H. Amdt. 1469 - Amendment to Make It Clear That the Definition of Significant Regulatory Action Would Include New Treasury Regulations Regarding Non-Resident Alien Deposits.

112th Congress (2011-2012) View amendment details
Sponsor:
This is an amendment to H.R. 4078 - Red Tape Reduction and Small Business Job Creation Act
House Vote: Amendment 23 to H.R. 4078

PASSED on July 26, 2012.

1/2 required to pass

voted YES: 251 voted NO: 165
16 voted present/not voting

Red Tape Reduction and Small Business Job Creation Act

H.R. 4078 — 112th Congress (2011–2012)

Summary
To provide that no agency may take any significant regulatory action until the unemployment rate is equal to or less than 6.0 percent. (by CRS)
Learn More
At OpenCongress
Title
To provide that no agency may take any significant regulatory action until the unemployment rate is equal to or less than 6.0 percent.
Other Titles
  • Regulatory Freeze for Jobs Act of 2012
  • Regulatory Freeze for Jobs Act of 2012
  • Red Tape Reduction and Small Business Job Creation Act
  • Midnight Rule Relief Act of 2012
  • RAPID Act
  • Regulatory Freeze for Jobs Act of 2012
  • Responsibly And Professionally Invigorating Development Act of 2012
  • SEC Regulatory Accountability Act
  • Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2012
  • Tracking the Cost to Taxpayers of Federal Litigation Act
  • Unfunded Mandates Information and Transparency Act of 2012
Sponsor
Tim Griffin
Co-Sponsors
Subjects
  • Government operations and politics
  • Administrative law and regulatory procedures
  • Civil actions and liability
  • Congressional oversight
  • Economic performance and conditions
  • Government liability
  • Judicial review and appeals
  • Legal fees and court costs
  • Small business
  • Unemployment
Related Bills
Major Actions
Introduced2/17/2012
Referred to Committee
Amendments (23 proposed)
Passed House7/26/2012
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteHouseAmendment 1 to H.R. 40787/25/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
188 voted YES 231 voted NO 13 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 2 to H.R. 40787/25/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
159 voted YES 259 voted NO 14 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 3 to H.R. 40787/25/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
173 voted YES 245 voted NO 14 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 4 to H.R. 40787/25/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
174 voted YES 242 voted NO 16 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 5 to H.R. 40787/25/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
177 voted YES 240 voted NO 15 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Schweikert amendment (A014) Agreed to by voice vote.7/26/2012PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Manzullo amendment (A021) Agreed to by voice vote.7/26/2012PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Lummis amendment (A022) Agreed to by voice vote.7/26/2012PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseAmendment 6 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
177 voted YES 244 voted NO 11 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 7 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
177 voted YES 238 voted NO 17 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 8 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
170 voted YES 247 voted NO 15 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 9 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
173 voted YES 246 voted NO 13 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 10 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
179 voted YES 234 voted NO 19 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 11 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment PASSED the House
248 voted YES 171 voted NO 13 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 12 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
176 voted YES 243 voted NO 13 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 13 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment PASSED the House
240 voted YES 178 voted NO 14 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 15 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
174 voted YES 239 voted NO 19 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 16 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
178 voted YES 236 voted NO 18 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 17 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
171 voted YES 247 voted NO 14 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 18 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment PASSED the House
251 voted YES 166 voted NO 15 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 19 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment PASSED the House
245 voted YES 171 voted NO 16 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseAmendment 20 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
173 voted YES 243 voted NO 16 voted present/not voting
currently selectedHouseAmendment 23 to H.R. 40787/26/2012This amendment PASSED the House
251 voted YES 165 voted NO 16 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseOn Motion to Recommit with Instructions: H.R. 4078 To provide that no agency may take any significant regulatory action until the unemployment rate is equal to or less than 6.0 percent7/26/2012This motion DID NOT PASS the House
181 voted YES 234 voted NO 17 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseOn Passage - House - H.R. 4078 To provide that no agency may take any significant regulatory action until the unemployment rate is equal to or less than 6.0 percent7/26/2012This bill PASSED the House
245 voted YES 172 voted NO 15 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced2/17/2012
2/17/2012Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
2/17/2012Referred to House Oversight and Government Reform
2/17/2012Referred to House Judiciary
2/23/2012Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law.
2/27/2012Subcommittee Hearings Held.
3/15/2012Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law Discharged.
3/20/2012Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Put on a legislative calendar3/20/2012Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 13.
4/26/2012Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Put on a legislative calendar4/26/2012Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 16.
4/27/2012Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 112-461, Part I.
7/19/2012Mr. Jordan asked unanimous consent that the Committee on Oversight and Government have until midnight on July 20 to file a report on H.R. 4078. Agreed to without objection.
7/20/2012Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 112-461, Part II.
Put on a legislative calendar7/20/2012Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 446.
7/25/2012Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 738.
7/25/2012The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4078 and H.R. 6082. H.R. 4078 is accorded 2 hours of general debate and H.R. 6082 is accorded 1 hour of general debate. For H.R. 4078, specified amendments printed in Part B of the report are in order and for H.R. 6082, specified amendments printed in Part C are in order. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit with or without instructions for each bill.
7/25/2012House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 738 and Rule XVIII.
7/25/2012The Speaker designated the Honorable Candice S. Miller to act as Chairwoman of the Committee.
7/25/2012GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with two hours of general debate on H.R. 4078.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hastings(FL) amendment No. 1
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hastings (FL) amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hastings (FL) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Johnson (GA) amendment No. 2.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Johnson(GA) amendment No. 2, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Johnson(GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kucinich amendment No. 3.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kucinich amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Kucinich demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Welch (VT) amendment No. 4.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Welch (VT) amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Welch (VT) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Markey amendment No. 5.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Markey amendment No. 5, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Markey demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
7/25/2012Mr. Griffin (AR) moved that the Committee now rise.
7/25/2012On motion that the Committee now rise Agreed to by voice vote.
