S. 454 - Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009

Pentagon, Department of Defense, Defense industry - Armed forces and national security. 111th Congress (2009-2010) View bill details
Sponsor:
Summary:
A bill to improve the organization and procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition of major weapon systems, and for other purposes. (by CRS) 
Status:
The bill has become law. 
Amendments:
14 proposed amendments. 12 accepted. View amendments 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on May 7, 2009.

1/2 required to pass

voted YES: 93 voted NO: 0
6 voted present/not voting

Other Votes:

Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009

S. 454 — 111th Congress (2009–2010)

Keywords
Pentagon, Department of Defense, Defense industry
Summary
A bill to improve the organization and procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition of major weapon systems, and for other purposes. (by CRS)
Learn More
At OpenCongress
Title
A bill to improve the organization and procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition of major weapon systems, and for other purposes.
Other Titles
  • Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009
  • Weapons Acquisition System Reform Through Enhancing Technical Knowledge and Oversight Act of 2009
  • Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009
  • Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009
  • Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009
Sponsor
Carl Levin
Co-Sponsors
Subjects
  • Armed forces and national security
  • Administrative law and regulatory procedures
  • Congressional oversight
  • Department of Defense
  • Executive agency funding and structure
  • Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management
  • Military procurement, research, weapons development
  • Performance measurement
  • Public contracts and procurement
  • Technology assessment
Related Bills
Major Actions
Introduced2/23/2009
Referred to Committee
Amendments (14 proposed)
Passed Senate5/07/2009
Signed by President5/22/2009
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1044 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1045 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1046 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1047 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1048 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1049 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1050 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1051 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1053 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1055 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.5/06/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1052 as modified agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.5/07/2009PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateAmendment SA 1057 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.5/07/2009PASSED by voice vote
currently selectedSenateOn Passage - Senate - S. 454 As Amended5/07/2009This bill PASSED the Senate
93 voted YES 0 voted NO 6 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAuthorizing Conferees to Close Meetings: S 454 To improve the organization and procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition of major weapon systems, and for other purposes5/13/2009This motion PASSED the House
409 voted YES 11 voted NO 13 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateOn the Conference Report - Senate - Conference Report to Accompany S. 4545/20/2009This motion PASSED the Senate
95 voted YES 0 voted NO 4 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseOn the Conference Report - House - S 454 Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act5/21/2009This motion PASSED the House
411 voted YES 0 voted NO 22 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/23/2009
2/23/2009Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2366-2368)
2/23/2009Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
3/03/2009Committee on Armed Services. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 111-149.
Put on a legislative calendar4/02/2009Committee on Armed Services. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.
4/02/2009Committee on Armed Services. Reported by Senator Levin with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Put on a legislative calendar4/02/2009Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 45.
5/06/2009Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1044 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Inhofe.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1044 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1045 proposed by Senator Collins.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1045 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1046 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Coburn.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1046 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1047 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Whitehouse.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1047 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1048 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Carper.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1048 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1049 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator McCaskill.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1049 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1050 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator McCaskill.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1050 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1051 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator McCaskill.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1051 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1053 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Chambliss.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1053 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/06/2009Amendment SA 1055 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Bingaman.
select this voteVote5/06/2009Amendment SA 1055 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
5/07/2009Considered by Senate.
