Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

SB 296 - An Act to Amend Section 186.22a of the Penal Code, Relating to Gangs.

Criminal street gangs: injunction: petition for exemption. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law provides for injunctive relief from the unlawful activities of criminal street gangs, the duration of which is within the court’s discretion. Existing law provides for injunctive relief from a person who engages in harassment, as specified, of a duration of not more than 3 years, and provides that, at any time within the 3 months before the expiration of the injunction prohibiting… More
Existing law provides for injunctive relief from the unlawful activities of criminal street gangs, the duration of which is within the court’s discretion. Existing law provides for injunctive relief from a person who engages in harassment, as specified, of a duration of not more than 3 years, and provides that, at any time within the 3 months before the expiration of the injunction prohibiting harassment, the plaintiff may apply for a renewal of that injunction by filing a new petition.

This bill would provide that, in addition to any other administrative or judicial remedies, in an action relating to an injunction pursuant to specified provisions to enjoin criminal street gang activity, an individual may file with the court a petition on a form developed by the Judicial Council to exempt him or her from the injunction or portions of the injunction. The bill would require the petitioner to state that he or she meets specified conditions. The bill would allow the court to hold an evidentiary hearing and receive any relevant evidence in order to rule on any petition filed pursuant to these provisions. The bill would permit the court to require the petitioner to testify at this hearing. The bill would require the petitioner to notify any prosecuting agency that filed the action for injunction of the filing of the petition. The bill would permit the court to charge the petitioner for the reasonable costs of filing the petition. The bill would provide that its provisions pertaining to the petition process become operative on July 1, 2012. The bill would express legislative findings, declarations, and intent regarding the enactment of the above provisions. Hide
 
Status:
This bill was passed by both houses and vetoed by the Governor. It did not become law
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 31, 2011.

voted YES: 42 voted NO: 35
3 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 186.22a of the Penal Code, Relating to Gangs.

SB 296 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
Existing law provides for injunctive relief from the unlawful activities of criminal street gangs, the duration of which is within the court’s discretion. Existing law provides for injunctive relief from a person who engages in harassment, as specified, of a duration of not more than 3 years, and provides that, at any time within the 3 months before the expiration of the injunction prohibiting harassment, the plaintiff may apply for a renewal of that injunction by filing a new petition.

This bill would provide that, in addition to any other administrative or judicial remedies, in an action relating to an injunction pursuant to specified provisions to enjoin criminal street gang activity, an individual may file with the court a petition on a form developed by the Judicial Council to exempt him or her from the injunction or portions of the injunction. The bill would require the petitioner to state that he or she meets specified conditions. The bill would allow the court to hold an evidentiary hearing and receive any relevant evidence in order to rule on any petition filed pursuant to these provisions. The bill would permit the court to require the petitioner to testify… More
Existing law provides for injunctive relief from the unlawful activities of criminal street gangs, the duration of which is within the court’s discretion. Existing law provides for injunctive relief from a person who engages in harassment, as specified, of a duration of not more than 3 years, and provides that, at any time within the 3 months before the expiration of the injunction prohibiting harassment, the plaintiff may apply for a renewal of that injunction by filing a new petition.