7/25/2012Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4078 as unfinished business.
7/25/2012Considered as unfinished business.
7/25/2012The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Watt amendment No. 6.
7/25/2012Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 741 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4078 with 1 hour of general debate. The resolution provides that the amendment to H.R. 4078 printed in section 2 of the resolution shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. The resolution does not provide any waivers.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - the conclusion of debate on the Watt amendment No. 6, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Watt demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Loebsack amendment No. 7.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Loebsack amendment No. 7, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Loebsack demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Richardson amendment No. 8.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Richardson amendment No. 8, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Richardson demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Richardson amendment No. 9.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Richardson amendment No. 9, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Richardson demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment No. 10.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment No. 10, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Connollly (VA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Posey amendment No. 11.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Posey (FL) amendment No. 11, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Posey (FL) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Nadler amendment No. 12.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Nadler (NY) amendment No. 12, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Nadler (NY) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McKinley amendment No. 13.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the McKinley (WV amendment No. 12, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McKinley (WV) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Schweikert (AZ) amendment No. 14.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the George Miller (CA) amendment No. 15.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the George Miller (CA) amendment No. 15, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. George Miller (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Woolsey amendment No. 16.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Woolsey (CA) amendment No. 16, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Woolsey (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Waters amendment No. 18.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Waters (CA) amendment No. 18, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Waters (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fitzpatrick (PA) amendment No. 19.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Fitzpatrick (PA) amendment No. 19, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Frank (MA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Posey amendment No. 20.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Posey (FL) amendment No. 20, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Cummings demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Maloney (NY) amendment No. 21.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Maloney (NY) amendment No. 21, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Maloney (NY) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Manzullo amendment No. 22.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lummis amendment No. 23.
7/25/2012DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 738, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Posey amendment No. 25.
7/25/2012POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Posey (FL) amendment No. 25, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Frank (MA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7/25/2012Mr. Lankford moved that the Committee rise.
7/25/2012On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
select this voteVote7/25/2012Amendment 1 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/25/2012Amendment 2 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/25/2012Amendment 3 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/25/2012Amendment 4 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/25/2012Amendment 5 to H.R. 4078
7/25/2012Amendment (A001) offered by Mr. Hastings (FL).
7/25/2012Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Johnson (GA).
7/25/2012Amendment (A003) offered by Mr. Kucinich.
7/25/2012Amendment (A004) offered by Mr. Welch.
7/25/2012Amendment (A005) offered by Mr. Markey.
7/25/2012Amendment (A006) offered by Mr. Watt.
7/25/2012Amendment (A007) offered by Mr. Loebsack.
7/25/2012Amendment (A008) offered by Ms. Richardson.
7/25/2012Amendment (A009) offered by Ms. Richardson.
7/25/2012Amendment (A010) offered by Mr. Connolly (VA).
7/25/2012Amendment (A011) offered by Mr. Posey.
7/26/2012Amendment (A012) offered by Mr. Nadler.
7/26/2012Rule H. Res. 741 passed House.
7/26/2012Considered as unfinished business.
7/26/2012The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
7/26/2012UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
7/26/2012The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4078.
7/26/2012The previous question was ordered without objection.
7/26/2012The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR 07/25/2012 H5244-5251)
7/26/2012Ms. Sutton moved to recommit with instructions to Oversight and Government.
7/26/2012DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Sutton motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to prohibit the underlying bill from imposing any limitation on agency action that would require the disclosure of a foreign financial account, including a bank account; implement tax cuts for middle class American families; protect against Asian Carp and other invasive species; ensure the safety of prescription drugs; or provide foreclosure relief and curb predatory practices by bank and non-bank subprime lenders.
7/26/2012The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
7/26/2012Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
7/26/2012Amendment (A013) offered by Mr. McKinley.
7/26/2012Amendment (A014) offered by Mr. Schweikert.
select this voteVote7/26/2012On agreeing to the Schweikert amendment (A014) Agreed to by voice vote.
7/26/2012Amendment (A015) offered by Mr. Miller, George.
7/26/2012Amendment (A016) offered by Ms. Woolsey.
7/26/2012Amendment (A017) offered by Ms. Waters.
7/26/2012Amendment (A018) offered by Mr. Fitzpatrick.
7/26/2012Amendment (A019) offered by Mr. Posey.
7/26/2012Amendment (A020) offered by Mrs. Maloney.
7/26/2012Amendment (A021) offered by Mr. Manzullo.
select this voteVote7/26/2012On agreeing to the Manzullo amendment (A021) Agreed to by voice vote.
7/26/2012Amendment (A022) offered by Mrs. Lummis.
select this voteVote7/26/2012On agreeing to the Lummis amendment (A022) Agreed to by voice vote.
7/26/2012Amendment (A023) offered by Mr. Posey.
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 6 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 7 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 8 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 9 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 10 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 11 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 12 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 13 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 15 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 16 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 17 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 18 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 19 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012Amendment 20 to H.R. 4078
currently selectedVote7/26/2012Amendment 23 to H.R. 4078
select this voteVote7/26/2012On Motion to Recommit with Instructions: H.R. 4078 To provide that no agency may take any significant regulatory action until the unemployment rate is equal to or less than 6.0 percent
select this voteHouse Vote on Passage7/26/2012On Passage - House - H.R. 4078 To provide that no agency may take any significant regulatory action until the unemployment rate is equal to or less than 6.0 percent
7/30/2012Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Put on a legislative calendar7/31/2012Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 477.
NumberSponsorDate OfferedStatus
select this voteH. Amdt. 1447Hastings, Alcee [D-FL20]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 25, 2012.