5/07/2009The committee substitute as amended agreed to by Unanimous Consent.
5/07/2009Message on Senate action sent to the House.
5/07/2009Amendment SA 1052 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator Murray.
select this voteVote5/07/2009Amendment SA 1052 as modified agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
5/07/2009Amendment SA 1057 proposed by Senator McCain for Senator Coburn.
select this voteVote5/07/2009Amendment SA 1057 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage5/07/2009On Passage - Senate - S. 454 As Amended
5/07/2009Received in the House.
5/07/2009Held at the desk.
5/13/2009Consideration initiated pursuant to H.Res. 432.
5/13/2009Considered pursuant to H.Res. 432.
5/13/2009The House struck all after the enacting clause and inserted in lieu thereof the provisions of a similar measure H.R. 2101 pursuant to H. Res. 432.
5/13/2009On passage Passed pursuant to H. Res. 432.
5/13/2009Pursuant to H. Res. 432, the House insisted on its amendment and requested a conference.
5/13/2009On motion that the House insist upon its amendment, and request a conference Agreed to without objection.
5/13/2009The Speaker appointed conferees: Skelton, Spratt, Ortiz, Taylor, Abercrombie, Reyes, Snyder, Smith (WA), Sanchez, Loretta, McIntyre, Tauscher, Brady (PA), Andrews, Davis (CA), Langevin, Cooper, Ellsworth, Sestak, McHugh, Bartlett, McKeon, Thornberry, Jones, Akin, Forbes, Miller (FL), Wilson (SC), Conaway, Hunter, and Coffman (CO).
5/13/2009Mr. Skelton moved that the House authorize conferees to close meetings.
select this voteVote5/13/2009Authorizing Conferees to Close Meetings: S 454 To improve the organization and procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition of major weapon systems, and for other purposes
5/14/2009Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill and House requests a conference.
5/14/2009Senate disagreed to House amendment, agreed to request for conference, and appointed conferees. Levin; Kennedy; Byrd; Lieberman; Reed; Akaka; Nelson FL; Nelson NE; Bayh; Webb; McCaskill; Udall CO; Hagan; Begich; Burris; McCain; Inhofe; Sessions; Chambliss; Graham; Thune; Martinez; Wicker; Burr; Vitter; Collins.
5/15/2009Message on Senate action sent to the House.
5/19/2009Conferees agreed to file conference report.
5/20/2009Conference papers: Senate report and manager's statement and official papers held at the desk in Senate.
5/20/2009Conference report considered in Senate.
5/20/2009Message on Senate action sent to the House.
5/20/2009Conference report H. Rept. 111-124 filed.
select this voteVote5/20/2009On the Conference Report - Senate - Conference Report to Accompany S. 454
Presented to President5/21/2009Cleared for White House.
Presented to President5/21/2009Presented to President.
5/21/2009Mr. Skelton brought up conference report H. Rept. 111-124 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 463.
5/21/2009DEBATE - The House proceeded with 1 hour of debate on the conference report to accompany S. 454.
5/21/2009The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
select this voteVote5/21/2009On the Conference Report - House - S 454 Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act
5/21/2009Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Signed5/22/2009Signed by President.
Enacted5/22/2009Became Public Law No: 111-23.
NumberSponsorDate OfferedStatus
select this voteS. Amdt. 1044Inhofe, James [R-OK]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To require a report on certain cost growth matters following the termination of a major defense acquisition program for critical cost growth.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1045Collins, Susan [R-ME]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To require the Secretary of Defense to apply uniform earned value management standards to reliably and consistently measure contract performance, and to ensure that contractors establish and use approved earned value management systems.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1046Coburn, Thomas [R-OK]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To require reports on the operation and support costs of major defense acquisition programs and major weapons systems.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1047Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To further improve the cost assessment procedures and processes of the Department of Defense.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1048Carper, Thomas [D-DE]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To require consultation between the Director of Defense Research and Engineering and the Director of Developmental Test and Evaluation in assessments of technological maturity of critical technologies of major defense acquisition programs.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1049McCaskill, Claire [D-MO]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To specify certain inputs to the Joint Requirements Oversight Council from the commanders of the combatant commands on joint military requirements.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1050McCaskill, Claire [D-MO]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To provide for a review by the Comptroller General of the United States of waivers of the requirement for competitive prototypes based on excessive cost.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1051McCaskill, Claire [D-MO]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To enhance the review of joint military requirements.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1052Murray, Patty [D-WA]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 6, 2009.

To expand the national security objectives of the national technology and industrial base and clarify the role of major defense acquisition programs toward such objectives.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1053Chambliss, Saxby [R-GA]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To clarify an exception to conflict of interest requirements applicable to contracts for systems engineering and technical assistance functions.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 1054Chambliss, Saxby [R-GA]May 6, 2009Offered on May 5, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1055Bingaman, Jeff [D-NM]May 6, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 5, 2009.