This bill would provide that, in addition to any other administrative or judicial remedies, in an action relating to an injunction pursuant to specified provisions to enjoin criminal street gang activity, an individual may file with the court a petition on a form developed by the Judicial Council to exempt him or her from the injunction or portions of the injunction. The bill would require the petitioner to state that he or she meets specified conditions. The bill would allow the court to hold an evidentiary hearing and receive any relevant evidence in order to rule on any petition filed pursuant to these provisions. The bill would permit the court to require the petitioner to testify at this hearing. The bill would require the petitioner to notify any prosecuting agency that filed the action for injunction of the filing of the petition. The bill would permit the court to charge the petitioner for the reasonable costs of filing the petition. The bill would provide that its provisions pertaining to the petition process become operative on July 1, 2012. The bill would express legislative findings, declarations, and intent regarding the enactment of the above provisions. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 186.22a of the Penal Code, Relating to Gangs.
Author(s)
Rod Wright
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Criminal street gangs: injunction: petition for exemption
    Major Actions
    Introduced2/14/2011
    Referred to Committee
    Passed Senate Committee on Public Safety3/22/2011
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations4/11/2011
    Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/26/2011
    Passed Senate6/01/2011
    Passed Assembly Committee on Public Safety7/05/2011
    Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations8/17/2011
    Passed Assembly8/31/2011
    Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/06/2011
    Vetoed by Governor9/29/2011
    Vetoed by Governor9/29/2011
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteSenate Committee on Public SafetyDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.3/22/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Public Safety
    5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.4/11/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    8 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/26/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
    6 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB296 Wright6/01/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
    23 voted YES 15 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on Public SafetyDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.7/05/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Public Safety
    5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/17/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
    10 voted YES 6 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    currently selectedAssemblySB 296 Wright Senate Third Reading By MITCHELL8/31/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
    42 voted YES 35 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced2/14/2011
    2/14/2011Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
    2/15/2011From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.
    2/24/2011Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
    3/10/2011Set for hearing March 22.
    select this voteVote3/22/2011Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
    3/25/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 417.) (March 22).
    3/29/2011Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    4/01/2011Set for hearing April 11.
    4/07/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    4/11/2011Placed on APPR. suspense file.
    select this voteVote4/11/2011Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
    5/20/2011Set for hearing May 26.
    select this voteVote5/26/2011Do pass.
    5/26/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 1114.) (May 26).
    5/27/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    6/01/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 1225.) Ordered to the Assembly.
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage6/01/2011Senate 3rd Reading SB296 Wright
    6/02/2011In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
    6/16/2011Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
    select this voteVote7/05/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    7/06/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
    select this voteVote8/17/2011Do pass.
    8/18/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 6.) (August 17).
    8/22/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
    8/31/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 42. Noes 35. Page 2755.) Ordered to the Senate.
    8/31/2011In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
    currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage8/31/2011SB 296 Wright Senate Third Reading By MITCHELL
    9/06/2011Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
    Vetoed9/29/2011Vetoed by the Governor.
    9/29/2011In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
    3/01/2012Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file. Veto sustained.

    Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

    supported this bill

    $31,600
    $3,500
    $35,100
    37 times as much
    $1,293,027
    $1,293,027

    opposed this bill

    Police & fire fighters unions and associations [About]
    Courts & justice system (split) [About]
    3 Organizations Supported and 6 Opposed; See Which Ones

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Section 186.22a of the Penal Code, Relating to Gangs.: SB 296 Wright Senate Third Reading By MITCHELL

    3 organizations supported this bill

    California Public Defenders Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    California State Conference of the NAACP
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    San Francisco Public Defender
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    6 organizations opposed this bill

    California District Attorneys Association
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    City And County Of San Francisco, Office Of The City Attorney
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    County Of San Bernardino, Office Of The District Attorney, Gang Injunction Unit
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Fresno County District Attorney’s Office
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    Fresno County Sheriff’s Office
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
    San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department
    Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Anything missing?

    Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
    How do you know they have this position? Please include a link to a newspaper article, organization's website, or other source.
    We will use it only to contact you about this form. Your address will never appear on this site.

    MapLight editors may add this organization after checking the sources you listed above. Thank you for helping to improve our site.

    Cancel
    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Contributions by Legislator

    Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$0$30,100
    Luis AlejoDCA-28$100$23,300
    Michael AllenDCA-7$7,800$64,500
    Tom AmmianoDCA-13$0$8,124
    Toni AtkinsDCA-76$0$17,500
    Jim BeallDCA-24$0$37,344
    Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$11,900
    Marty BlockDCA-78$0$35,800
    Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$0$27,900
    Susan BonillaDCA-11$0$26,040
    Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$14,000
    Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
    Joan BuchananDCA-15$0$24,200
    Betsy ButlerDCA-53$0$89,600
    Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
    Nora CamposDCA-23$0$32,751
    Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$0$14,450
    Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$20,400
    Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
    Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
    Roger DickinsonDCA-9$0$18,150
    Tim DonnellyRCA-59$0$0
    Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
    Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
    Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
    Paul FongDCA-22$2,500$26,334
    Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
    Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
    Beth GainesRCA-4$1,000$7,000
    Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$44,400
    Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
    Mike GattoDCA-43$0$32,300
    Rich GordonDCA-21$0$24,650
    Jeff GorellRCA-37$0$31,200
    Shannon GroveRCA-32$0$1,500
    Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$24,000
    Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
    Isadore HallDCA-52$0$36,200
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$8,400
    Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
    Roger HernandezDCA-57$3,900$11,550
    Jerry HillDCA-19$0$34,600
    Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
    Ben HuesoDCA-79$0$16,500
    Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
    Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
    Brian JonesRCA-77$0$2,000
    Steve KnightRCA-36$0$15,200
    Ricardo LaraDCA-50$0$23,900
    Dan LogueRCA-3$0$11,000
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$0$18,400
    Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
    Allan MansoorRCA-68$0$0
    Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
    Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$9,800
    Holly MitchellDCA-47$0$17,731
    Bill MonningDCA-27$0$25,822
    Mike MorrellRCA-63$0$7,749
    Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$25,000
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$5,500
    Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$3,000
    Kristin OlsenRCA-25$0$12,150
    Richard PanDCA-5$12,800$32,321
    Henry PereaDCA-31$0$32,200
    John PerezDCA-46$0$75,300
    Manuel PerezDCA-80$0$30,200
    Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
    Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$0$26,705
    Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
    Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
    Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
    Norma TorresDCA-61$0$27,953
    David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
    Don WagnerRCA-70$0$0
    Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$0$37,200
    Das WilliamsDCA-35$3,000$45,450
    Mariko YamadaDCA-8$4,000$13,753

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    Show All
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$0$30,100
    Luis AlejoDCA-28$100$23,300
    Michael AllenDCA-7$7,800$64,500
    Tom AmmianoDCA-13$0$8,124
    Toni AtkinsDCA-76$0$17,500
    Jim BeallDCA-24$0$37,344
    Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$11,900
    Marty BlockDCA-78$0$35,800
    Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$0$27,900
    Susan BonillaDCA-11$0$26,040
    Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$14,000
    Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
    Joan BuchananDCA-15$0$24,200
    Betsy ButlerDCA-53$0$89,600
    Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
    Nora CamposDCA-23$0$32,751
    Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
    Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$0$14,450
    Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$20,400
    Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
    Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
    Roger DickinsonDCA-9$0$18,150
    Tim DonnellyRCA-59$0$0
    Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
    Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
    Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
    Paul FongDCA-22$2,500$26,334
    Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
    Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
    Beth GainesRCA-4$1,000$7,000
    Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$44,400
    Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
    Mike GattoDCA-43$0$32,300
    Rich GordonDCA-21$0$24,650
    Jeff GorellRCA-37$0$31,200
    Shannon GroveRCA-32$0$1,500
    Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$24,000
    Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
    Isadore HallDCA-52$0$36,200
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$8,400
    Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
    Roger HernandezDCA-57$3,900$11,550
    Jerry HillDCA-19$0$34,600
    Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
    Ben HuesoDCA-79$0$16,500
    Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
    Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
    Brian JonesRCA-77$0$2,000
    Steve KnightRCA-36$0$15,200
    Ricardo LaraDCA-50$0$23,900
    Dan LogueRCA-3$0$11,000
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$0$18,400
    Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
    Allan MansoorRCA-68$0$0
    Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
    Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$9,800
    Holly MitchellDCA-47$0$17,731
    Bill MonningDCA-27$0$25,822
    Mike MorrellRCA-63$0$7,749
    Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$25,000
    Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$5,500
    Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$3,000
    Kristin OlsenRCA-25$0$12,150
    Richard PanDCA-5$12,800$32,321
    Henry PereaDCA-31$0$32,200
    John PerezDCA-46$0$75,300
    Manuel PerezDCA-80$0$30,200
    Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
    Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$0$26,705
    Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
    Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
    Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
    Norma TorresDCA-61$0$27,953
    David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
    Don WagnerRCA-70$0$0
    Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$0$37,200
    Das WilliamsDCA-35$3,000$45,450
    Mariko YamadaDCA-8$4,000$13,753

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated
    Minority & ethnic groups$31,600
    Courts & justice system$15,858
    Public official (elected or appointed)$3,500

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,293,027
    Courts & justice system$15,858
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range