Amendment sought to provide an exception to the underlying legislation, permitting agencies to make regulatory actions intended to ensure safe drinking water.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1448Johnson, Henry [D-GA4]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 25, 2012.

Amendment sought to exempt regulatory actions pertaining to privacy from Title I of the bill and exempts midnight rules pertaining to privacy from Title II of the bill; and sought to exempt consent decrees and settlement agreements in an action to compel agency action pertaining to privacy from Title III of the bill.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1449Kucinich, Dennis [D-OH10]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 25, 2012.

Amendment sought to exempt from the provisions of the bill any significant regulatory action specifically aimed at limiting oil speculation.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1450Welch, Peter [D-VT]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 25, 2012.

Amendment sought to provide an exception for regulations which are intended to promote energy efficiency.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1451Markey, Edward [D-MA]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 25, 2012.

An amendment numbered 5 printed in Part B of House Report 112-616 to allow regulations protecting the public from extreme weather, including drought, flooding and catastrophic wildfire, to go forward despite the prohibitions in the underlying bill.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1452Watt, Melvin [D-NC12]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to exempt regulatory actions by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that streamline the application process for patents and trademarks, including rules implementing the micro entity provision of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, from Title I of the bill and exempts midnight rules implementing such provisions from Title II of the bill. The amendment also sought to exempt consent decrees and settlement agreements in an action to compel agency action by the PTO to help streamline the application process for patents and trademarks from Title III of the bill.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1453Loebsack, David [D-IA2]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to allow actions that would lower prices for gasoline, diesel, oil, or other motor fuels.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1454Richardson, Laura [D-CA37]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to ensure that the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the health provisions of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 can be carried out.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1455Richardson, Laura [D-CA37]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to allow regulations that protect consumers under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1456Connolly, Gerald [D-VA11]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to clarify the procedure for considering a request for a congressional waiver by the President.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1457Posey, Bill [R-FL8]July 25, 2012Passed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment to require that awarded attorney's fees and costs for small businesses in Title I would be paid out of the administrative budget of the office in the agency that proposed the regulation.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1458Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY10]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to exempt issues relating to nuclear power plants from the obstacles to establishing safety protections in the following titles of H.R. 4078: Title I (Regulatory Freeze for Jobs Act); Title III (Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act); Title V (Responsibly and Professionally Invigorating Development (RAPID) Act.).

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1459McKinley, David [R-WV1]July 25, 2012Passed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment to reduce the term significant regulatory action from $100,000,000 or more to $50,000,000 or more in annual cost to the economy. This amendment would allow for more oversight on Federal Agency Regulations by lowering the dollar amount threshold.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1460Schweikert, David [R-AZ6]July 25, 2012Passed by voice vote on July 25, 2012.

