Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

SB 450 - An Act to Amend Sections 33080, 33080.1, 33080.2, 33080.8, 33334.2, 33334.3, 33334.4, 33334.12, 33334.16, 33413, 33413.5, 33418, 33487, and 33490 Of, to Add Sections 33080.9, 33080.11, 33080.12, 33506, and 50464.5 To, and to Add Article 13 (Commencing with Section 33460) to Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 24 Of, the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Redevelopment.

Redevelopment. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)The Community Redevelopment Law requires that each redevelopment agency submit the final report of any audit undertaken by any other local, state, or federal government entity to its legislative body and to additionally present an annual report to the legislative body containing specified information.

This bill would require the agency to include additional information relating to… More
(1)The Community Redevelopment Law requires that each redevelopment agency submit the final report of any audit undertaken by any other local, state, or federal government entity to its legislative body and to additionally present an annual report to the legislative body containing specified information.

This bill would require the agency to include additional information relating to any major audit violations, as defined, any corrections to those violations, and planning and general administrative expenses of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. The bill would authorize the Controller to conduct quality control reviews of independent financial audit reports and require the Controller to publish the results of his or her reviews. The Controller would be required to comply with certain notification and referral provisions in the event that the audit was conducted in a manner that may constitute unprofessional conduct.

The bill would require the Department of Housing and Community Development to conduct audits of redevelopment agencies to ensure compliance with the housing provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. The bill would require each agency to annually deposit 0.05% of any tax increment deposited into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund into the Redevelopment Agency Accountability Fund, which the bill would create, to fund the department audits.

(2)Existing law requires that funds used for purposes of increasing, improving, and preserving a community’s supply of low- and moderate-income housing be held in a separate Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund until used. Existing law limits the planning and general administrative costs which may be paid with moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund.

The bill would revise the costs and expenses which may be considered planning and general administrative costs for the purposes of being paid from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Except as provided, the bill would prohibit an agency from expending more than 15% of the tax increment deposited in the fund for planning and general administrative costs. The bill would impose other reporting and accountability measures on agencies with respect to the use of moneys in the fund for planning and administrative purposes. The bill would revise various provisions governing an action to compel agency compliance with specified provisions.

(3)Existing law requires, except as specified, each agency to expend over each 10-year period of the implementation plan, the moneys in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to assist housing for persons of moderate, low, and very low income according to specified calculations.

The bill would instead require that at least 75% of the agency’s expenditures from the fund directly assist the new construction, acquisition and substantial rehabilitation, or preservation of housing for persons of extremely low, very low, low, or moderate income, with at least 25% of the expenditures required to be directed towards housing for persons of extremely low income and at least 50% of the expenditures required to be directed towards housing for persons of very low income.

(4)Existing law authorizes a redevelopment agency to merge project areas under its jurisdiction, and requires that at least 20% of specified taxes allocated to the redevelopment agency be deposited into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to assist in the construction or rehabilitation of housing units for very low, and low- and moderate-income households, as specified. Existing law requires that if those funds have not been committed for that purpose within 6 years, the agency shall offer the funds to the housing authority that operates within the jurisdiction of the agency, as specified.

This bill would delete the requirement that the funds be offered to the housing authority.

(5)Existing law requires an agency that has failed to expend or encumber excess surplus in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund within one year to disburse the surplus voluntarily to the appropriate county housing authority or another public agency or to expend or encumber the surplus within 2 additional years.

The bill would delete these provisions. The bill would modify the definition of the term “excess surplus.”

(6)Existing law provides that whenever low- or moderate-income housing dwelling units are destroyed or removed from the low- and moderate-income housing market as part of a redevelopment that is subject to a written agreement with the agency, or where financial assistance has been provided by the agency, the agency is required to provide replacement housing within 4 years of the destruction or removal.

The bill would modify the agency’s obligation to provide replacement housing to low- or moderate-income persons and families and would impose new requirements on the agency with respect to the replacement housing plan and housing specifications. If a court has found that an agency has failed to comply with these provisions, the bill would require the court, at a minimum, to issue an order temporarily prohibiting the agency from issuing any debt for any project area, except as specified. Hide
 
Status:
This bill was passed by both houses and vetoed by the Governor. It did not become law
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on September 8, 2011.

voted YES: 40 voted NO: 0
0 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 33080, 33080.1, 33080.2, 33080.8, 33334.2, 33334.3, 33334.4, 33334.12, 33334.16, 33413, 33413.5, 33418, 33487, and 33490 Of, to Add Sections 33080.9, 33080.11, 33080.12, 33506, and 50464.5 To, and to Add Article 13 (Commencing with Section 33460) to Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 24 Of, the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Redevelopment.

