Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

SB 880 - An Act to Amend Sections 1353.9 and 1363.07 of the Civil Code, Relating to Common Interest Developments, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.

Common interest developments: electric vehicle charging stations. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act defines and regulates common interest developments, which include community apartment projects, condominium projects, planned developments, and stock cooperatives. Beginning January 1, 2012, any covenant, restriction, or condition in a deed or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of an interest in a common interest development, or any… More
The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act defines and regulates common interest developments, which include community apartment projects, condominium projects, planned developments, and stock cooperatives. Beginning January 1, 2012, any covenant, restriction, or condition in a deed or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of an interest in a common interest development, or any provision of the governing documents of a common interest development, that prohibits or restricts the installation or use of an electric vehicle charging station is void and unenforceable. On and after January 1, 2012, if an electric vehicle charging station is to be placed in a common area, the homeowner and common interest development association shall be subject to certain requirements.

This bill would make those provisions applicable only to the installation or use of an electric vehicle charging station in an owner’s designated parking space, as described. The bill would also provide that any provision in those documents that is in conflict with those requirements is void and unenforceable. The bill would authorize the installation of a charging station for the exclusive use of an owner in a common area that is not an exclusive use common area only if installation in the owner’s designated parking space is impossible or unreasonably expensive. However, the bill would authorize an association or owners to install a charging station in the common area for the use of all members, and would require the association to develop appropriate terms of use for the charging station. The bill would authorize the board of directors of an association to grant exclusive use of a portion of the common area without the affirmative vote of the members of the association for the purpose of installing and using an electric vehicle charging station in an owner’s garage or designated parking space, under specified circumstances, such as when the installation or use of the charging station requires reasonable access through the common area for utility lines or meters.

This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on February 23, 2012.

voted YES: 35 voted NO: 0
5 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 1353.9 and 1363.07 of the Civil Code, Relating to Common Interest Developments, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.

SB 880 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act defines and regulates common interest developments, which include community apartment projects, condominium projects, planned developments, and stock cooperatives. Beginning January 1, 2012, any covenant, restriction, or condition in a deed or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of an interest in a common interest development, or any provision of the governing documents of a common interest development, that prohibits or restricts the installation or use of an electric vehicle charging station is void and unenforceable. On and after January 1, 2012, if an electric vehicle charging station is to be placed in a common area, the homeowner and common interest development association shall be subject to certain requirements.

This bill would make those provisions applicable only to the installation or use of an electric vehicle charging station in an owner’s designated parking space, as described. The bill would also provide that any provision in those documents that is in conflict with those requirements is void and unenforceable. The bill would authorize the installation of a charging station for the… More
The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act defines and regulates common interest developments, which include community apartment projects, condominium projects, planned developments, and stock cooperatives. Beginning January 1, 2012, any covenant, restriction, or condition in a deed or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of an interest in a common interest development, or any provision of the governing documents of a common interest development, that prohibits or restricts the installation or use of an electric vehicle charging station is void and unenforceable. On and after January 1, 2012, if an electric vehicle charging station is to be placed in a common area, the homeowner and common interest development association shall be subject to certain requirements.

This bill would make those provisions applicable only to the installation or use of an electric vehicle charging station in an owner’s designated parking space, as described. The bill would also provide that any provision in those documents that is in conflict with those requirements is void and unenforceable. The bill would authorize the installation of a charging station for the exclusive use of an owner in a common area that is not an exclusive use common area only if installation in the owner’s designated parking space is impossible or unreasonably expensive. However, the bill would authorize an association or owners to install a charging station in the common area for the use of all members, and would require the association to develop appropriate terms of use for the charging station. The bill would authorize the board of directors of an association to grant exclusive use of a portion of the common area without the affirmative vote of the members of the association for the purpose of installing and using an electric vehicle charging station in an owner’s garage or designated parking space, under specified circumstances, such as when the installation or use of the charging station requires reasonable access through the common area for utility lines or meters.

This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 1353.9 and 1363.07 of the Civil Code, Relating to Common Interest Developments, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.
Author(s)
Ellen Corbett
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Common interest developments: electric vehicle charging stations
Major Actions
Introduced2/18/2011
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Environmental Quality4/04/2011
Passed Senate5/09/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Housing and Community Development1/11/2012
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary1/17/2012
Passed Assembly1/30/2012
Passed Senate2/23/2012
Presented to the governor (enrolled)2/24/2012
Became law (chaptered).2/29/2012
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on Environmental QualityDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations Recommend Consent.4/04/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Environmental Quality
7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateConsent Calendar 2nd SB880 Corbett5/09/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
40 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Housing and Community DevelopmentDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary.1/11/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Housing and Community Development
6 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass as amended.1/17/2012This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
6 voted YES 3 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 880 Corbett Third Reading Urgency By BUTLER1/30/2012This bill PASSED the Assembly
56 voted YES 19 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
currently selectedSenateUnfinished Business SB880 Corbett Urgency Clause Concurrence2/23/2012This bill PASSED the Senate
35 voted YES 0 voted NO 5 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/18/2011
2/18/2011Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/19/2011From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
3/10/2011Referred to Com. on RLS.
3/21/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
3/24/2011Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
3/30/2011Set for hearing April 4.
select this voteVote4/04/2011Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations Recommend Consent.
4/05/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 543.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
4/13/2011Set for hearing May 2.
5/03/2011From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
5/04/2011Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
5/09/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 905.) Ordered to the Assembly.
5/09/2011In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage5/09/2011Consent Calendar 2nd SB880 Corbett
5/19/2011Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
9/07/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
1/04/2012Re-referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
1/11/2012From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (January 11). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote1/11/2012Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
1/17/2012From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (January 17).
select this voteVote1/17/2012Do pass as amended.
1/18/2012Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
1/19/2012Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
1/23/2012Read third time and amended. (Page 3562.) Ordered to third reading.
1/30/2012Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 56. Noes 19. Page 3630.) Ordered to the Senate.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage1/30/2012SB 880 Corbett Third Reading Urgency By BUTLER
1/31/2012In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
2/23/2012Urgency clause adopted. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 2838.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage2/23/2012Unfinished Business SB880 Corbett Urgency Clause Concurrence
2/24/2012Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:15 a.m.
2/29/2012Approved by the Governor.
2/29/2012Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 6, Statutes of 2012.

Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

5 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 1353.9 and 1363.07 of the Civil Code, Relating to Common Interest Developments, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof, to Take Effect Immediately.: Unfinished Business SB880 Corbett Urgency Clause Concurrence

5 organizations supported this bill

California Electric Transportation Coalition
Senate Rules Committee (2012, February 1). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Community Associations Institute
Senate Rules Committee (2012, February 1). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Executive Council of Homeowners
Senate Rules Committee (2012, February 1). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Personal Insurance Federation
Senate Rules Committee (2012, February 1). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Plug in America
Senate Rules Committee (2012, February 1). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

0 organizations opposed this bill

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Votesort icon
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
Alex PadillaDCA-20$56,150$0
Anthony CannellaRCA-12$33,100$0
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$21,125$0
Bob DuttonRCA-31$13,700$0
Bob HuffRCA-29$37,850$0
Carol LiuDCA-21$7,400$0
Christine KehoeDCA-39$10,900$0
Curren PriceDCA-26$39,500$0
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$49,650$0
Doug La MalfaRCA-4$7,200$0
Ed HernandezDCA-24$48,686$0
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$2,000$0
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$2,600$0
Fran PavleyDCA-23$19,900$0
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$25,050$0
Jean FullerRCA-18$33,275$0
Joe SimitianDCA-11$11,400$0
Joel AndersonRCA-36$51,650$0
Juan VargasDCA-40$93,100$0
Kevin De LeonDCA-22$63,392$0
Leland YeeDCA-8$29,500$0
Lois WolkDCA-5$25,100$0
Loni HancockDCA-9$4,000$0
Lou CorreaDCA-34$44,445$0
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$9,250$0
Mark LenoDCA-3$6,750$0
Mark WylandRCA-38$16,600$0
Michael RubioDCA-16$58,572$0
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$39,775$0
Noreen EvansDCA-2$22,050$0
Rod WrightDCA-25$60,557$0
Ron CalderonDCA-30$50,900$0
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
Sharon RunnerRCA-17$4,900$0
Ted GainesRCA-1$108,825$0
Ted LieuDCA-28$75,100$0
Tom BerryhillRCA-14$32,950$0
Tom HarmanRCA-35$20,000$0
Tony StricklandRCA-19$54,957$0

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$2,000$0
Joel AndersonRCA-36$51,650$0
Tom BerryhillRCA-14$32,950$0
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
Ron CalderonDCA-30$50,900$0
Anthony CannellaRCA-12$33,100$0
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$2,600$0
Lou CorreaDCA-34$44,445$0
Kevin De LeonDCA-22$63,392$0
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$9,250$0
Bob DuttonRCA-31$13,700$0
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$21,125$0
Noreen EvansDCA-2$22,050$0
Jean FullerRCA-18$33,275$0
Ted GainesRCA-1$108,825$0
Loni HancockDCA-9$4,000$0
Tom HarmanRCA-35$20,000$0
Ed HernandezDCA-24$48,686$0
Bob HuffRCA-29$37,850$0
Christine KehoeDCA-39$10,900$0
Doug La MalfaRCA-4$7,200$0
Mark LenoDCA-3$6,750$0
Ted LieuDCA-28$75,100$0
Carol LiuDCA-21$7,400$0
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$25,050$0
Alex PadillaDCA-20$56,150$0
Fran PavleyDCA-23$19,900$0
Curren PriceDCA-26$39,500$0
Michael RubioDCA-16$58,572$0
Sharon RunnerRCA-17$4,900$0
Joe SimitianDCA-11$11,400$0
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$49,650$0
Tony StricklandRCA-19$54,957$0
Juan VargasDCA-40$93,100$0
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$39,775$0
Lois WolkDCA-5$25,100$0
Rod WrightDCA-25$60,557$0
Mark WylandRCA-38$16,600$0
Leland YeeDCA-8$29,500$0

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Property & casualty insurance$1,086,709
Alternate energy production & services$205,150
Transportation$0
Consumer groups$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range