Amendment to define annual cost to the economy as being inclusive of business revenue, so that determination of the bills application shall be accurately applied.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1461Miller, George [D-CA11]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to exempt from the definition of significant regulatory action a rule that would prevent or reduce deaths or injuries caused by explosions and fires related to the ignition of combustible dusts in the workplace.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1462Woolsey, Lynn [D-CA6]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to exempt from the definition of significant regulatory action a rule that would prevent or reduce the number of workers suffering electrocutions or other fatalities associated with working on high voltage transmission and distribution lines.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1463Waters, Maxine [D-CA43]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment to authorize appropriations (1) to enable the SEC and CFTC to carry out the additional cost/benefit analysis requirements under the bill; (2) for costs of litigation incurred by the Commissions related to the requirements under the bill.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1464Fitzpatrick, Michael [R-PA8]July 25, 2012Passed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment to direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to take into account the large burden of section 404b of Sarbanes-Oxley on companies with a public float less than $250 million, compared to the benefit.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1465Posey, Bill [R-FL8]July 25, 2012Passed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to keep the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from enforcing or issuing interpretive guidance on climate change.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1466Maloney, Carolyn [D-NY12]July 25, 2012Failed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment sought to mandate that Title VI cannot take effect until the Chair of the SEC certifies that in conducting the cost benefit analysis no resources will be diverted away from the SECs mission to protect investors, maintain efficient markets and promote access to capital.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1467Manzullo, Donald [R-IL16]July 25, 2012Passed by voice vote on July 25, 2012.

Amendment to require each Federal agency to submit and obtain approval from the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of scientific information relied upon by the agency.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 1468Lummis, Cynthia [R-WY]July 25, 2012Passed by voice vote on July 25, 2012.

Amendment to add a new Title to the bill requiring the tracking and reporting of all payments issued pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Would establish a publicly available, online searchable database to access information regarding EAJA payments and the parties involved in the adjudicatory action leading to an EAJA payment.

Show amendment details

currently selectedH. Amdt. 1469Posey, Bill [R-FL8]July 25, 2012Passed by roll call vote on July 26, 2012.

Amendment to make it clear that the definition of significant regulatory action would include new Treasury regulations regarding non-resident alien deposits.

Actions

July 25, 2012, 9:47 pm ET - Amendment (A023) offered by Mr. Posey.
July 26, 2012, 8:12 am ET - Amendment 23 to H.R. 4078

Full Text of this Amendment

The text of this amendment is not available.

MapLight did not identify any interest groups that took a position on this vote.
You may be able to explore campaign contributions data if you add interest groups.

0 Organizations Supported and 0 Opposed

Organizations that took a position on
Red Tape Reduction and Small Business Job Creation Act: Amendment 23 to H.R. 4078

