Includes all politicians who are currently in office.

AB 200 - An Act to Amend Sections 42605 and 42606 of the Education Code, Relating to Education Finance.

Education finance: categorical programs. 2013-2014 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law establishes various categorical education programs, and appropriates the funding for those programs in the annual Budget Act. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to apportion from the amounts provided in the annual Budget Act for specified categorical education programs an amount based on the… More
(1)Existing law establishes various categorical education programs, and appropriates the funding for those programs in the annual Budget Act. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to apportion from the amounts provided in the annual Budget Act for specified categorical education programs an amount based on the relative proportion that the local educational agency received in the 2008–09 fiscal year for those programs and authorizes local educational agencies, for those fiscal years, to use these funds, with specified exceptions, for any educational purpose, to the extent permitted by federal law. Existing law requires a school district that receives funding on behalf of a charter school pursuant to certain provisions, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to continue to distribute the funds to those charter schools based on the same relative proportion that the school district distributed in the 2007–08 fiscal year, as adjusted by the school district to reflect changes in charter school attendance in the school district. Existing law requires a local educational agency to report expenditures of these funds to the State Department of Education. Existing law also requires the Superintendent, for the 2010–11 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to allocate a supplemental categorical block grant to a charter school that began operation on or after the 2008–09 fiscal year, as specified.

This bill would delete the 2014–15 fiscal year termination dates and would require, commencing with the 2014–15 fiscal year, the apportionments from the categorical education programs, as described above, to be apportioned to recipients by multiplying the recipient’s per-pupil rate, calculated as specified, by the recipient’s current fiscal year average daily attendance. The bill would also require the department to adopt uniform definitions for reporting the expenditure of the funds and would require a local educational agency, as a condition of receiving the funds, to (A) report the expenditure of those funds to the department, as specified, and (B) post information on the Internet Web site of the local educational agency on the expenditure of the funds at the school district level on a per pupil basis and identify separately the amount expended at each schoolsite on a per pupil basis. By requiring school districts to continue to distribute funds to charter schools, as discussed above, beyond the 2014–15 fiscal year, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(2)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Hide
 
Status:
The bill was voted on by an Assembly committee on May 1, 2013. 
There have been no votes on passage on this bill.
Other Votes:

An Act to Amend Sections 42605 and 42606 of the Education Code, Relating to Education Finance.

AB 200 — 2013-2014 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law establishes various categorical education programs, and appropriates the funding for those programs in the annual Budget Act. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to apportion from the amounts provided in the annual Budget Act for specified categorical education programs an amount based on the relative proportion that the local educational agency received in the 2008–09 fiscal year for those programs and authorizes local educational agencies, for those fiscal years, to use these funds, with specified exceptions, for any educational purpose, to the extent permitted by federal law. Existing law requires a school district that receives funding on behalf of a charter school pursuant to certain provisions, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to continue to distribute the funds to those charter schools based on the same relative proportion that the school district distributed in the 2007–08 fiscal year, as adjusted by the school district to reflect changes in charter school attendance in the school district. Existing law requires a local educational agency to… More
(1)Existing law establishes various categorical education programs, and appropriates the funding for those programs in the annual Budget Act. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to apportion from the amounts provided in the annual Budget Act for specified categorical education programs an amount based on the relative proportion that the local educational agency received in the 2008–09 fiscal year for those programs and authorizes local educational agencies, for those fiscal years, to use these funds, with specified exceptions, for any educational purpose, to the extent permitted by federal law. Existing law requires a school district that receives funding on behalf of a charter school pursuant to certain provisions, for the 2008–09 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to continue to distribute the funds to those charter schools based on the same relative proportion that the school district distributed in the 2007–08 fiscal year, as adjusted by the school district to reflect changes in charter school attendance in the school district. Existing law requires a local educational agency to report expenditures of these funds to the State Department of Education. Existing law also requires the Superintendent, for the 2010–11 to 2014–15 fiscal years, inclusive, to allocate a supplemental categorical block grant to a charter school that began operation on or after the 2008–09 fiscal year, as specified.

