H.R. 367 - Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013

Government operations and politics. 113th Congress (2013-2014) View bill details
Sponsor:
Summary:
To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law. (by CRS) 
Status:
The bill was voted on in the House on August 2, 2013 
Amendments:
11 proposed amendments. 7 accepted. 4 rejected. View amendments 
House Vote: On Passage

PASSED on August 2, 2013.

voted YES: 0 voted NO: 0
1 voted present/not voting

Other Votes:

Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013

H.R. 367 — 113th Congress (2013–2014)

Summary
To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law. (by CRS)
Learn More
At OpenCongress
Title
To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law.
Other Titles
  • Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013
  • Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013
  • Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013
  • Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013
Sponsor
Todd Young
Co-Sponsors
Subjects
  • Government operations and politics
  • Administrative law and regulatory procedures
  • Business investment and capital
  • Climate change and greenhouse gases
  • Competitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits
  • Congressional oversight
  • Economic performance and conditions
  • Industrial policy and productivity
  • Inflation and prices
  • Judicial review and appeals
  • Legislative rules and procedure
  • Unemployment
Related Bills
Major Actions
Introduced1/23/2013
Referred to Committee
Amendments (11 proposed)
Passed House8/02/2013
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Davis, Rodney amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote.8/01/2013PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Sessions amendment (A005) Agreed to by voice vote.8/01/2013PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the McKinley amendment (A009) Agreed to by voice vote.8/02/2013PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseOn agreeing to the Webster (FL) amendment (A010) Agreed to by voice vote.8/02/2013PASSED by voice vote
select this voteHouseH.Amdt. 448 (Scalise) to H.R. 367: Amendment requires the Administration to receive approval from Congress before implementing a carbon tax.8/02/2013This amendment PASSED the House
0 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseH.Amdt. 450 (Smith) to H.R. 367: Amendment requires Congressional approval for all rules under the authority of the Affordable Care ...8/02/2013This amendment PASSED the House
0 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseH.Amdt. 451 (Latham) to H.R. 367: Amendment clarifies that the report required to be submitted to Congress by Federal agencies ...8/02/2013This amendment PASSED the House
0 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseH.Amdt. 453 (Nadler) to H.R. 367: Amendment sought to exempt from the bill's Congressional approval requirement any rule pertaining to ...8/02/2013This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
0 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseH.Amdt. 454 (Johnson) to H.R. 367: Amendment sought to exempt from the provisions of the bill any rule that the ...8/02/2013This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
0 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseH.Amdt. 455 (Jackson Lee) to H.R. 367: Amendment sought to exempt from the bill's Congressional approval requirement any rule promulgated ...8/02/2013This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
0 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseH.Amdt. 458 (Moore) to H.R. 367: Amendment sought to exempt rules pertaining to veterans from the provisions of the bill.8/02/2013This amendment DID NOT PASS the House
0 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
select this voteHouseOn Motion to Recommit with Instructions: H R 367 Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act8/02/2013This motion DID NOT PASS the House
0 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
currently selectedHouseH.R. 367 (113th): Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 20138/02/2013This bill PASSED the House
0 voted YES 0 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced1/23/2013
1/23/2013Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
1/23/2013Referred to House Judiciary
1/23/2013Referred to House Rules
1/23/2013Referred to House Budget
1/23/2013Introduced in House
2/28/2013Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
3/05/2013Subcommittee Hearings Held.
3/20/2013Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
3/20/2013Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 6 - 3 .
4/11/2013Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Put on a legislative calendar4/11/2013Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 9.
7/19/2013Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 113-160, Part I.
7/19/2013Committee on Rules discharged.
7/19/2013Committee on Budget discharged.
Put on a legislative calendar7/19/2013Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 115.
7/31/2013Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 322 Reported to House. In each case the rule provides for one hour of debate on the bill and one motion to recommit for each bill.
8/01/2013Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 322.
8/01/2013In each case the rule provides for one hour of debate on the bill and one motion to recommit for each bill.
8/01/2013House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 322 and Rule XVIII.
8/01/2013The Speaker designated the Honorable Randy Hultgren to act as Chairman of the Committee.
8/01/2013GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 367.
8/01/2013The Committee of the Whole rose informally to receive a message from the Senate.
8/01/2013The Committee of the Whole resumed its sitting and continued with debate on H.R. 367.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Scalise amendment No. 1.
8/01/2013POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Scalise amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Scalise demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rodney Davis (IL) amendment No. 2.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Smith (MO) amendment No. 3.
8/01/2013POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Smith(MO) amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Smith (MO) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Latham amendment No. 4.
8/01/2013POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Latham amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Johnson (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Sessions amendment No. 5.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Nadler amendment No. 6.
8/01/2013POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Nadler amendment No. 6, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Nadler demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Johnson (GA) amendment No. 7.