SB 450 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
(1)The Community Redevelopment Law requires that each redevelopment agency submit the final report of any audit undertaken by any other local, state, or federal government entity to its legislative body and to additionally present an annual report to the legislative body containing specified information.

This bill would require the agency to include additional information relating to any major audit violations, as defined, any corrections to those violations, and planning and general administrative expenses of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. The bill would authorize the Controller to conduct quality control reviews of independent financial audit reports and require the Controller to publish the results of his or her reviews. The Controller would be required to comply with certain notification and referral provisions in the event that the audit was conducted in a manner that may constitute unprofessional conduct.

The bill would require the Department of Housing and Community Development to conduct audits of redevelopment agencies to ensure compliance with the housing provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. The bill would require each agency… More
(1)The Community Redevelopment Law requires that each redevelopment agency submit the final report of any audit undertaken by any other local, state, or federal government entity to its legislative body and to additionally present an annual report to the legislative body containing specified information.

This bill would require the agency to include additional information relating to any major audit violations, as defined, any corrections to those violations, and planning and general administrative expenses of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. The bill would authorize the Controller to conduct quality control reviews of independent financial audit reports and require the Controller to publish the results of his or her reviews. The Controller would be required to comply with certain notification and referral provisions in the event that the audit was conducted in a manner that may constitute unprofessional conduct.

The bill would require the Department of Housing and Community Development to conduct audits of redevelopment agencies to ensure compliance with the housing provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law. The bill would require each agency to annually deposit 0.05% of any tax increment deposited into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund into the Redevelopment Agency Accountability Fund, which the bill would create, to fund the department audits.

(2)Existing law requires that funds used for purposes of increasing, improving, and preserving a community’s supply of low- and moderate-income housing be held in a separate Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund until used. Existing law limits the planning and general administrative costs which may be paid with moneys from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund.

The bill would revise the costs and expenses which may be considered planning and general administrative costs for the purposes of being paid from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Except as provided, the bill would prohibit an agency from expending more than 15% of the tax increment deposited in the fund for planning and general administrative costs. The bill would impose other reporting and accountability measures on agencies with respect to the use of moneys in the fund for planning and administrative purposes. The bill would revise various provisions governing an action to compel agency compliance with specified provisions.

(3)Existing law requires, except as specified, each agency to expend over each 10-year period of the implementation plan, the moneys in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to assist housing for persons of moderate, low, and very low income according to specified calculations.

The bill would instead require that at least 75% of the agency’s expenditures from the fund directly assist the new construction, acquisition and substantial rehabilitation, or preservation of housing for persons of extremely low, very low, low, or moderate income, with at least 25% of the expenditures required to be directed towards housing for persons of extremely low income and at least 50% of the expenditures required to be directed towards housing for persons of very low income.

(4)Existing law authorizes a redevelopment agency to merge project areas under its jurisdiction, and requires that at least 20% of specified taxes allocated to the redevelopment agency be deposited into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund to assist in the construction or rehabilitation of housing units for very low, and low- and moderate-income households, as specified. Existing law requires that if those funds have not been committed for that purpose within 6 years, the agency shall offer the funds to the housing authority that operates within the jurisdiction of the agency, as specified.

This bill would delete the requirement that the funds be offered to the housing authority.

(5)Existing law requires an agency that has failed to expend or encumber excess surplus in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund within one year to disburse the surplus voluntarily to the appropriate county housing authority or another public agency or to expend or encumber the surplus within 2 additional years.

The bill would delete these provisions. The bill would modify the definition of the term “excess surplus.”

(6)Existing law provides that whenever low- or moderate-income housing dwelling units are destroyed or removed from the low- and moderate-income housing market as part of a redevelopment that is subject to a written agreement with the agency, or where financial assistance has been provided by the agency, the agency is required to provide replacement housing within 4 years of the destruction or removal.

