Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

SB 582 - An Act to Add and Repeal Section 65081 of the Government Code, Relating to Transportation.

Commute benefit policies. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law requires transportation planning agencies to undertake various transportation planning activities, including preparation of a regional transportation plan. Existing law requires transportation planning agencies that are designated under federal law as metropolitan planning organizations to include a sustainable communities strategy as part of the regional transportation plan for… More
Existing law requires transportation planning agencies to undertake various transportation planning activities, including preparation of a regional transportation plan. Existing law requires transportation planning agencies that are designated under federal law as metropolitan planning organizations to include a sustainable communities strategy as part of the regional transportation plan for their region. Existing law creates air quality management districts and air pollution control districts with various responsibilities relative to reduction of air pollution.

This bill, beginning on January 1, 2013, subject to certain exceptions, would authorize a metropolitan planning organization jointly with the local air quality management district or air pollution control district to adopt a commute benefit ordinance that requires covered employers operating within the common area of the organization and district with a specified number of covered employees to offer those employees certain commute benefits. The bill would require that the ordinance specify certain matters, including any consequences for noncompliance, and would impose a specified reporting requirement. The bill would provide for the 8 metropolitan planning organizations within the region served by a specified air district to adopt the ordinance only after the district first acts to adopt the ordinance. The bill would exclude from its provisions an air district with a trip reduction regulation initially adopted prior to the federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 as long as it continues to have a regulation that allows trip reduction as a method of compliance. The bill would make its provisions inoperative on January 1, 2017. Hide
 
Status:
This bill was passed by both houses and vetoed by the Governor. It did not become law
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on July 11, 2011.

voted YES: 47 voted NO: 28
5 voted present/not voting

An Act to Add and Repeal Section 65081 of the Government Code, Relating to Transportation.

SB 582 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
Existing law requires transportation planning agencies to undertake various transportation planning activities, including preparation of a regional transportation plan. Existing law requires transportation planning agencies that are designated under federal law as metropolitan planning organizations to include a sustainable communities strategy as part of the regional transportation plan for their region. Existing law creates air quality management districts and air pollution control districts with various responsibilities relative to reduction of air pollution.

This bill, beginning on January 1, 2013, subject to certain exceptions, would authorize a metropolitan planning organization jointly with the local air quality management district or air pollution control district to adopt a commute benefit ordinance that requires covered employers operating within the common area of the organization and district with a specified number of covered employees to offer those employees certain commute benefits. The bill would require that the ordinance specify certain matters, including any consequences for noncompliance, and would impose a specified reporting requirement. The bill… More
Existing law requires transportation planning agencies to undertake various transportation planning activities, including preparation of a regional transportation plan. Existing law requires transportation planning agencies that are designated under federal law as metropolitan planning organizations to include a sustainable communities strategy as part of the regional transportation plan for their region. Existing law creates air quality management districts and air pollution control districts with various responsibilities relative to reduction of air pollution.

