H.R. 1036 - Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act

Intellectual property. 109th Congress (2005-2006) View bill details
Sponsor:
Summary:
To amend title 17, United States Code, to make technical corrections relating to Copyright Royalty Judges, and for other purposes. (by CRS) 
Status:
The bill has become law. 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED by voice vote on July 19, 2006.

Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act

H.R. 1036 — 109th Congress (2005–2006)

Summary
To amend title 17, United States Code, to make technical corrections relating to Copyright Royalty Judges, and for other purposes. (by CRS)
Learn More
At OpenCongress
Title
To amend title 17, United States Code, to make technical corrections relating to copyright royalty judges.
Other Titles
  • Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act
  • Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act
  • Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act
  • Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act
  • To amend title 17, United States Code, to make technical corrections relating to Copyright Royalty Judges, and for other purposes.
Sponsor
Lamar Smith
Co-Sponsors
Subjects
  • Intellectual property
  • Administrative law judges
  • Administrative remedies
  • Broadband
  • Broadcasting
  • Business
  • Cable television
  • Commercial arbitration
  • Communication satellites
  • Congress
  • Congressional agencies
  • Copyright
  • Federal libraries
  • Fees
  • Humanities
  • Law
  • Library of Congress
  • Music
  • Sound recording and reproducing
  • Technology
  • Telecommunication
  • Television broadcasting
  • Television programs
  • Television relay systems
  • Television stations
Related Bills
    Major Actions
    Introduced3/02/2005
    Referred to Committee
    Passed House11/16/2005
    Passed Senate7/19/2006
    Signed by President10/06/2006
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    select this voteHouseOn motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.11/16/2005PASSED by voice vote
    currently selectedSenatePassed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.7/19/2006PASSED by voice vote
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced3/02/2005
    3/02/2005Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
    3/02/2005Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.
    3/03/2005Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
    3/03/2005Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
    3/09/2005Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
    Put on a legislative calendar3/09/2005Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
    4/28/2005Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 109-64.
    Put on a legislative calendar4/28/2005Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 31.
    11/16/2005Mr. Sensenbrenner moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
    11/16/2005Considered under suspension of the rules.
    11/16/2005DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1036.
    11/16/2005The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
    select this voteHouse Vote on Passage11/16/2005On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
    11/17/2005Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
    6/29/2006Committee on the Judiciary. Committee consideration and Mark Up Session held.
    7/13/2006Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Specter with an amendment. Without written report.
    Put on a legislative calendar7/13/2006Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 515.
    Put on a legislative calendar7/13/2006Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.
    currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage7/19/2006Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
    7/20/2006Message on Senate action sent to the House.
    Presented to President9/25/2006Cleared for White House.
    9/25/2006Mr. Sensenbrenner moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment.
    9/25/2006DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the motion to suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment to H.R. 1036.
    9/25/2006On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by voice vote.
    Presented to President9/29/2006Presented to President.
    Signed10/06/2006Signed by President.
    Enacted10/06/2006Became Public Law No: 109-303.
    NumberSponsorDate OfferedStatus

    MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
    You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.
    Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.

    0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

    Organizations that took a position on
    Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.

    0 organizations supported this bill

    0 organizations opposed this bill

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Anything missing?

    Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
    How do you know they have this position? Please include a link to a newspaper article, organization's website, or other source.
    We will use it only to contact you about this form. Your address will never appear on this site.

    MapLight editors may add this organization after checking the sources you listed above. Thank you for helping to improve our site.

