SB 53 - An Act to Amend Sections 11106, 17315, 30000, 30005, 30312, 30345, 30347, 30350, 30352, and 30365 Of, to Amend the Heading of Article 3 (Commencing with Section 30345) of Chapter 1 of Division 10 of Title 4 of Part 6 Of, to Add Sections 16663, 30313, 30348, and 30367 To, to Add Article 5 (Commencing with Section 30380) to Chapter 1 of Division 10 of Title 4 of Part 6 Of, and to Repeal Section 30355 Of, the Penal Code, Relating to Ammunition.

Ammunition: purchase permits. 2013-2014 Legislature. View bill details
Author(s):
Summary:
(1)Existing law requires the Attorney General to maintain records, including among other things, fingerprints, licenses to carry concealed firearms, and information from firearms dealers pertaining to firearms, for purposes of assisting in the investigation of crimes, and specified civil actions. In regard to certain of those records, existing law authorizes specified peace officers to… More
(1)Existing law requires the Attorney General to maintain records, including among other things, fingerprints, licenses to carry concealed firearms, and information from firearms dealers pertaining to firearms, for purposes of assisting in the investigation of crimes, and specified civil actions. In regard to certain of those records, existing law authorizes specified peace officers to disseminate the name of the subject of the record, the number of firearms listed in the record, the description of any firearm, and other information reported to the Department of Justice, as specified, if the subject of the record has been arraigned, is being prosecuted, or is serving a sentence for domestic violence, or is the subject of specified protective orders. Existing law requires the law enforcement officer to provide a victim of domestic violence to whom information is disseminated with a “Victims of Domestic Violence” card, and authorizes the victim or other person to whom the information is disseminated to disclose that information as he or she deems necessary to protect himself, herself, or another person from bodily harm by the person who is the subject of the record.

This bill would require the Attorney General to also maintain information about ammunition transactions, as specified, and ammunition vendor licenses, as specified, for those purposes. This bill would similarly authorize specified peace officers to disseminate the name of a person and the fact of any ammunition purchases by that person, as specified, if the subject of the record has been arraigned, is being prosecuted, or is serving a sentence for domestic violence, or is the subject of specified protective orders. The bill would require the law enforcement officer to provide a victim of domestic violence to whom information is disseminated with a “Victims of Domestic Violence” card, and would authorize the victim or other person to whom the information is disseminated to disclose that information as he or she deems necessary to protect himself, herself, or another person from bodily harm by the person who is the subject of the record.By imposing new duties on local law enforcement officers, this bill would impose a state‑mandated local program.(2)Existing law establishes the Prohibited Armed Persons File, the purpose of which is to cross-reference persons prohibited from possessing firearms with records of firearm transactions to determine if these persons have acquired or attempted to acquire firearms. Under existing law, a person who is prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm is prohibited from owning, possessing, or having under his or her custody or control, any ammunition or reloaded ammunition. The bill would also create a similar Prohibited Ammunition Purchaser File for these purposes.

This bill would, commencing July 1, 2016, use the Prohibited Armed Persons File to cross-reference those persons with records of ammunition transactions to determine if these persons have acquired or attempted to acquire ammunition.

(3)Existing law, subject to exceptions, requires that the delivery or transfer of ownership of handgun ammunition occur only in a face-to-face transaction and makes a violation of this requirement a crime. Existing law provides that the term “vendor” for purposes of ammunition sales is a “handgun ammunition vendor” as defined for those and other purposes.

This bill would extend those provisions to any ammunition. The bill would provide that the term “vendor” for purposes of ammunition sales means “ammunition vendor,” and, commencing July 1, 2016, who is licensed, as specified, for those and other purposes. The bill would provide that commencing July 1, 2016, only a licensed ammunition vendor may sell ammunition. The bill would create additional exemptions from these requirements for specified events conducted by a nonprofit entity, and for persons who hold a valid hunting license, as specified, and would make additional conforming changes.

