Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

SB 1366 - An Act to Amend Sections 16520, 26835, and 27535 Of, and to Add Division 4.5 (Commencing with Section 25250) to Title 4 of Part 6 Of, the Penal Code, Relating to Firearms.

Firearms: lost or stolen: reports. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law requires each sheriff or police chief executive to submit descriptions of serialized property, or nonserialized property that has been uniquely inscribed, which has been reported stolen, lost, or found directly into the appropriate Department of Justice automated property system for firearms, stolen bicycles, stolen vehicles, or other property. Existing law requires that… More
(1)Existing law requires each sheriff or police chief executive to submit descriptions of serialized property, or nonserialized property that has been uniquely inscribed, which has been reported stolen, lost, or found directly into the appropriate Department of Justice automated property system for firearms, stolen bicycles, stolen vehicles, or other property. Existing law requires that information about a firearm entered into the automated system for firearms remain in the system until the reported firearm has been found. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to implement an electronic system to receive comprehensive tracing information from each local law enforcement agency and to forward the information to the National Tracing Center.

This bill would require every person, with exceptions, to report the theft or loss of a firearm he or she owns or possesses to a local law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction in which the theft or loss occurred within 48 hours of the time he or she knew or reasonably should have known that the firearm had been stolen or lost, and requires every person who has reported a firearm lost or stolen to notify the local law enforcement agency within 48 hours if the firearm is subsequently recovered. The bill would make a violation of these provisions an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $100 for a first offense, an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 for a 2nd offense, and a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding 6 months, or by a fine not to exceed $1,000, or both that fine and imprisonment, for a 3rd or subsequent offense. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for any person to make a report to a local law enforcement agency that a firearm has been lost or stolen, knowing the report to be false. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The bill would require every sheriff or police chief to submit a description of each firearm that has been reported lost or stolen directly to the Department of Justice automated property system for firearms. By imposing new duties on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The bill would also require that persons licensed to sell firearms post a warning within the licensed premises in block letters stating the requirement that a lost or stolen firearm be reported to a local law enforcement agency, as specified.

(2)Existing law prohibits a person from making an application to purchase more than one handgun within any 30-day period. Existing law makes an exception for the replacement of a handgun when the person’s handgun was lost or stolen and the person reported the firearm lost or stolen prior to the completion of the application to purchase.

This bill would instead make the exception for the replacement of a lost or stolen handgun applicable when the person has reported the handgun lost or stolen pursuant to the provisions of this bill.

(3)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 16520 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 1527, that would become operative only if AB 1527 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Hide
 
Status:
This bill was passed by both houses and vetoed by the Governor. It did not become law
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 23, 2012.

voted YES: 22 voted NO: 15
3 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 16520, 26835, and 27535 Of, and to Add Division 4.5 (Commencing with Section 25250) to Title 4 of Part 6 Of, the Penal Code, Relating to Firearms.

SB 1366 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law requires each sheriff or police chief executive to submit descriptions of serialized property, or nonserialized property that has been uniquely inscribed, which has been reported stolen, lost, or found directly into the appropriate Department of Justice automated property system for firearms, stolen bicycles, stolen vehicles, or other property. Existing law requires that information about a firearm entered into the automated system for firearms remain in the system until the reported firearm has been found. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to implement an electronic system to receive comprehensive tracing information from each local law enforcement agency and to forward the information to the National Tracing Center.

This bill would require every person, with exceptions, to report the theft or loss of a firearm he or she owns or possesses to a local law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction in which the theft or loss occurred within 48 hours of the time he or she knew or reasonably should have known that the firearm had been stolen or lost, and requires every person who has reported a firearm lost or stolen to notify the local law… More
(1)Existing law requires each sheriff or police chief executive to submit descriptions of serialized property, or nonserialized property that has been uniquely inscribed, which has been reported stolen, lost, or found directly into the appropriate Department of Justice automated property system for firearms, stolen bicycles, stolen vehicles, or other property. Existing law requires that information about a firearm entered into the automated system for firearms remain in the system until the reported firearm has been found. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to implement an electronic system to receive comprehensive tracing information from each local law enforcement agency and to forward the information to the National Tracing Center.

This bill would require every person, with exceptions, to report the theft or loss of a firearm he or she owns or possesses to a local law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction in which the theft or loss occurred within 48 hours of the time he or she knew or reasonably should have known that the firearm had been stolen or lost, and requires every person who has reported a firearm lost or stolen to notify the local law enforcement agency within 48 hours if the firearm is subsequently recovered. The bill would make a violation of these provisions an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $100 for a first offense, an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 for a 2nd offense, and a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding 6 months, or by a fine not to exceed $1,000, or both that fine and imprisonment, for a 3rd or subsequent offense. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for any person to make a report to a local law enforcement agency that a firearm has been lost or stolen, knowing the report to be false. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The bill would require every sheriff or police chief to submit a description of each firearm that has been reported lost or stolen directly to the Department of Justice automated property system for firearms. By imposing new duties on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The bill would also require that persons licensed to sell firearms post a warning within the licensed premises in block letters stating the requirement that a lost or stolen firearm be reported to a local law enforcement agency, as specified.

