Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

AB 740 - An Act to Add Section 19135 to the Government Code, Relating to Personal Services Contracts.

Personal services contracts. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law authorizes state agencies to use personal services contracts if specified standards are satisfied, including, among other things, the contract does not cause the displacement of civil service employees and the contract is awarded through a publicized, competitive bidding process. The State Personnel Board is required to review a proposed contract upon the request of an employee… More
Existing law authorizes state agencies to use personal services contracts if specified standards are satisfied, including, among other things, the contract does not cause the displacement of civil service employees and the contract is awarded through a publicized, competitive bidding process. The State Personnel Board is required to review a proposed contract upon the request of an employee organization for compliance with those standards.

This bill would require a state agency to immediately discontinue a contract disapproved by action of the board or its delegate unless ordered otherwise by the board or its delegate. The bill would prohibit the state agency from circumventing or disregarding the board’s action by entering into another contract for the same or similar services or to continue the services that were the subject of the contract that was disapproved. The bill would require the state agency to serve notice of the discontinuation of the contract to the vendor within 15 days from the board’s final action, and to serve a copy of the notice on the board and the employee organization that filed the contract challenge. The bill would provide that failure to serve this notice may be grounds for rejection of future contracts for the same or similar services. The bill would make a related statement of legislative findings. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on September 1, 2011.

voted YES: 24 voted NO: 14
2 voted present/not voting

An Act to Add Section 19135 to the Government Code, Relating to Personal Services Contracts.

AB 740 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
Existing law authorizes state agencies to use personal services contracts if specified standards are satisfied, including, among other things, the contract does not cause the displacement of civil service employees and the contract is awarded through a publicized, competitive bidding process. The State Personnel Board is required to review a proposed contract upon the request of an employee organization for compliance with those standards.

This bill would require a state agency to immediately discontinue a contract disapproved by action of the board or its delegate unless ordered otherwise by the board or its delegate. The bill would prohibit the state agency from circumventing or disregarding the board’s action by entering into another contract for the same or similar services or to continue the services that were the subject of the contract that was disapproved. The bill would require the state agency to serve notice of the discontinuation of the contract to the vendor within 15 days from the board’s final action, and to serve a copy of the notice on the board and the employee organization that filed the contract challenge. The bill would provide that failure to… More
Existing law authorizes state agencies to use personal services contracts if specified standards are satisfied, including, among other things, the contract does not cause the displacement of civil service employees and the contract is awarded through a publicized, competitive bidding process. The State Personnel Board is required to review a proposed contract upon the request of an employee organization for compliance with those standards.

This bill would require a state agency to immediately discontinue a contract disapproved by action of the board or its delegate unless ordered otherwise by the board or its delegate. The bill would prohibit the state agency from circumventing or disregarding the board’s action by entering into another contract for the same or similar services or to continue the services that were the subject of the contract that was disapproved. The bill would require the state agency to serve notice of the discontinuation of the contract to the vendor within 15 days from the board’s final action, and to serve a copy of the notice on the board and the employee organization that filed the contract challenge. The bill would provide that failure to serve this notice may be grounds for rejection of future contracts for the same or similar services. The bill would make a related statement of legislative findings. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add Section 19135 to the Government Code, Relating to Personal Services Contracts.
Author(s)
Bob Blumenfield
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Personal services contracts
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/17/2011
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Assembly Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection4/05/2011
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/04/2011
    Passed Assembly5/19/2011
    Passed Senate Committee on Governmental Organization6/28/2011
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/15/2011
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations8/25/2011
    Passed Senate9/01/2011
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/13/2011
    Became law (chaptered).10/09/2011
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteAssembly Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer ProtectionDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/05/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection
    8 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/04/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    12 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblyAB 740 BLUMENFIELD Assembly Third Reading5/19/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
    54 voted YES 19 voted NO 7 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on Governmental OrganizationDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.6/28/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Governmental Organization
    8 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.8/15/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    8 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/25/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    6 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB740 Blumenfield By Lieu9/01/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
    24 voted YES 14 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/17/2011
    2/17/2011Read first time. To print.
    2/18/2011From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
    3/07/2011Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
    select this voteVote4/05/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    4/05/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    select this voteVote5/04/2011Do pass.
    5/05/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 4).
    5/09/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    5/19/2011Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 19. Page 1463.)
    5/19/2011In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage5/19/2011AB 740 BLUMENFIELD Assembly Third Reading
    6/02/2011Referred to Com. on G.O.
    6/28/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    select this voteVote6/28/2011Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
    select this voteVote8/15/2011Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
    8/15/2011In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
    select this voteVote8/25/2011Do pass.
    8/25/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25).
    8/29/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    9/01/2011Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 2248.).
    currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage9/01/2011Assembly 3rd Reading AB740 Blumenfield By Lieu
    9/02/2011In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
    9/13/2011Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.
    10/09/2011Approved by the Governor.
    10/09/2011Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 684, Statutes of 2011.

    Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

    $707,723
    $72,150
    $0
    $779,873
    $0
    4 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Add Section 19135 to the Government Code, Relating to Personal Services Contracts.: Assembly 3rd Reading AB740 Blumenfield By Lieu

    4 organizations supported this bill

    AFL-CIO
    Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 29). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved September 12, 2011, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
    Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 29). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved September 12, 2011, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Professional Engineers in California Government
    Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 29). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved September 12, 2011, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Service Employees International Union
    Senate Rules Committee (2011, August 29). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved September 12, 2011, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    0 organizations opposed this bill

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2012.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$1,750$0
    Joel AndersonRCA-36$13,625$0
    Tom BerryhillRCA-14$0$0
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$7,900$0
    Anthony CannellaRCA-12$0$0
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$18,700$0
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$25,300$0
    Kevin De LeonDCA-22$44,899$0
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$35,180$0
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$5,600$0
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$600$0
    Noreen EvansDCA-2$28,720$0
    Jean FullerRCA-18$0$0
    Ted GainesRCA-1$1,500$0
    Loni HancockDCA-9$66,450$0
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$6,000$0
    Ed HernandezDCA-24$29,749$0
    Bob HuffRCA-29$1,500$0
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$5,300$0
    Doug La MalfaRCA-4$0$0
    Mark LenoDCA-3$38,250$0
    Ted LieuDCA-28$53,200$0
    Carol LiuDCA-21$8,400$0
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$11,400$0
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$19,700$0
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$88,100$0
    Curren PriceDCA-26$16,500$0
    Michael RubioDCA-16$16,600$0
    Sharon RunnerRCA-17$0$0
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$5,500$0
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$101,600$0
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$4,500$0
    Juan VargasDCA-40$52,300$0
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$0$0
    Lois WolkDCA-5$14,550$0
    Rod WrightDCA-25$17,500$0
    Mark WylandRCA-38$0$0
    Leland YeeDCA-8$39,000$0

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$1,750$0
    Joel AndersonRCA-36$13,625$0
    Tom BerryhillRCA-14$0$0
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$7,900$0
    Anthony CannellaRCA-12$0$0
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$18,700$0
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$25,300$0
    Kevin De LeonDCA-22$44,899$0
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$35,180$0
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$5,600$0
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$600$0
    Noreen EvansDCA-2$28,720$0
    Jean FullerRCA-18$0$0
    Ted GainesRCA-1$1,500$0
    Loni HancockDCA-9$66,450$0
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$6,000$0
    Ed HernandezDCA-24$29,749$0
    Bob HuffRCA-29$1,500$0
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$5,300$0
    Doug La MalfaRCA-4$0$0
    Mark LenoDCA-3$38,250$0
    Ted LieuDCA-28$53,200$0
    Carol LiuDCA-21$8,400$0
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$11,400$0
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$19,700$0
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$88,100$0
    Curren PriceDCA-26$16,500$0
    Michael RubioDCA-16$16,600$0
    Sharon RunnerRCA-17$0$0
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$5,500$0
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$101,600$0
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$4,500$0
    Juan VargasDCA-40$52,300$0
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$0$0
    Lois WolkDCA-5$14,550$0
    Rod WrightDCA-25$17,500$0
    Mark WylandRCA-38$0$0
    Leland YeeDCA-8$39,000$0

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    State & local government employee unions$707,723
    Labor unions$72,150
    Commercial service unions$0

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range