0 organizations supported this amendment

0 organizations opposed this amendment

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of House members in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2011 – December 31, 2012.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
Show All
NamePartyState$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
Gary AckermanDNY-5$0$0Not Voting
Sandy AdamsRFL-24$0$0Yes
Robert AderholtRAL-4$0$0Yes
W. Todd AkinRMO-2$0$0Not Voting
Rodney AlexanderRLA-5$0$0Yes
Jason AltmireDPA-4$0$0No
Justin AmashRMI-3$0$0Yes
Mark AmodeiRNV-2$0$0Yes
Rob AndrewsDNJ-1$0$0No
Steve AustriaROH-7$0$0Yes
Joe BacaDCA-43$0$0No
Michele BachmannRMN-6$0$0Yes
Spencer BachusRAL-6$0$0Yes
Tammy BaldwinDWI-2$0$0No
Ron BarberDAZ-8$0$0No
Lou BarlettaRPA-11$0$0Yes
John BarrowDGA-12$0$0No
Roscoe BartlettRMD-6$0$0Yes
Joe BartonRTX-6$0$0Yes
Charlie BassRNH-2$0$0No
Karen BassDCA-33$0$0No
Xavier BecerraDCA-31$0$0No
Dan BenishekRMI-1$0$0Yes
Rick BergRND$0$0Yes
Rochelle "Shelley" BerkleyDNV-1$0$0No
Howard BermanDCA-28$0$0No
Judy BiggertRIL-13$0$0Yes
Brian BilbrayRCA-50$0$0Yes
Gus BilirakisRFL-9$0$0Yes
Rob BishopRUT-1$0$0Yes
Sanford BishopDGA-2$0$0No
Tim BishopDNY-1$0$0No
Diane BlackRTN-6$0$0Yes
Marsha BlackburnRTN-7$0$0Yes
Earl BlumenauerDOR-3$0$0No
John A. BoehnerROH-8$0$0Not Voting
Suzanne BonamiciDOR-1$0$0No
Jo BonnerRAL-1$0$0Yes
Mary Bono MackRCA-45$0$0Yes
Dan BorenDOK-2$0$0Yes
Leonard BoswellDIA-3$0$0No
Charles BoustanyRLA-7$0$0Yes
Kevin BradyRTX-8$0$0Yes
Bob BradyDPA-1$0$0No
Bruce BraleyDIA-1$0$0No
Mo BrooksRAL-5$0$0Yes
Paul BrounRGA-10$0$0No
Corrine BrownDFL-3$0$0No
Vern BuchananRFL-13$0$0Yes
Larry BucshonRIN-8$0$0Yes
Ann Marie BuerkleRNY-25$0$0Yes
Michael BurgessRTX-26$0$0Yes
Dan BurtonRIN-5$0$0Yes
George "G.K." ButterfieldDNC-1$0$0Not Voting
Ken CalvertRCA-44$0$0Yes
Dave CampRMI-4$0$0Yes
John CampbellRCA-48$0$0Yes
Francisco CansecoRTX-23$0$0Yes
Eric CantorRVA-7$0$0Yes
Shelley CapitoRWV-2$0$0Yes
Lois CappsDCA-23$0$0No
Mike CapuanoDMA-8$0$0No
Dennis CardozaDCA-18$0$0Not Voting
John "Russ" CarnahanDMO-3$0$0No
John CarneyDDE$0$0No
André CarsonDIN-7$0$0No
John CarterRTX-31$0$0Yes
Bill CassidyRLA-6$0$0Yes
Kathy CastorDFL-11$0$0Yes
Steve ChabotROH-1$0$0Yes
Jason ChaffetzRUT-3$0$0Yes
Albert "Ben" ChandlerDKY-6$0$0Yes
Judy ChuDCA-32$0$0No
David CicillineDRI-1$0$0No
Hansen ClarkeDMI-13$0$0No
Yvette ClarkeDNY-11$0$0No
William Lacy ClayDMO-1$0$0No
Emanuel CleaverDMO-5$0$0No
Jim ClyburnDSC-6$0$0No
John Howard CobleRNC-6$0$0Yes
Mike CoffmanRCO-6$0$0Yes
Steve CohenDTN-9$0$0No
Tom ColeROK-4$0$0Yes
K. "Mike" ConawayRTX-11$0$0Yes
Gerry ConnollyDVA-11$0$0No
John ConyersDMI-14$0$0No
Jim CooperDTN-5$0$0No
Jim CostaDCA-20$0$0No
Jerry CostelloDIL-12$0$0No
Joe CourtneyDCT-2$0$0No
Chip CravaackRMN-8$0$0Yes
Eric CrawfordRAR-1$0$0Yes
Ander CrenshawRFL-4$0$0Yes
Mark CritzDPA-12$0$0No
Joe CrowleyDNY-7$0$0No
Henry CuellarDTX-28$0$0Yes
John CulbersonRTX-7$0$0Not Voting
Elijah CummingsDMD-7$0$0No
Danny DavisDIL-7$0$0Not Voting