8/01/2013POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Johnson (GA) amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Johnson (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 8.
8/01/2013POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment No. 8, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McKinley amendment No. 9.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Webster amendment No. 11.
8/01/2013DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 322, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moore amendment No. 12.
8/01/2013POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Moore amendment No. 12, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Moore demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
8/01/2013Mr. Goodlatte moved that the Committee rise.
8/01/2013On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
8/01/2013Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 367 as unfinished business.
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013
8/01/2013House amendment offered
8/01/2013Amendment (A001) offered by Mr. Scalise.
8/01/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A001) offered by Mr. Scalise.
8/01/2013Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Davis, Rodney.
8/01/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Davis, Rodney.
select this voteVote8/01/2013On agreeing to the Davis, Rodney amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote.
8/01/2013Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
8/01/2013House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the Davis, Rodney amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote.
8/01/2013Amendment (A003) offered by Mr. Smith (MO).
8/01/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A003) offered by Mr. Smith (MO).
8/01/2013Amendment (A004) offered by Mr. Latham.
8/01/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A004) offered by Mr. Latham.
8/01/2013Amendment (A005) offered by Mr. Sessions.
8/01/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A005) offered by Mr. Sessions.
select this voteVote8/01/2013On agreeing to the Sessions amendment (A005) Agreed to by voice vote.
8/01/2013Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
8/01/2013House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the Sessions amendment (A005) Agreed to by voice vote.
8/01/2013Amendment (A006) offered by Mr. Nadler.
8/01/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A006) offered by Mr. Nadler.
8/02/2013Considered as unfinished business.
8/02/2013The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
8/02/2013UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postopned.
8/02/2013The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 367.
8/02/2013The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
8/02/2013The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
8/02/2013Ms. Kuster moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.
8/02/2013DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kuster motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House forthwith with an amendment to add a section to the bill titled "Protecting Jobs, Economic Growth, and the Health and Safety of the American Public".
8/02/2013The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
8/02/2013Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
8/02/2013Amendment (A007) offered by Mr. Johnson (GA).
8/02/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A007) offered by Mr. Johnson (GA).
8/02/2013Amendment (A008) offered by Ms. Jackson Lee.
8/02/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A008) offered by Ms. Jackson Lee.
8/02/2013Amendment (A009) offered by Mr. McKinley.
8/02/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A009) offered by Mr. McKinley.
select this voteVote8/02/2013On agreeing to the McKinley amendment (A009) Agreed to by voice vote.
8/02/2013Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
8/02/2013House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the McKinley amendment (A009) Agreed to by voice vote.
8/02/2013Amendment (A010) offered by Mr. Webster (FL).
8/02/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A010) offered by Mr. Webster (FL).
select this voteVote8/02/2013On agreeing to the Webster (FL) amendment (A010) Agreed to by voice vote.
8/02/2013Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
8/02/2013House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the Webster (FL) amendment (A010) Agreed to by voice vote.
8/02/2013Amendment (A011) offered by Ms. Moore.
8/02/2013House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A011) offered by Ms. Moore.
select this voteVote8/02/2013H.Amdt. 448 (Scalise) to H.R. 367: Amendment requires the Administration to receive approval from Congress before implementing a carbon tax.
select this voteVote8/02/2013H.Amdt. 450 (Smith) to H.R. 367: Amendment requires Congressional approval for all rules under the authority of the Affordable Care ...
select this voteVote8/02/2013H.Amdt. 451 (Latham) to H.R. 367: Amendment clarifies that the report required to be submitted to Congress by Federal agencies ...
select this voteVote8/02/2013H.Amdt. 453 (Nadler) to H.R. 367: Amendment sought to exempt from the bill's Congressional approval requirement any rule pertaining to ...
select this voteVote8/02/2013H.Amdt. 454 (Johnson) to H.R. 367: Amendment sought to exempt from the provisions of the bill any rule that the ...
select this voteVote8/02/2013H.Amdt. 455 (Jackson Lee) to H.R. 367: Amendment sought to exempt from the bill's Congressional approval requirement any rule promulgated ...
select this voteVote8/02/2013H.Amdt. 458 (Moore) to H.R. 367: Amendment sought to exempt rules pertaining to veterans from the provisions of the bill.
select this voteVote8/02/2013On Motion to Recommit with Instructions: H R 367 Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act
currently selectedHouse Vote on Passage8/02/2013H.R. 367 (113th): Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013
8/02/2013Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
8/02/2013Roll call votes on amendments in House
8/02/2013Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
8/02/2013Roll call votes on amendments in House
8/02/2013Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
8/02/2013Roll call votes on amendments in House
8/02/2013Amendment failed in Committee of the Whole
8/02/2013Roll call votes on amendments in House
8/02/2013Amendment failed in Committee of the Whole
8/02/2013Roll call votes on amendments in House
8/02/2013Amendment failed in Committee of the Whole
8/02/2013Roll call votes on amendments in House
8/02/2013Amendment failed in Committee of the Whole
8/02/2013Roll call votes on amendments in House
9/09/2013Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
NumberSponsorDate OfferedStatus
select this voteH. Amdt. 448Scalise, Steve [R-LA1]August 1, 2013Passed by roll call vote on August 2, 2013.

