SB 829 - An Act to Add Section 2503 to the Public Contract Code, Relating to Public Contracts.

Public contracts: public entities: project labor agreements. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law sets forth the requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by public entities and authorizes a public entity to use, enter into, or require contractors to enter into, a project labor agreement for a construction project if the agreement includes specified taxpayer protection provisions. Existing law also provides that if a charter provision,… More
Existing law sets forth the requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by public entities and authorizes a public entity to use, enter into, or require contractors to enter into, a project labor agreement for a construction project if the agreement includes specified taxpayer protection provisions. Existing law also provides that if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance of a charter city prohibits the governing board’s consideration of a project labor agreement for a project to be awarded by the city, or prohibits the governing board from considering whether to allocate funds to a city-funded project covered by such an agreement, state funding or financial assistance may not be used to support that project, as specified.

This bill would additionally provide that if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance of a charter city prohibits, limits, or constrains in any way the governing board’s authority or discretion to adopt, require, or utilize a project labor agreement that includes specified taxpayer protection provisions for some or all of the construction projects to be awarded by the city, state funding or financial assistance may not be used to support any construction projects awarded by the city, as specified. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Committee on Rules Vote: Be referred to Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection.

PASSED on March 1, 2012.

voted YES: 8 voted NO: 0
3 voted present/not voting

An Act to Add Section 2503 to the Public Contract Code, Relating to Public Contracts.

SB 829 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
Existing law sets forth the requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by public entities and authorizes a public entity to use, enter into, or require contractors to enter into, a project labor agreement for a construction project if the agreement includes specified taxpayer protection provisions. Existing law also provides that if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance of a charter city prohibits the governing board’s consideration of a project labor agreement for a project to be awarded by the city, or prohibits the governing board from considering whether to allocate funds to a city-funded project covered by such an agreement, state funding or financial assistance may not be used to support that project, as specified.

This bill would additionally provide that if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance of a charter city prohibits, limits, or constrains in any way the governing board’s authority or discretion to adopt, require, or utilize a project labor agreement that includes specified taxpayer protection provisions for some or all of the construction projects to be awarded by the city, state funding or… More
Existing law sets forth the requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by public entities and authorizes a public entity to use, enter into, or require contractors to enter into, a project labor agreement for a construction project if the agreement includes specified taxpayer protection provisions. Existing law also provides that if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance of a charter city prohibits the governing board’s consideration of a project labor agreement for a project to be awarded by the city, or prohibits the governing board from considering whether to allocate funds to a city-funded project covered by such an agreement, state funding or financial assistance may not be used to support that project, as specified.

This bill would additionally provide that if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance of a charter city prohibits, limits, or constrains in any way the governing board’s authority or discretion to adopt, require, or utilize a project labor agreement that includes specified taxpayer protection provisions for some or all of the construction projects to be awarded by the city, state funding or financial assistance may not be used to support any construction projects awarded by the city, as specified. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Add Section 2503 to the Public Contract Code, Relating to Public Contracts.
Author(s)
Michael Rubio
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Public contracts: public entities: project labor agreements
Major Actions
Introduced2/18/2011
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations4/27/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/16/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/26/2011
Passed Senate6/02/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment7/06/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Rules3/01/2012
Passed Assembly Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection3/13/2012
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations3/28/2012
Passed Assembly4/12/2012
Passed Senate Committee on Governance and Finance4/18/2012
Passed Senate4/19/2012
Presented to the governor (enrolled)4/23/2012
Became law (chaptered).4/26/2012
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on Labor and Industrial RelationsDo pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/27/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations
5 voted YES 0 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.5/16/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
9 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/26/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
6 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB829 DeSaulnier6/02/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
23 voted YES 15 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Labor and EmploymentDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.7/06/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment
5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssembly Committee on RulesBe referred to Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection.3/01/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Rules
8 voted YES 0 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer ProtectionDo pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.3/13/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection
6 voted YES 2 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.3/28/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 4 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 829 Rubio Senate Third Reading By WILLIAMS4/12/2012This bill PASSED the Assembly
50 voted YES 23 voted NO 7 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on Governance and FinanceFrom committee: That the Assembly Amendments be concurred in.4/18/2012This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Governance and Finance
6 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateUnfinished Business SB829 Rubio Concurrence4/19/2012This bill PASSED the Senate
25 voted YES 13 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/18/2011
2/18/2011Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/20/2011From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
3/10/2011Referred to Com. on RLS.
3/24/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
3/31/2011Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
4/13/2011Set for hearing April 27.
select this voteVote4/27/2011Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
5/02/2011From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 766.) (April 27).
5/03/2011Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
5/06/2011Set for hearing May 16.
select this voteVote5/16/2011Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
5/16/2011Placed on APPR. suspense file.
5/20/2011Set for hearing May 26.
select this voteVote5/26/2011Do pass as amended.
5/27/2011From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 1122.) (May 26).
5/31/2011Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
6/02/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 1264.) Ordered to the Assembly.
6/02/2011In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage6/02/2011Senate 3rd Reading SB829 DeSaulnier
6/16/2011Referred to Com. on L. & E.
7/01/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
select this voteVote7/06/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
7/07/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/17/2011Hearing postponed by committee.
2/23/2012From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2/27/2012Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
3/01/2012From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 1). Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
currently selectedVote3/01/2012Be referred to Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection.
3/13/2012From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (March 13).
select this voteVote3/13/2012Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
3/14/2012Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
3/28/2012From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (March 28).
select this voteVote3/28/2012Do pass.
3/29/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
4/09/2012Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
4/12/2012Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 50. Noes 23. Page 4343.) Ordered to the Senate.
4/12/2012In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage4/12/2012SB 829 Rubio Senate Third Reading By WILLIAMS
4/16/2012Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 3165.) Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
4/18/2012Set for hearing April 18. From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 3206.)
select this voteVote4/18/2012From committee: That the Assembly Amendments be concurred in.
4/19/2012Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 3218.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage4/19/2012Unfinished Business SB829 Rubio Concurrence
4/23/2012Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:15 p.m.
4/26/2012Approved by the Governor.
4/26/2012Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 11, Statutes of 2012.

MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Add Section 2503 to the Public Contract Code, Relating to Public Contracts.: Be referred to Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection.

0 organizations supported this motion

0 organizations opposed this motion

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-33$0$0
Luis AlejoDCA-28$0$0
Michael AllenDCA-7$0$0
Tom AmmianoDCA-13$0$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-76$0$0
Jim BeallDCA-24$0$0
Bill BerryhillRCA-26$0$0
Marty BlockDCA-78$0$0
Bob BlumenfieldDCA-40$0$0
Susan BonillaDCA-11$0$0
Steven BradfordDCA-51$0$0
Julia BrownleyDCA-41$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-15$0$0
Betsy ButlerDCA-53$0$0
Charles CalderonDCA-58$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-23$0$0
Wilmer Amina CarterDCA-62$0$0
Gilbert CedilloDCA-45$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-1$0$0
Connie ConwayRCA-34$0$0
Paul CookRCA-65$0$0
Mike DavisDCA-48$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-9$0$0
Tim DonnellyRCA-59$0$0
Mike EngDCA-49$0$0
Mike FeuerDCA-42$0$0
Nathan FletcherRCA-75$0$0
Paul FongDCA-22$0$0
Felipe FuentesDCA-39$0$0
Warren FurutaniDCA-55$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-4$0$0
Cathleen GalgianiDCA-17$0$0
Martin GarrickRCA-74$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$0$0
Rich GordonDCA-21$0$0
Jeff GorellRCA-37$0$0
Shannon GroveRCA-32$0$0
Curt HagmanRCA-60$0$0
Linda HaldermanRCA-29$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-52$0$0
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$0
Mary HayashiDCA-18$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-57$0$0
Jerry HillDCA-19$0$0
Alyson HuberDCA-10$0$0
Ben HuesoDCA-79$0$0
Jared HuffmanDCA-6$0$0
Kevin JeffriesRCA-66$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-77$0$0
Steve KnightRCA-36$0$0
Ricardo LaraDCA-50$0$0
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$0
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-54$0$0
Fiona MaDCA-12$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-68$0$0
Tony MendozaDCA-56$0$0
Jeff MillerRCA-71$0$0
Holly MitchellDCA-47$0$0
Bill MonningDCA-27$0$0
Mike MorrellRCA-63$0$0
Brian NestandeRCA-64$0$0
Jim NielsenRCA-2$0$0
Chris NorbyRCA-72$0$0
Kristin OlsenRCA-25$0$0
Richard PanDCA-5$0$0
Henry PereaDCA-31$0$0
John PerezDCA-46$0$0
Manuel PerezDCA-80$0$0
Anthony PortantinoDCA-44$0$0
Jim SilvaRCA-67$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-14$0$0
Cameron SmythRCA-38$0$0
Jose SolorioDCA-69$0$0
Sandre SwansonDCA-16$0$0
Norma TorresDCA-61$0$0
David ValadaoRCA-30$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-70$0$0
Bob WieckowskiDCA-20$0$0
Das WilliamsDCA-35$0$0
Mariko YamadaDCA-8$0$0

Interest Groups that supported this motion

$ Donated

Interest Groups that opposed this motion

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range