This bill would delete the 2014–15 fiscal year termination dates and would require, commencing with the 2014–15 fiscal year, the apportionments from the categorical education programs, as described above, to be apportioned to recipients by multiplying the recipient’s per-pupil rate, calculated as specified, by the recipient’s current fiscal year average daily attendance. The bill would also require the department to adopt uniform definitions for reporting the expenditure of the funds and would require a local educational agency, as a condition of receiving the funds, to (A) report the expenditure of those funds to the department, as specified, and (B) post information on the Internet Web site of the local educational agency on the expenditure of the funds at the school district level on a per pupil basis and identify separately the amount expended at each schoolsite on a per pupil basis. By requiring school districts to continue to distribute funds to charter schools, as discussed above, beyond the 2014–15 fiscal year, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(2)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 42605 and 42606 of the Education Code, Relating to Education Finance.
Author(s)
Curt Hagman
Co-Authors
    Subjects
    • Education finance: categorical programs
    Major Actions
    Introduced1/29/2013
    Referred to Committee
    Failed passage in Assembly Committee on Education5/01/2013
    Passed Assembly Committee on Education5/01/2013
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteAssembly Committee on EducationDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.5/01/2013This motion DID NOT PASS the Assembly Committee on Education
    2 voted YES 4 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
    select this voteAssembly Committee on EducationSet second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.5/01/2013This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Education
    7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced1/29/2013
    1/29/2013Read first time. To print.
    1/30/2013From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
    3/19/2013Referred to Com. on ED.
    3/20/2013Re-referred to Com. on ED.
    4/03/2013From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
    4/04/2013Re-referred to Com. on ED.
    4/22/2013Re-referred to Com. on ED.
    select this voteVote5/01/2013Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
    select this voteVote5/01/2013Set second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
    5/01/2013In committee: Set second hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
    1/15/2014In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

    MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
    You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

    0 Organizations Support and 0 Oppose

    Organizations that took a position on
    An Act to Amend Sections 42605 and 42606 of the Education Code, Relating to Education Finance.

    0 organizations support this bill

    0 organizations oppose this bill

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office during the 2013-2014 California State Legislature, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
    Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
    That Support
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Oppose
    Katcho AchadjianRCA-35$0$0
    Luis AlejoDCA-30$0$0
    Travis AllenRCA-72$0$0
    Tom AmmianoDCA-17$0$0
    Toni AtkinsDCA-78$0$0
    Frank BigelowRCA-5$0$0
    Richard BloomDCA-50$0$0
    Raul BocanegraDCA-39$0$0
    Susan BonillaDCA-14$0$0
    Rob BontaDCA-18$0$0
    Steven BradfordDCA-62$0$0
    Cheryl BrownDCA-47$0$0
    Joan BuchananDCA-16$0$0
    Ian CalderonDCA-57$0$0
    Nora CamposDCA-27$0$0
    Ed ChauDCA-49$0$0
    Rocky ChavezRCA-76$0$0
    Wesley ChesbroDCA-2$0$0
    Connie ConwayRCA-26$0$0
    Ken CooleyDCA-8$0$0
    Brian DahleRCA-1$0$0
    Tom DalyDCA-69$0$0
    Roger DickinsonDCA-7$0$0
    Tim DonnellyRCA-33$0$0
    Susan EggmanDCA-13$0$0
    Paul FongDCA-28$0$0
    Steve FoxDCA-36$0$0
    Jim FrazierDCA-11$0$0
    Beth GainesRCA-6$0$0
    Cristina GarciaDCA-58$0$0
    Mike GattoDCA-43$0$0
    Jimmy GomezDCA-51$0$0
    Rich GordonDCA-24$0$0
    Jeff GorellRCA-44$0$0
    Adam GrayDCA-21$0$0
    Shannon GroveRCA-34$0$0
    Curt HagmanRCA-55$0$0
    Isadore HallDCA-64$0$0
    Diane HarkeyRCA-73$0$0
    Roger HernandezDCA-48$0$0
    Chris HoldenDCA-41$0$0
    Brian JonesRCA-71$0$0
    Reggie Jones-SawyerDCA-59$0$0
    Marc LevineDCA-10$0$0
    Eric LinderRCA-60$0$0
    Dan LogueRCA-3$0$0
    Bonnie LowenthalDCA-70$0$0
    Brian MaienscheinRCA-77$0$0
    Allan MansoorRCA-74$0$0
    Jose MedinaDCA-61$0$0
    Melissa MelendezRCA-67$0$0
    Kevin MullinDCA-22$0$0
    Al MuratsuchiDCA-66$0$0
    Adrin NazarianDCA-46$0$0
    Brian NestandeRCA-42$0$0
    Kristin OlsenRCA-12$0$0
    Richard PanDCA-9$0$0
    Jim PattersonRCA-23$0$0
    Henry PereaDCA-31$0$0
    John PerezDCA-53$0$0
    Manuel PerezDCA-56$0$0
    Bill QuirkDCA-20$0$0
    Sharon Quirk-SilvaDCA-65$0$0
    Anthony RendonDCA-63$0$0
    Rudy SalasDCA-32$0$0
    Nancy SkinnerDCA-15$0$0
    Mark StoneDCA-29$0$0
    Phil TingDCA-19$0$0
    Don WagnerRCA-68$0$0
    Marie WaldronRCA-75$0$0
    Shirley WeberDCA-79$0$0
    Bob WieckowskiDCA-25$0$0
    Scott WilkRCA-38$0$0
    Das WilliamsDCA-37$0$0
    Mariko YamadaDCA-4$0$0

    Interest Groups that support this bill

    $ Donated

    Interest Groups that oppose this bill

    $ Donated
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range