Individual legislator voting records for this vote are not currently available. Includes all politicians who were in office at any point during the 2013-2014 Legislature.

AB 1005 - An Act to Amend Section 12011.5 of the Government Code, Relating to Judicial Appointments.

Judicial appointments: demographic data. 2013-2014 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
Existing law requires the Governor, the designated agency of the State Bar responsible for the evaluation of judicial candidates, and the Administrative Office of the Courts to annually collect demographic data relating to judicial applicants, judicial appointees or nominees, judicial candidates, and justices and judges, as specified, relative to ethnicity, race, and gender. These entities are… More
Existing law requires the Governor, the designated agency of the State Bar responsible for the evaluation of judicial candidates, and the Administrative Office of the Courts to annually collect demographic data relating to judicial applicants, judicial appointees or nominees, judicial candidates, and justices and judges, as specified, relative to ethnicity, race, and gender. These entities are required to release the demographic data on or before March 1 of each year. Existing law encourages members of judicial selection advisory committees to recommend candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified.

This bill would expand these provisions to include the collection of demographic data relative to disability and veteran status, as defined. The bill would provide that the collection of this demographic data is required only for judicial applicants, candidates, appointees, nominees, justices, and judges who apply, or are reviewed, appointed, nominated, or elected, on or after January 1, 2014, and would require the release of this data to begin in 2015. The bill would encourage the Governor and members of judicial selection advisory committees to give particular consideration to candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified. Hide
 
Status:
The bill has become law (chaptered). 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 5, 2013.

voted YES: 72 voted NO: 0
6 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Section 12011.5 of the Government Code, Relating to Judicial Appointments.

AB 1005 — 2013-2014 Legislature

Summary
Existing law requires the Governor, the designated agency of the State Bar responsible for the evaluation of judicial candidates, and the Administrative Office of the Courts to annually collect demographic data relating to judicial applicants, judicial appointees or nominees, judicial candidates, and justices and judges, as specified, relative to ethnicity, race, and gender. These entities are required to release the demographic data on or before March 1 of each year. Existing law encourages members of judicial selection advisory committees to recommend candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified.

This bill would expand these provisions to include the collection of demographic data relative to disability and veteran status, as defined. The bill would provide that the collection of this demographic data is required only for judicial applicants, candidates, appointees, nominees, justices, and judges who apply, or are reviewed, appointed, nominated, or elected, on or after January 1, 2014, and would require the release of this data to begin in 2015. The bill would encourage the Governor and members of judicial selection advisory committees to give… More
Existing law requires the Governor, the designated agency of the State Bar responsible for the evaluation of judicial candidates, and the Administrative Office of the Courts to annually collect demographic data relating to judicial applicants, judicial appointees or nominees, judicial candidates, and justices and judges, as specified, relative to ethnicity, race, and gender. These entities are required to release the demographic data on or before March 1 of each year. Existing law encourages members of judicial selection advisory committees to recommend candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified.

This bill would expand these provisions to include the collection of demographic data relative to disability and veteran status, as defined. The bill would provide that the collection of this demographic data is required only for judicial applicants, candidates, appointees, nominees, justices, and judges who apply, or are reviewed, appointed, nominated, or elected, on or after January 1, 2014, and would require the release of this data to begin in 2015. The bill would encourage the Governor and members of judicial selection advisory committees to give particular consideration to candidates from diverse backgrounds and cultures, as specified. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Section 12011.5 of the Government Code, Relating to Judicial Appointments.
Author(s)
Luis Alejo
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Judicial appointments: demographic data
Major Actions
Introduced2/22/2013
Referred to Committee
Passed Assembly Committee on Judiciary4/23/2013
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations5/08/2013
Passed Assembly5/20/2013
Passed Senate Committee on Judiciary6/11/2013
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations6/24/2013
Passed Senate7/01/2013
Passed Assembly8/05/2013
Presented to the governor (enrolled)8/12/2013
Became law (chaptered).8/16/2013
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteAssembly Committee on JudiciaryDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.4/23/2013This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
10 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/08/2013This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
16 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblyAB 1005 ALEJO Assembly Third Reading5/20/2013This bill PASSED the Assembly
74 voted YES 0 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on JudiciaryDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.6/11/2013This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Judiciary
7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass.6/24/2013This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateAssembly 3rd Reading AB1005 Alejo By Corbett7/01/2013This bill PASSED the Senate
35 voted YES 0 voted NO 3 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblyAB 1005 ALEJO Concurrence in Senate Amendments8/05/2013This bill PASSED the Assembly
72 voted YES 0 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/22/2013
2/22/2013Introduced. To print.
2/24/2013From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
2/25/2013Read first time.
3/18/2013Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
4/22/2013Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
4/23/2013From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote4/23/2013Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/30/2013From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
5/01/2013Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
select this voteVote5/08/2013Do pass as amended.
5/13/2013From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 8).
5/14/2013Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
5/15/2013Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
5/16/2013Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
5/20/2013Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
5/20/2013In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage5/20/2013AB 1005 ALEJO Assembly Third Reading
5/29/2013Referred to Com. on JUD.
6/03/2013From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
6/11/2013From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
select this voteVote6/11/2013Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
6/24/2013From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 24).
select this voteVote6/24/2013Do pass.
6/25/2013Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
7/01/2013Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly.
7/01/2013In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage7/01/2013Assembly 3rd Reading AB1005 Alejo By Corbett
8/05/2013Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling.
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage8/05/2013AB 1005 ALEJO Concurrence in Senate Amendments
8/12/2013Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:40 p.m.
8/16/2013Approved by the Governor.
8/16/2013Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 113, Statutes of 2013.

MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Section 12011.5 of the Government Code, Relating to Judicial Appointments.: AB 1005 ALEJO Concurrence in Senate Amendments

0 organizations supported this bill

0 organizations opposed this bill

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-35$0$0
Luis AlejoDCA-30$0$0
Travis AllenRCA-72$0$0
Tom AmmianoDCA-17$0$0
Toni AtkinsDCA-78$0$0
Frank BigelowRCA-5$0$0
Richard BloomDCA-50$0$0
Raul BocanegraDCA-39$0$0
Susan BonillaDCA-14$0$0
Rob BontaDCA-18$0$0
Steven BradfordDCA-62$0$0
Cheryl BrownDCA-47$0$0
Joan BuchananDCA-16$0$0
Ian CalderonDCA-57$0$0
Nora CamposDCA-27$0$0
Ed ChauDCA-49$0$0
Rocky ChavezRCA-76$0$0
Wesley ChesbroDCA-2$0$0
Connie ConwayRCA-26$0$0
Ken CooleyDCA-8$0$0
Brian DahleRCA-1$0$0
Tom DalyDCA-69$0$0
Roger DickinsonDCA-7$0$0
Tim DonnellyRCA-33$0$0
Susan EggmanDCA-13$0$0
Paul FongDCA-28$0$0
Steve FoxDCA-36$0$0
Jim FrazierDCA-11$0$0
Beth GainesRCA-6$0$0
Cristina GarciaDCA-58$0$0
Mike GattoDCA-43$0$0
Jimmy GomezDCA-51$0$0
Lorena GonzalezDCA-80$0$0
Rich GordonDCA-24$0$0
Jeff GorellRCA-44$0$0
Adam GrayDCA-21$0$0
Shannon GroveRCA-34$0$0
Curt HagmanRCA-55$0$0
Isadore HallDCA-64$0$0
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$0
Roger HernandezDCA-48$0$0
Chris HoldenDCA-41$0$0
Brian JonesRCA-71$0$0
Reginald B. Jones-Sawyer, Sr.DCA-59$0$0
Marc LevineDCA-10$0$0
Eric LinderRCA-60$0$0
Dan LogueRCA-3$0$0
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-70$0$0
Brian MaienscheinRCA-77$0$0
Allan MansoorRCA-74$0$0
Jose MedinaDCA-61$0$0
Melissa MelendezRCA-67$0$0
Holly MitchellDCA-54$0$0
Mike MorrellRCA-40$0$0
Kevin MullinDCA-22$0$0
Al MuratsuchiDCA-66$0$0
Adrin NazarianDCA-46$0$0
Brian NestandeRCA-42$0$0
Kristin OlsenRCA-12$0$0
Richard PanDCA-9$0$0
Jim PattersonRCA-23$0$0
Henry PereaDCA-31$0$0
John PerezDCA-53$0$0
Manuel PerezDCA-56$0$0
Bill QuirkDCA-20$0$0
Sharon Quirk-SilvaDCA-65$0$0
Anthony RendonDCA-63$0$0
Rudy SalasDCA-32$0$0
Nancy SkinnerDCA-15$0$0
Mark StoneDCA-29$0$0
Phil TingDCA-19$0$0
Don WagnerRCA-68$0$0
Marie WaldronRCA-75$0$0
Shirley WeberDCA-79$0$0
Bob WieckowskiDCA-25$0$0
Scott WilkRCA-38$0$0
Das WilliamsDCA-37$0$0
Mariko YamadaDCA-4$0$0

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range