H. Amdt. 493 - Amendment Sought to Strike Section 5 in the America Invents Act Which Expanded the Prior-User Rights Defense to Apply to All Patents with Minimal Exceptions.

112th Congress (2011-2012) View amendment details
Sponsor:
This is an amendment to H.R. 1249 - Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
House Vote: Amendment 3 to H.R. 1249

DID NOT PASS on June 23, 2011.

1/2 required to pass

voted YES: 81 voted NO: 342
9 voted present/not voting

Leahy-Smith America Invents Act

H.R. 1249 — 112th Congress (2011–2012)

Summary
To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform. (by CRS)
Learn More
At OpenCongress
Title
To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform.
Other Titles
  • America Invents Act
  • America Invents Act
  • Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
  • Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
  • Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
Sponsor
Lamar Smith
Co-Sponsors
Subjects
  • Commerce
  • Administrative law and regulatory procedures
  • Administrative remedies
  • Advanced technology and technological innovations
  • Civil actions and liability
  • Competitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits
  • Congressional oversight
  • Congressional tributes
  • Department of Commerce
  • Evidence and witnesses
  • Executive agency funding and structure
  • Federal district courts
  • Government buildings, facilities, and property
  • Government employee pay, benefits, personnel management
  • Government investigations
  • Government trust funds
  • Intellectual property
  • Judges
  • Judicial review and appeals
  • Jurisdiction and venue
  • Legal fees and court costs
  • Michigan
  • Small business
  • State and local courts
  • Tax administration and collection, taxpayers
  • User charges and fees
  • Virginia
Related Bills
Major Actions
Introduced3/30/2011
Referred to Committee
Amendments (22 proposed)
Passed House6/23/2011
Passed Senate9/08/2011
Signed by President9/16/2011
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteHouseAmendment 1 to H.R. 12496/23/2011This amendment PASSED the House
283 voted YES 140 voted NO 9 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 2 to H.R. 12496/23/2011This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
105 voted YES 316 voted NO 11 voted present/not voting
currently selectedHouseAmendment 3 to H.R. 12496/23/2011This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
81 voted YES 342 voted NO 9 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 9 to H.R. 12496/23/2011This amendment PASSED the House
223 voted YES 198 voted NO 11 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 12 to H.R. 12496/23/2011This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
129 voted YES 295 voted NO 8 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 13 to H.R. 12496/23/2011This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
92 voted YES 329 voted NO 11 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 14 to H.R. 12496/23/2011This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
81 voted YES 342 voted NO 9 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 15 to H.R. 12496/23/2011This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
158 voted YES 262 voted NO 12 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseOn Motion to Recommit with Instructions: H.R. 1249 To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform6/23/2011This motion DID NOT PASS the House
172 voted YES 251 voted NO 9 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseOn Passage - House - H.R. 1249 To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform6/23/2011This bill PASSED the House
304 voted YES 117 voted NO 11 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Moore amendment (A004) Agreed to by voice vote.6/23/2011PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment (A005) Agreed to by voice vote.6/23/2011PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Lujan amendment (A006) Agreed to by voice vote.6/23/2011PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Peters amendment (A007) Agreed to by voice vote.6/23/2011PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Polis amendment (A008) Failed by voice vote.6/23/2011DID NOT PASS by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Speier amendment (A010) Agreed to by voice vote.6/23/2011PASSED by voice vote
select this voteSenateOn the Cloture Motion H.R. 12499/06/2011This motion PASSED the Senate
93 voted YES 5 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateOn the Amendment S.Amdt. 600 to H.R. 1249 (Leahy-Smith America Invents Act)9/08/2011This amendment DID NOT PASS the Senate
47 voted YES 51 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateOn the Amendment S.Amdt. 595 to H.R. 1249 (Leahy-Smith America Invents Act)9/08/2011This amendment DID NOT PASS the Senate
13 voted YES 85 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateOn the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 599 to H.R. 1249 (Leahy-Smith America Invents Act)9/08/2011This amendment PASSED the Senate
50 voted YES 48 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
select this voteSenateOn Passage of the Bill H.R. 12499/08/2011This bill PASSED the Senate
89 voted YES 9 voted NO 2 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced3/30/2011
3/30/2011Subcommittee Hearings Held.
3/30/2011Referred to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet.
3/30/2011Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
3/30/2011Referred to House Judiciary
3/30/2011Referred to House Budget
4/11/2011Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet Discharged.
4/14/2011Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Put on a legislative calendar4/14/2011Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 32 - 3.
6/01/2011Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 112-98, Part I.
6/01/2011Committee on The Budget discharged.
Put on a legislative calendar6/01/2011Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 54.
6/21/2011Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 316 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2021 and H.R. 1249. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate for H.R. 2021 and 80 minutes of general debate for H.R. 1249. The resolution also provides that for H.R. 1249, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary shall be considered as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule.
6/22/2011Rule H. Res. 316 passed House.
6/22/2011Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 316.
6/22/2011Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2021 and H.R. 1249. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measures will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate for H.R. 2021 and 80 minutes of general debate for H.R. 1249. The resolution also provides that for H.R. 1249, the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary shall be considered as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule.
6/22/2011House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 316 and Rule XVIII.
6/22/2011The Speaker designated the Honorable Tom Graves to act as Chairman of the Committee.
6/22/2011DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with twenty minutes of debate on the question of constitutionality of the measure.
6/22/2011GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 1249.
6/22/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Smith (TX) amendment.
6/22/2011POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Smith (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Smith (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
