S. 540 - Medical Device Safety Act of 2009
Riegel v. Medtronic, Medical Device Amendments Act, Food and Drug Administration, Medical regulation, Pacemakers - Health. 111th Congress (2009-2010) View bill details
- Sponsor:
- Edward Kennedy
- Summary:
- A bill to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices. (by CRS)
- Status:
- The bill has been introduced.
There have been no votes on this bill.
Medical Device Safety Act of 2009
S. 540 — 111th Congress (2009–2010)
- Keywords
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Medical Device Amendments Act, Food and Drug Administration, Medical regulation, Pacemakers
- Summary
- A bill to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices. (by CRS)
- Learn More
- at OpenCongress
- Title
- A bill to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices.
- Other Titles
- Medical Device Safety Act of 2009
- Sponsor
- Edward Kennedy
- Co-Sponsors
- Sherrod Brown
- Bernard Sanders
- Tom Udall
- Jeff Bingaman
- Barbara Boxer
- Robert Byrd
- Christopher Dodd
- Richard Durbin
- Russell Feingold
- Dianne Feinstein
- Thomas Harkin
- Tim Johnson
- Patrick Leahy
- John Reed
- John Rockefeller
- Charles Schumer
- Kirsten Gillibrand
- Claire McCaskill
- Robert Casey
- Sheldon Whitehouse
- Kay Hagan
- Jeff Merkley
- Roland Burris
- Subjects
- Health
- Civil actions and liability
- Federal preemption
- Health technology, devices, supplies
- Product safety and quality
- Related Bills
- Major Actions
Introduced 3/05/2009 Referred to Committee - Bill History
-
There have been no votes on this bill.
Action Date Description Introduced 3/05/2009 3/05/2009 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. 8/04/2009 Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held. Number Sponsor Date Offered Status
Total contributions given to Senators from interest groups that…
support this bill
| Attorneys & law firms [About] |
| Women's issues [About] |
| Trial lawyers & law firms [About] |
| Book, newspaper & periodical publishing [About] |
| Health & welfare policy [About] |
| Elderly issues/Social Security [About] |
| Health professionals [About] |
| Consumer groups [About] |
| Health, Education & Human Resources (split) [About] |
oppose this bill
| Insurance companies, brokers & agents [About] |
| Pharmaceutical manufacturing [About] |
| Medical supplies manufacturing & sales [About] |
| Chemicals [About] |
| Nursing homes [About] |
| Pharmaceutical wholesale [About] |
| Health care products [About] |
| Chambers of commerce [About] |
| Manufacturing [About] |
| Military [About] |
| Pro-business associations [About] |
| Health, Education & Human Resources (split) [About] |
Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of Senators in office during the 111th U.S. Congress, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MAPLight.org, June 4, 2004 – June 3, 2010.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org