To clarify the submittal of certifications of the adequacy of budgets by the Director of the Department of Defense Test Resource Management Center.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 1056Snowe, Olympia [R-ME]May 6, 2009Offered on May 5, 2009.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 1057Coburn, Thomas [R-OK]May 7, 2009Passed by voice vote on May 6, 2009.

To require a plan for the elimination of weaknesses in operations that hinder the capacity to assemble and assess reliable cost information on assets acquired under major defense acquisition programs.

Show amendment details

Average contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…

supported this bill

Aircraft manufacturers [About]
Fiscal & tax policy [About]
Consumer groups [About]
Average given to Senators who voted:
$3,891
$66
$356
YES$4,313
$0
$0
$0
NO$0

opposed this bill

Defense policy, doves [About]
Average given to Senators who voted:
$5,585
YES$5,585
$0
NO$0
5 Organizations Supported and 1 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009: On Passage - Senate - S. 454 As Amended

5 organizations supported this bill

Aerospace Industries Association
Aerospace Industries Association (2009, September 17). Acq Reform Panel. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from Aerospace Industries Association.
National Taxpayers Union
undersigned organizations (2009, May 5). Good Government Groups Urge Congress to Preserve Key Procurement Reforms in S. 454 and H.R. 2101. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from POGO.
Project On Government Oversight
undersigned organizations (2009, May 5). Good Government Groups Urge Congress to Preserve Key Procurement Reforms in S. 454 and H.R. 2101. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from POGO.
Taxpayers for Common Sense
undersigned organizations (2009, May 5). Good Government Groups Urge Congress to Preserve Key Procurement Reforms in S. 454 and H.R. 2101. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from POGO.
U.S. PIRG
undersigned organizations (2009, May 5). Good Government Groups Urge Congress to Preserve Key Procurement Reforms in S. 454 and H.R. 2101. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from POGO.

