H.R.1550 - Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of 2009 Sponsor: Betty Sutton / 111th Congress

Title
111th Congress - To accelerate motor fuel savings nationwide and provide incentives to registered owners of high polluting automobiles to replace such automobiles with new fuel efficient and less polluting automobiles or public transportation. hidemore...
Summary
To accelerate motor fuel savings nationwide and provide incentives to registered owners of high polluting automobiles to replace such automobiles with new fuel efficient and less polluting automobiles or public transportation. (by CRS)
Status
The bill has been introduced.

Customize

Customize the interests supporting and opposing this bill

To remove an interest, click the Remove button next to its name below this box.

To add an interest, choose one from this list:

To add an interest, click Support or Oppose.

You can share your customized pages with other people by sending them the URL for pages about this bill. Other MAPLight.org users will not see your customizations unless they use the URL you send them. To save your customizations for your next visit, create a free New Account, then Sign In.

Done

Interests who did want this bill to become law included these interests and specific groups:

Interests who did not want this bill to become law included these interests and specific groups:

Contribution data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics (OpenSecrets.org)

Comments RSS feed

Cash-for-clunkers bill with weak environmental protections by Karen Chung, May 11, 2009 (10:18pm)

The Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of 2009 (CARS Act) (111th) is different from other cash-for-clunkers bills because its main goal is to subsidize the auto industry rather than protect the environment. Under the CARS Act, all vehicles manufactured in 2000 and earlier would be eligible for trade-in for a U.S. assembled car that achieves 27 highway miles-per-gallon. Under the Accelerated Retirement of Inefficient Vehicles Act (111th), introduced both in the House and Senate, only around 5 percent of vehicles on the road would qualify for trade-in. Under CARS, however, around half the vehicles on the road would qualify. The United Auto Workers along with domestic auto manufacturers support the CARS Act because of its potential to maintain and create jobs. Environmentalists, on the other hand, criticize the bill for using age rather than fuel economy to determine qualification. Also, because consumers would be able to trade-in for a car that achieves only 27 MPG, environmentalists argue that the bill would not reduce emissions or oil dependence.

The auto aftermarket industry opposes all cash-for-clunkers programs. The aftermarket industry is concerned that less demand for automotive repair and parts will drive parts manufacturers and repair shops out of business. Although the programs are voluntary, the aftermarket industry argues that difficult access to parts and repair would essentially make trade-in compulsory.