H.R.1126 - To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988. Sponsor: Daniel Lipinski / 110th Congress

Title
110th Congress - To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988.
Summary
Amends the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 to authorize appropriations for FY2008-FY2012. Requires the Secretary of Energy, in reviewing research and development activities for possible inclusion in the research plan to expand the steel research and development initiative, to consider among steel project priorities the development of technologies which reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Revises the requirement for consideration of the development of advanced coatings for sheet steels to specify sheet and bar steels. (by MAPLight.org)
Status
The bill was voted on in the House on March 12, 2007

Customize

Customize the interests supporting and opposing this bill

To remove an interest, click the Remove button next to its name below this box.

To add an interest, choose one from this list:

To add an interest, click Support or Oppose.

You can share your customized pages with other people by sending them the URL for pages about this bill. Other MAPLight.org users will not see your customizations unless they use the URL you send them. To save your customizations for your next visit, create a free New Account, then Sign In.

Done

Interests who did want this bill to become law included these interests and specific groups:

Interests who did not want this bill to become law included these interests and specific groups:

(None found)

Contribution data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics (OpenSecrets.org)

Comments RSS feed

More Research and Development Money by Spencer Maccoll, Jun 10, 2008 (3:11pm)

Hr 1126, a bill to reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988, gives $60 million over the 2008-2012 period for research and development in the steel industry. It sounds good for money to be going towards researching how to make more environmental friendly metals such as light steel that can be used for cars so that a car’s miles per gallon can increase. But is there a better way to make more efficient metals than having the government give $60 million to the Steel Industry?

Reply to this comment
Reply to this comment close
[ Tags ]
[ Tags ] close
[ Spam ]
[ Spam ] close