(4)Existing law prohibits an ammunition vendor from allowing a person the vendor knows or should know is a person who is prohibited from possessing firearms for specified reasons, from handling, selling, or delivering handgun ammunition in the course and scope of their employment. Existing law prohibits an ammunition vendor from selling or otherwise transferring ownership of, offering for sale or otherwise offering to transfer ownership of, or displaying for sale or displaying for transfer of ownership of, any handgun ammunition in a manner that allows that ammunition to be accessible to a purchaser or transferee without the assistance of the vendor or an employee of the vendor.

This bill would extend those prohibitions to any ammunition. The bill would provide that a violation of those provisions is a misdemeanor.

By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(5)Existing law requires ammunition vendors to maintain ammunition transaction records, as specified, on the vendor’s premises for a period of 5 years.

This bill would repeal the provisions requiring ammunition transaction records be maintained for 5 years by the vendor.

(6)Existing law subject to exceptions, requires a handgun ammunition vendor to record specified information at the time of delivery of handgun ammunition to a purchaser, as specified.

This bill would extend those provisions to transactions of any ammunition and would, commencing July 1, 2016, require the ammunition vendor to submit that information to the department, as specified. The bill would require the department to retain the information for 5 years in a database to be known as the Ammunition Purchase Records File and would prescribe the authority of the department and other entities to use the file, as specified.

(7)The bill would authorize the Department of Justice to accept applications for ammunition vendor licenses, commencing January 1, 2016. The bill would require an ammunition vendor to be licensed, commencing July 1, 2016, in order to sell ammunition. Violation of these provisions would be a misdemeanor. The bill would create an application process for ammunition vendors, as specified. The bill would establish the Ammunition Vendors Special Account, into which vendor license fees would be deposited and made available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the Department of Justice for purposes of enforcing the ammunition vendor licensing provisions. The bill would require the ammunition vendor to conduct business at the location specified in the license, except in the case of gun shows or events, as specified. The bill would require the Attorney General to prepare and submit to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2017, a report concerning, among other things, recommendations for enhancements that could be made to the background check system, as specified.

By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(8)The bill would provide that for the provisions discussed above, as specified, “ammunition” does not include blanks.(9)Existing law establishes the Firearms Safety and Enforcement Special Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for use by the Department of Justice for specified purposes related to weapons and firearms regulation.This bill would, notwithstanding that continuous appropriation, provide that these funds are available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for specified purposes related to ammunition vendors and ammunition vendor licensing.

(10)The bill would make additional nonsubstantive, technical changes.

(11)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 11106 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 808 that would become operative if this bill and SB 808 are both enacted and this bill is enacted last.

(12)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Hide
 
Status:
The bill was voted on by the Assembly on August 30, 2014. 
Assembly Vote: On Passage

DID NOT PASS on August 30, 2014.

voted YES: 35 voted NO: 35
8 voted present/not voting

An Act to Amend Sections 11106, 17315, 30000, 30005, 30312, 30345, 30347, 30350, 30352, and 30365 Of, to Amend the Heading of Article 3 (Commencing with Section 30345) of Chapter 1 of Division 10 of Title 4 of Part 6 Of, to Add Sections 16663, 30313, 30348, and 30367 To, to Add Article 5 (Commencing with Section 30380) to Chapter 1 of Division 10 of Title 4 of Part 6 Of, and to Repeal Section 30355 Of, the Penal Code, Relating to Ammunition.

SB 53 — 2013-2014 Legislature

Summary
(1)Existing law requires the Attorney General to maintain records, including among other things, fingerprints, licenses to carry concealed firearms, and information from firearms dealers pertaining to firearms, for purposes of assisting in the investigation of crimes, and specified civil actions. In regard to certain of those records, existing law authorizes specified peace officers to disseminate the name of the subject of the record, the number of firearms listed in the record, the description of any firearm, and other information reported to the Department of Justice, as specified, if the subject of the record has been arraigned, is being prosecuted, or is serving a sentence for domestic violence, or is the subject of specified protective orders. Existing law requires the law enforcement officer to provide a victim of domestic violence to whom information is disseminated with a “Victims of Domestic Violence” card, and authorizes the victim or other person to whom the information is disseminated to disclose that information as he or she deems necessary to protect himself, herself, or another person from bodily harm by the person who is the subject of the record.
More
(1)Existing law requires the Attorney General to maintain records, including among other things, fingerprints, licenses to carry concealed firearms, and information from firearms dealers pertaining to firearms, for purposes of assisting in the investigation of crimes, and specified civil actions. In regard to certain of those records, existing law authorizes specified peace officers to disseminate the name of the subject of the record, the number of firearms listed in the record, the description of any firearm, and other information reported to the Department of Justice, as specified, if the subject of the record has been arraigned, is being prosecuted, or is serving a sentence for domestic violence, or is the subject of specified protective orders. Existing law requires the law enforcement officer to provide a victim of domestic violence to whom information is disseminated with a “Victims of Domestic Violence” card, and authorizes the victim or other person to whom the information is disseminated to disclose that information as he or she deems necessary to protect himself, herself, or another person from bodily harm by the person who is the subject of the record.

