Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

SB 132 - An Act to Amend Sections 17211 and 17251 Of, and to Add Section 17070.31 To, the Education Code, and to Amend Section 13102 of the Government Code, Relating to School Facilities.

School facilities: state planning priorities. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law sets forth state planning priorities that are intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety in the state. Those priorities are as follows: (a) to promote infill development and equity by rehabilitating, maintaining, and improving existing infrastructure that supports infill development and appropriate reuse and… More
(1)Existing law sets forth state planning priorities that are intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety in the state. Those priorities are as follows: (a) to promote infill development and equity by rehabilitating, maintaining, and improving existing infrastructure that supports infill development and appropriate reuse and redevelopment of previously developed, underutilized land, (b) to protect environmental and agricultural resources by protecting, preserving, and enhancing the state’s most valuable natural resources, and (c) to encourage efficient development patterns by ensuring that any infrastructure associated with development, other than infill development, supports new development that meets prescribed criteria.

Under the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 (hereafter the Greene Act), the State Allocation Board is charged with the allocation of state funds to school districts for the acquisition of schoolsites and the construction and modernization of schools.

This bill would require the State Allocation Board, on or before July 1, 2012, to review the guidelines, rules, regulations, procedures, and policies for the modernization of school facilities adopted for implementation of the Greene Act to ensure they reflect the state planning priorities referenced above and to revise those guidelines, rules, regulations, procedures, and policies as necessary.

(2)Existing law requires the State Department of Education, among other things, to advise the governing board of a school district on the acquisition of new schoolsites, to develop standards for use by a school district in the selection of schoolsites, and to establish standards for use by school districts to ensure that the design and construction of school facilities are educationally appropriate and promote school safety. Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, before commencing the acquisition of real property for a new schoolsite or an addition to an existing schoolsite, to evaluate the property using the standards developed by the department.

This bill would require the site selection standards and the design and construction standards developed by the department to reflect the state planning priorities and would require the governing board of a school district to consider whether a new schoolsite or addition reflects the state planning priorities. The bill would require the department to consider, among other things, the state planning priorities in prioritizing the list of recommended school locations provided by the department to the school district.

(3)Existing law requires the Governor to submit annually a proposed 5-year infrastructure plan to the Legislature in conjunction with the Governor’s Budget. Existing law requires this infrastructure plan to include a proposal for funding the infrastructure that includes criteria and priorities used to identify and select the infrastructure proposed to be funded.

This bill would require the infrastructure plan to include information, to be provided to the Governor by the State Department of Education and the State Allocation Board, on the extent to which the department’s site selection standards and design and construction standards and the board adopted guidelines, rules, regulations, procedures, and policies for the modernization of school facilities are consistent with the state planning priorities. Hide
 
Status:
The bill was voted on by an Assembly committee on July 6, 2011. 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on May 31, 2011.

voted YES: 26 voted NO: 11
3 voted present/not voting

Other Votes:

An Act to Amend Sections 17211 and 17251 Of, and to Add Section 17070.31 To, the Education Code, and to Amend Section 13102 of the Government Code, Relating to School Facilities.

SB 132 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law sets forth state planning priorities that are intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety in the state. Those priorities are as follows: (a) to promote infill development and equity by rehabilitating, maintaining, and improving existing infrastructure that supports infill development and appropriate reuse and redevelopment of previously developed, underutilized land, (b) to protect environmental and agricultural resources by protecting, preserving, and enhancing the state’s most valuable natural resources, and (c) to encourage efficient development patterns by ensuring that any infrastructure associated with development, other than infill development, supports new development that meets prescribed criteria.

Under the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 (hereafter the Greene Act), the State Allocation Board is charged with the allocation of state funds to school districts for the acquisition of schoolsites and the construction and modernization of schools.

This bill would require the State Allocation Board, on or before July 1, 2012, to review the guidelines,… More
(1)Existing law sets forth state planning priorities that are intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety in the state. Those priorities are as follows: (a) to promote infill development and equity by rehabilitating, maintaining, and improving existing infrastructure that supports infill development and appropriate reuse and redevelopment of previously developed, underutilized land, (b) to protect environmental and agricultural resources by protecting, preserving, and enhancing the state’s most valuable natural resources, and (c) to encourage efficient development patterns by ensuring that any infrastructure associated with development, other than infill development, supports new development that meets prescribed criteria.

