SB 223 - An Act to Add Part 5.7 (Commencing with Section 11160) to Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Local Government Finance.

Voter-approved local assessment: vehicles. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law authorizes certain counties to impose a local vehicle license fee not exceeding $10 per vehicle, as provided, for the privilege of operating specified vehicles on public roads in the county. Existing law requires a county imposing this fee to contract with the Department of Motor Vehicles to collect and administer the fee, as specified.

This bill would authorize the City… More
Existing law authorizes certain counties to impose a local vehicle license fee not exceeding $10 per vehicle, as provided, for the privilege of operating specified vehicles on public roads in the county. Existing law requires a county imposing this fee to contract with the Department of Motor Vehicles to collect and administer the fee, as specified.

This bill would authorize the City and County of San Francisco to impose a voter-approved local assessment for specified vehicles if certain conditions, including approval by local voters, are met. The bill would require the city and county to contract with the department to collect and administer the assessment, as provided.

The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various deductions against the income that is otherwise subject to tax under those laws, including a deduction for local taxes that were paid or incurred by a taxpayer.

This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to annually notify the department of estimated revenue losses to the state resulting from taxpayers deducting, for purposes of the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, the voter-approved local assessments authorized by this bill, as specified. This bill would require the department to transmit from the assessments collected an amount equal to these reported losses for deposit in the General Fund.

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco. Hide
 
Status:
This bill was passed by both houses and vetoed by the Governor. It did not become law
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on September 9, 2011.

voted YES: 22 voted NO: 15
3 voted present/not voting

An Act to Add Part 5.7 (Commencing with Section 11160) to Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Local Government Finance.

SB 223 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
Existing law authorizes certain counties to impose a local vehicle license fee not exceeding $10 per vehicle, as provided, for the privilege of operating specified vehicles on public roads in the county. Existing law requires a county imposing this fee to contract with the Department of Motor Vehicles to collect and administer the fee, as specified.

This bill would authorize the City and County of San Francisco to impose a voter-approved local assessment for specified vehicles if certain conditions, including approval by local voters, are met. The bill would require the city and county to contract with the department to collect and administer the assessment, as provided.

The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various deductions against the income that is otherwise subject to tax under those laws, including a deduction for local taxes that were paid or incurred by a taxpayer.

This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to annually notify the department of estimated revenue losses to the state resulting from taxpayers deducting, for purposes of the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, the voter-approved… More
Existing law authorizes certain counties to impose a local vehicle license fee not exceeding $10 per vehicle, as provided, for the privilege of operating specified vehicles on public roads in the county. Existing law requires a county imposing this fee to contract with the Department of Motor Vehicles to collect and administer the fee, as specified.

This bill would authorize the City and County of San Francisco to impose a voter-approved local assessment for specified vehicles if certain conditions, including approval by local voters, are met. The bill would require the city and county to contract with the department to collect and administer the assessment, as provided.

The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various deductions against the income that is otherwise subject to tax under those laws, including a deduction for local taxes that were paid or incurred by a taxpayer.

This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to annually notify the department of estimated revenue losses to the state resulting from taxpayers deducting, for purposes of the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, the voter-approved local assessments authorized by this bill, as specified. This bill would require the department to transmit from the assessments collected an amount equal to these reported losses for deposit in the General Fund.

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City and County of San Francisco. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add Part 5.7 (Commencing with Section 11160) to Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Local Government Finance.
Author(s)
Mark Leno
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Voter-approved local assessment: vehicles
Major Actions
Introduced2/09/2011
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing3/29/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Governance and Finance4/27/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/09/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/26/2011
Passed Senate6/01/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Local Government6/22/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation7/06/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations8/25/2011
Passed Assembly9/07/2011
Passed Senate9/09/2011
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/16/2011
Vetoed by Governor10/04/2011
Vetoed by Governor10/04/2011
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on Transportation and HousingDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Governance and Finance.3/29/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing
6 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on Governance and FinanceDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/27/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Governance and Finance
6 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.5/09/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
9 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/26/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
6 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB223 Leno6/01/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
23 voted YES 15 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Local GovernmentDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Revenue and Taxation.6/22/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Local Government
6 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Revenue and TaxationDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.7/06/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation
5 voted YES 3 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/25/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 6 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 223 Leno Senate Third Reading By MA9/07/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
44 voted YES 30 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
currently selectedSenateUnfinished Supp 1 SB223 Leno Concurrence9/09/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
22 voted YES 15 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/09/2011
2/09/2011Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/10/2011From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 12.
2/17/2011Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and GOV. & F.
3/04/2011Set for hearing March 29.
select this voteVote3/29/2011Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Governance and Finance.
3/30/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 496.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
4/08/2011Set for hearing April 27.
select this voteVote4/27/2011Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/27/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 761.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
4/29/2011Set for hearing May 9.
select this voteVote5/09/2011Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
5/09/2011Placed on APPR. suspense file.
5/20/2011Set for hearing May 26.
select this voteVote5/26/2011Do pass.
5/26/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 1114.) (May 26).
5/27/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
6/01/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 1225.) Ordered to the Assembly.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage6/01/2011Senate 3rd Reading SB223 Leno
6/02/2011In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
6/13/2011Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and REV. & TAX.
select this voteVote6/22/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Revenue and Taxation.
6/23/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
6/28/2011Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
select this voteVote7/06/2011Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
7/07/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (July 6).
7/11/2011Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/17/2011Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
select this voteVote8/25/2011Do pass.
8/26/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (August 25). Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/31/2011Read third time and amended. (Page 2712.) Ordered to third reading.
9/07/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 44. Noes 30. Page 3018.) Ordered to the Senate.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage9/07/2011SB 223 Leno Senate Third Reading By MA
9/09/2011In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 2459.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage9/09/2011Unfinished Supp 1 SB223 Leno Concurrence
9/16/2011Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10:30 a.m.
Vetoed10/04/2011Vetoed by the Governor.
10/04/2011In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
3/01/2012Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file. Veto sustained.

