voted YES 14 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblyAB 469 SWANSON Concurrence in Senate Amendments9/06/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
51 voted YES 27 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/15/2011
2/15/2011Read first time. To print.
2/16/2011From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
3/31/2011Referred to Coms. on L. & E. and JUD. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
4/04/2011Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
4/07/2011From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
4/11/2011Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
select this voteVote4/13/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
4/14/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on JUD. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
4/25/2011Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote4/26/2011Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
5/02/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 26).
5/03/2011Read second time and amended.
5/04/2011Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
5/18/2011In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
5/27/2011From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27). Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
select this voteVote5/27/2011Do pass as amended.
5/31/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
6/01/2011Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 1725.)
6/01/2011In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage6/01/2011AB 469 SWANSON Assembly Third Reading
6/08/2011Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
6/14/2011From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
select this voteVote6/22/2011Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.
6/23/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 22).
6/27/2011Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote7/05/2011Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
7/06/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
7/12/2011From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/15/2011From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
8/16/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/29/2011Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
8/30/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/31/2011Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 2203.).
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage8/31/2011Assembly 3rd Reading AB469 Swanson By Lieu
9/01/2011In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
9/06/2011Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 2907.).
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage9/06/2011AB 469 SWANSON Concurrence in Senate Amendments
9/19/2011Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
10/09/2011Approved by the Governor.
10/09/2011Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 655, Statutes of 2011.

Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from Communications & hi-tech unions, which…

supported this bill

Communications & hi-tech unions$21,100
$21,100

20 Organizations Supported and 15 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 98, 226, 240, 243, 1174, and 1197.1 Of, and to Add Sections 200.5, 1194.3, 1197.2, 1206, and 2810.5 To, the Labor Code, Relating to Employment.: AB 469 SWANSON Concurrence in Senate Amendments

20 organizations supported this bill

Alameda Labor Council
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Amalgamated Transit Union
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Employment Lawyers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Labor Federation
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Centro Legal de la Raza
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
City of Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Engineers and Scientists of California
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
IFPTE Local 21
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Association Of Working Women
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Lawyers Guild Labor & Employment Committee
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Nurses United
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Small Business California
Hauge, Scott (2011, April 1). Paid Sick Leave/ SB 469/AB 52 . Retrieved April 18, 2011, from Small Business California.
UFCW Western States Council
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
UNITE HERE!
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Young Workers United
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

15 organizations opposed this bill

Acclimation Insurance Management Services
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Allied Managed Care
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Associated Builders & Contractors
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Associated General Contractors of America
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Chapter American Fence Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Employment Law Council
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Farm Bureau Federation
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Fence Contractors' Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Retailers Association
Dombrowski, Bill (2011, April 6). We Need Legislators to Focus on Growing Jobs, Not Anti-Job Legislation. Retrieved April 6, 2011, from Fox & Hounds Daily.
Construction Employers' Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Engineering Contractors' Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Flasher Barricade Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Marin Builders Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Western Growers
Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 31). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from Communications & hi-tech unions interest groups, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$0$0
Luis AlejoDCA-28$0$0
Michael AllenDCA-7$0$0
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$0$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$0$0
Jim BeallDCA-24$7,800$0
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$0
Marty BlockDCA-78$0$0
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$0$0
Susan BonillaDCA-11$0$0
Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$0
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$0$0
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$1,500$0
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$750$0
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$0$0
Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$0
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$0$0
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$0$0
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$4,650$0
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$0$0
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$0
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$2,500$0
Rich GordonDCA-21$0$0
Jeff GorellRCA-37$0$0
Shannon GroveRCA-32$0$0
Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$0
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$0$0
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$0
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$0$0
Jerry HillDCA-19$0$0
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$0$0
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$0$0
Steve KnightRCA-36$0$0
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$0$0
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$0
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$0$0
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$0$0
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$0
Holly MitchellDCA-47$0$0
Bill MonningDCA-27$0$0
Mike MorrellRCA-63$0$0
Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$0
Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$0
Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$0
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$0$0
Richard PanDCA-5$0$0
Henry PereaDCA-31$0$0
John PerezDCA-46$0$0
Manuel PerezDCA-80$0$0
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$3,900$0
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$0$0
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$0$0
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$0$0
Das WilliamsDCA-35$0$0
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$0$0

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$3,000$18,250
Luis AlejoDCA-28$32,883$5,500
Michael AllenDCA-7$71,700$3,300
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$27,699$1,100
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$27,450$45,574
Jim BeallDCA-24$125,350$6,300
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$5,900$62,250
Marty BlockDCA-78$75,300$5,500
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$24,400$12,000
Susan BonillaDCA-11$26,435$24,760
Steven BradfordDCA-51$13,500$18,000
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$23,250$34,968
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$79,250$16,674
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$31,750$6,974
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$7,250$3,500
Connie ConwayRCA-34$5,900$105,195
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$24,700$6,350
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$0$2,000
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$45,750$2,500
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$3,000$59,893
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$93,500$43,683
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$24,400$71,525
Rich GordonDCA-21$15,536$32,668
Jeff GorellRCA-37$1,500$29,200
Shannon GroveRCA-32$1,000$14,000
Curt HagmanRCA-60$3,100$42,900
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$16,000$35,582
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$1,000$18,500
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$25,616$32,330
Jerry HillDCA-19$31,697$37,234
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$15,997$16,500
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$0$12,000
Steve KnightRCA-36$0$13,500
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$31,400$37,200
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$61,509
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$16,800$6,000
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$0$14,025
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$8,800$91,900
Holly MitchellDCA-47$22,552$8,774
Bill MonningDCA-27$43,600$29,313
Mike MorrellRCA-63$2,000$29,070
Brian NestandeRCA-64$8,800$22,400
Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$10,500
Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$29,500
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$2,000$55,169
Richard PanDCA-5$69,800$59,168
Henry PereaDCA-31$26,600$80,088
John PerezDCA-46$82,249$106,124
Manuel PerezDCA-80$7,600$26,650
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$38,150$15,301
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$18,400$25,476
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$1,000$14,100
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$20,000$11,500
Das WilliamsDCA-35$32,039$10,000
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$26,950$2,000

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Health worker unions$453,700
Other unions$359,200
Teamsters unions$118,495
Labor unions$107,250
Transportation unions$87,299
Health & welfare policy$79,008
Women's issues$39,700
Minority & ethnic groups$31,600
Merchant marine & longshoremen unions$24,000
Communications & hi-tech unions$21,100
Small business organizations$17,700
Public official (elected or appointed)$3,500
Manufacturing unions$0
Food service & related unions$0
Human rights$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Accident & health insurance$600,150
Builders associations$314,825
Insurance agencies, brokers & agents$291,450
Engineering, architecture & construction management services$103,695
Farm Bureau/affiliated organizations & PACs$83,080
Construction equipment$60,100
Farm organizations & cooperatives$54,794
Retail trade$41,479
Manufacturing$30,253
Special trade contractors$6,150
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range