This bill, beginning on January 1, 2013, subject to certain exceptions, would authorize a metropolitan planning organization jointly with the local air quality management district or air pollution control district to adopt a commute benefit ordinance that requires covered employers operating within the common area of the organization and district with a specified number of covered employees to offer those employees certain commute benefits. The bill would require that the ordinance specify certain matters, including any consequences for noncompliance, and would impose a specified reporting requirement. The bill would provide for the 8 metropolitan planning organizations within the region served by a specified air district to adopt the ordinance only after the district first acts to adopt the ordinance. The bill would exclude from its provisions an air district with a trip reduction regulation initially adopted prior to the federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 as long as it continues to have a regulation that allows trip reduction as a method of compliance. The bill would make its provisions inoperative on January 1, 2017. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add and Repeal Section 65081 of the Government Code, Relating to Transportation.
Author(s)
Leland Yee
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Commute benefit policies
Major Actions
Introduced2/17/2011
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing4/26/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Environmental Quality5/09/2011
Passed Senate5/31/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Transportation6/20/2011
Passed Assembly7/11/2011
Passed Senate7/14/2011
Presented to the governor (enrolled)7/19/2011
Vetoed by Governor8/01/2011
Vetoed by Governor8/01/2011
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on Transportation and HousingDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Environmental Quality.4/26/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing
8 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on Environmental QualityDo pass as amended.5/09/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Environmental Quality
5 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB582 Emmerson5/31/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
36 voted YES 2 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on TransportationDo pass as amended, to Consent Calendar.6/20/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Transportation
14 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblySB 582 Yee Senate Third Reading By HILL7/11/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
47 voted YES 28 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateUnfinished Business SB582 Yee Concurrence7/14/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
24 voted YES 14 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/17/2011
2/17/2011Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/18/2011From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 20.
3/03/2011Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and E.Q.
3/09/2011Set for hearing April 5.
3/29/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
4/05/2011Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
4/21/2011Set for hearing April 26.
4/25/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
select this voteVote4/26/2011Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Environmental Quality.
4/27/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 766.) (April 26).
4/28/2011Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
5/03/2011Set for hearing May 9.
5/05/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
select this voteVote5/09/2011Do pass as amended.
5/16/2011From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 930.) (May 9).
5/17/2011Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
5/31/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 2. Page 1171.) Ordered to the Assembly.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage5/31/2011Senate 3rd Reading SB582 Emmerson
6/01/2011In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
6/09/2011Referred to Com. on TRANS.
6/14/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
select this voteVote6/20/2011Do pass as amended, to Consent Calendar.
6/21/2011From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 20).
6/22/2011Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
6/23/2011Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
6/27/2011From consent calendar. Ordered to third reading.
7/07/2011Read third time and amended. (Page 2229.) Ordered to third reading.
7/11/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 47. Noes 28. Page 2252.) Ordered to the Senate.
7/11/2011In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage7/11/2011SB 582 Yee Senate Third Reading By HILL
7/14/2011Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 1863.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage7/14/2011Unfinished Business SB582 Yee Concurrence
7/19/2011Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.
Vetoed8/01/2011Vetoed by the Governor.
8/01/2011In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
2/02/2012Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.

Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

15 times as much
$31,800
$79,008
$707,290
$7,750
$103,695
$39,935
$26,800
$141,700
$56,150
$0
$0
$1,194,128
$30,253
$48,800
$79,053

opposed this bill

Fiscal & tax policy [About]
Manufacturing [About]
Chambers of commerce (split) [About]
29 Organizations Supported and 3 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Add and Repeal Section 65081 of the Government Code, Relating to Transportation.: SB 582 Yee Senate Third Reading By HILL

29 organizations supported this bill

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
American Lung Association of California
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Bay Area Air Quality Management District
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Bayer
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Berkeley Chamber Of Commerce
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Breathe California
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Brereton Architects
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
California Infill Builders Federation
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
California Transit Association Clean Air
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Coalition for Clean Air
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Enterprise-national-alamo Car Rental
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Environmental Defense Fund
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Facebook
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
League of Conservation Voters
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Natural Resources Defense Council
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Orchard Hotel Of San Francisco
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Planning and Conservation League
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Resource Legacy Group
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Roche
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
San Francisco Chamber of Commerce
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Sierra Club California
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
TransForm
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Van Pool Services, Inc.
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
Wendel Rosen Black And Dean
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .

3 organizations opposed this bill

California Chamber of Commerce
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
California Manufacturers & Technology Association
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .
California Taxpayers Association
(2011, July 13). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from .