6/22/2011Mr. Smith (TX) moved to rise.
6/22/2011On motion to rise Agreed to by voice vote.
6/22/2011Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1249 as unfinished business.
6/23/2011Considered as unfinished business.
6/23/2011The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
6/23/2011UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced the unfinished business was on the question of adoption of an amendment which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings were postponed.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Conyers amendment no. 2.
6/23/2011POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Conyers amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Conyers demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Baldwin amendment no. 3.
6/23/2011POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Baldwin amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Baldwin demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moore amendment no. 4.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment no. 5.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lujan amendment no. 6.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters amendment no. 7.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Polis (CO) amendment no. 8.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Conyers amendment no. 9.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Speier amendment no. 10.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Watt amendment no. 11.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Sensenbrenner amendment no. 12.
6/23/2011POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Sensenbrenner amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Sensenbrenner demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Manzullo amendment no. 13.
6/23/2011POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Manzullo amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Manzullo demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rohrabacher amendment no. 14.
6/23/2011POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Rohrabacher amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Rohrabacher demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
6/23/2011DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 316, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Schock amendment no. 15.
6/23/2011POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Schock amendment, the Chair put t he question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Smith (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
6/23/2011UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on the adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings were postponed.
6/23/2011The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1249.
6/23/2011The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
6/23/2011The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text: CR 6/22/2011 H4433-4438)
6/23/2011Mr. Miller (NC) moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.
6/23/2011DEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to report the same to the House with an amendment to require the U.S. Patent Office to prioritize patent applications filed by entities that pledge to develop or manufacture their products, processes, and technologies in the U.S., including, specifically, those filed by small businesses and individuals.
6/23/2011The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
6/23/2011Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
6/23/2011The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 1249.
6/23/2011Mr. Jackson (IL) raised a point of order. Subsequent to the completion of a roll call vote on the Conyers amendment No. 9, the final disposition was called into question and by unanimous consent, the proceedings were vacated and the Conyers amendment No. 9 was redesignated and the question of adoption was put again by the Chair de novo for a re-vote by the Committee of the Whole.
6/23/2011Amendment (A001) offered by Mr. Smith (TX).
select this voteVote6/23/2011Amendment 1 to H.R. 1249
select this voteVote6/23/2011Amendment 2 to H.R. 1249
currently selectedVote6/23/2011Amendment 3 to H.R. 1249
select this voteVote6/23/2011Amendment 9 to H.R. 1249
select this voteVote6/23/2011Amendment 12 to H.R. 1249
select this voteVote6/23/2011Amendment 13 to H.R. 1249
select this voteVote6/23/2011Amendment 14 to H.R. 1249
select this voteVote6/23/2011Amendment 15 to H.R. 1249
select this voteVote6/23/2011On Motion to Recommit with Instructions: H.R. 1249 To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform
select this voteHouse Vote on Passage6/23/2011On Passage - House - H.R. 1249 To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform
6/23/2011Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Conyers.
6/23/2011Amendment (A003) offered by Ms. Baldwin.
6/23/2011Amendment (A004) offered by Ms. Moore.
select this voteVote6/23/2011On agreeing to the Moore amendment (A004) Agreed to by voice vote.
6/23/2011Amendment (A005) offered by Ms. Jackson Lee (TX).
select this voteVote6/23/2011On agreeing to the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment (A005) Agreed to by voice vote.
6/23/2011Amendment (A006) offered by Mr. Lujan.
select this voteVote6/23/2011On agreeing to the Lujan amendment (A006) Agreed to by voice vote.
6/23/2011Amendment (A007) offered by Mr. Peters.
select this voteVote6/23/2011On agreeing to the Peters amendment (A007) Agreed to by voice vote.
6/23/2011Amendment (A008) offered by Mr. Polis.
select this voteVote6/23/2011On agreeing to the Polis amendment (A008) Failed by voice vote.
6/23/2011Amendment (A009) offered by Mr. Conyers.
6/23/2011Amendment (A010) offered by Ms. Speier.
select this voteVote6/23/2011On agreeing to the Speier amendment (A010) Agreed to by voice vote.
6/23/2011Amendment (A011) offered by Mr. Watt.
6/23/2011By unanimous consent, the Watt amendment was withdrawn.
6/23/2011Amendment (A012) offered by Mr. Sensenbrenner.
6/23/2011Amendment (A013) offered by Mr. Manzullo.
6/23/2011Amendment (A014) offered by Mr. Rohrabacher.
6/23/2011Amendment (A015) offered by Mr. Schock.
6/23/2011Amendment (A009) offered by Mr. Conyers.
6/27/2011Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Put on a legislative calendar6/28/2011Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 87.
8/02/2011Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate.
8/02/2011Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate.
select this voteVote9/06/2011On the Cloture Motion H.R. 1249
9/07/2011Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate.
9/07/2011Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate.
9/07/2011Measure laid before Senate by motion.
9/08/2011Considered by Senate.
9/08/2011Message on Senate action sent to the House.
9/08/2011Amendment SA 595 proposed by Senator Cantwell.
9/08/2011Amendment SA 599 proposed by Senator Coburn.
9/08/2011Amendment SA 600 proposed by Senator Sessions.
select this voteVote9/08/2011On the Amendment S.Amdt. 600 to H.R. 1249 (Leahy-Smith America Invents Act)
select this voteVote9/08/2011On the Amendment S.Amdt. 595 to H.R. 1249 (Leahy-Smith America Invents Act)
select this voteVote9/08/2011On the Motion to Table S.Amdt. 599 to H.R. 1249 (Leahy-Smith America Invents Act)
select this voteSenate Vote on Passage9/08/2011On Passage of the Bill H.R. 1249
Presented to President9/12/2011Presented to President.
Signed9/16/2011Signed by President.
Enacted9/16/2011Became Public Law No: 112-29.
NumberSponsorDate OfferedStatus
select this voteH. Amdt. 491Smith, Lamar [R-TX21]June 22, 2011Passed by roll call vote on June 23, 2011.

