S. 263 - Deschutes River Conservancy Reauthorization Act of 2007
- Sponsor:
- Gordon Smith
- Summary:
- A bill to amend the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 to reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the Deschutes River Conservancy, and for other purposes. (by CRS)
- Status:
- The bill has passed through committee and has been put on a legislative calendar.
Deschutes River Conservancy Reauthorization Act of 2007
S. 263 — 110th Congress (2007–2008)
- Summary
- A bill to amend the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 to reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the Deschutes River Conservancy, and for other purposes. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- At OpenCongress
- Title
- A bill to amend the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 to reauthorize the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the Deschutes River Conservancy, and for other purposes.
- Other Titles
- Deschutes River Conservancy Reauthorization Act of 2007
- Deschutes River Conservancy Reauthorization Act of 2007
- Sponsor
- Gordon Smith
- Co-Sponsors
- Subjects
- Water resources
- Authorization
- Budgets
- Construction costs
- Environmental protection
- Federal aid to water resources development
- Oregon
- Restoration ecology
- Riparian ecology
- Stream conservation
- Watersheds
- Related Bills
- Major Actions
Introduced 1/11/2007 Referred to Committee - Bill History
-
There have been no votes on this bill.
Action Date Description Introduced 1/11/2007 1/11/2007 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Put on a legislative calendar 1/31/2007 Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably. 2/16/2007 Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Bingaman without amendment. With written report No. 110-22. Put on a legislative calendar 2/16/2007 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 48. 6/11/2008 Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status
MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.
Help your colleagues by suggesting an organization that took a position on this vote.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org