1 organization opposed this bill

Center for Defense Information
Wheeler, Winslow T. (2009, March 16). Adult Supervision Needed on Defense. Politico. Retrieved May 6, 2009, from http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20031.html.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2005 – December 31, 2010.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyState$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Daniel K. AkakaDHI$500$5,200Yes
Andrew Lamar AlexanderRTN$0$0Yes
John BarrassoRWY$0$0Yes
Max BaucusDMT$11,250$0Yes
Birch "Evan" BayhDIN$0$0Yes
Mark BegichDAK$0$0Yes
Michael F. BennetDCO$2,500$31,748Yes
Bob BennettRUT$0$0Yes
Jesse "Jeff" BingamanDNM$0$962Yes
Christopher "Kit" BondRMO$0$0Not Voting
Barbara BoxerDCA$19,400$18,747Yes
Sherrod BrownDOH$0$53,519Yes
Sam BrownbackRKS$1,000$0Yes
Jim BunningRKY$0$0Yes
Richard BurrRNC$0$0Yes
Roland BurrisDIL$0$0Yes
Robert ByrdDWV$0$12,497Yes
Maria CantwellDWA$250$0Yes
Ben CardinDMD$6,600$25,404Yes
Tom CarperDDE$0$425Yes
Bob CaseyDPA$250$18,934Yes
Clarence Saxby ChamblissRGA$7,000$0Yes
Tom CoburnROK$0$0Yes
William Thad CochranRMS$1,000$0Yes
Susan M. CollinsRME$1,000$0Yes
Gaylord Kent ConradDND$1,000$12,760Yes
Bob CorkerRTN$5,250$0Yes
John CornynRTX$2,500$0Yes
Mike CrapoRID$2,000$0Yes
Jim DeMintRSC$15,000$0Yes
Chris DoddDCT$0$0Yes
Byron DorganDND$15,800$0Yes
Dick DurbinDIL$0$0Yes
John EnsignRNV$5,000$0Yes
Mike EnziRWY$0$0Yes
Russ FeingoldDWI$250$58,767Yes
Dianne FeinsteinDCA$0$2,050Yes
Kirsten E. GillibrandDNY$0$0Yes
Lindsey GrahamRSC$1,000$0Yes
Chuck GrassleyRIA$0$0Yes
Judd GreggRNH$0$0Yes
Kay R. HaganDNC$0$0Yes
Tom HarkinDIA$0$9,360Yes
Orrin G. HatchRUT$2,750$0Yes
Kay Bailey HutchisonRTX$20,600$0Yes
Jim InhofeROK$0$0Yes
Dan InouyeDHI$12,000$0Yes
Johnny IsaksonRGA$27,000$0Yes
Mike JohannsRNE$0$0Yes
Tim JohnsonDSD$0$13,545Not Voting
Ted KaufmanDDE$0$0Yes
Ted KennedyDMA$0$4,479Not Voting
John F. KerryDMA$26,000$0Yes
Amy KlobucharDMN$0$250Yes
Herb KohlDWI$0$425Yes
Jon KylRAZ$5,800$0Yes
Mary L. LandrieuDLA$0$0Yes
Frank R. LautenbergDNJ$0$15,405Not Voting
Patrick J. LeahyDVT$0$0Yes
Carl LevinDMI$0$0Yes
Joe LiebermanICT$1,500$0Yes
Blanche LincolnDAR$20,500$0Yes
Dick LugarRIN$4,000$425Yes
Mel MartinezRFL$0$0Yes
John McCainRAZ$5,800$0Yes
Claire McCaskillDMO$1,500$0Yes
Addison "Mitch" McConnellRKY$0$0Yes
Bob MenéndezDNJ$0$29,300Not Voting
Jeff MerkleyDOR$500$65,244Yes
Barbara A. MikulskiDMD$1,500$0Yes
Lisa MurkowskiRAK$0$0Yes
Patty MurrayDWA$17,500$15,031Yes
Earl "Ben" NelsonDNE$1,000$0Yes
Clarence "Bill" NelsonDFL$8,100$0Yes
Mark L. PryorDAR$20,500$0Yes
John "Jack" ReedDRI$0$0Yes
Harry ReidDNV$3,500$4,238Yes
Jim RischRID$1,000$0Yes
Charles "Pat" RobertsRKS$33,350$0Yes
John "Jay" RockefellerDWV$29,500$0Not Voting
Bernie SandersIVT$0$22,635Yes
Chuck SchumerDNY$0$0Yes
Jeff SessionsRAL$1,000$0Yes
Jeanne ShaheenDNH$0$13,238Yes
Richard C. ShelbyRAL$1,500$0Yes
Olympia J. SnoweRME$20,000$0Yes
Arlen SpecterDPA$19,200$0Yes
Debbie StabenowDMI$1,000$20,920Yes
Jon TesterDMT$0$55,084Yes
John ThuneRSD$7,000$0Yes
Mark UdallDCO$0$45,139Yes
Tom UdallDNM$0$23,241Yes
David VitterRLA$17,000$0Yes
George VoinovichROH$0$0Yes
Mark R. WarnerDVA$3,500$0Yes
Jim WebbDVA$2,000$3,200Yes
Sheldon WhitehouseDRI$9,000$0Yes
Roger F. WickerRMS$7,000$0Yes
Ron WydenDOR$0$0Yes

