- Vote Date:
- June 07, 2006
- Motion:
- H R 5449 To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify bargaining requirements for proposed changes to the personnel management system of the Federal Aviation Administration (under suspension of the rules)
- Location:
- House
- Result:
- Fail
- 271 Yes Votes

- 148 No Votes

- 13 Not Voting

- Showing contributions
- Jan 2005-May 2008 House
Interests who did want this bill to become law (such as Air transport unions and Transportation unions) gave an average of:
- $22,854 to each legislator voting Yes

- $2,821 to each legislator voting No

Interests who did not want this bill to become law (such as Fiscal & tax policy) gave an average of:
- $39 to each legislator voting Yes

- $181 to each legislator voting No

Contribution data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics (OpenSecrets.org)
Comments 
Do we really want unhappy air traffic controllers? by Milan Sundaresan, Jul 31, 2008 (8:09pm)
A win for the Federal Aviation Administration, H.R. 5449 was merely an attempt by Congress to intervene between the NATCA, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association and the FAA when the FAA proposed a new management system that would give it more control of its workers. The argument ran as follows: the FAA insisted on minimizing compensation costs while the controllers demanded that there be enough personnel to maintain safe air traffic. The bill was also opposed by the White House but my vote is with the controllers- they’re the ones that can sink my plane!

Latest Comments
See More | New Comment