Manager's amendment makes numerous technical and clarifying changes to the bill.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 492Conyers, John [D-MI13]June 23, 2011Failed by roll call vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment sought to permit the conversion of the United States to a first-to-file system only upon a Presidential finding that other nations have adopted a similar one-year grace period.

Show amendment details

currently selectedH. Amdt. 493Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]June 23, 2011Failed by roll call vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment sought to strike section 5 in the America Invents Act which expanded the prior-user rights defense to apply to all patents with minimal exceptions.

Actions

June 23, 2011, 12:48 pm ET - Amendment 3 to H.R. 1249
June 23, 2011, 2:23 pm ET - Amendment (A003) offered by Ms. Baldwin.

Full Text of this Amendment

The text of this amendment is not available.
select this voteH. Amdt. 494Moore, Gwen [D-WI4]June 23, 2011Passed by voice vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment allows the United States Patent Trade Office to develop methods for ways to track the diversity of patent applicants.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 495Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX18]June 23, 2011Passed by voice vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment expresses the sense of Congress that "the patent system should promote industries to continue to develop new technologies that spur growth and create jobs across the country".

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 496Luján, Ben [D-NM3]June 23, 2011Passed by voice vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment lists criteria that the Patent Trade Office Director must take into account when selecting satellite offices in the United States.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 497Peters, Gary [D-MI14]June 23, 2011Passed by voice vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment mandates a United States Patent Trade Office led study with the Small Business Administration on how to better utilize existing government resources for education and technical assistance to help small businesses with international patent protection.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 498Polis, Jared [D-CO2]June 23, 2011Failed by voice vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment sought to allow any tax strategy patent that was filed as of the date of enactment of the bill to move toward issuance by the Patent Trade Office.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 499Conyers, John [D-MI13]June 23, 2011Passed by roll call vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment clarifies the deadline for filing patent term extension applications covering drug products that must be approved by the FDA.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 500Speier, Jackie [D-CA14]June 23, 2011Passed by voice vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment requires the United States Patent Trade Office to provide rules for the exchange of relevant information during the derivation proceedings.