Amendment requires the Administration to receive approval from Congress before implementing a carbon tax.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 449Davis, Rodney [R-IL13]August 1, 2013Passed by voice vote on August 1, 2013.

Amendment adds to the definition of what constitutes a "major rule" to include any interim final rule issued by EPA that would have a significant impact on a substantial amount of agricultural entities (as determined by the Secretary of Agriculture).

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 450Smith, Jason [R-MO8]August 1, 2013Passed by roll call vote on August 2, 2013.

Amendment requires Congressional approval for all rules under the authority of the Affordable Care Act.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 451Latham, Tom [R-IA3]August 1, 2013Passed by roll call vote on August 2, 2013.

Amendment clarifies that the report required to be submitted to Congress by Federal agencies promulgating a rule under the Act, must include a list of any other related regulatory actions taken by, or that will be taken by, any other Federal agency with authority to implement the same statutory provision or regulatory objective.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 452Sessions, Pete [R-TX32]August 1, 2013Passed by voice vote on August 1, 2013.

Amendment requires an agency submitting a report on any proposed Federal rule to include an assessment, as part of the cost-benefit analysis submitted to the Comptroller General and each House of Congress, of anticipated jobs gained or lost as a result of implementation, and to specify whether those jobs will come from the public or private sector.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 453Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY10]August 1, 2013Failed by roll call vote on August 2, 2013.

Amendment sought to exempt from the bill's Congressional approval requirement any rule pertaining to nuclear reactor safety standards in order to prevent nuclear meltdowns like the one in Fukushima. The amendment would have also ensured that enhanced nuclear safety protection requirements could go into effect.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 454Johnson, Henry [D-GA4]August 1, 2013Failed by roll call vote on August 2, 2013.

Amendment sought to exempt from the provisions of the bill any rule that the Office of Management and Budget determines would result in net job creation.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 455Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX18]August 1, 2013Failed by roll call vote on August 2, 2013.

Amendment sought to exempt from the bill's Congressional approval requirement any rule promulgated by the Department of Homeland Security.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 456McKinley, David [R-WV1]August 1, 2013Passed by voice vote on August 1, 2013.

Amendment reduces the cost threshhold from $100 million to $50 million for the requirement that all regulations must be approved by Congress.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 457Webster, Daniel [R-FL11]August 1, 2013Passed by voice vote on August 1, 2013.

Amendment prevents federal agencies from implementing significant policy changes without appropriate congressional review and requires bringing administrative rules having an economic impact of $100 million or more (as scored by OMB) before Congress for a vote.

Show amendment details

select this voteH. Amdt. 458Moore, Gwen [D-WI4]August 1, 2013Failed by roll call vote on August 2, 2013.

Amendment sought to exempt rules pertaining to veterans from the provisions of the bill.

Show amendment details

Total contributions given to John A. Boehner from interest groups that…

26 Organizations Supported and 66 Opposed; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013: H.R. 367 (113th): Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2013

26 organizations supported this bill

60 Plus Association
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
American Commitment
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
American Conservative Union
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
Americans for Prosperity
James Valvo (2013, January 24). AFP Letter of Support: REINS Act, HR 367 and S 15. Retrieved July 26, 2013, from AFP.
Americans for Tax Reform
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
Campaign for Liberty
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
Center for Individual Freedom
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
Competitive Enterprise Institute
CEI Staff (2013, January 24). REINS Act Introduced in House. Retrieved July 26, 2013, from CEI.
Consumer Electronics Association
Laurie Ann Phillips and Laura Hubbard (2013, January 25). CEA Applauds Introduction of REINS Act. Retrieved July 26, 2013, from CEA.
Freedom Action
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
FreedomWorks
Kibbe, Matt (2013, July 29). Key Vote YES on the REINS Act, H.R. 367. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from FreedomWorks.
Frontiers of Freedom
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
Heartland Institute
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
Heritage Foundation
Gattuso, James L. (2013, March 5). “REINS Act of 2013”: Promoting Jobs, Growth, and Competitiveness. Retrieved July 26, 2013, from Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law.
Industrial Energy Consumers of America
Cicio, Paul N. (2013, June 25). Industrial Energy Consumers of America Supports REINS Act. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Industrial Energy Consumers of America.
Less Government
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
National Association of Electrical Distributors
National Association of Electrical Distributors (2013, February 13). REINS Act Reintroduced in the U.S. House . Retrieved July 29, 2013, from National Association of Electrical Distributors.
National Association of Federal Credit Unions
Thaler, Brad (2013, July 31). NAFCU Letter in Support of Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act (H.R. 367). Retrieved August 9, 2013, from Credit Union Insight.
National Cattlemen's Beef Association
George, Scott and Brice Lee (2013, March 4). Letter to the Hon Todd Young in Support of HR 367, the REINS Act. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Public Lands Council.
National Pork Producers Council
National Pork Producers Council (2013, July 26). For The Week Ending July 26, 2013. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from National Pork Producers Council.
National Taxpayers Union
Swift, Nan (2013, January 24). NTU writes in support of the “Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act.”. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from National Taxpayers Union.
Public Lands Council
George, Scott and Brice Lee (2013, March 4). Letter to the Hon Todd Young in Support of HR 367, the REINS Act. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Public Lands Council.
R Street Institute
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
undersigned organizations (2013, October 28). Coalition letter to U.S. Senate supporting the REINS Act. Retrieved November 7, 2013, from R Street.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Josten, R. Bruce (2013, April 3). Letter Supporting H.R. 367, the "Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act". Retrieved July 29, 2013, from U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Western Energy Alliance
(n.d.). Western Energy Alliance Legislative Center. Retrieved December 5, 2013, from Western Energy Alliance.