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyState$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Daniel K. AkakaDHI$500$5,200Yes
Andrew Lamar AlexanderRTN$0$0Yes
John BarrassoRWY$0$0Yes
Max BaucusDMT$11,250$0Yes
Birch "Evan" BayhDIN$0$0Yes
Mark BegichDAK$0$0Yes
Michael F. BennetDCO$2,500$31,748Yes
Bob BennettRUT$0$0Yes
Jesse "Jeff" BingamanDNM$0$962Yes
Christopher "Kit" BondRMO$0$0Not Voting
Barbara BoxerDCA$19,400$18,747Yes
Sherrod BrownDOH$0$53,519Yes
Sam BrownbackRKS$1,000$0Yes
Jim BunningRKY$0$0Yes
Richard BurrRNC$0$0Yes
Roland BurrisDIL$0$0Yes
Robert ByrdDWV$0$12,497Yes
Maria CantwellDWA$250$0Yes
Ben CardinDMD$6,600$25,404Yes
Tom CarperDDE$0$425Yes
Bob CaseyDPA$250$18,934Yes
Clarence Saxby ChamblissRGA$7,000$0Yes
Tom CoburnROK$0$0Yes
William Thad CochranRMS$1,000$0Yes
Susan M. CollinsRME$1,000$0Yes
Gaylord Kent ConradDND$1,000$12,760Yes
Bob CorkerRTN$5,250$0Yes
John CornynRTX$2,500$0Yes
Mike CrapoRID$2,000$0Yes
Jim DeMintRSC$15,000$0Yes
Chris DoddDCT$0$0Yes
Byron DorganDND$15,800$0Yes
Dick DurbinDIL$0$0Yes
John EnsignRNV$5,000$0Yes
Mike EnziRWY$0$0Yes
Russ FeingoldDWI$250$58,767Yes
Dianne FeinsteinDCA$0$2,050Yes
Kirsten E. GillibrandDNY$0$0Yes
Lindsey GrahamRSC$1,000$0Yes
Chuck GrassleyRIA$0$0Yes
Judd GreggRNH$0$0Yes
Kay R. HaganDNC$0$0Yes
Tom HarkinDIA$0$9,360Yes
Orrin G. HatchRUT$2,750$0Yes
Kay Bailey HutchisonRTX$20,600$0Yes
Jim InhofeROK$0$0Yes
Dan InouyeDHI$12,000$0Yes
Johnny IsaksonRGA$27,000$0Yes
Mike JohannsRNE$0$0Yes
Tim JohnsonDSD$0$13,545Not Voting
Ted KaufmanDDE$0$0Yes
Ted KennedyDMA$0$4,479Not Voting
John F. KerryDMA$26,000$0Yes
Amy KlobucharDMN$0$250Yes
Herb KohlDWI$0$425Yes
Jon KylRAZ$5,800$0Yes
Mary L. LandrieuDLA$0$0Yes
Frank R. LautenbergDNJ$0$15,405Not Voting
Patrick J. LeahyDVT$0$0Yes
Carl LevinDMI$0$0Yes
Joe LiebermanICT$1,500$0Yes
Blanche LincolnDAR$20,500$0Yes
Dick LugarRIN$4,000$425Yes
Mel MartinezRFL$0$0Yes
John McCainRAZ$5,800$0Yes
Claire McCaskillDMO$1,500$0Yes
Addison "Mitch" McConnellRKY$0$0Yes
Bob MenéndezDNJ$0$29,300Not Voting
Jeff MerkleyDOR$500$65,244Yes
Barbara A. MikulskiDMD$1,500$0Yes
Lisa MurkowskiRAK$0$0Yes
Patty MurrayDWA$17,500$15,031Yes
Earl "Ben" NelsonDNE$1,000$0Yes
Clarence "Bill" NelsonDFL$8,100$0Yes
Mark L. PryorDAR$20,500$0Yes
John "Jack" ReedDRI$0$0Yes
Harry ReidDNV$3,500$4,238Yes
Jim RischRID$1,000$0Yes
Charles "Pat" RobertsRKS$33,350$0Yes
John "Jay" RockefellerDWV$29,500$0Not Voting
Bernie SandersIVT$0$22,635Yes
Chuck SchumerDNY$0$0Yes
Jeff SessionsRAL$1,000$0Yes
Jeanne ShaheenDNH$0$13,238Yes
Richard C. ShelbyRAL$1,500$0Yes
Olympia J. SnoweRME$20,000$0Yes
Arlen SpecterDPA$19,200$0Yes
Debbie StabenowDMI$1,000$20,920Yes
Jon TesterDMT$0$55,084Yes
John ThuneRSD$7,000$0Yes
Mark UdallDCO$0$45,139Yes
Tom UdallDNM$0$23,241Yes
David VitterRLA$17,000$0Yes
George VoinovichROH$0$0Yes
Mark R. WarnerDVA$3,500$0Yes
Jim WebbDVA$2,000$3,200Yes
Sheldon WhitehouseDRI$9,000$0Yes
Roger F. WickerRMS$7,000$0Yes
Ron WydenDOR$0$0Yes

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Aircraft manufacturers$391,400
Fiscal & tax policy$33,150
Consumer groups$6,100

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Defense policy, doves$582,172
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range