Geoff DavisRKY-4$0$0Yes
Susan DavisDCA-53$0$0No
Peter DeFazioDOR-4$0$0No
Diana DeGetteDCO-1$0$0No
Rosa DeLauroDCT-3$0$0No
Jeff DenhamRCA-19$0$0Yes
Charlie DentRPA-15$0$0Yes
Scott DesJarlaisRTN-4$0$0Yes
Theodore DeutchDFL-19$0$0Yes
Mario Diaz-BalartRFL-21$0$0Yes
Norm DicksDWA-6$0$0No
John DingellDMI-15$0$0No
Lloyd DoggettDTX-25$0$0No
Bob DoldRIL-10$0$0Yes
Joe DonnellyDIN-2$0$0Yes
Mike DoyleDPA-14$0$0No
David DreierRCA-26$0$0Yes
Sean DuffyRWI-7$0$0Yes
Jeff DuncanRSC-3$0$0Yes
John "Jimmy" DuncanRTN-2$0$0Yes
Donna EdwardsDMD-4$0$0No
Keith EllisonDMN-5$0$0No
Renee EllmersRNC-2$0$0Yes
Jo Ann EmersonRMO-8$0$0Yes
Eliot EngelDNY-17$0$0No
Anna EshooDCA-14$0$0No
Blake FarentholdRTX-27$0$0Yes
Sam FarrDCA-17$0$0No
Chaka FattahDPA-2$0$0Not Voting
Bob FilnerDCA-51$0$0No
Stephen FincherRTN-8$0$0Yes
Mike FitzpatrickRPA-8$0$0Yes
Jeff FlakeRAZ-6$0$0Yes
Charles FleischmannRTN-3$0$0Yes
John FlemingRLA-4$0$0Yes
Bill FloresRTX-17$0$0Yes
J. "Randy" ForbesRVA-4$0$0Yes
Jeff FortenberryRNE-1$0$0Yes
Virginia FoxxRNC-5$0$0Yes
Barney FrankDMA-4$0$0No
Trent FranksRAZ-2$0$0Yes
Rodney FrelinghuysenRNJ-11$0$0Yes
Marcia FudgeDOH-11$0$0No
Elton GalleglyRCA-24$0$0Yes
John GaramendiDCA-10$0$0No
Cory GardnerRCO-4$0$0Yes
Ernest Scott GarrettRNJ-5$0$0Yes
Jim GerlachRPA-6$0$0Yes
Bob GibbsROH-18$0$0Yes
Christopher GibsonRNY-20$0$0Yes
John "Phil" GingreyRGA-11$0$0Yes
Louie GohmertRTX-1$0$0Yes
Charlie GonzalezDTX-20$0$0No
Bob GoodlatteRVA-6$0$0Yes
Paul GosarRAZ-1$0$0Yes
Trey GowdyRSC-4$0$0Yes
Kay GrangerRTX-12$0$0Yes
Sam GravesRMO-6$0$0Yes
John "Tom" GravesRGA-9$0$0Yes
Al GreenDTX-9$0$0Yes
Raymond "Gene" GreenDTX-29$0$0No
Tim GriffinRAR-2$0$0Yes
H. GriffithRVA-9$0$0Yes
Raúl GrijalvaDAZ-7$0$0No
Michael GrimmRNY-13$0$0Yes
Frank GuintaRNH-1$0$0Yes
Steven Brett GuthrieRKY-2$0$0Yes
Luis GutiérrezDIL-4$0$0No
Janice HahnDCA-36$0$0No
Ralph HallRTX-4$0$0Yes
Colleen HanabusaDHI-1$0$0No
Richard HannaRNY-24$0$0Yes
Gregg HarperRMS-3$0$0Yes
Andy HarrisRMD-1$0$0Yes
Vicky HartzlerRMO-4$0$0Yes
Alcee HastingsDFL-23$0$0Yes
Richard "Doc" HastingsRWA-4$0$0Yes
Nan HayworthRNY-19$0$0Yes
Joseph HeckRNV-3$0$0Yes
Martin HeinrichDNM-1$0$0No
Jeb HensarlingRTX-5$0$0Yes
Wally HergerRCA-2$0$0Yes
Jaime Herrera BeutlerRWA-3$0$0Yes
Brian HigginsDNY-27$0$0No
Jim HimesDCT-4$0$0Yes
Maurice HincheyDNY-22$0$0No
Rubén HinojosaDTX-15$0$0Yes
Mazie HironoDHI-2$0$0Not Voting
Kathy HochulDNY-26$0$0No
Thomas "Tim" HoldenDPA-17$0$0No
Rush HoltDNJ-12$0$0No
Mike HondaDCA-15$0$0No
Steny H. HoyerDMD-5$0$0No
Tim HuelskampRKS-1$0$0Yes
Bill HuizengaRMI-2$0$0Yes
Randy HultgrenRIL-14$0$0Yes
Duncan HunterRCA-52$0$0Yes
Robert HurtRVA-5$0$0Yes
Steve IsraelDNY-2$0$0No
Darrell IssaRCA-49$0$0Yes
Sheila Jackson LeeDTX-18$0$0Not Voting
Jesse JacksonDIL-2$0$0Not Voting
Lynn JenkinsRKS-2$0$0Yes
Bill JohnsonROH-6$0$0Yes
Eddie Bernice JohnsonDTX-30$0$0No
Henry "Hank" JohnsonDGA-4$0$0No
Sam JohnsonRTX-3$0$0Yes
Tim JohnsonRIL-15$0$0Yes
Walter JonesRNC-3$0$0Yes
Jim JordanROH-4$0$0Yes
Marcy KapturDOH-9$0$0No
William KeatingDMA-10$0$0No
