H.R. 491 - To Provide for the Mandatory Revocation of Passports of Individuals Who Are More Than $5,000 in Arrears in Child Support Payments.
- Sponsor:
- Dennis Moore
- Summary:
- To provide for the mandatory revocation of passports of individuals who are more than $5,000 in arrears in child support payments. (by CRS)
- Status:
- The bill has been introduced.
To Provide for the Mandatory Revocation of Passports of Individuals Who Are More Than $5,000 in Arrears in Child Support Payments.
H.R. 491 — 110th Congress (2007–2008)
- Summary
- To provide for the mandatory revocation of passports of individuals who are more than $5,000 in arrears in child support payments. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- At OpenCongress
- Title
- To provide for the mandatory revocation of passports of individuals who are more than $5,000 in arrears in child support payments.
- Other Titles
- Sponsor
- Dennis Moore
- Co-Sponsors
- Carolyn McCarthy
- Raul Grijalva
- Robert Wexler
- Adam Schiff
- Nancy Boyda
- Thaddeus McCotter
- John Boozman
- Todd Tiahrt
- Linda Sánchez
- John Shimkus
- Jo Ann Emerson
- Corrine Brown
- Melissa Bean
- John Tanner
- Steve Israel
- Jerry Moran
- Danny Davis
- Brad Sherman
- Ronald Kind
- Shelley Berkley
- Emanuel Cleaver
- C.A. Ruppersberger
- Patrick Murphy
- Subjects
- Welfare
- Child support
- Children
- Collection of accounts
- Families
- Fines (Penalties)
- Immigration
- Law
- Passports
- Related Bills
- Major Actions
Introduced 1/16/2007 Referred to Committee - Bill History
-
There have been no votes on this bill.
Action Date Description Introduced 1/16/2007 1/16/2007 Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. 1/16/2007 Referred to House Ways and Means 1/16/2007 Referred to House Foreign Affairs 1/18/2007 Referred to the Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status
MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.
Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org
