Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2011-2012 Legislature.

SB 930 - An Act to Amend Sections 12301.25, 12301.6, and 12305.86 Of, and to Repeal Sections 12305.73 and 12305.85 Of, the Welfare and Institutions Code, Relating to Public Social Services.

In-home supportive services: enrollment and fingerprinting requirements. 2011-2012 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law authorizes services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract… More
Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law authorizes services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Existing law requires a county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium, as applicable, to conduct an investigation of the qualifications and background of an IHSS provider applicant, including specified criminal background checks.

This bill would require the county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium to send the State Department of Social Services a copy of the state-level criminal offender record information search response that is provided to that entity by the Department of Justice for any individual who has requested an appeal of a denial of placement on the registry of IHSS personnel or denial of eligibility to provide supportive services to an IHSS recipient.

Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. Under existing law, IHSS recipients who are eligible for the Medi-Cal program, are provided with personal care option services, as defined, in lieu of receiving these services under the IHSS program.

Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services, in consultation with the county welfare departments, is required to develop protocols and procedures for obtaining fingerprint images of all individuals who are being assessed or reassessed to receive supportive services, as specified. Existing law also requires the standardized time provider timesheet used to track the work performed by providers of in-home supportive services to contain specified information, including, effective July 1, 2011, designated spaces for the index fingerprints of the provider and recipient.

This bill would delete the requirements pertaining to obtaining fingerprint images of IHSS recipients, and the requirement that the provider timesheet include spaces for provider and recipient fingerprints.

Existing law requires an IHSS provider enrollment form to be completed using the provider’s physical residence address, and prohibits the use of a post office box address. Existing law also prohibits a county from mailing a provider’s paycheck to a post office box address, unless the county approves a provider request to do so, as specified.

This bill would delete these requirements, and the prohibitions relating to the use of a post office box address by an IHSS provider. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on September 1, 2011.

voted YES: 23 voted NO: 15
2 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 12301.25, 12301.6, and 12305.86 Of, and to Repeal Sections 12305.73 and 12305.85 Of, the Welfare and Institutions Code, Relating to Public Social Services.

SB 930 — 2011-2012 Legislature

Summary
Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law authorizes services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Existing law requires a county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium, as applicable, to conduct an investigation of the qualifications and background of an IHSS provider applicant, including specified criminal background checks.

This bill would require the county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium to send the State Department of Social Services a copy of the state-level criminal offender record information search response that is provided to that entity by the Department of Justice for any individual who has requested an appeal of a denial of placement on the registry of IHSS personnel or… More
Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law authorizes services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Existing law requires a county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium, as applicable, to conduct an investigation of the qualifications and background of an IHSS provider applicant, including specified criminal background checks.

This bill would require the county, public authority, or nonprofit consortium to send the State Department of Social Services a copy of the state-level criminal offender record information search response that is provided to that entity by the Department of Justice for any individual who has requested an appeal of a denial of placement on the registry of IHSS personnel or denial of eligibility to provide supportive services to an IHSS recipient.

Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. Under existing law, IHSS recipients who are eligible for the Medi-Cal program, are provided with personal care option services, as defined, in lieu of receiving these services under the IHSS program.

Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services, in consultation with the county welfare departments, is required to develop protocols and procedures for obtaining fingerprint images of all individuals who are being assessed or reassessed to receive supportive services, as specified. Existing law also requires the standardized time provider timesheet used to track the work performed by providers of in-home supportive services to contain specified information, including, effective July 1, 2011, designated spaces for the index fingerprints of the provider and recipient.

This bill would delete the requirements pertaining to obtaining fingerprint images of IHSS recipients, and the requirement that the provider timesheet include spaces for provider and recipient fingerprints.

Existing law requires an IHSS provider enrollment form to be completed using the provider’s physical residence address, and prohibits the use of a post office box address. Existing law also prohibits a county from mailing a provider’s paycheck to a post office box address, unless the county approves a provider request to do so, as specified.

This bill would delete these requirements, and the prohibitions relating to the use of a post office box address by an IHSS provider. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 12301.25, 12301.6, and 12305.86 Of, and to Repeal Sections 12305.73 and 12305.85 Of, the Welfare and Institutions Code, Relating to Public Social Services.
Author(s)
Noreen Evans
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • In-home supportive services: enrollment and fingerprinting requirements
Major Actions
Introduced2/18/2011
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Human Services4/26/2011
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/09/2011
Passed Senate5/19/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Human Services6/28/2011
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations8/25/2011
Passed Assembly8/30/2011
Passed Senate9/01/2011
Presented to the governor (enrolled)9/09/2011
Became law (chaptered).10/09/2011
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on Human ServicesDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/26/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Human Services
4 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.5/09/2011This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
6 voted YES 3 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateSenate 3rd Reading SB930 Evans5/19/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
23 voted YES 16 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Human ServicesDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.6/28/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Human Services
4 voted YES 1 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.8/25/2011This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 6 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 930 Evans Senate Third Reading By YAMADA8/30/2011This bill PASSED the Assembly
51 voted YES 27 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
currently selectedSenateUnfinished Business SB930 Evans Concurrence9/01/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
23 voted YES 15 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/18/2011
2/18/2011Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
2/19/2011From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
3/10/2011Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
4/12/2011Set for hearing April 26.
select this voteVote4/26/2011Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/27/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 3. Page 764.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
4/29/2011Set for hearing May 9.
select this voteVote5/09/2011Do pass.
5/10/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 930.) (May 9).
5/11/2011Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
5/19/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 16. Page 1034.) Ordered to the Assembly.
5/19/2011In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage5/19/2011Senate 3rd Reading SB930 Evans
5/27/2011Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
select this voteVote6/28/2011Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
6/29/2011From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/15/2011From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/17/2011Hearing postponed by committee.
select this voteVote8/25/2011Do pass.
8/25/2011Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
8/26/2011From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (August 25). Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/30/2011Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 2694.) Ordered to the Senate.
8/30/2011In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/30/2011SB 930 Evans Senate Third Reading By YAMADA
9/01/2011Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 2237.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage9/01/2011Unfinished Business SB930 Evans Concurrence
9/09/2011Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
10/09/2011Approved by the Governor.
10/09/2011Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 649, Statutes of 2011.

Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

20 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 12301.25, 12301.6, and 12305.86 Of, and to Repeal Sections 12305.73 and 12305.85 Of, the Welfare and Institutions Code, Relating to Public Social Services.: Unfinished Business SB930 Evans Concurrence

20 organizations supported this bill

American Civil Liberties Union
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Alliance for Retired Americans
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Association of Public Authorities for IHSS
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Disability Community Action Network
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California Foundation for Independent Living Centers
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California In-home Supportive Services Consumer Alliance
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California State Association of Counties
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
California United Homecare Workers
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Californians for Disability Rights
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Communities United In Defense Of Olmstead
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Contra Costa County
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
County Welfare Directors Association of California
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Disability Rights California
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Personal Assistance Services Council Of Los Angeles County
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
San Francisco Ihss Public Authority
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
The Arc
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
United Cerebral Palsy in California
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.
Western Center on Law and Poverty
Senate Rules Committee (2011, May 11). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from Leg. Info.

0 organizations opposed this bill

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$4,500$0
Joel AndersonRCA-36$14,800$0
Tom BerryhillRCA-14$15,300$0
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
Ron CalderonDCA-30$19,100$0
Anthony CannellaRCA-12$9,800$0
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$14,000$0
Lou CorreaDCA-34$17,700$0
Kevin De LeonDCA-22$48,500$0
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$43,950$0
Bob DuttonRCA-31$7,800$0
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$21,900$0
Noreen EvansDCA-2$38,850$0
Jean FullerRCA-18$9,000$0
Ted GainesRCA-1$17,300$0
Loni HancockDCA-9$43,150$0
Tom HarmanRCA-35$14,500$0
Ed HernandezDCA-24$68,233$0
Bob HuffRCA-29$11,300$0
Christine KehoeDCA-39$4,000$0
Doug La MalfaRCA-4$6,200$0
Mark LenoDCA-3$47,019$0
Ted LieuDCA-28$59,400$0
Carol LiuDCA-21$15,700$0
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$18,500$0
Alex PadillaDCA-20$17,000$0
Fran PavleyDCA-23$57,300$0
Curren PriceDCA-26$24,200$0
Michael RubioDCA-16$24,200$0
Sharon RunnerRCA-17$2,000$0
Joe SimitianDCA-11$9,000$0
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$34,000$0
Tony StricklandRCA-19$8,100$0
Juan VargasDCA-40$36,400$0
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$16,200$0
Lois WolkDCA-5$18,116$0
Rod WrightDCA-25$14,600$0
Mark WylandRCA-38$4,950$0
Leland YeeDCA-8$16,721$0

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Elaine AlquistDCA-13$4,500$0
Joel AndersonRCA-36$14,800$0
Tom BerryhillRCA-14$15,300$0
Sam BlakesleeRCA-15$0$0
Ron CalderonDCA-30$19,100$0
Anthony CannellaRCA-12$9,800$0
Ellen CorbettDCA-10$14,000$0
Lou CorreaDCA-34$17,700$0
Kevin De LeonDCA-22$48,500$0
Mark DeSaulnierDCA-7$43,950$0
Bob DuttonRCA-31$7,800$0
Bill EmmersonRCA-37$21,900$0
Noreen EvansDCA-2$38,850$0
Jean FullerRCA-18$9,000$0
Ted GainesRCA-1$17,300$0
Loni HancockDCA-9$43,150$0
Tom HarmanRCA-35$14,500$0
Ed HernandezDCA-24$68,233$0
Bob HuffRCA-29$11,300$0
Christine KehoeDCA-39$4,000$0
Doug La MalfaRCA-4$6,200$0
Mark LenoDCA-3$47,019$0
Ted LieuDCA-28$59,400$0
Carol LiuDCA-21$15,700$0
Alan LowenthalDCA-27$0$0
Gloria Negrete McLeodDCA-32$18,500$0
Alex PadillaDCA-20$17,000$0
Fran PavleyDCA-23$57,300$0
Curren PriceDCA-26$24,200$0
Michael RubioDCA-16$24,200$0
Sharon RunnerRCA-17$2,000$0
Joe SimitianDCA-11$9,000$0
Darrell SteinbergDCA-6$34,000$0
Tony StricklandRCA-19$8,100$0
Juan VargasDCA-40$36,400$0
Mimi WaltersRCA-33$16,200$0
Lois WolkDCA-5$18,116$0
Rod WrightDCA-25$14,600$0
Mark WylandRCA-38$4,950$0
Leland YeeDCA-8$16,721$0

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Nursing homes$290,523
Health worker unions$279,500
Other unions$205,650
Health & welfare policy$41,716
Municipal & county government organizations$21,900
Minority & ethnic groups$14,000
Consumer groups$0
Elderly issues & Social Security$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range