This bill would require the Attorney General to also maintain information about ammunition transactions, as specified, and ammunition vendor licenses, as specified, for those purposes. This bill would similarly authorize specified peace officers to disseminate the name of a person and the fact of any ammunition purchases by that person, as specified, if the subject of the record has been arraigned, is being prosecuted, or is serving a sentence for domestic violence, or is the subject of specified protective orders. The bill would require the law enforcement officer to provide a victim of domestic violence to whom information is disseminated with a “Victims of Domestic Violence” card, and would authorize the victim or other person to whom the information is disseminated to disclose that information as he or she deems necessary to protect himself, herself, or another person from bodily harm by the person who is the subject of the record.By imposing new duties on local law enforcement officers, this bill would impose a state‑mandated local program.(2)Existing law establishes the Prohibited Armed Persons File, the purpose of which is to cross-reference persons prohibited from possessing firearms with records of firearm transactions to determine if these persons have acquired or attempted to acquire firearms. Under existing law, a person who is prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm is prohibited from owning, possessing, or having under his or her custody or control, any ammunition or reloaded ammunition. The bill would also create a similar Prohibited Ammunition Purchaser File for these purposes.

This bill would, commencing July 1, 2016, use the Prohibited Armed Persons File to cross-reference those persons with records of ammunition transactions to determine if these persons have acquired or attempted to acquire ammunition.

(3)Existing law, subject to exceptions, requires that the delivery or transfer of ownership of handgun ammunition occur only in a face-to-face transaction and makes a violation of this requirement a crime. Existing law provides that the term “vendor” for purposes of ammunition sales is a “handgun ammunition vendor” as defined for those and other purposes.

This bill would extend those provisions to any ammunition. The bill would provide that the term “vendor” for purposes of ammunition sales means “ammunition vendor,” and, commencing July 1, 2016, who is licensed, as specified, for those and other purposes. The bill would provide that commencing July 1, 2016, only a licensed ammunition vendor may sell ammunition. The bill would create additional exemptions from these requirements for specified events conducted by a nonprofit entity, and for persons who hold a valid hunting license, as specified, and would make additional conforming changes.

(4)Existing law prohibits an ammunition vendor from allowing a person the vendor knows or should know is a person who is prohibited from possessing firearms for specified reasons, from handling, selling, or delivering handgun ammunition in the course and scope of their employment. Existing law prohibits an ammunition vendor from selling or otherwise transferring ownership of, offering for sale or otherwise offering to transfer ownership of, or displaying for sale or displaying for transfer of ownership of, any handgun ammunition in a manner that allows that ammunition to be accessible to a purchaser or transferee without the assistance of the vendor or an employee of the vendor.

This bill would extend those prohibitions to any ammunition. The bill would provide that a violation of those provisions is a misdemeanor.

By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(5)Existing law requires ammunition vendors to maintain ammunition transaction records, as specified, on the vendor’s premises for a period of 5 years.

This bill would repeal the provisions requiring ammunition transaction records be maintained for 5 years by the vendor.

(6)Existing law subject to exceptions, requires a handgun ammunition vendor to record specified information at the time of delivery of handgun ammunition to a purchaser, as specified.

This bill would extend those provisions to transactions of any ammunition and would, commencing July 1, 2016, require the ammunition vendor to submit that information to the department, as specified. The bill would require the department to retain the information for 5 years in a database to be known as the Ammunition Purchase Records File and would prescribe the authority of the department and other entities to use the file, as specified.