Average contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

supported this bill

$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
YES$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
NO$0

opposed this bill

$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
YES$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
NO$0
8 Organizations Supported and 9 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Add Part 5.7 (Commencing with Section 11160) to Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, Relating to Local Government Finance.: Unfinished Supp 1 SB223 Leno Concurrence

8 organizations supported this bill

California State Association of Counties
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Tax Reform Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
City and County of San Francisco
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Glendale City Employees Association
Assembly Committee on Local Government (2011, June 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 23, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Organization of SMUD Employees
Assembly Committee on Local Government (2011, June 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 23, 2011, from Leg. Info.
San Bernardino Public Employees Association
Assembly Committee on Local Government (2011, June 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 23, 2011, from Leg. Info.
San Francisco Chamber of Commerce
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
San Francisco Labor Council
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.

9 organizations opposed this bill

AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah
Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation (2011, July 1). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Automobile Club of Southern California
SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE (2011, March 29). Vehicle license fee: local assessment. Retrieved March 30, 2011, from Leginfo.
California Chamber of Commerce
Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation (2011, July 1). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California New Car Dealers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California State Automobile Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Taxpayers Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Engineering & Utility Contractors Association
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 27). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Assembly Committee on Local Government (2011, June 21). Assembly Committee Analysis. Retrieved June 23, 2011, from Leg. Info.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$1,750$2,000
Joel AndersonRCA-36$13,625$64,500
Tom BerryhillRCA-14$0$34,950
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
Ron CalderonDCA-30$7,900$51,400
Anthony CannellaRCA-12$0$50,399
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$18,700$2,600
Lou CorreaDCA-34$25,300$52,645
Kevin De LeonDCA-22$46,899$71,992
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$37,180$22,750
Bob DuttonRCA-31$5,600$21,114
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$600$28,650
Noreen EvansDCA-2$28,720$24,450
Jean FullerRCA-18$0$31,000
Ted GainesRCA-1$6,900$136,325
Loni HancockDCA-9$66,450$4,500
Tom HarmanRCA-35$9,000$25,800
Ed HernandezDCA-24$30,749$63,086
Bob HuffRCA-29$1,500$87,049
Christine KehoeDCA-39$5,300$8,600
Doug La MalfaRCA-4$0$14,400
Mark LenoDCA-3$38,250$9,850
Ted LieuDCA-28$55,200$68,600
Carol LiuDCA-21$8,400$16,700
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$11,400$31,850
Alex PadillaDCA-20$22,700$42,200
Fran PavleyDCA-23$88,100$9,900
Curren PriceDCA-26$16,500$47,100
Michael RubioDCA-16$16,600$65,472
Sharon RunnerRCA-17$0$6,900
Joe SimitianDCA-11$5,500$4,500
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$101,600$46,350
Tony StricklandRCA-19$4,500$64,559
Juan VargasDCA-40$54,300$106,350
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$0$64,074
Lois WolkDCA-5$14,550$34,100
Rod WrightDCA-25$19,000$70,457
Mark WylandRCA-38$0$26,600
Leland YeeDCA-8$39,000$31,000

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$1,750$2,000
Joel AndersonRCA-36$13,625$64,500
Tom BerryhillRCA-14$0$34,950
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
Ron CalderonDCA-30$7,900$51,400
Anthony CannellaRCA-12$0$50,399
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$18,700$2,600
Lou CorreaDCA-34$25,300$52,645
Kevin De LeonDCA-22$46,899$71,992
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$37,180$22,750
Bob DuttonRCA-31$5,600$21,114
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$600$28,650
Noreen EvansDCA-2$28,720$24,450
Jean FullerRCA-18$0$31,000
Ted GainesRCA-1$6,900$136,325
Loni HancockDCA-9$66,450$4,500
Tom HarmanRCA-35$9,000$25,800
Ed HernandezDCA-24$30,749$63,086
Bob HuffRCA-29$1,500$87,049
Christine KehoeDCA-39$5,300$8,600
Doug La MalfaRCA-4$0$14,400
Mark LenoDCA-3$38,250$9,850
Ted LieuDCA-28$55,200$68,600
Carol LiuDCA-21$8,400$16,700
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$11,400$31,850
Alex PadillaDCA-20$22,700$42,200
Fran PavleyDCA-23$88,100$9,900
Curren PriceDCA-26$16,500$47,100
Michael RubioDCA-16$16,600$65,472
Sharon RunnerRCA-17$0$6,900
Joe SimitianDCA-11$5,500$4,500
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$101,600$46,350
Tony StricklandRCA-19$4,500$64,559
Juan VargasDCA-40$54,300$106,350
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$0$64,074
Lois WolkDCA-5$14,550$34,100
Rod WrightDCA-25$19,000$70,457
Mark WylandRCA-38$0$26,600
Leland YeeDCA-8$39,000$31,000

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
State & local government employee unions$707,723
Chambers of commerce$88,900
Labor unions$72,150
Municipal & county government organizations$21,900
Consumer groups$0
Energy-related unions (non-mining)$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Property & casualty insurance$1,086,709
Auto dealers, new & used$181,002
Engineering, architecture & construction management services$142,397
Auto manufacturers$95,164
Chambers of commerce$88,900
Fiscal & tax policy$39,500
Automotive & trucking$0
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range