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$7,500$0
Luis AlejoDCA-28$9,535$0
Michael AllenDCA-7$7,400$0
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$1,475$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$37,166$0
Jim BeallDCA-24$20,600$0
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$24,700$9,800
Marty BlockDCA-78$14,500$0
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$9,500$0
Susan BonillaDCA-11$12,885$686
Steven BradfordDCA-51$8,850$0
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$8,100$0
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$12,350$0
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$14,520$0
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$3,535$0
Connie ConwayRCA-34$76,191$12,000
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$8,300$0
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$1,500$6,000
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$14,700$0
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$17,806$3,000
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$46,475$0
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$33,500$0
Rich GordonDCA-21$35,586$0
Jeff GorellRCA-37$19,650$3,500
Shannon GroveRCA-32$2,000$3,000
Curt HagmanRCA-60$10,000$1,500
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$42,900$179
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$21,750$1,000
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$25,751$0
Jerry HillDCA-19$78,700$0
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$16,497$0
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$6,000$2,000
Steve KnightRCA-36$3,000$0
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$46,400$1,000
Dan LogueRCA-3$13,900$2,000
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$6,500$0
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$8,500$8,800
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$46,450$15,700
Holly MitchellDCA-47$16,935$0
Bill MonningDCA-27$26,700$0
Mike MorrellRCA-63$4,370$1,000
Brian NestandeRCA-64$19,000$0
Jim NielsenRCA-2$3,000$1,500
Chris NorbyRCA-72$10,250$3,000
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$25,000$0
Richard PanDCA-5$44,594$1,000
Henry PereaDCA-31$79,994$1,388
John PerezDCA-46$77,600$0
Manuel PerezDCA-80$37,100$0
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$16,225$0
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$12,400$0
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$16,500$1,000
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$21,900$0
Das WilliamsDCA-35$5,289$0
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$2,600$0

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$7,500$0
Luis AlejoDCA-28$9,535$0
Michael AllenDCA-7$7,400$0
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$1,475$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$37,166$0
Jim BeallDCA-24$20,600$0
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$24,700$9,800
Marty BlockDCA-78$14,500$0
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$9,500$0
Susan BonillaDCA-11$12,885$686
Steven BradfordDCA-51$8,850$0
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$8,100$0
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$12,350$0
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$14,520$0
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$3,535$0
Connie ConwayRCA-34$76,191$12,000
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$8,300$0
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$1,500$6,000
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$14,700$0
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$17,806$3,000
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$46,475$0
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$33,500$0
Rich GordonDCA-21$35,586$0
Jeff GorellRCA-37$19,650$3,500
Shannon GroveRCA-32$2,000$3,000
Curt HagmanRCA-60$10,000$1,500
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$42,900$179
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$21,750$1,000
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$25,751$0
Jerry HillDCA-19$78,700$0
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$16,497$0
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$6,000$2,000
Steve KnightRCA-36$3,000$0
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$46,400$1,000
Dan LogueRCA-3$13,900$2,000
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$6,500$0
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$8,500$8,800
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$46,450$15,700
Holly MitchellDCA-47$16,935$0
Bill MonningDCA-27$26,700$0
Mike MorrellRCA-63$4,370$1,000
Brian NestandeRCA-64$19,000$0
Jim NielsenRCA-2$3,000$1,500
Chris NorbyRCA-72$10,250$3,000
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$25,000$0
Richard PanDCA-5$44,594$1,000
Henry PereaDCA-31$79,994$1,388
John PerezDCA-46$77,600$0
Manuel PerezDCA-80$37,100$0
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$16,225$0
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$12,400$0
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$16,500$1,000
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$21,900$0
Das WilliamsDCA-35$5,289$0
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$2,600$0

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Pharmaceutical manufacturing$707,290
Online computer services$141,700
Engineering, architecture & construction management services$103,695
Health & welfare policy$79,008
Chambers of commerce$62,400
Hotels & motels$56,150
Environmental policy$39,935
Municipal & county government organizations$31,800
Car & truck rental agencies$26,800
Architectural services$7,750
Buses & taxis$0
Bus services$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Chambers of commerce$62,400
Fiscal & tax policy$48,800
Manufacturing$30,253
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range