Show amendment details

H. Amdt. 501Watt, Melvin [D-NC12]June 23, 2011Withdrawn on June 23, 2011.

An amendment numbered 11 printed in Part B of House Report 112-111 to add a severability clause protecting the remainder of the bill if the Supreme Court determines that certain sections or provisions are unconstitutional.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 502Sensenbrenner, F. [R-WI5]June 23, 2011Failed by roll call vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment sought to strike section 3 of the bill which created a first-to-file patent system.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 503Manzullo, Donald [R-IL16]June 23, 2011Failed by roll call vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment sought to strike the provision giving the United States Patent Trade Office the authority to set patent and trademark fees.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 504Rohrabacher, Dana [R-CA48]June 23, 2011Failed by roll call vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment sought to exempt small businesses from the post-grant reviews and reexaminations.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 505Schock, Aaron [R-IL18]June 23, 2011Failed by roll call vote on June 23, 2011.

Amendment sought to strike section 18 which established a pilot program that allowed the United States Patent Trade Office to review certain low-quality business method patents.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 594Johnson, Ron [R-WI]September 7, 2011Offered on September 6, 2011.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 595Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]September 7, 2011Failed by roll call vote on September 7, 2011.

To establish a transitional program for covered business method patents.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 596Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]September 7, 2011Offered on September 6, 2011.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 597Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]September 7, 2011Offered on September 6, 2011.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

S. Amdt. 598Paul, Rand [R-KY]September 7, 2011Offered on September 6, 2011.

Amendment information not available.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 599Coburn, Thomas [R-OK]September 7, 2011Offered on September 6, 2011.

To amend the provision relating to funding the Patent and Trademark Office by establishing a United States Patent and Trademark Office Public Enterprise Fund, and for other purposes.

Show amendment details

select this voteS. Amdt. 600Sessions, Jefferson [R-AL]September 7, 2011Failed by roll call vote on September 7, 2011.

To strike the provision relating to the calculation of the 60-day period for application of patent term extension.

Show amendment details

MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

Organizations that took a position on
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: Amendment 3 to H.R. 1249

