S. Amdt. 1011 - To Require Post-Date-Of-Enactment Authorization for an Established Business Relationship to a Telephone Facsimile Machine.

109th Congress (2005-2006) View amendment details
Sponsor:
This is an amendment to S. 714 - Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005
Senate Vote: Amendment SA 1011 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

PASSED by voice vote on June 24, 2005.

Other Votes:

Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005

S. 714 — 109th Congress (2005–2006)

Summary
This bill prohibits unsolicited faxes, with exceptions made in certain cases. The bill is a modification to the more stringent former FCC regulations. (by CRS)
Learn More
At OpenCongress
Title
A bill to amend section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227) relating to the prohibition on junk fax transmissions.
Other Titles
  • Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005
  • Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005
  • Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005
  • Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005
  • Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005
Sponsor
Gordon Smith
Co-Sponsors
Subjects
  • Telecommunication
  • Administrative procedure
  • Advertising
  • Business
  • Collection of accounts
  • Congress
  • Congressional investigations
  • Congressional reporting requirements
  • Consumer complaints
  • Consumer education
  • Consumer protection
  • Consumers
  • Direct mail advertising
  • Executive departments
  • Facsimile transmission
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • Fines (Penalties)
  • Forfeiture
  • Government information
  • Government paperwork
  • Government statistics
  • Independent regulatory commissions
  • Law
  • Nonprofit organizations
  • Small business
  • Social services
  • Tax-exempt organizations
  • Taxation
  • Technology
  • Telemarketing
  • Telephone
  • Trade associations
Related Bills
    Major Actions
    Introduced4/06/2005
    Referred to Committee
    Amendments (1 proposed)
    Passed Senate6/24/2005
    Passed House6/28/2005
    Signed by President7/09/2005
    Bill History
    Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
    currently selectedSenateAmendment SA 1011 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.6/24/2005PASSED by voice vote
    select this voteSenatePassed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.6/24/2005PASSED by voice vote
    select this voteHouseOn motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.6/28/2005PASSED by voice vote
    ActionDateDescription
    Introduced4/06/2005
    4/06/2005Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
    4/06/2005Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3280)
    4/13/2005Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Subcommittee on Trade, Tourism, and Economic Development. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 109-278.
    Put on a legislative calendar4/14/2005Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
    6/07/2005Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Stevens with amendments. With written report No. 109-76.
    Put on a legislative calendar6/07/2005Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 120.
    6/24/2005Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
    6/24/2005The committee amendments agreed to by Unanimous Consent.
    6/24/2005Message on Senate action sent to the House.
    6/24/2005Amendment SA 1011 proposed by Senator Alexander for Senator Boxer.
    currently selectedVote6/24/2005Amendment SA 1011 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
    select this voteSenate Vote on Passage6/24/2005Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.
    6/24/2005Received in the House.
    6/24/2005Held at the desk.
    Presented to President6/28/2005Cleared for White House.
    6/28/2005Mr. Upton moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
    6/28/2005Considered under suspension of the rules.
    6/28/2005DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 714.
    select this voteHouse Vote on Passage6/28/2005On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
    Presented to President6/30/2005Presented to President.
    Signed7/09/2005Signed by President.
    Enacted7/09/2005Became Public Law No: 109-21.
    NumberSponsorDate OfferedStatus
    currently selectedS. Amdt. 1011Alexander, Lamar [R-TN]June 24, 2005Passed by voice vote on June 24, 2005.

    To require post-date-of-enactment authorization for an established business relationship to a telephone facsimile machine.

    Actions

    June 24, 2005, 12:00 am ET - Amendment SA 1011 proposed by Senator Alexander for Senator Boxer.
    June 24, 2005, 12:00 am ET - Amendment SA 1011 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

    Full Text of this Amendment

    SA 1011. Mrs. BOXER (for Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. SMITH)) proposed an amendment to the bill S. 714, to amend section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227) relating to the prohibition on junk fax transmissions; as follows:

    On page 2, line 15, strike ``and''.
    On page 2, between lines 15 and 16, insert the following:
    ``(ii) the sender obtained the number of the telephone facsimile machine through--
    ``(I) the voluntary communication of such number, within the context of such established business relationship, from the recipient of the unsolicited advertisement, or
    ``(II) a directory, advertisement, or site on the Internet to which the recipient voluntarily agreed to make available its facsimile number for public distribution,

    except that this clause shall not apply in the case of an unsolicited advertisement that is sent based on an established business relationship with the recipient that was in existence before the date of enactment of the Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005 if the sender possessed the facsimile machine number of the recipient before such date of enactment; and''
    On page 2, strike lines 16 through 26 and insert the following:
    ``(iii) the unsolicited advertisement contains a notice meeting the requirements under paragraph (2)(D),

    except that the exception under clauses (i) and (ii) shall not apply with respect to an unsolicited advertisement sent to a telephone facsimile machine by a sender to whom a request has been made not to send future unsolicited advertisements to such telephone facsimile machine that complies with the requirements under paragraph (2)(E); or''.
    On page 7, line 17, strike ``(1)(C)(ii),'' and insert ``(1)(C)(iii),''.
    On page 7, line 25, strike ``(1)(C)(ii)'' and insert ``(1)(C)(iii)''.


    (As printed in the Congressional Record for the Senate on Jun 24, 2005.)

    MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
    You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.
    Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.

    0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

    Organizations that took a position on
    Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005: Amendment SA 1011 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

    0 organizations supported this amendment

    0 organizations opposed this amendment

    Need proof?

    View citations of support and opposition

    Anything missing?

    Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
    How do you know they have this position? Please include a link to a newspaper article, organization's website, or other source.
    We will use it only to contact you about this form. Your address will never appear on this site.

    MapLight editors may add this organization after checking the sources you listed above. Thank you for helping to improve our site.

    Cancel
    Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2001 – December 31, 2006.
    Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org

    Add Data Filters:

    Legislator Filters
    Legislator Filters
    NamePartyState$ From Interest Groups
    That Supported
    $ From Interest Groups
    That Opposed
    Vote
    Daniel K. AkakaDHI$0$0Yes
    Andrew Lamar AlexanderRTN$0$0Yes
    Alan Wayne AllardRCO$0$0Yes
    George AllenRVA$0$0Yes
    Max BaucusDMT$0$0Yes
    Birch "Evan" BayhDIN$0$0Yes
    Bob BennettRUT$0$0Yes
    Joe BidenDDE$0$0Yes
    Jesse "Jeff" BingamanDNM$0$0Yes
    Christopher "Kit" BondRMO$0$0Yes
    Barbara BoxerDCA$0$0Yes
    Sam BrownbackRKS$0$0Yes
    Jim BunningRKY$0$0Yes
    Conrad BurnsRMT$0$0Yes
    Richard BurrRNC$0$0Yes
    Robert ByrdDWV$0$0Yes
    Maria CantwellDWA$0$0Yes
    Tom CarperDDE$0$0Yes
    Lincoln ChafeeRRI$0$0Yes
    Clarence Saxby ChamblissRGA$0$0Yes
    Hillary ClintonDNY$0$0Yes
    Tom CoburnROK$0$0Yes
    William Thad CochranRMS$0$0Yes
    Norm ColemanRMN$0$0Yes
    Susan CollinsRME$0$0Yes
    Gaylord Kent ConradDND$0$0Yes
    John CornynRTX$0$0Yes
    Jon CorzineDNJ$0$0Yes
    Larry CraigRID$0$0Yes
    Mike CrapoRID$0$0Yes
    Mark DaytonDMN$0$0Yes
    Jim DeMintRSC$0$0Yes
    Mike DeWineROH$0$0Yes
    Chris DoddDCT$0$0Yes
    Mary Elizabeth DoleRNC$0$0Yes
    Pete DomeniciRNM$0$0Yes
    Byron DorganDND$0$0Yes
    Dick DurbinDIL$0$0Yes
    John EnsignRNV$0$0Yes
    Mike EnziRWY$0$0Yes
    Russ FeingoldDWI$0$0Yes
    Dianne FeinsteinDCA$0$0Yes
    Bill FristRTN$0$0Yes
    Lindsey GrahamRSC$0$0Yes
    Chuck GrassleyRIA$0$0Yes
    Judd GreggRNH$0$0Yes
    Chuck HagelRNE$0$0Yes
    Tom HarkinDIA$0$0Yes
    Orrin HatchRUT$0$0Yes
    Kay Bailey HutchisonRTX$0$0Yes
    Jim InhofeROK$0$0Yes
    Dan InouyeDHI$0$0Yes
    Johnny IsaksonRGA$0$0Yes
    Jim JeffordsIVT$0$0Yes
    Tim JohnsonDSD$0$0Yes
    Ted KennedyDMA$0$0Yes
    John KerryDMA$0$0Yes
    Herb KohlDWI$0$0Yes
    Jon KylRAZ$0$0Yes
    Mary LandrieuDLA$0$0Yes
    Frank LautenbergDNJ$0$0Yes
    Patrick LeahyDVT$0$0Yes
    Carl LevinDMI$0$0Yes
    Joe LiebermanICT$0$0Yes
    Blanche LincolnDAR$0$0Yes
    Chester Trent LottRMS$0$0Yes
    Dick LugarRIN$0$0Yes
    Mel MartinezRFL$0$0Yes
    John McCainRAZ$0$0Yes
    Addison "Mitch" McConnellRKY$0$0Yes
    Barbara MikulskiDMD$0$0Yes
    Lisa MurkowskiRAK$0$0Yes
    Patty MurrayDWA$0$0Yes
    Earl "Ben" NelsonDNE$0$0Yes
    Clarence "Bill" NelsonDFL$0$0Yes
    Barack ObamaDIL$0$0Yes
    Mark PryorDAR$0$0Yes
    John "Jack" ReedDRI$0$0Yes
    Harry ReidDNV$0$0Yes
    Charles "Pat" RobertsRKS$0$0Yes
    John "Jay" RockefellerDWV$0$0Yes
    Ken SalazarDCO$0$0Yes
    Rick SantorumRPA$0$0Yes
    Paul SarbanesDMD$0$0Yes
    Chuck SchumerDNY$0$0Yes
    Jeff SessionsRAL$0$0Yes
    Richard ShelbyRAL$0$0Yes
    Gordon SmithROR$0$0Yes
    Olympia SnoweRME$0$0Yes
    Arlen SpecterDPA$0$0Yes
    Debbie StabenowDMI$0$0Yes
    Ted StevensRAK$0$0Yes
    John SununuRNH$0$0Yes
    Jim TalentRMO$0$0Yes
    Craig ThomasRWY$0$0Yes
    John ThuneRSD$0$0Yes
    David VitterRLA$0$0Yes
    George VoinovichROH$0$0Yes
    John WarnerRVA$0$0Yes
    Ron WydenDOR$0$0Yes

    Interest Groups that supported this amendment

    $ Donated

    Interest Groups that opposed this amendment

    $ Donated
    Loading…
    Date Range of Contributions
    Enter a custom date range