The bill would modify the agency’s obligation to provide replacement housing to low- or moderate-income persons and families and would impose new requirements on the agency with respect to the replacement housing plan and housing specifications. If a court has found that an agency has failed to comply with these provisions, the bill would require the court, at a minimum, to issue an order temporarily prohibiting the agency from issuing any debt for any project area, except as specified. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 33080, 33080.1, 33080.2, 33080.8, 33334.2, 33334.3, 33334.4, 33334.12, 33334.16, 33413, 33413.5, 33418, 33487, and 33490 Of, to Add Sections 33080.9, 33080.11, 33080.12, 33506, and 50464.5 To, and to Add Article 13 (Commencing with Section 33460) to Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 24 Of, the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Redevelopment.
Author(s)
Alan Lowenthal
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Redevelopment
Major Actions
Introduced2/16/2011
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing4/05/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/02/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/26/2011
Passed Senate6/02/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Housing and Community Development6/29/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations8/25/2011
Passed Assembly9/02/2011
Passed Assembly9/07/2011
Passed Senate9/08/2011
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/14/2011
Vetoed by Governor10/04/2011
Vetoed by Governor10/04/2011
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on Transportation and HousingDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/05/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing
9 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.5/02/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
9 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/26/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
8 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateSpecial Consent #4 SB450 Lowenthal6/02/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
39 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Housing and Community DevelopmentDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.6/29/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Housing and Community Development
7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/25/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
17 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 450 Lowenthal Senate Third Reading By TORRES Amend By TORRES Set #19/02/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
74 voted YES 0 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 450 Lowenthal Senate Third Reading By TORRES9/07/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
74 voted YES 0 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
currently selectedSenateUnfinished Business SB450 Lowenthal Concurrence9/08/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
40 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/16/2011
2/16/2011Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/17/2011From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 19.
2/24/2011Referred to Com. on T. & H.
3/04/2011Set for hearing April 5.
3/29/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
select this voteVote4/05/2011Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/07/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 544.) (April 5).
4/11/2011Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
4/13/2011Set for hearing May 2.
select this voteVote5/02/2011Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
5/02/2011Placed on APPR. suspense file.
5/20/2011Set for hearing May 26.
5/26/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 1117.) (May 26).
select this voteVote5/26/2011Do pass.
5/27/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
5/31/2011Ordered to special consent calendar.
6/02/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1282.) Ordered to the Assembly.
6/02/2011In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage6/02/2011Special Consent #4 SB450 Lowenthal
6/13/2011Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
6/20/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D. (Corrected June 22.)
6/29/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote6/29/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
8/15/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/17/2011Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
select this voteVote8/25/2011Do pass.
8/26/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 25).
9/02/2011Read third time and amended. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2816.) Ordered to third reading.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage9/02/2011SB 450 Lowenthal Senate Third Reading By TORRES Amend By TORRES Set #1
9/07/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2996.) Ordered to the Senate.
9/07/2011In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage9/07/2011SB 450 Lowenthal Senate Third Reading By TORRES
9/08/2011Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2412.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage9/08/2011Unfinished Business SB450 Lowenthal Concurrence
9/14/2011Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.
Vetoed10/04/2011Vetoed by the Governor.
10/04/2011In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
3/01/2012Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file. Veto sustained.

Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

$0
$0
$707,723
$0
$36,350
$0
$0
$34,500
$176,650
$35,409
$255,675
$270,700
$16,350
$1,533,357
$0

opposed this bill

Health & welfare policy (split) [About]
Municipal & county government organizations (split) [About]
Public official (elected or appointed) (split) [About]
26 Organizations Supported and 4 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 33080, 33080.1, 33080.2, 33080.8, 33334.2, 33334.3, 33334.4, 33334.12, 33334.16, 33413, 33413.5, 33418, 33487, and 33490 Of, to Add Sections 33080.9, 33080.11, 33080.12, 33506, and 50464.5 To, and to Add Article 13 (Commencing with Section 33460) to Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 24 Of, the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Redevelopment.: Unfinished Business SB450 Lowenthal Concurrence

26 organizations supported this bill

Aging Services of California
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Bay Area Council
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
BRIDGE Housing
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Coalition for Rural Housing
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Housing Consortium
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Infill Builders Federation
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Redevelopment Association
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
City of San Jose
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Corporation for Supportive Housing
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
County of Los Angeles
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Habitat for Humanity California
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Holland and Knight
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Housing California
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
John Stewart Company
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Long Beach Area Coalition for the Homeless
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Planning and Conservation League
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Related Companies of California
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
San Luis Obispo County Housing Trust Fund
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Seifel Consulting
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
State Controller John Chiang
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
TMG Partners
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Western Center on Law and Poverty
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