Under the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 (hereafter the Greene Act), the State Allocation Board is charged with the allocation of state funds to school districts for the acquisition of schoolsites and the construction and modernization of schools.

This bill would require the State Allocation Board, on or before July 1, 2012, to review the guidelines, rules, regulations, procedures, and policies for the modernization of school facilities adopted for implementation of the Greene Act to ensure they reflect the state planning priorities referenced above and to revise those guidelines, rules, regulations, procedures, and policies as necessary.

(2)Existing law requires the State Department of Education, among other things, to advise the governing board of a school district on the acquisition of new schoolsites, to develop standards for use by a school district in the selection of schoolsites, and to establish standards for use by school districts to ensure that the design and construction of school facilities are educationally appropriate and promote school safety. Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, before commencing the acquisition of real property for a new schoolsite or an addition to an existing schoolsite, to evaluate the property using the standards developed by the department.

This bill would require the site selection standards and the design and construction standards developed by the department to reflect the state planning priorities and would require the governing board of a school district to consider whether a new schoolsite or addition reflects the state planning priorities. The bill would require the department to consider, among other things, the state planning priorities in prioritizing the list of recommended school locations provided by the department to the school district.

(3)Existing law requires the Governor to submit annually a proposed 5-year infrastructure plan to the Legislature in conjunction with the Governor’s Budget. Existing law requires this infrastructure plan to include a proposal for funding the infrastructure that includes criteria and priorities used to identify and select the infrastructure proposed to be funded.

This bill would require the infrastructure plan to include information, to be provided to the Governor by the State Department of Education and the State Allocation Board, on the extent to which the department’s site selection standards and design and construction standards and the board adopted guidelines, rules, regulations, procedures, and policies for the modernization of school facilities are consistent with the state planning priorities. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 17211 and 17251 Of, and to Add Section 17070.31 To, the Education Code, and to Amend Section 13102 of the Government Code, Relating to School Facilities.
Author(s)
Alan Lowenthal
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • School facilities: state planning priorities
    Major Actions
    Introduced1/27/2011
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Senate Committee on Education5/04/2011
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/23/2011
    Passed Senate5/31/2011
    Passed Assembly Committee on Education7/06/2011
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteSenate Committee on EducationDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.5/04/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Education
    8 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/23/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    6 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB132 Lowenthal5/31/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
    26 voted YES 11 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on EducationDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.7/06/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Education
    6 voted YES 4 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced1/27/2011
    1/27/2011Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
    1/28/2011From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 27.
    2/10/2011Referred to Com. on ED.
    3/08/2011Set for hearing March 16.
    3/10/2011Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
    4/08/2011Set for hearing April 27.
    4/11/2011Hearing postponed by committee.
    4/21/2011Set for hearing May 4.
    4/27/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
    select this voteVote5/04/2011Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
    5/10/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 850.) (May 4).
    5/11/2011Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    5/13/2011Set for hearing May 23.
    select this voteVote5/23/2011Do pass.
    5/23/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 1085.) (May 23).
    5/24/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    5/31/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 11. Page 1189.) Ordered to the Assembly.
    currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage5/31/2011Senate 3rd Reading SB132 Lowenthal
    6/01/2011In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
    6/09/2011Referred to Com. on ED.
    6/22/2011Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
    select this voteVote7/06/2011Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    7/12/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (July 6).
    7/13/2011Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    8/17/2011Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
    8/25/2011Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

    Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

    $35,409
    $72,913
    $18,372
    $707,723
    $26,787
    $0
    $4,100
    $1,675,503
    $2,540,806
    $0

    opposed this bill

    Builders associations (split) [About]
    13 Organizations Supported and 1 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Sections 17211 and 17251 Of, and to Add Section 17070.31 To, the Education Code, and to Amend Section 13102 of the Government Code, Relating to School Facilities.: Senate 3rd Reading SB132 Lowenthal