Mike KellyRPA-3$0$0Yes
Dale KildeeDMI-5$0$0No
Ron KindDWI-3$0$0No
Pete KingRNY-3$0$0Yes
Steve KingRIA-5$0$0Yes
Jack KingstonRGA-1$0$0Yes
Adam KinzingerRIL-11$0$0Yes
Larry KissellDNC-8$0$0Yes
John KlineRMN-2$0$0Yes
Dennis KucinichDOH-10$0$0No
Steve LaTouretteROH-14$0$0No
Raúl LabradorRID-1$0$0Yes
Doug LambornRCO-5$0$0Yes
Leonard LanceRNJ-7$0$0Yes
Jeff LandryRLA-3$0$0Yes
Jim LangevinDRI-2$0$0No
James LankfordROK-5$0$0Yes
Rick LarsenDWA-2$0$0No
John LarsonDCT-1$0$0No
Tom LathamRIA-4$0$0Yes
Bob LattaROH-5$0$0Yes
Barbara LeeDCA-9$0$0No
Sandy LevinDMI-12$0$0No
Charles "Jerry" LewisRCA-41$0$0Yes
John LewisDGA-5$0$0No
Dan LipinskiDIL-3$0$0No
Frank LoBiondoRNJ-2$0$0Yes
Dave LoebsackDIA-2$0$0No
Zoe LofgrenDCA-16$0$0No
Billy LongRMO-7$0$0Yes
Nita LoweyDNY-18$0$0No
Frank LucasROK-3$0$0Yes
Blaine LuetkemeyerRMO-9$0$0Yes
Ben Ray LujánDNM-3$0$0No
Cynthia LummisRWY$0$0Yes
Dan LungrenRCA-3$0$0Yes
Stephen LynchDMA-9$0$0No
Connie MackRFL-14$0$0Not Voting
Carolyn MaloneyDNY-14$0$0No
Don ManzulloRIL-16$0$0Yes
Kenny MarchantRTX-24$0$0Yes
Tom MarinoRPA-10$0$0Yes
Ed MarkeyDMA-7$0$0No
Jim MathesonDUT-2$0$0Yes
Doris MatsuiDCA-5$0$0No
Carolyn McCarthyDNY-4$0$0No
Kevin McCarthyRCA-22$0$0Yes
Michael McCaulRTX-10$0$0Yes
Tom McClintockRCA-4$0$0Yes
Betty McCollumDMN-4$0$0No
Jim McDermottDWA-7$0$0No
Jim McGovernDMA-3$0$0No
Patrick McHenryRNC-10$0$0Yes
Douglas "Mike" McIntyreDNC-7$0$0Yes
Howard P. "Buck" McKeonRCA-25$0$0Yes
David McKinleyRWV-1$0$0Yes
Cathy McMorris RodgersRWA-5$0$0Yes
Jerry McNerneyDCA-11$0$0No
Patrick MeehanRPA-7$0$0Yes
Gregory MeeksDNY-6$0$0Not Voting
John MicaRFL-7$0$0Yes
Mike MichaudDME-2$0$0No
Candice MillerRMI-10$0$0Yes
Gary MillerRCA-42$0$0Yes
George MillerDCA-7$0$0No
Jeff MillerRFL-1$0$0Yes
R. "Brad" MillerDNC-13$0$0No
Gwen MooreDWI-4$0$0No
Jim MoranDVA-8$0$0No
Mick MulvaneyRSC-5$0$0Yes
Chris MurphyDCT-5$0$0Not Voting
Tim MurphyRPA-18$0$0Yes
Sue MyrickRNC-9$0$0Yes
Jerry NadlerDNY-8$0$0No
Grace NapolitanoDCA-38$0$0No
Richard NealDMA-2$0$0No
Robert "Randy" NeugebauerRTX-19$0$0Yes
Kristi NoemRSD$0$0Yes
Richard NugentRFL-5$0$0Yes
Devin NunesRCA-21$0$0Yes
Alan NunneleeRMS-1$0$0Yes
Pete OlsonRTX-22$0$0Yes
John OlverDMA-1$0$0No
Bill OwensDNY-23$0$0Yes
Steven PalazzoRMS-4$0$0Yes
Frank PalloneDNJ-6$0$0No
Bill PascrellDNJ-8$0$0No
Ed PastorDAZ-4$0$0No
Ron PaulRTX-14$0$0Yes
Erik PaulsenRMN-3$0$0Yes
Steve PearceRNM-2$0$0Yes
Nancy PelosiDCA-8$0$0No
Mike PenceRIN-6$0$0Yes
Ed PerlmutterDCO-7$0$0No
Gary PetersDMI-9$0$0No
Collin PetersonDMN-7$0$0No
Tom PetriRWI-6$0$0Yes
Rochelle "Chellie" PingreeDME-1$0$0No
Joe PittsRPA-16$0$0Yes
Todd PlattsRPA-19$0$0Yes
Lloyd "Ted" PoeRTX-2$0$0Yes
Jared PolisDCO-2$0$0No
Mike PompeoRKS-4$0$0Yes
Bill PoseyRFL-15$0$0Yes
David PriceDNC-4$0$0No
Tom PriceRGA-6$0$0Yes
Ben QuayleRAZ-3$0$0Yes
Mike QuigleyDIL-5$0$0No
Nick RahallDWV-3$0$0Yes
Charlie RangelDNY-15$0$0No
Tom ReedRNY-29$0$0Yes
Denny RehbergRMT$0$0Yes
David ReichertRWA-8$0$0Yes
James RenacciROH-16$0$0Yes
Silvestre ReyesDTX-16$0$0No
Reid RibbleRWI-8$0$0Yes