66 organizations opposed this bill

AFL-CIO
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Alliance for Justice
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
American Association for Justice
AAJ (2013, August 2). AAJ Statement on House Passage of the REINS Act. Retrieved October 15, 2014, from AAJ.
American Association of University Professors
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition for Sensible Safeguards.
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
American Federation of Teachers
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
American Lung Association
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
American Rivers
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Americans for Financial Reform
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
BlueGreen Alliance
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Campaign for Contract Agriculture Reform
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Center for Digital Democracy
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Center for Effective Government
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Center for Food Safety
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Center for Foodborne Illness Research & Prevention
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Citizens for Sludge-Free Land
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Clean Air Watch
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Clean Water Network
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Consumer Federation of America
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Consumers Union
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
CounterCorp
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Demos
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Economic Policy Institute
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Environment America
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Farmworker Justice
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Free Press
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Friends of the Earth
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Green for All
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Health Care for America Now
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
In the Public Interest
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
International Center for Technology Assessment
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
League of Conservation Voters
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Main Street Alliance
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
National Association of Consumer Advocates
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
National Center for Healthy Housing
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
National Consumers League
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
National Council for Occupational Safety and Health
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
National Employment Law Project
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
National Lawyers Guild
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
National Women's Health Network
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
National Women's Law Center
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Natural Resources Defense Council
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
New Jersey Work Environment Council
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Partnership for Working Families
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
People for the American Way
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Protect All Children's Environment
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Public Citizen
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Reproductive Health Technologies Project
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Service Employees International Union
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Sierra Club
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
STOP Foodborne Illness
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
The Arc
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Trust for America's Health
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
U.S. Chamber Watch
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
U.S. PIRG
Hossain, Nasima (2013, March 6). REINS Bill Would Dismantle America’s Public Health and Consumer Protections. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from US Public Interest Research Group.
Union of Concerned Scientists
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
United Church of Christ, Network for Environmental & Economic Responsibility
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
United Steelworkers
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Waterkeeper Alliance
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.
Worksafe
Coalition For Sensible Safeguards (2013, March 5). Radical REINS Act – Distraction From Other Anti-Regulatory Bills. Retrieved July 29, 2013, from Coalition For Sensible Safeguards.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of John A. Boehner, who didn’t vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, January 1, 2013 – December 31, 2014.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
NamePartyState$ From Interest Groups
That Supported
$ From Interest Groups
That Opposed
Vote
John A. BoehnerROH-8$576,688$87,531Not Voting

Interest Groups that supported this bill

$ Donated
Republican/Conservative$263,928
Independent oil & gas producers$185,950
Livestock$52,960
Credit unions$32,200
Manufacturing$18,700
Electrical Supply$9,200
Pro-business associations$7,200
Chambers of commerce$3,950
Fiscal & tax policy$2,600
Communications & Electronics$0
Consumer groups$0

Interest Groups that opposed this bill

$ Donated
Health, Education & Human Resources$20,431
Environmental policy$18,550
Trial lawyers & law firms$16,100
Education$14,250
Small business associations$10,000
Farm organizations & cooperatives$5,000
Health & welfare policy$3,000
Churches, clergy & religious organizations$200
Food service & related unions$0
Manufacturing unions$0
Abortion policy/Pro-Abortion Rights$0
Commercial service unions$0
Teamsters union$0
Consumer groups$0
Labor Unions$0
Human Rights$0
State & local govt employee unions$0
Automotive Manufacturing union$0
Democratic/Liberal$0
Other unions$0
Teachers unions$0
Women's issues$0
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range