(7)The bill would authorize the Department of Justice to accept applications for ammunition vendor licenses, commencing January 1, 2016. The bill would require an ammunition vendor to be licensed, commencing July 1, 2016, in order to sell ammunition. Violation of these provisions would be a misdemeanor. The bill would create an application process for ammunition vendors, as specified. The bill would establish the Ammunition Vendors Special Account, into which vendor license fees would be deposited and made available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the Department of Justice for purposes of enforcing the ammunition vendor licensing provisions. The bill would require the ammunition vendor to conduct business at the location specified in the license, except in the case of gun shows or events, as specified. The bill would require the Attorney General to prepare and submit to the Legislature on or before July 1, 2017, a report concerning, among other things, recommendations for enhancements that could be made to the background check system, as specified.

By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

(8)The bill would provide that for the provisions discussed above, as specified, “ammunition” does not include blanks.(9)Existing law establishes the Firearms Safety and Enforcement Special Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for use by the Department of Justice for specified purposes related to weapons and firearms regulation.This bill would, notwithstanding that continuous appropriation, provide that these funds are available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for specified purposes related to ammunition vendors and ammunition vendor licensing.

(10)The bill would make additional nonsubstantive, technical changes.

(11)This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 11106 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 808 that would become operative if this bill and SB 808 are both enacted and this bill is enacted last.

(12)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Hide
Learn More
At LegInfo.ca.gov
Title
An Act to Amend Sections 11106, 17315, 30000, 30005, 30312, 30345, 30347, 30350, 30352, and 30365 Of, to Amend the Heading of Article 3 (Commencing with Section 30345) of Chapter 1 of Division 10 of Title 4 of Part 6 Of, to Add Sections 16663, 30313, 30348, and 30367 To, to Add Article 5 (Commencing with Section 30380) to Chapter 1 of Division 10 of Title 4 of Part 6 Of, and to Repeal Section 30355 Of, the Penal Code, Relating to Ammunition.
Author(s)
Kevin De Leon
Co-Authors
Subjects
  • Ammunition: purchase permits
Major Actions
Introduced12/20/2012
Referred to Committee
Passed Senate Committee on Public Safety4/16/2013
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/06/2013
Passed Senate Committee on Appropriations5/23/2013
Passed Senate5/29/2013
Passed Assembly Committee on Public Safety7/02/2013
Passed Assembly Committee on Appropriations8/30/2013
Passed Assembly Committee on Public Safety6/10/2014
Passed Assembly8/22/2014
Failed passage in Assembly8/30/2014
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenate Committee on Public SafetyDo pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.4/16/2013This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Public Safety
5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsPlaced on Appropriations Suspense file.5/06/2013This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
7 voted YES 0 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenate Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.5/23/2013This motion PASSED the Senate Committee on Appropriations
5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateSpecial Order SB53 De León5/29/2013This bill PASSED the Senate
23 voted YES 15 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Public SafetyDo pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.7/02/2013This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Public Safety
5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on AppropriationsDo pass as amended.8/30/2013This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Appropriations
11 voted YES 6 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssembly Committee on Public SafetyDo pass.6/10/2014This motion PASSED the Assembly Committee on Public Safety
5 voted YES 2 voted NO 0 voted present/not voting
select this voteAssemblySB 53 De León Senate Third Reading By BONTA Amend By BONTA Set #18/22/2014This bill PASSED the Assembly
44 voted YES 27 voted NO 8 voted present/not voting
currently selectedAssemblySB 53 De León Senate Third Reading By BONTA8/30/2014This bill DID NOT PASS the Assembly
35 voted YES 35 voted NO 8 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced12/20/2012
12/20/2012Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
12/21/2012From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 20.
1/07/2013Read first time.
1/10/2013Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
3/13/2013Set for hearing April 16.
3/21/2013From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
4/01/2013From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
select this voteVote4/16/2013Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
4/17/2013From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
4/26/2013Set for hearing May 6.
select this voteVote5/06/2013Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
5/06/2013Placed on APPR. suspense file.
5/17/2013Set for hearing May 23.
select this voteVote5/23/2013Do pass as amended.
5/24/2013From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 23).
5/29/2013Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14.) Ordered to the Assembly.
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage5/29/2013Special Order SB53 De León
5/30/2013In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
6/17/2013Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
6/27/2013From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
select this voteVote7/02/2013Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
7/03/2013From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
8/14/2013Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
select this voteVote8/30/2013Do pass as amended.
8/30/2013From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (August 30).
9/03/2013Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
9/04/2013Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
9/09/2013Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
9/10/2013From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
9/11/2013Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended.
6/05/2014From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
select this voteVote6/10/2014Do pass.
6/11/2014From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 10).
6/12/2014Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8/22/2014Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
select this voteAssembly Vote on Passage8/22/2014SB 53 De León Senate Third Reading By BONTA Amend By BONTA Set #1
currently selectedAssembly Vote on Passage8/30/2014SB 53 De León Senate Third Reading By BONTA
8/30/2014Read third time. Refused passage.
8/30/2014From Assembly without further action.