    Cancel
    Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, June 19, 2006 – August 18, 2006.
    Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    NamePartyState$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Daniel K. AkakaDHI$0$0Yes
    Andrew Lamar AlexanderRTN$0$0Yes
    Alan Wayne AllardRCO$0$0Yes
    George AllenRVA$0$0Yes
    Max BaucusDMT$0$0Yes
    Birch "Evan" BayhDIN$0$0Yes
    Bob BennettRUT$0$0Yes
    Joe BidenDDE$0$0Yes
    Jesse "Jeff" BingamanDNM$0$0Yes
    Christopher "Kit" BondRMO$0$0Yes
    Barbara BoxerDCA$0$0Yes
    Sam BrownbackRKS$0$0Yes
    Jim BunningRKY$0$0Yes
    Conrad BurnsRMT$0$0Yes
    Richard BurrRNC$0$0Yes
    Robert ByrdDWV$0$0Yes
    Maria CantwellDWA$0$0Yes
    Tom CarperDDE$0$0Yes
    Lincoln ChafeeRRI$0$0Yes
    Clarence Saxby ChamblissRGA$0$0Yes
    Hillary ClintonDNY$0$0Yes
    Tom CoburnROK$0$0Yes
    William Thad CochranRMS$0$0Yes
    Norm ColemanRMN$0$0Yes
    Susan CollinsRME$0$0Yes
    Gaylord Kent ConradDND$0$0Yes
    John CornynRTX$0$0Yes
    Larry CraigRID$0$0Yes
    Mike CrapoRID$0$0Yes
    Mark DaytonDMN$0$0Yes
    Jim DeMintRSC$0$0Yes
    Mike DeWineROH$0$0Yes
    Chris DoddDCT$0$0Yes
    Mary Elizabeth DoleRNC$0$0Yes
    Pete DomeniciRNM$0$0Yes
    Byron DorganDND$0$0Yes
    Dick DurbinDIL$0$0Yes
    John EnsignRNV$0$0Yes
    Mike EnziRWY$0$0Yes
    Russ FeingoldDWI$0$0Yes
    Dianne FeinsteinDCA$0$0Yes
    Bill FristRTN$0$0Yes
    Lindsey GrahamRSC$0$0Yes
    Chuck GrassleyRIA$0$0Yes
    Judd GreggRNH$0$0Yes
    Chuck HagelRNE$0$0Yes
    Tom HarkinDIA$0$0Yes
    Orrin HatchRUT$0$0Yes
    Kay Bailey HutchisonRTX$0$0Yes
    Jim InhofeROK$0$0Yes
    Dan InouyeDHI$0$0Yes
    Johnny IsaksonRGA$0$0Yes
    Jim JeffordsIVT$0$0Yes
    Tim JohnsonDSD$0$0Yes
    Ted KennedyDMA$0$0Yes
    John KerryDMA$0$0Yes
    Herb KohlDWI$0$0Yes
    Jon KylRAZ$0$0Yes
    Mary LandrieuDLA$0$0Yes
    Frank LautenbergDNJ$0$0Yes
    Patrick LeahyDVT$0$0Yes
    Carl LevinDMI$0$0Yes
    Joe LiebermanICT$0$0Yes
    Blanche LincolnDAR$0$0Yes
    Chester Trent LottRMS$0$0Yes
    Dick LugarRIN$0$0Yes
    Mel MartinezRFL$0$0Yes
    John McCainRAZ$0$0Yes
    Addison "Mitch" McConnellRKY$0$0Yes
    Bob MenéndezDNJ$0$0Yes
    Barbara MikulskiDMD$0$0Yes
    Lisa MurkowskiRAK$0$0Yes
    Patty MurrayDWA$0$0Yes
    Earl "Ben" NelsonDNE$0$0Yes
    Clarence "Bill" NelsonDFL$0$0Yes
    Barack ObamaDIL$0$0Yes
    Mark PryorDAR$0$0Yes
    John "Jack" ReedDRI$0$0Yes
    Harry ReidDNV$0$0Yes
    Charles "Pat" RobertsRKS$0$0Yes
    John "Jay" RockefellerDWV$0$0Yes
    Ken SalazarDCO$0$0Yes
    Rick SantorumRPA$0$0Yes
    Paul SarbanesDMD$0$0Yes
    Chuck SchumerDNY$0$0Yes
    Jeff SessionsRAL$0$0Yes
    Richard ShelbyRAL$0$0Yes
    Gordon SmithROR$0$0Yes
    Olympia SnoweRME$0$0Yes
    Arlen SpecterDPA$0$0Yes
    Debbie StabenowDMI$0$0Yes
    Ted StevensRAK$0$0Yes
    John SununuRNH$0$0Yes
    Jim TalentRMO$0$0Yes
    Craig ThomasRWY$0$0Yes
    John ThuneRSD$0$0Yes
    David VitterRLA$0$0Yes
    George VoinovichROH$0$0Yes
    John WarnerRVA$0$0Yes
    Ron WydenDOR$0$0Yes

    Interest Groups that supported this bill

    $ Donated

    Interest Groups that opposed this bill

    $ Donated
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range