(2)Existing law prohibits a person from making an application to purchase more than one handgun within any 30-day period. Existing law makes an exception for the replacement of a handgun when the person’s handgun was lost or stolen and the person reported the firearm lost or stolen prior to the completion of the application to purchase.

This bill would instead make the exception for the replacement of a lost or stolen handgun applicable when the person has reported the handgun lost or stolen pursuant to the provisions of this bill.

(3)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 16520 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 1527, that would become operative only if AB 1527 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last.

(4)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 16520, 26835, and 27535 Of, and to Add Division 4.5 (Commencing with Section 25250) to Title 4 of Part 6 Of, the Penal Code, Relating to Firearms.
Author(s)
Mark DeSaulnier
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Firearms: lost or stolen: reports
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/24/2012
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Senate Committee on Public Safety4/10/2012
    Passed Senate5/14/2012
    Passed Assembly Committee on Public Safety6/12/2012
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations8/08/2012
    Passed Assembly8/22/2012
    Passed Senate8/23/2012
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)8/30/2012
    Vetoed by Governor9/28/2012
    Vetoed by Governor9/28/2012
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteSenate Committee on Public SafetyDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.4/10/2012This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Public Safety
    5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB1366 DeSaulnier5/14/2012This bill PASSED the Senate
    23 voted YES 14 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on Public SafetyDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.6/12/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Public Safety
    4 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/08/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    12 voted YES 5 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssemblySB 1366 DeSaulnier Senate Third Reading By FEUER8/22/2012This bill PASSED the Assembly
    50 voted YES 28 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedSenateUnfinished Business SB1366 DeSaulnier Concurrence8/23/2012This bill PASSED the Senate
    22 voted YES 15 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/24/2012
    2/24/2012Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
    2/25/2012From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
    2/27/2012Read first time.
    3/08/2012Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
    3/21/2012Set for hearing April 10.
    3/29/2012From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
    select this voteVote4/10/2012Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary.
    4/16/2012From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3105.) (April 10).
    4/17/2012Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
    4/18/2012Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    4/27/2012Set for hearing May 7.
    5/07/2012From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
    5/08/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    5/14/2012Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 14. Page 3487.) Ordered to the Assembly.
    5/14/2012In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage5/14/2012Senate 3rd Reading SB1366 DeSaulnier
    5/25/2012Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
    select this voteVote6/12/2012Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    6/13/2012From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    select this voteVote8/08/2012Do pass.
    8/09/2012From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 8).
    8/13/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    8/20/2012Read third time and amended. (Page 6002.) Ordered to third reading.
    8/22/2012Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 50. Noes 28. Page 6121.) Ordered to the Senate.
    8/22/2012In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
    select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/22/2012SB 1366 DeSaulnier Senate Third Reading By FEUER
    8/23/2012Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 4770.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
    currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage8/23/2012Unfinished Business SB1366 DeSaulnier Concurrence
    8/30/2012Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
    Vetoed9/28/2012Vetoed by the Governor.
    9/28/2012In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

    Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

    46 Organizations Supported and 7 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Sections 16520, 26835, and 27535 Of, and to Add Division 4.5 (Commencing with Section 25250) to Title 4 of Part 6 Of, the Penal Code, Relating to Firearms.: Unfinished Business SB1366 DeSaulnier Concurrence