0 organizations supported this amendment

0 organizations opposed this amendment

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of House members in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyState$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Gary AckermanDNY-5$0$0No
Sandy AdamsRFL-24$0$0No
Robert AderholtRAL-4$0$0No
W. Todd AkinRMO-2$0$0No
Rodney AlexanderRLA-5$0$0No
Jason AltmireDPA-4$0$0No
Justin AmashRMI-3$0$0No
Rob AndrewsDNJ-1$0$0No
Steve AustriaROH-7$0$0No
Joe BacaDCA-43$0$0No
Michele BachmannRMN-6$0$0Yes
Spencer BachusRAL-6$0$0No
Tammy BaldwinDWI-2$0$0Yes
Lou BarlettaRPA-11$0$0No
John BarrowDGA-12$0$0No
Roscoe BartlettRMD-6$0$0Yes
Joe BartonRTX-6$0$0No
Charlie BassRNH-2$0$0No
Karen BassDCA-33$0$0No
Xavier BecerraDCA-31$0$0No
Dan BenishekRMI-1$0$0No
Rick BergRND$0$0Not Voting
Rochelle "Shelley" BerkleyDNV-1$0$0No
Howard BermanDCA-28$0$0No
Judy BiggertRIL-13$0$0No
Brian BilbrayRCA-50$0$0No
Gus BilirakisRFL-9$0$0Yes
Rob BishopRUT-1$0$0No
Sanford BishopDGA-2$0$0No
Tim BishopDNY-1$0$0No
Diane BlackRTN-6$0$0No
Marsha BlackburnRTN-7$0$0No
Earl BlumenauerDOR-3$0$0No
John A. BoehnerROH-8$0$0Not Voting
Jo BonnerRAL-1$0$0No
Mary Bono MackRCA-45$0$0No
Dan BorenDOK-2$0$0No
Leonard BoswellDIA-3$0$0No
Charles BoustanyRLA-7$0$0No
Kevin BradyRTX-8$0$0No
Bob BradyDPA-1$0$0No
Bruce BraleyDIA-1$0$0No
Mo BrooksRAL-5$0$0No
Paul BrounRGA-10$0$0Yes
Corrine BrownDFL-3$0$0No
Vern BuchananRFL-13$0$0No
Larry BucshonRIN-8$0$0No
Ann Marie BuerkleRNY-25$0$0Yes
Michael BurgessRTX-26$0$0No
Dan BurtonRIN-5$0$0No
George "G.K." ButterfieldDNC-1$0$0No
Ken CalvertRCA-44$0$0No
Dave CampRMI-4$0$0No
John CampbellRCA-48$0$0No
Francisco CansecoRTX-23$0$0No
Eric CantorRVA-7$0$0No
Shelley CapitoRWV-2$0$0No
Lois CappsDCA-23$0$0No
Mike CapuanoDMA-8$0$0No
Dennis CardozaDCA-18$0$0Yes
John "Russ" CarnahanDMO-3$0$0No
John CarneyDDE$0$0No
André CarsonDIN-7$0$0Yes
John CarterRTX-31$0$0No
Bill CassidyRLA-6$0$0No
Kathy CastorDFL-11$0$0No
Steve ChabotROH-1$0$0No
Jason ChaffetzRUT-3$0$0No
Albert "Ben" ChandlerDKY-6$0$0No
Judy ChuDCA-32$0$0No
David CicillineDRI-1$0$0No
Hansen ClarkeDMI-13$0$0Yes
Yvette ClarkeDNY-11$0$0Yes
William Lacy ClayDMO-1$0$0No
Emanuel CleaverDMO-5$0$0No
Jim ClyburnDSC-6$0$0No
John Howard CobleRNC-6$0$0No
Mike CoffmanRCO-6$0$0Yes
Steve CohenDTN-9$0$0No
Tom ColeROK-4$0$0No
K. "Mike" ConawayRTX-11$0$0No
Gerry ConnollyDVA-11$0$0No
John ConyersDMI-14$0$0Yes
Jim CooperDTN-5$0$0No
Jim CostaDCA-20$0$0No
Jerry CostelloDIL-12$0$0No
Joe CourtneyDCT-2$0$0No
Chip CravaackRMN-8$0$0No
Eric CrawfordRAR-1$0$0No
Ander CrenshawRFL-4$0$0No
Mark CritzDPA-12$0$0Yes
Joe CrowleyDNY-7$0$0No
Henry CuellarDTX-28$0$0No
John CulbersonRTX-7$0$0No
Elijah CummingsDMD-7$0$0No
Danny DavisDIL-7$0$0No
Geoff DavisRKY-4$0$0No
Susan DavisDCA-53$0$0No
Peter DeFazioDOR-4$0$0No
Diana DeGetteDCO-1$0$0No
Rosa DeLauroDCT-3$0$0No
Jeff DenhamRCA-19$0$0No
Charlie DentRPA-15$0$0No