    13 organizations supported this bill

    Advancement Project
    Assembly Committee on Education (2011, July 5). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
    (2011, May 26). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    American Planning Association, California Chapter
    (2011, May 26). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Farm Bureau Federation
    Senate Committee on Education (2011, May 3). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Infill Builders Federation
    (2011, May 26). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Fresno Unified School District
    (2011, May 26). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Green-collar Jobs Campaign
    (2011, May 26). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Los Angeles Unified School District
    Senate Committee on Education (2011, May 3). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Natural Resources Defense Council
    Senate Committee on Education (2011, May 3). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    State Building and Construction Trades Council of California
    (2011, May 26). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    State Superintendent of Public Instruction
    (2011, May 26). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    U.S. Green Building Council
    Senate Committee on Education (2011, May 3). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    U.S. Green Building Council California
    (2011, May 26). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    1 organization opposed this bill

    California Building Industry Association
    (2011, May 26). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2012.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$3,250$0
    Joel AndersonRCA-36$14,664$0
    Tom BerryhillRCA-14$15,050$0
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$48,200$0
    Anthony CannellaRCA-12$11,900$0
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$68,500$0
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$111,063$0
    Kevin De LeonDCA-22$178,699$0
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$146,920$0
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$5,600$0
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$14,500$0
    Noreen EvansDCA-2$111,479$0
    Jean FullerRCA-18$12,000$0
    Ted GainesRCA-1$1,500$0
    Loni HancockDCA-9$150,250$0
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$7,350$0
    Ed HernandezDCA-24$122,763$0
    Bob HuffRCA-29$15,393$0
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$11,850$0
    Doug La MalfaRCA-4$10,250$0
    Mark LenoDCA-3$123,000$0
    Ted LieuDCA-28$181,748$0
    Carol LiuDCA-21$85,675$0
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$39,150$0
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$87,150$0
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$205,050$0
    Curren PriceDCA-26$67,050$0
    Michael RubioDCA-16$164,250$0
    Sharon RunnerRCA-17$150$0
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$23,500$0
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$184,100$0
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$8,400$0
    Juan VargasDCA-40$87,650$0
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$4,900$0
    Lois WolkDCA-5$69,950$0
    Rod WrightDCA-25$72,550$0
    Mark WylandRCA-38$3,450$0
    Leland YeeDCA-8$71,903$0

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$3,250$0
    Joel AndersonRCA-36$14,664$0
    Tom BerryhillRCA-14$15,050$0
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$48,200$0
    Anthony CannellaRCA-12$11,900$0
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$68,500$0
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$111,063$0
    Kevin De LeonDCA-22$178,699$0
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$146,920$0
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$5,600$0
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$14,500$0
    Noreen EvansDCA-2$111,479$0
    Jean FullerRCA-18$12,000$0
    Ted GainesRCA-1$1,500$0
    Loni HancockDCA-9$150,250$0
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$7,350$0
    Ed HernandezDCA-24$122,763$0
    Bob HuffRCA-29$15,393$0
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$11,850$0
    Doug La MalfaRCA-4$10,250$0
    Mark LenoDCA-3$123,000$0
    Ted LieuDCA-28$181,748$0
    Carol LiuDCA-21$85,675$0
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$39,150$0
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$87,150$0
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$205,050$0
    Curren PriceDCA-26$67,050$0
    Michael RubioDCA-16$164,250$0
    Sharon RunnerRCA-17$150$0
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$23,500$0
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$184,100$0
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$8,400$0
    Juan VargasDCA-40$87,650$0
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$4,900$0
    Lois WolkDCA-5$69,950$0
    Rod WrightDCA-25$72,550$0
    Mark WylandRCA-38$3,450$0
    Leland YeeDCA-8$71,903$0

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    Construction unions$1,675,503
    State & local government employee unions$707,723
    Builders associations$405,473
    Farm Bureau/affiliated organizations & PACs$72,913
    Environmental policy$35,409
    Civil servant/public employee$26,787
    Public school teachers, administrators & officials$18,372
    Public official (elected or appointed)$4,100
    Human rights$0

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Builders associations$405,473
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range