Total contributions given to Assemblymembers from interest groups that…

25 Organizations Support and 11 Oppose; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
An Act to Amend Sections 11106, 17315, 30000, 30005, 30312, 30345, 30347, 30350, 30352, and 30365 Of, to Amend the Heading of Article 3 (Commencing with Section 30345) of Chapter 1 of Division 10 of Title 4 of Part 6 Of, to Add Sections 16663, 30313, 30348, and 30367 To, to Add Article 5 (Commencing with Section 30380) to Chapter 1 of Division 10 of Title 4 of Part 6 Of, and to Repeal Section 30355 Of, the Penal Code, Relating to Ammunition.: SB 53 De León Senate Third Reading By BONTA

25 organizations support this bill

American Association of University Women, California
(2013, May 28). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 29, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Anti-Defamation League
(2013, May 28). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 29, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Auburn Area Democratic Club
(2013, May 28). Senate Floor Analysis. Retrieved May 29, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Bend the Arc
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Chapters of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Church IMPACT
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Federation of Teachers
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Police Chiefs Association
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
City of Beverly Hills
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
City of Oakland
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
CLUE California
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Coalition Against Gun Violence
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Community Against Gun Violence
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Courage Campaign
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Doctors for America
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Laguna Woods Democratic Club
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Los Angeles Community College District
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Lutheran Office of Public Policy - California
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
PICO California
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Violence Prevention Coalition of Orange County
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Youth ALIVE!
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