    46 organizations supported this bill

    Antelope Valley
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Association of Bay Area Governments
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, California Chapters
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Partnership to End Domestic Violence
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Police Chiefs Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Probation, Parole and Correctional Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California State Sheriffs' Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Aaron L. Baker, City Of Pittsburg
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Camerino Sanchez, City Of Santa Barbara
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Chris Magnus, City Of Richmond
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Christopher W. Boyd, City Of Citrus Heights
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Craig T. Steckler, City Of Fremont
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Dan Bellini, City Of Woodland
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief David Bejarano, City Of Chula Vista
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Gary D. Peterson, City Of Martinez
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Gregory Suhr, City And County Of San Francisco
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Guy A. Swanger, City Of Concord
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Howard A. Jordan, City Of Oakland
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Jerry Dyer, City Of Fresno
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Jim Mcdonnell, City Of Long Beach
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Joel H. Bryden, City Of Walnut Creek
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief John Hardester, City Of Pinole
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Ken James, City Of Emeryville
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Landy Black, City Of Davis
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Paul M. Walters, City Of Santa Ana
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Scott Lachasse, City Of Burbank
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Susan E. Manheimer, City Of San Mateo
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Sylvia M. Moir, City Of El Cerrito
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Chief Walter Schuld, City Of San Pablo
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Cities Of Long Beach, Los Angeles, And San Francisco
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Coalition Against Gun Violence
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Counties Of Alameda, Contra Costa, Napa, Nevada, Orange, San Diego, San Joaquin, San Mateo, Santa Barbara...
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Don Lane, Mayor Of Santa Cruz
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Friends Committee on Legislation of California
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Global Exchange
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Legal Community Against Violence
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Los Angeles County Sheriff
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Mayor Helene Schneider, City Of Santa Barbara
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Mayors Against Illegal Guns
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Sacramento Valley
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    San Francisco District Attorney
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Violence Prevention Coalition of Greater Los Angeles
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Violence Protection Coalition Of Orange County
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Women Against Gun Violence
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Youth Alive!
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    7 organizations opposed this bill

    California Outdoor Heritage Alliance
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Rifle and Pistol Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California Sportsman's Lobby
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Gun Owners of California
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    National Rifle Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Outdoor Sportsmen's Coalition of California
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Safari Club International
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, August 22). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2012.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$9,450$0
    Joel AndersonRCA-36$37,525$0
    Tom BerryhillRCA-14$33,400$0
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$35,250$0
    Anthony CannellaRCA-12$27,050$0
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$35,204$0
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$65,552$0
    Kevin De LeonDCA-22$96,781$0
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$72,104$0
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$29,800$0
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$37,850$0
    Noreen EvansDCA-2$61,119$0
    Jean FullerRCA-18$14,000$0
    Ted GainesRCA-1$14,025$0
    Loni HancockDCA-9$78,005$0
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$25,600$0
    Ed HernandezDCA-24$81,276$0
    Bob HuffRCA-29$61,550$0
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$21,300$0
    Doug La MalfaRCA-4$5,000$0
    Mark LenoDCA-3$64,449$0
    Ted LieuDCA-28$163,392$0
    Carol LiuDCA-21$39,845$0
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$30,350$0
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$45,100$0
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$131,050$0
    Curren PriceDCA-26$41,700$0
    Michael RubioDCA-16$48,092$0
    Sharon RunnerRCA-17$9,305$0
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$16,500$0
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$132,000$0
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$20,500$0
    Juan VargasDCA-40$84,650$0
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$1,000$0
    Lois WolkDCA-5$39,150$0
    Rod WrightDCA-25$61,300$0
    Mark WylandRCA-38$21,400$0
    Leland YeeDCA-8$50,600$0

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Elaine AlquistDCA-13$9,450$0
    Joel AndersonRCA-36$37,525$0
    Tom BerryhillRCA-14$33,400$0
    Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
    Ron CalderonDCA-30$35,250$0
    Anthony CannellaRCA-12$27,050$0
    Ellen CorbettDCA-10$35,204$0
    Lou CorreaDCA-34$65,552$0
    Kevin De LeonDCA-22$96,781$0
    Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$72,104$0
    Bob DuttonRCA-31$29,800$0
    Bill EmmersonRCA-37$37,850$0
    Noreen EvansDCA-2$61,119$0
    Jean FullerRCA-18$14,000$0
    Ted GainesRCA-1$14,025$0
    Loni HancockDCA-9$78,005$0
    Tom HarmanRCA-35$25,600$0
    Ed HernandezDCA-24$81,276$0
    Bob HuffRCA-29$61,550$0
    Christine KehoeDCA-39$21,300$0
    Doug La MalfaRCA-4$5,000$0
    Mark LenoDCA-3$64,449$0
    Ted LieuDCA-28$163,392$0
    Carol LiuDCA-21$39,845$0
    Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
    Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$30,350$0
    Alex PadillaDCA-20$45,100$0
    Fran PavleyDCA-23$131,050$0
    Curren PriceDCA-26$41,700$0
    Michael RubioDCA-16$48,092$0
    Sharon RunnerRCA-17$9,305$0
    Joe SimitianDCA-11$16,500$0
    Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$132,000$0
    Tony StricklandRCA-19$20,500$0
    Juan VargasDCA-40$84,650$0
    Mimi WaltersRCA-33$1,000$0
    Lois WolkDCA-5$39,150$0
    Rod WrightDCA-25$61,300$0
    Mark WylandRCA-38$21,400$0
    Leland YeeDCA-8$50,600$0

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,108,000
    State & local government employee unions$707,723
    Municipal & county government organizations$21,900
    Public official (elected or appointed)$4,100
    Pro-gun control$500
    Human rights$0

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Hunting & wildlife$0
    Anti-gun control$0
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range