Laura RichardsonDCA-37$0$0No
Cedric RichmondDLA-2$0$0No
Edward RigellRVA-2$0$0Yes
David RiveraRFL-25$0$0Yes
Martha RobyRAL-2$0$0Yes
David "Phil" RoeRTN-1$0$0Yes
Harold "Hal" RogersRKY-5$0$0Yes
Mike D. RogersRAL-3$0$0Yes
Mike RogersRMI-8$0$0Yes
Dana RohrabacherRCA-46$0$0Yes
Todd RokitaRIN-4$0$0Yes
Tom RooneyRFL-16$0$0Yes
Ileana Ros-LehtinenRFL-18$0$0Yes
Peter RoskamRIL-6$0$0Yes
Dennis RossRFL-12$0$0Yes
Mike RossDAR-4$0$0Yes
Steve RothmanDNJ-9$0$0No
Lucille Roybal-AllardDCA-34$0$0No
Ed RoyceRCA-40$0$0Yes
Jon RunyanRNJ-3$0$0Yes
C.A. "Dutch" RuppersbergerDMD-2$0$0No
Bobby RushDIL-1$0$0No
Paul RyanRWI-1$0$0Yes
Tim RyanDOH-17$0$0No
Loretta SanchezDCA-47$0$0No
John SarbanesDMD-3$0$0No
Steve ScaliseRLA-1$0$0Yes
Jan SchakowskyDIL-9$0$0No
Adam SchiffDCA-29$0$0No
Robert SchillingRIL-17$0$0Yes
Jeannette "Jean" SchmidtROH-2$0$0Yes
Aaron SchockRIL-18$0$0Yes
Kurt SchraderDOR-5$0$0Yes
Allyson SchwartzDPA-13$0$0No
David SchweikertRAZ-5$0$0Yes
Austin ScottRGA-8$0$0Yes
David ScottDGA-13$0$0No
Bobby ScottDVA-3$0$0No
Tim ScottRSC-1$0$0Yes
F. "Jim" SensenbrennerRWI-5$0$0Yes
José SerranoDNY-16$0$0No
Pete SessionsRTX-32$0$0Yes
Terri SewellDAL-7$0$0No
Brad ShermanDCA-27$0$0No
John ShimkusRIL-19$0$0Yes
Joseph Heath ShulerDNC-11$0$0No
Bill ShusterRPA-9$0$0Yes
Mike SimpsonRID-2$0$0Yes
Albio SiresDNJ-13$0$0No
Louise SlaughterDNY-28$0$0No
David Adam SmithDWA-9$0$0No
Adrian SmithRNE-3$0$0Yes
Chris SmithRNJ-4$0$0Yes
Lamar SmithRTX-21$0$0Yes
Steve SoutherlandRFL-2$0$0Yes
Karen "Jackie" SpeierDCA-12$0$0No
Fortney "Pete" StarkDCA-13$0$0No
Cliff StearnsRFL-6$0$0Yes
Steve StiversROH-15$0$0Not Voting
Marlin StutzmanRIN-3$0$0Yes
John SullivanROK-1$0$0Yes
Betty SuttonDOH-13$0$0No
Linda SánchezDCA-39$0$0No
Lee TerryRNE-2$0$0Yes
Bennie ThompsonDMS-2$0$0No
Glenn ThompsonRPA-5$0$0Yes
C. Mike ThompsonDCA-1$0$0No
William "Mac" ThornberryRTX-13$0$0Yes
Pat TiberiROH-12$0$0Yes
John TierneyDMA-6$0$0No
Scott TiptonRCO-3$0$0Yes
Paul TonkoDNY-21$0$0No
Ed TownsDNY-10$0$0No
Niki TsongasDMA-5$0$0No
Mike TurnerROH-3$0$0Yes
Robert TurnerRNY-9$0$0Yes
Fred UptonRMI-6$0$0Yes
Chris Van HollenDMD-8$0$0No
Nydia VelázquezDNY-12$0$0No
Pete ViscloskyDIN-1$0$0No
Tim WalbergRMI-7$0$0Yes
Greg WaldenROR-2$0$0Yes
Joe WalshRIL-8$0$0Yes
Tim WalzDMN-1$0$0No
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDFL-20$0$0Yes
Maxine WatersDCA-35$0$0Not Voting
Mel WattDNC-12$0$0No
Henry WaxmanDCA-30$0$0No
Daniel WebsterRFL-8$0$0Yes
Peter WelchDVT$0$0No
Allen WestRFL-22$0$0Yes
Lynn WestmorelandRGA-3$0$0Yes
Ed WhitfieldRKY-1$0$0Yes
Frederica WilsonDFL-17$0$0No
Addison "Joe" WilsonRSC-2$0$0Yes
Robert WittmanRVA-1$0$0Yes
Frank WolfRVA-10$0$0Yes
Steve WomackRAR-3$0$0Yes
Rob WoodallRGA-7$0$0Yes
Lynn WoolseyDCA-6$0$0No
John YarmuthDKY-3$0$0No
Kevin YoderRKS-3$0$0Yes
C. W. "Bill" YoungRFL-10$0$0Yes
Don YoungRAK$0$0Yes
Todd YoungRIN-9$0$0Yes

Interest Groups that supported this amendment

$ Donated

Interest Groups that opposed this amendment

$ Donated
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range