11 organizations oppose this bill

California Association of Firearms Retailers
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Rifle and Pistol Association
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
California Right to Carry
California Right to Carry (2013, March 3). California Bills we Oppose as of March 3, 2013. Retrieved March 8, 2013, from California Right to Carry.
California Sportsman's Lobby
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Crossroads of the West Gun Shows
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Firearms Policy Coalition
FPC (2013). The Issues. Retrieved January 11, 2013, from FPC.
National Rifle Association
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
National Shooting Sports Foundation
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Outdoor Sportsmen's Coalition of California
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Safari Club International
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.
Tea Party United
Senate Committee on Public Safety (2013, April 15). Senate Committee Analysis. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from Leginfo: Bill Analysis.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to campaigns of Assemblymembers in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: FollowTheMoney.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Support
$ From Interest Groups
That Oppose
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-35$33,100$0No
Luis AlejoDCA-30$41,735$0Not Voting
Travis AllenRCA-72$0$0No
Tom AmmianoDCA-17$29,124$0Yes
Toni AtkinsDCA-78$48,250$0Yes
Frank BigelowRCA-5$9,500$0No
Richard BloomDCA-50$7,150$0Yes
Raul BocanegraDCA-39$61,200$0Yes
Susan BonillaDCA-14$55,925$0Yes
Rob BontaDCA-18$80,516$0Yes
Steven BradfordDCA-62$31,100$0Not Voting
Cheryl BrownDCA-47$23,878$0No
Joan BuchananDCA-16$55,800$0Yes
Ian CalderonDCA-57$33,100$0Yes
Nora CamposDCA-27$44,151$0Yes
Ed ChauDCA-49$69,700$0Yes
Rocky ChavezRCA-76$8,900$4,776No
Wesley ChesbroDCA-2$33,850$0No
Connie ConwayRCA-26$20,400$0No
Ken CooleyDCA-8$80,050$0No
Matt DababnehDCA-45$0$0Not Voting
Brian DahleRCA-1$7,800$479No
Tom DalyDCA-69$47,600$0Not Voting
Roger DickinsonDCA-7$36,350$0Yes
Tim DonnellyRCA-33$0$1,000No
Susan EggmanDCA-13$44,500$0Not Voting
Paul FongDCA-28$81,584$0Yes
Steve FoxDCA-36$500$0No
Jim FrazierDCA-11$41,482$0No
Beth GainesRCA-6$10,000$2,000No
Cristina GarciaDCA-58$42,550$0Yes
Mike GattoDCA-43$55,400$0No
Jimmy GomezDCA-51$64,243$0Yes
Lorena GonzalezDCA-80$0$0Yes
Rich GordonDCA-24$41,436$0Yes
Jeff GorellRCA-44$31,200$1,000No
Adam GrayDCA-21$90,675$0No
Shannon GroveRCA-34$2,500$0No
Curt HagmanRCA-55$25,500$0No
Isadore HallDCA-64$51,800$0Not Voting
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$12,400$0No
Roger HernandezDCA-48$30,016$0Yes
Chris HoldenDCA-41$65,122$0Yes
Brian JonesRCA-71$2,000$3,900No
Reggie Jones-SawyerDCA-59$51,300$0Yes
Marc LevineDCA-10$2,000$0Yes
Eric LinderRCA-60$0$0No
Dan LogueRCA-3$11,000$0No
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-70$19,400$0Yes
Brian MaienscheinRCA-77$3,000$1,396No
Allan MansoorRCA-74$0$1,000No
Jose MedinaDCA-61$59,050$0No
Melissa MelendezRCA-67$20,000$396No
Kevin MullinDCA-22$43,200$0Yes
Al MuratsuchiDCA-66$108,836$0Yes
Adrin NazarianDCA-46$52,900$0Yes
Brian NestandeRCA-42$25,000$0No
Kristin OlsenRCA-12$14,150$0No
Richard PanDCA-9$74,721$0Yes
Jim PattersonRCA-23$7,800$0Not Voting
Henry PereaDCA-31$38,900$0No
John PerezDCA-53$117,149$0Not Voting
Manuel PerezDCA-56$46,700$0No
Bill QuirkDCA-20$39,176$0Yes
Sharon Quirk-SilvaDCA-65$66,310$0No
Anthony RendonDCA-63$68,872$0Yes
Sebastian Ridley-ThomasDCA-54$0$0Yes
Freddie RodriguezDCA-52$0$0Not Voting
Rudy SalasDCA-32$95,268$0No
Nancy SkinnerDCA-15$47,805$0Yes
Mark StoneDCA-29$40,850$0Yes
Phil TingDCA-19$81,092$0Yes
Don WagnerRCA-68$2,500$0No
Marie WaldronRCA-75$2,500$2,396No
Shirley WeberDCA-79$72,350$0Yes
Bob WieckowskiDCA-25$52,500$0Yes
Scott WilkRCA-38$7,400$6,584No
Das WilliamsDCA-37$74,039$0Yes
Mariko YamadaDCA-4$25,153$0Yes

