H.Con.Res. 70 - Expressing the Sense of Congress That the United States Should Strongly Oppose China's Anti-Secession Legislation with Respect to Taiwan.
Foreign policy. 109th Congress (2005-2006) View bill details
- Sponsor:
- Steven Chabot
- Summary:
- Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should strongly oppose China's anti-secession legislation with respect to Taiwan. (by CRS)
- Status:
- The bill has been introduced.
There have been no votes on this bill.
Expressing the Sense of Congress That the United States Should Strongly Oppose China's Anti-Secession Legislation with Respect to Taiwan.
H.Con.Res. 70 — 109th Congress (2005–2006)
- Summary
- Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should strongly oppose China's anti-secession legislation with respect to Taiwan. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- At OpenCongress
- Title
- Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should strongly oppose China's anti-secession legislation with respect to Taiwan.
- Other Titles
- Sponsor
- Steven Chabot
- Co-Sponsors
- Bob Beauprez
- Ileana Ros-Lehtinen
- Roscoe Bartlett
- Michael McNulty
- Robert Andrews
- John Hostettler
- Peter Sessions
- Charles Norwood
- Frank Pallone
- Dana Rohrabacher
- Sherrod Brown
- Michael Bilirakis
- Edolphus Towns
- John Culberson
- Dan Burton
- Al Green
- David Scott
- Thomas Tancredo
- David Wu
- Nita Lowey
- John Gingrey
- Mario Diaz-Balart
- Michael Rogers
- Mark Souder
- Connie Mack
- Lincoln Diaz-Balart
- Subjects
- Foreign policy
- Aggression
- Armed forces
- China
- Defense policy
- Diplomacy
- East Asia
- Foreign leaders
- International affairs
- Negotiations
- Peace
- Sovereignty
- Taiwan
- Related Bills
- Major Actions
Introduced 2/17/2005 Referred to Committee - Bill History
-
There have been no votes on this bill.
Action Date Description Introduced 2/17/2005 2/17/2005 Referred to the House Committee on International Relations. 3/17/2005 Referred to the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status
MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.
Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of House members in office during the 109th U.S. Congress, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2005 – December 31, 2006.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org