Scott DesJarlaisRTN-4$0$0No
Theodore DeutchDFL-19$0$0No
Mario Diaz-BalartRFL-21$0$0No
Norm DicksDWA-6$0$0No
John DingellDMI-15$0$0No
Lloyd DoggettDTX-25$0$0No
Bob DoldRIL-10$0$0No
Joe DonnellyDIN-2$0$0No
Mike DoyleDPA-14$0$0No
David DreierRCA-26$0$0No
Sean DuffyRWI-7$0$0Yes
Jeff DuncanRSC-3$0$0No
John "Jimmy" DuncanRTN-2$0$0Yes
Donna EdwardsDMD-4$0$0Yes
Keith EllisonDMN-5$0$0Yes
Renee EllmersRNC-2$0$0Yes
Jo Ann EmersonRMO-8$0$0Yes
Eliot EngelDNY-17$0$0Yes
Anna EshooDCA-14$0$0No
Blake FarentholdRTX-27$0$0No
Sam FarrDCA-17$0$0No
Chaka FattahDPA-2$0$0No
Bob FilnerDCA-51$0$0Yes
Stephen FincherRTN-8$0$0No
Mike FitzpatrickRPA-8$0$0No
Jeff FlakeRAZ-6$0$0No
Charles FleischmannRTN-3$0$0No
John FlemingRLA-4$0$0No
Bill FloresRTX-17$0$0No
J. "Randy" ForbesRVA-4$0$0No
Jeff FortenberryRNE-1$0$0No
Virginia FoxxRNC-5$0$0No
Barney FrankDMA-4$0$0No
Trent FranksRAZ-2$0$0Yes
Rodney FrelinghuysenRNJ-11$0$0No
Marcia FudgeDOH-11$0$0Yes
Elton GalleglyRCA-24$0$0No
John GaramendiDCA-10$0$0Yes
Cory GardnerRCO-4$0$0No
Ernest Scott GarrettRNJ-5$0$0Yes
Jim GerlachRPA-6$0$0No
Bob GibbsROH-18$0$0No
Christopher GibsonRNY-20$0$0Yes
Gabrielle GiffordsDAZ-8$0$0Not Voting
John "Phil" GingreyRGA-11$0$0Not Voting
Louie GohmertRTX-1$0$0No
Charlie GonzalezDTX-20$0$0Yes
Bob GoodlatteRVA-6$0$0No
Paul GosarRAZ-1$0$0Yes
Trey GowdyRSC-4$0$0No
Kay GrangerRTX-12$0$0No
Sam GravesRMO-6$0$0No
John "Tom" GravesRGA-9$0$0No
Al GreenDTX-9$0$0No
Raymond "Gene" GreenDTX-29$0$0Yes
Tim GriffinRAR-2$0$0No
H. GriffithRVA-9$0$0No
Raúl GrijalvaDAZ-7$0$0Not Voting
Michael GrimmRNY-13$0$0No
Frank GuintaRNH-1$0$0No
Steven Brett GuthrieRKY-2$0$0No
Luis GutiérrezDIL-4$0$0No
Ralph HallRTX-4$0$0No
Colleen HanabusaDHI-1$0$0No
Richard HannaRNY-24$0$0No
Gregg HarperRMS-3$0$0No
Andy HarrisRMD-1$0$0No
Vicky HartzlerRMO-4$0$0Yes
Alcee HastingsDFL-23$0$0No
Richard "Doc" HastingsRWA-4$0$0No
Nan HayworthRNY-19$0$0No
Joseph HeckRNV-3$0$0No
Martin HeinrichDNM-1$0$0No
Jeb HensarlingRTX-5$0$0No
Wally HergerRCA-2$0$0No
Jaime Herrera BeutlerRWA-3$0$0No
Brian HigginsDNY-27$0$0No
Jim HimesDCT-4$0$0No
Maurice HincheyDNY-22$0$0Yes
Rubén HinojosaDTX-15$0$0No
Mazie HironoDHI-2$0$0Yes
Kathy HochulDNY-26$0$0No
Thomas "Tim" HoldenDPA-17$0$0Not Voting
Rush HoltDNJ-12$0$0No
Mike HondaDCA-15$0$0No
Steny H. HoyerDMD-5$0$0No
Tim HuelskampRKS-1$0$0Yes
Bill HuizengaRMI-2$0$0No
Randy HultgrenRIL-14$0$0Yes
Duncan HunterRCA-52$0$0Yes
Robert HurtRVA-5$0$0No
Jay InsleeDWA-1$0$0No
Steve IsraelDNY-2$0$0No
Darrell IssaRCA-49$0$0No
Sheila Jackson LeeDTX-18$0$0No
Jesse JacksonDIL-2$0$0Yes
Lynn JenkinsRKS-2$0$0No
Bill JohnsonROH-6$0$0No
Eddie Bernice JohnsonDTX-30$0$0No
Henry "Hank" JohnsonDGA-4$0$0No
Sam JohnsonRTX-3$0$0No
Tim JohnsonRIL-15$0$0No
Walter JonesRNC-3$0$0Yes
Jim JordanROH-4$0$0No
Marcy KapturDOH-9$0$0Yes
William KeatingDMA-10$0$0No
Mike KellyRPA-3$0$0No
Dale KildeeDMI-5$0$0Yes
Ron KindDWI-3$0$0Yes
Pete KingRNY-3$0$0No
Steve KingRIA-5$0$0Yes