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
NamePartyDistrict$ From Interest Groups
That Support
$ From Interest Groups
That Oppose
Vote
Katcho AchadjianRCA-35$33,100$0No
Luis AlejoDCA-30$41,735$0Not Voting
Travis AllenRCA-72$0$0No
Tom AmmianoDCA-17$29,124$0Yes
Toni AtkinsDCA-78$48,250$0Yes
Frank BigelowRCA-5$9,500$0No
Richard BloomDCA-50$7,150$0Yes
Raul BocanegraDCA-39$61,200$0Yes
Susan BonillaDCA-14$55,925$0Yes
Rob BontaDCA-18$80,516$0Yes
Steven BradfordDCA-62$31,100$0Not Voting
Cheryl BrownDCA-47$23,878$0No
Joan BuchananDCA-16$55,800$0Yes
Ian CalderonDCA-57$33,100$0Yes
Nora CamposDCA-27$44,151$0Yes
Ed ChauDCA-49$69,700$0Yes
Rocky ChavezRCA-76$8,900$4,776No
Wesley ChesbroDCA-2$33,850$0No
Connie ConwayRCA-26$20,400$0No
Ken CooleyDCA-8$80,050$0No
Matt DababnehDCA-45$0$0Not Voting
Brian DahleRCA-1$7,800$479No
Tom DalyDCA-69$47,600$0Not Voting
Roger DickinsonDCA-7$36,350$0Yes
Tim DonnellyRCA-33$0$1,000No
Susan EggmanDCA-13$44,500$0Not Voting
Paul FongDCA-28$81,584$0Yes
Steve FoxDCA-36$500$0No
Jim FrazierDCA-11$41,482$0No
Beth GainesRCA-6$10,000$2,000No
Cristina GarciaDCA-58$42,550$0Yes
Mike GattoDCA-43$55,400$0No
Jimmy GomezDCA-51$64,243$0Yes
Lorena GonzalezDCA-80$0$0Yes
Rich GordonDCA-24$41,436$0Yes
Jeff GorellRCA-44$31,200$1,000No
Adam GrayDCA-21$90,675$0No
Shannon GroveRCA-34$2,500$0No
Curt HagmanRCA-55$25,500$0No
Isadore HallDCA-64$51,800$0Not Voting
Diane HarkeyRCA-73$12,400$0No
Roger HernandezDCA-48$30,016$0Yes
Chris HoldenDCA-41$65,122$0Yes
Brian JonesRCA-71$2,000$3,900No
Reggie Jones-SawyerDCA-59$51,300$0Yes
Marc LevineDCA-10$2,000$0Yes
Eric LinderRCA-60$0$0No
Dan LogueRCA-3$11,000$0No
Bonnie LowenthalDCA-70$19,400$0Yes
Brian MaienscheinRCA-77$3,000$1,396No
Allan MansoorRCA-74$0$1,000No
Jose MedinaDCA-61$59,050$0No
Melissa MelendezRCA-67$20,000$396No
Kevin MullinDCA-22$43,200$0Yes
Al MuratsuchiDCA-66$108,836$0Yes
Adrin NazarianDCA-46$52,900$0Yes
Brian NestandeRCA-42$25,000$0No
Kristin OlsenRCA-12$14,150$0No
Richard PanDCA-9$74,721$0Yes
Jim PattersonRCA-23$7,800$0Not Voting
Henry PereaDCA-31$38,900$0No
John PerezDCA-53$117,149$0Not Voting
Manuel PerezDCA-56$46,700$0No
Bill QuirkDCA-20$39,176$0Yes
Sharon Quirk-SilvaDCA-65$66,310$0No
Anthony RendonDCA-63$68,872$0Yes
Sebastian Ridley-ThomasDCA-54$0$0Yes
Freddie RodriguezDCA-52$0$0Not Voting
Rudy SalasDCA-32$95,268$0No
Nancy SkinnerDCA-15$47,805$0Yes
Mark StoneDCA-29$40,850$0Yes
Phil TingDCA-19$81,092$0Yes
Don WagnerRCA-68$2,500$0No
Marie WaldronRCA-75$2,500$2,396No
Shirley WeberDCA-79$72,350$0Yes
Bob WieckowskiDCA-25$52,500$0Yes
Scott WilkRCA-38$7,400$6,584No
Das WilliamsDCA-37$74,039$0Yes
Mariko YamadaDCA-4$25,153$0Yes

Interest Groups that support this bill

$ Donated
Police & fire fighters unions and associations$1,662,064
Teachers unions$1,026,225
Health & welfare policy$112,791
Women's issues$61,750
Municipal & county government organizations$32,600
Democratic-based groups (but not official party committees) and generic liberal/progressive ones$19,027
Pro-gun control$5,550
Technical, business & vocational schools and services$3,000
Consumer groups$0
Human rights$0

Interest Groups that oppose this bill

$ Donated
Republican-based groups (but not official party committees) and generic conservative ones$18,428
Anti-gun control$5,000
Miscellaneous retail stores$1,500
Hunting & wildlife$0
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range