H.R. 1675 - Preservation Approval Process Improvement Act of 2007
- Sponsor:
- Melissa Bean
- Summary:
- To suspend the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding electronic filing of previous participation certificates and regarding filing of such certificates with respect to certain low-income housing investors. (by CRS)
- Status:
- The bill has become law.
PASSED by voice vote on May 24, 2007.
Preservation Approval Process Improvement Act of 2007
H.R. 1675 — 110th Congress (2007–2008)
- Summary
- To suspend the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding electronic filing of previous participation certificates and regarding filing of such certificates with respect to certain low-income housing investors. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- At OpenCongress
- Title
- To suspend the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding electronic filing of previous participation certificates and regarding filing of such certificates with respect to certain low-income housing investors.
- Other Titles
- Preservation Approval Process Improvement Act of 2007
- Preservation Approval Process Improvement Act of 2007
- Preservation Approval Process Improvement Act of 2007
- Preservation Approval Process Improvement Act of 2007
- Preservation Approval Process Improvement Act of 2007
- Preservation Approval Process Improvement Act of 2007
- Sponsor
- Melissa Bean
- Co-Sponsors
- Subjects
- Housing
- Administrative procedure
- Affordable housing
- Apartment houses
- Business
- Congress
- Congressional oversight
- Congressional reporting requirements
- Corporation taxes
- Department of Housing and Urban Development
- Electronic data interchange
- Electronic government information
- Executive departments
- Finance
- Government information
- Government paperwork
- Housing subsidies
- Income tax
- Investors
- Law
- Low-income housing
- Real estate business
- Rental housing
- Tax credits
- Taxation
- Technology
- Telecommunication
- Welfare
- Related Bills
- Major Actions
Introduced 3/26/2007 Referred to Committee Passed House 4/25/2007 Passed Senate 5/24/2007 Signed by President 6/15/2007 - Bill History
-
Chamber/Committee Motion Date Result select this vote House On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. 4/25/2007 PASSED by voice vote currently selected Senate Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. 5/24/2007 PASSED by voice vote Action Date Description Introduced 3/26/2007 3/26/2007 Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. 3/29/2007 Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held. Put on a legislative calendar 3/29/2007 Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote. 4/23/2007 Reported by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 110-106. Put on a legislative calendar 4/23/2007 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 65. 4/25/2007 Ms. Bean moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill. 4/25/2007 Considered under suspension of the rules. 4/25/2007 DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1675. select this vote House Vote on Passage 4/25/2007 On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. 4/25/2007 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Put on a legislative calendar 5/16/2007 Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably. 5/17/2007 Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Reported by Senator Dodd without amendment. Without written report. Put on a legislative calendar 5/17/2007 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 151. Presented to President 5/24/2007 Cleared for White House. currently selected Senate Vote on Passage 5/24/2007 Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. 5/25/2007 Message on Senate action sent to the House. Presented to President 6/06/2007 Presented to President. Signed 6/15/2007 Signed by President. Enacted 6/15/2007 Became Public Law No: 110-35. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status
MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.
Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org