Jack KingstonRGA-1$0$0No
Adam KinzingerRIL-11$0$0No
Larry KissellDNC-8$0$0No
John KlineRMN-2$0$0No
Dennis KucinichDOH-10$0$0Yes
Steve LaTouretteROH-14$0$0No
Raúl LabradorRID-1$0$0No
Doug LambornRCO-5$0$0No
Leonard LanceRNJ-7$0$0No
Jeff LandryRLA-3$0$0No
Jim LangevinDRI-2$0$0No
James LankfordROK-5$0$0No
Rick LarsenDWA-2$0$0No
John LarsonDCT-1$0$0Yes
Tom LathamRIA-4$0$0No
Bob LattaROH-5$0$0No
Barbara LeeDCA-9$0$0Yes
Sandy LevinDMI-12$0$0No
Charles "Jerry" LewisRCA-41$0$0No
John LewisDGA-5$0$0No
Dan LipinskiDIL-3$0$0No
Frank LoBiondoRNJ-2$0$0No
Dave LoebsackDIA-2$0$0No
Zoe LofgrenDCA-16$0$0No
Billy LongRMO-7$0$0Yes
Nita LoweyDNY-18$0$0No
Frank LucasROK-3$0$0No
Blaine LuetkemeyerRMO-9$0$0No
Ben Ray LujánDNM-3$0$0No
Cynthia LummisRWY$0$0Yes
Dan LungrenRCA-3$0$0No
Stephen LynchDMA-9$0$0No
Connie MackRFL-14$0$0No
Carolyn MaloneyDNY-14$0$0No
Don ManzulloRIL-16$0$0Yes
Kenny MarchantRTX-24$0$0No
Tom MarinoRPA-10$0$0No
Ed MarkeyDMA-7$0$0No
Jim MathesonDUT-2$0$0No
Doris MatsuiDCA-5$0$0No
Carolyn McCarthyDNY-4$0$0No
Kevin McCarthyRCA-22$0$0No
Michael McCaulRTX-10$0$0No
Tom McClintockRCA-4$0$0Yes
Betty McCollumDMN-4$0$0No
Thaddeus McCotterRMI-11$0$0No
Jim McDermottDWA-7$0$0No
Jim McGovernDMA-3$0$0No
Patrick McHenryRNC-10$0$0No
Douglas "Mike" McIntyreDNC-7$0$0No
Howard P. "Buck" McKeonRCA-25$0$0No
David McKinleyRWV-1$0$0No
Cathy McMorris RodgersRWA-5$0$0No
Jerry McNerneyDCA-11$0$0Yes
Patrick MeehanRPA-7$0$0No
Gregory MeeksDNY-6$0$0No
John MicaRFL-7$0$0No
Mike MichaudDME-2$0$0No
Candice MillerRMI-10$0$0No
Gary MillerRCA-42$0$0No
George MillerDCA-7$0$0No
Jeff MillerRFL-1$0$0No
R. "Brad" MillerDNC-13$0$0No
Gwen MooreDWI-4$0$0Yes
Jim MoranDVA-8$0$0No
Mick MulvaneyRSC-5$0$0No
Chris MurphyDCT-5$0$0No
Tim MurphyRPA-18$0$0No
Sue MyrickRNC-9$0$0No
Jerry NadlerDNY-8$0$0No
Grace NapolitanoDCA-38$0$0Not Voting
Richard NealDMA-2$0$0No
Robert "Randy" NeugebauerRTX-19$0$0No
Kristi NoemRSD$0$0No
Richard NugentRFL-5$0$0No
Devin NunesRCA-21$0$0No
Alan NunneleeRMS-1$0$0No
Pete OlsonRTX-22$0$0No
John OlverDMA-1$0$0No
Bill OwensDNY-23$0$0No
Steven PalazzoRMS-4$0$0No
Frank PalloneDNJ-6$0$0No
Bill PascrellDNJ-8$0$0No
Ed PastorDAZ-4$0$0No
Ron PaulRTX-14$0$0No
Erik PaulsenRMN-3$0$0No
Donald PayneDNJ-10$0$0Yes
Steve PearceRNM-2$0$0Yes
Nancy PelosiDCA-8$0$0No
Mike PenceRIN-6$0$0No
Ed PerlmutterDCO-7$0$0No
Gary PetersDMI-9$0$0No
Collin PetersonDMN-7$0$0No
Tom PetriRWI-6$0$0Yes
Rochelle "Chellie" PingreeDME-1$0$0Yes
Joe PittsRPA-16$0$0No
Todd PlattsRPA-19$0$0No
Lloyd "Ted" PoeRTX-2$0$0No
Jared PolisDCO-2$0$0Yes
Mike PompeoRKS-4$0$0No
Bill PoseyRFL-15$0$0Yes
David PriceDNC-4$0$0No
Tom PriceRGA-6$0$0No
Ben QuayleRAZ-3$0$0No
Mike QuigleyDIL-5$0$0Yes
Nick RahallDWV-3$0$0No
Charlie RangelDNY-15$0$0Not Voting
Tom ReedRNY-29$0$0No
Denny RehbergRMT$0$0Yes
David ReichertRWA-8$0$0No
James RenacciROH-16$0$0No
Silvestre ReyesDTX-16$0$0No
Reid RibbleRWI-8$0$0Yes
Laura RichardsonDCA-37$0$0No