4 organizations opposed this bill

Affordable Housing Advocates
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Department of Finance
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
City of Lakewood
Senate Rules Committee (2012, January 4). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
City of West Covina
(2011, September 8). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved September 25, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$750$0
Joel AndersonRCA-36$22,125$0
Tom BerryhillRCA-14$22,450$0
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
Ron CalderonDCA-30$37,150$0
Anthony CannellaRCA-12$23,450$0
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$20,200$0
Lou CorreaDCA-34$42,500$0
Kevin De LeonDCA-22$69,799$0
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$33,080$0
Bob DuttonRCA-31$13,100$0
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$13,400$0
Noreen EvansDCA-2$25,329$0
Jean FullerRCA-18$29,850$0
Ted GainesRCA-1$23,525$0
Loni HancockDCA-9$65,100$0
Tom HarmanRCA-35$30,050$0
Ed HernandezDCA-24$52,949$0
Bob HuffRCA-29$46,150$0
Christine KehoeDCA-39$7,300$0
Doug La MalfaRCA-4$1,100$0
Mark LenoDCA-3$35,250$0
Ted LieuDCA-28$80,200$0
Carol LiuDCA-21$9,400$0
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$-100$0
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$13,900$0
Alex PadillaDCA-20$43,100$0
Fran PavleyDCA-23$97,750$0
Curren PriceDCA-26$27,000$0
Michael RubioDCA-16$62,650$0
Sharon RunnerRCA-17$4,900$0
Joe SimitianDCA-11$9,500$0
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$141,800$0
Tony StricklandRCA-19$96,600$0
Juan VargasDCA-40$76,000$0
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$121,500$0
Lois WolkDCA-5$26,250$0
Rod WrightDCA-25$44,100$0
Mark WylandRCA-38$13,300$0
Leland YeeDCA-8$50,900$0

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$750$0
Joel AndersonRCA-36$22,125$0
Tom BerryhillRCA-14$22,450$0
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
Ron CalderonDCA-30$37,150$0
Anthony CannellaRCA-12$23,450$0
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$20,200$0
Lou CorreaDCA-34$42,500$0
Kevin De LeonDCA-22$69,799$0
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$33,080$0
Bob DuttonRCA-31$13,100$0
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$13,400$0
Noreen EvansDCA-2$25,329$0
Jean FullerRCA-18$29,850$0
Ted GainesRCA-1$23,525$0
Loni HancockDCA-9$65,100$0
Tom HarmanRCA-35$30,050$0
Ed HernandezDCA-24$52,949$0
Bob HuffRCA-29$46,150$0
Christine KehoeDCA-39$7,300$0
Doug La MalfaRCA-4$1,100$0
Mark LenoDCA-3$35,250$0
Ted LieuDCA-28$80,200$0
Carol LiuDCA-21$9,400$0
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$-100$0
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$13,900$0
Alex PadillaDCA-20$43,100$0
Fran PavleyDCA-23$97,750$0
Curren PriceDCA-26$27,000$0
Michael RubioDCA-16$62,650$0
Sharon RunnerRCA-17$4,900$0
Joe SimitianDCA-11$9,500$0
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$141,800$0
Tony StricklandRCA-19$96,600$0
Juan VargasDCA-40$76,000$0
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$121,500$0
Lois WolkDCA-5$26,250$0
Rod WrightDCA-25$44,100$0
Mark WylandRCA-38$13,300$0
Leland YeeDCA-8$50,900$0

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
State & local government employee unions$707,723
Finance, insurance & real estate$270,700
Real estate developers & subdividers$255,675
Building operators & managers$176,650
Health & welfare policy$41,716
Residential construction$36,350
Environmental policy$35,409
Welfare & social work$34,500
Municipal & county government organizations$21,900
Business services$16,350
Public official (elected or appointed)$4,100
Construction & public works$0
Consumer groups$0
Elderly issues & Social Security$0
Human rights$0
General business associations$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Health & welfare policy$41,716
Municipal & county government organizations$21,900
Public official (elected or appointed)$4,100
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range