S. 1828 - A Bill to Require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to Conduct a Study of the Feasibility of Increasing the Consumption in the United States of Certain Ethanol-Blended Gasoline.

Air pollution.
Sponsor:
Summary:
A bill to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a study of the feasibility of increasing the consumption in the United States of certain ethanol-blended gasoline. (by CRS)
Status:
The bill has passed through committee and has been put on a legislative calendar.
There have been no votes on this bill.

A Bill to Require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to Conduct a Study of the Feasibility of Increasing the Consumption in the United States of Certain Ethanol-Blended Gasoline.

S. 1828 — 110th Congress (2007–2008)

Summary
A bill to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a study of the feasibility of increasing the consumption in the United States of certain ethanol-blended gasoline. (by CRS)
Learn More
at OpenCongress
Title
A bill to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a study of the feasibility of increasing the consumption in the United States of certain ethanol-blended gasoline.
Other Titles
    Sponsor
    James Inhofe
    Co-Sponsors
      Subjects
      • Air pollution
      • Administrative procedure
      • Alcohol as fuel
      • All terrain vehicles
      • Energy
      • Environmental Protection Agency
      • Environmental assessment
      • Environmental protection
      • Executive departments
      • Fuel consumption
      • Fuel storage
      • Gasoline
      • Governmental investigations
      • Law
      • Marine engines
      • Motor vehicle pollution control
      • Transportation
      Related Bills
        Major Actions
        Introduced7/19/2007
        Referred to Committee
        Bill History

        There have been no votes on this bill.

        ActionDateDescription
        Introduced7/19/2007
        7/19/2007Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9619-9620)
        7/19/2007Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
        Put on a legislative calendar9/17/2008Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.
        9/24/2008Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Boxer with an amendment. With written report No. 110-494.
        Put on a legislative calendar9/24/2008Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 1070.
        NumberSponsorDate OfferedStatus
        0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

        Organizations that took a position on
        A Bill to Require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to Conduct a Study of the Feasibility of Increasing the Consumption in the United States of Certain Ethanol-Blended Gasoline.

        0 organizations supported this bill

        0 organizations opposed this bill

        Need proof?

        View citations of support and opposition

        Anything missing?

        Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
        How do you know they have this position? Please include a link to a newspaper article, organization's website, or other source.
        Including your e-mail address is optional. We will use it only to contact you about this form. Your address will never appear on this site.

        MAPLight.org editors may add this organization after checking the sources you listed above. Thank you for helping to improve our site.

        Cancel
        Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of Senators in office during the 110th U.S. Congress, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MAPLight.org, January 1, 2003 – December 31, 2008.
        Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org

        Add Data Filters:

        Legislator Filters
        Legislator Filters
        Show All
        NamePartyState$ From Interest Groups
        That Supported
        $ From Interest Groups
        That Opposed
        Akaka, DanielDHI$0$0
        Alexander, LamarRTN$0$0
        Allard, WayneRCO$0$0
        Barrasso, JohnRWY$0$0
        Baucus, MaxDMT$0$0
        Bayh, EvanDIN$0$0
        Bennett, RobertRUT$0$0
        Biden, JosephDDE$0$0
        Bingaman, JeffDNM$0$0
        Bond, ChristopherRMO$0$0
        Boxer, BarbaraDCA$0$0
        Brown, SherrodDOH$0$0
        Brownback, SamuelRKS$0$0
        Bunning, JimRKY$0$0
        Burr, RichardRNC$0$0
        Byrd, RobertDWV$0$0
        Cantwell, MariaDWA$0$0
        Cardin, BenjaminDMD$0$0
        Carper, ThomasDDE$0$0
        Casey, RobertDPA$0$0
        Chambliss, SaxbyRGA$0$0
        Clinton, HillaryDNY$0$0
        Coburn, ThomasROK$0$0
        Cochran, ThadRMS$0$0
        Coleman, NormRMN$0$0
        Collins, SusanRME$0$0
        Conrad, KentDND$0$0
        Corker, BobRTN$0$0
        Cornyn, JohnRTX$0$0
        Craig, LarryRID$0$0
        Crapo, MichaelRID$0$0
        DeMint, JimRSC$0$0
        Dodd, ChristopherDCT$0$0
        Dole, ElizabethRNC$0$0
        Domenici, PeteRNM$0$0
        Dorgan, ByronDND$0$0
        Durbin, RichardDIL$0$0
        Ensign, JohnRNV$0$0
        Enzi, MichaelRWY$0$0
        Feingold, RussellDWI$0$0
        Feinstein, DianneDCA$0$0
        Graham, LindseyRSC$0$0
        Grassley, CharlesRIA$0$0
        Gregg, JuddRNH$0$0
        Hagel, CharlesRNE$0$0
        Harkin, ThomasDIA$0$0
        Hatch, OrrinRUT$0$0
        Hutchison, KayRTX$0$0
        Inhofe, JamesROK$0$0
        Inouye, DanielDHI$0$0
        Isakson, JohnRGA$0$0
        Johnson, TimDSD$0$0
        Kennedy, EdwardDMA$0$0
        Kerry, JohnDMA$0$0
        Klobuchar, AmyDMN$0$0
        Kohl, HerbertDWI$0$0
        Kyl, JonRAZ$0$0
        Landrieu, MaryDLA$0$0
        Lautenberg, FrankDNJ$0$0
        Leahy, PatrickDVT$0$0
        Levin, CarlDMI$0$0
        Lieberman, JosephICT$0$0
        Lincoln, BlancheDAR$0$0
        Lott, TrentRMS$0$0
        Lugar, RichardRIN$0$0
        Martinez, MelRFL$0$0
        McCain, JohnRAZ$0$0
        McCaskill, ClaireDMO$0$0
        McConnell, MitchRKY$0$0
        Menéndez, RobertDNJ$0$0
        Mikulski, BarbaraDMD$0$0
        Murkowski, LisaRAK$0$0
        Murray, PattyDWA$0$0
        Nelson, BenDNE$0$0
        Nelson, BillDFL$0$0
        Obama, BarackDIL$0$0
        Pryor, MarkDAR$0$0
        Reed, JohnDRI$0$0
        Reid, HarryDNV$0$0
        Roberts, PatRKS$0$0
        Rockefeller, JohnDWV$0$0
        Salazar, KenDCO$0$0
        Sanders, BernardIVT$0$0
        Schumer, CharlesDNY$0$0
        Sessions, JeffersonRAL$0$0
        Shelby, RichardRAL$0$0
        Smith, GordonROR$0$0
        Snowe, OlympiaRME$0$0
        Specter, ArlenDPA$0$0
        Stabenow, Debbie AnnDMI$0$0
        Stevens, TedRAK$0$0
        Sununu, JohnRNH$0$0
        Tester, JonDMT$0$0
        Thomas, CraigRWY$0$0
        Thune, JohnRSD$0$0
        Vitter, DavidRLA$0$0
        Voinovich, GeorgeROH$0$0
        Warner, JohnRVA$0$0
        Webb, JimDVA$0$0
        Whitehouse, SheldonDRI$0$0
        Wicker, RogerRMS$0$0
        Wyden, RonDOR$0$0

        Interest Groups that supported this bill

        $ Donated

        Interest Groups that opposed this bill

        $ Donated
        Loading…
        Date Range of Contributions
        Enter a custom date range