Cedric RichmondDLA-2$0$0No
Edward RigellRVA-2$0$0No
David RiveraRFL-25$0$0No
Martha RobyRAL-2$0$0No
David "Phil" RoeRTN-1$0$0No
Harold "Hal" RogersRKY-5$0$0No
Mike D. RogersRAL-3$0$0No
Mike RogersRMI-8$0$0No
Dana RohrabacherRCA-46$0$0Yes
Todd RokitaRIN-4$0$0No
Tom RooneyRFL-16$0$0No
Ileana Ros-LehtinenRFL-18$0$0No
Peter RoskamRIL-6$0$0No
Dennis RossRFL-12$0$0No
Mike RossDAR-4$0$0No
Steve RothmanDNJ-9$0$0No
Lucille Roybal-AllardDCA-34$0$0No
Ed RoyceRCA-40$0$0Yes
Jon RunyanRNJ-3$0$0No
C.A. "Dutch" RuppersbergerDMD-2$0$0No
Bobby RushDIL-1$0$0Yes
Paul RyanRWI-1$0$0Yes
Tim RyanDOH-17$0$0No
Loretta SanchezDCA-47$0$0Yes
John SarbanesDMD-3$0$0No
Steve ScaliseRLA-1$0$0No
Jan SchakowskyDIL-9$0$0No
Adam SchiffDCA-29$0$0Yes
Robert SchillingRIL-17$0$0Yes
Jeannette "Jean" SchmidtROH-2$0$0No
Aaron SchockRIL-18$0$0No
Kurt SchraderDOR-5$0$0Yes
Allyson SchwartzDPA-13$0$0No
David SchweikertRAZ-5$0$0No
Austin ScottRGA-8$0$0No
David ScottDGA-13$0$0No
Bobby ScottDVA-3$0$0No
Tim ScottRSC-1$0$0No
F. "Jim" SensenbrennerRWI-5$0$0Yes
José SerranoDNY-16$0$0No
Pete SessionsRTX-32$0$0No
Terri SewellDAL-7$0$0No
Brad ShermanDCA-27$0$0No
John ShimkusRIL-19$0$0No
Joseph Heath ShulerDNC-11$0$0No
Bill ShusterRPA-9$0$0No
Mike SimpsonRID-2$0$0No
Albio SiresDNJ-13$0$0No
Louise SlaughterDNY-28$0$0No
David Adam SmithDWA-9$0$0No
Adrian SmithRNE-3$0$0No
Chris SmithRNJ-4$0$0No
Lamar SmithRTX-21$0$0No
Steve SoutherlandRFL-2$0$0Yes
Karen "Jackie" SpeierDCA-12$0$0No
Fortney "Pete" StarkDCA-13$0$0Yes
Cliff StearnsRFL-6$0$0No
Steve StiversROH-15$0$0Not Voting
Marlin StutzmanRIN-3$0$0No
John SullivanROK-1$0$0No
Betty SuttonDOH-13$0$0No
Linda SánchezDCA-39$0$0Yes
Lee TerryRNE-2$0$0Yes
Bennie ThompsonDMS-2$0$0No
Glenn ThompsonRPA-5$0$0No
C. Mike ThompsonDCA-1$0$0No
William "Mac" ThornberryRTX-13$0$0No
Pat TiberiROH-12$0$0No
John TierneyDMA-6$0$0No
Scott TiptonRCO-3$0$0No
Paul TonkoDNY-21$0$0No
Ed TownsDNY-10$0$0Yes
Niki TsongasDMA-5$0$0No
Mike TurnerROH-3$0$0Yes
Fred UptonRMI-6$0$0No
Chris Van HollenDMD-8$0$0No
Nydia VelázquezDNY-12$0$0No
Pete ViscloskyDIN-1$0$0No
Tim WalbergRMI-7$0$0No
Greg WaldenROR-2$0$0No
Joe WalshRIL-8$0$0No
Tim WalzDMN-1$0$0No
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDFL-20$0$0No
Maxine WatersDCA-35$0$0Yes
Mel WattDNC-12$0$0No
Henry WaxmanDCA-30$0$0No
Daniel WebsterRFL-8$0$0Yes
Peter WelchDVT$0$0No
Allen WestRFL-22$0$0Yes
Lynn WestmorelandRGA-3$0$0No
Ed WhitfieldRKY-1$0$0No
Frederica WilsonDFL-17$0$0No
Addison "Joe" WilsonRSC-2$0$0No
Robert WittmanRVA-1$0$0No
Frank WolfRVA-10$0$0No
Steve WomackRAR-3$0$0No
Rob WoodallRGA-7$0$0Yes
Lynn WoolseyDCA-6$0$0Yes
David WuDOR-1$0$0Yes
John YarmuthDKY-3$0$0Yes
Kevin YoderRKS-3$0$0No
C. W. "Bill" YoungRFL-10$0$0No
Don YoungRAK$0$0No
Todd YoungRIN-9$0$0No

Interest Groups that supported this amendment

$ Donated

Interest Groups that opposed this amendment

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range