AB 1005 - An Act to Amend Section 12011.5 of the Government Code, Relating to Judicial Appointments.

Judicial appointments: demographic data. 2013-2014 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law requires the Governor, the designated agency of the State Bar responsible for the evaluation of judicial candidates, and the Administrative Office of the Courts to annually collect demographic data relating to judicial applicants, judicial appointees or nominees, judicial candidates, and justices and judges, as specified, relative to ethnicity, race, and gender. These entities are… More
Existing law requires the Governor, the designated agency of the State Bar responsible for the evaluation of judicial candidates, and the Administrative Office of the Courts to annually collect demographic data relating to judicial applicants, judicial appointees or nominees, judicial candidates, and justices and judges, as specified, relative to ethnicity, race, and gender. These entities are required to release the demographic data on or before March 1 of each year. Existing law encourages members of judicial selection advisory committees to recommend candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified.

This bill would expand these provisions to include the collection of demographic data relative to disability and veteran status, as defined. The bill would provide that the collection of this demographic data is required only for judicial applicants, candidates, appointees, nominees, justices, and judges who apply, or are reviewed, appointed, nominated, or elected, on or after January 1, 2014, and would require the release of this data to begin in 2015. The bill would encourage the Governor and members of judicial selection advisory committees to give particular consideration to candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 5, 2013.

voted YES: 72 voted NO: 0
6 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 12011.5 of the Government Code, Relating to Judicial Appointments.

AB 1005 — 2013-2014 Legislature

Summary
Existing law requires the Governor, the designated agency of the State Bar responsible for the evaluation of judicial candidates, and the Administrative Office of the Courts to annually collect demographic data relating to judicial applicants, judicial appointees or nominees, judicial candidates, and justices and judges, as specified, relative to ethnicity, race, and gender. These entities are required to release the demographic data on or before March 1 of each year. Existing law encourages members of judicial selection advisory committees to recommend candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified.

This bill would expand these provisions to include the collection of demographic data relative to disability and veteran status, as defined. The bill would provide that the collection of this demographic data is required only for judicial applicants, candidates, appointees, nominees, justices, and judges who apply, or are reviewed, appointed, nominated, or elected, on or after January 1, 2014, and would require the release of this data to begin in 2015. The bill would encourage the Governor and members of judicial selection advisory committees to give… More
Existing law requires the Governor, the designated agency of the State Bar responsible for the evaluation of judicial candidates, and the Administrative Office of the Courts to annually collect demographic data relating to judicial applicants, judicial appointees or nominees, judicial candidates, and justices and judges, as specified, relative to ethnicity, race, and gender. These entities are required to release the demographic data on or before March 1 of each year. Existing law encourages members of judicial selection advisory committees to recommend candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified.

This bill would expand these provisions to include the collection of demographic data relative to disability and veteran status, as defined. The bill would provide that the collection of this demographic data is required only for judicial applicants, candidates, appointees, nominees, justices, and judges who apply, or are reviewed, appointed, nominated, or elected, on or after January 1, 2014, and would require the release of this data to begin in 2015. The bill would encourage the Governor and members of judicial selection advisory committees to give particular consideration to candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 12011.5 of the Government Code, Relating to Judicial Appointments.
Author(s)
Luis Alejo
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Judicial appointments: demographic data
Major Actions
Introduced2/22/2013
Referred to Committee
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary4/23/2013
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/08/2013
Passed Assembly5/20/2013
Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary6/11/2013
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations6/24/2013
Passed Senate7/01/2013
Passed Assembly8/05/2013
Presented to the governor (enrolled)8/12/2013
Became law (chaptered).8/16/2013
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/23/2013This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
10 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/08/2013This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
16 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblyAB 1005 ALEJO Assembly Third Reading5/20/2013This bill PASSED the Assembly
74 voted YES 0 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.6/11/2013This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.6/24/2013This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB1005 Alejo By Corbett7/01/2013This bill PASSED the Senate
35 voted YES 0 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblyAB 1005 ALEJO Concurrence in Senate Amendments8/05/2013This bill PASSED the Assembly
72 voted YES 0 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/22/2013
2/22/2013Introduced. To print.
2/24/2013From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
2/25/2013Read first time.
3/18/2013Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
4/22/2013Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote4/23/2013Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/23/2013From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
4/30/2013From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
5/01/2013Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote5/08/2013Do pass as amended.
5/13/2013From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 8).
5/14/2013Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
5/15/2013Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
5/16/2013Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
5/20/2013Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
5/20/2013In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage5/20/2013AB 1005 ALEJO Assembly Third Reading
5/29/2013Referred to Com. on JUD.
6/03/2013From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
6/11/2013From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote6/11/2013Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
select this voteVote6/24/2013Do pass.
6/24/2013From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 24).
6/25/2013Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
7/01/2013Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly.
7/01/2013In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage7/01/2013Assembly 3rd Reading AB1005 Alejo By Corbett
8/05/2013Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling.
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage8/05/2013AB 1005 ALEJO Concurrence in Senate Amendments
8/12/2013Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:40 p.m.
8/16/2013Approved by the Governor.
8/16/2013Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 113, Statutes of 2013.

MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

0 Organizations Support and 0 Oppose

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Section 12011.5 of the Government Code, Relating to Judicial Appointments.: AB 1005 ALEJO Concurrence in Senate Amendments

0 organizations support this bill

0 organizations oppose this bill

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Support
$ From Interest Groups
That Oppose
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-35$0$0Yes
Luis AlejoDCA-30$0$0Yes
Travis AllenRCA-72$0$0Yes
Tom AmmianoDCA-17$0$0Yes
Toni AtkinsDCA-78$0$0Yes
Frank BigelowRCA-5$0$0Yes
Richard BloomDCA-50$0$0Yes
Raul BocanegraDCA-39$0$0Yes
Susan BonillaDCA-14$0$0Yes
Rob BontaDCA-18$0$0Not Voting
Steven BradfordDCA-62$0$0Yes
Cheryl BrownDCA-47$0$0Yes
Joan BuchananDCA-16$0$0Yes
Ian CalderonDCA-57$0$0Yes
Nora CamposDCA-27$0$0Yes
Ed ChauDCA-49$0$0Yes
Rocky ChavezRCA-76$0$0Yes
Wesley ChesbroDCA-2$0$0Yes
Connie ConwayRCA-26$0$0Yes
Ken CooleyDCA-8$0$0Yes
Brian DahleRCA-1$0$0Yes
Tom DalyDCA-69$0$0Yes
Roger DickinsonDCA-7$0$0Yes
Tim DonnellyRCA-33$0$0Not Voting
Susan EggmanDCA-13$0$0Yes
Paul FongDCA-28$0$0Yes
Steve FoxDCA-36$0$0Yes
Jim FrazierDCA-11$0$0Yes
Beth GainesRCA-6$0$0Yes
Cristina GarciaDCA-58$0$0Yes
Mike GattoDCA-43$0$0Yes
Jimmy GomezDCA-51$0$0Not Voting
Lorena GonzalezDCA-80$0$0Yes
Rich GordonDCA-24$0$0Yes
Jeff GorellRCA-44$0$0Yes
Adam GrayDCA-21$0$0Yes
Shannon GroveRCA-34$0$0Yes
Curt HagmanRCA-55$0$0Yes
Isadore HallDCA-64$0$0Not Voting
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$0Yes
Roger HernandezDCA-48$0$0Yes
Chris HoldenDCA-41$0$0Not Voting
Brian JonesRCA-71$0$0Yes
Reggie Jones-SawyerDCA-59$0$0Yes
Marc LevineDCA-10$0$0Yes
Eric LinderRCA-60$0$0Yes
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$0Yes
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-70$0$0Yes
Brian MaienscheinRCA-77$0$0Yes
Allan MansoorRCA-74$0$0Yes
Jose MedinaDCA-61$0$0Yes
Melissa MelendezRCA-67$0$0Yes
Holly MitchellDCA-54$0$0Yes
Mike MorrellRCA-40$0$0Yes
Kevin MullinDCA-22$0$0Yes
Al MuratsuchiDCA-66$0$0Yes
Adrin NazarianDCA-46$0$0Yes
Brian NestandeRCA-42$0$0Yes
Kristin OlsenRCA-12$0$0Yes
Richard PanDCA-9$0$0Yes
Jim PattersonRCA-23$0$0Yes
Henry PereaDCA-31$0$0Yes
John PerezDCA-53$0$0Yes
Manuel PerezDCA-56$0$0Yes
Bill QuirkDCA-20$0$0Not Voting
Sharon Quirk-SilvaDCA-65$0$0Yes
Anthony RendonDCA-63$0$0Yes
Rudy SalasDCA-32$0$0Yes
Nancy SkinnerDCA-15$0$0Yes
Mark StoneDCA-29$0$0Yes
Phil TingDCA-19$0$0Yes
Don WagnerRCA-68$0$0Yes
Marie WaldronRCA-75$0$0Yes
Shirley WeberDCA-79$0$0Yes
Bob WieckowskiDCA-25$0$0Yes
Scott WilkRCA-38$0$0Yes
Das WilliamsDCA-37$0$0Yes
Mariko YamadaDCA-4$0$0Yes

Interest Groups that support this bill

$ Donated

Interest Groups that oppose this bill

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range