H.J.Res. 44 - Disapproving the Rule Submitted by the Department of the Interior Relating to Bureau of Land Management Regulations That Establish the Procedures Used to Prepare, Revise, or Amend Land Use Plans Pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.

Public lands and natural resources. 115th Congress (2017-2018) View bill details
Sponsor:
Summary:
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. (by CRS) 
Status:
The bill has become law. 
Senate Vote: On Passage

PASSED on March 7, 2017.

1/2 required to pass

voted YES: 51 voted NO: 48
1 voted present/not voting

Disapproving the Rule Submitted by the Department of the Interior Relating to Bureau of Land Management Regulations That Establish the Procedures Used to Prepare, Revise, or Amend Land Use Plans Pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.

H.J.Res. 44 — 115th Congress (2017–2018)

Summary
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. (by CRS)
Learn More
At OpenCongress
Title
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.
Other Titles
  • Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.
Sponsor
Liz Cheney
Co-Sponsors
Subjects
  • Public lands and natural resources
  • Administrative law and regulatory procedures
  • Congressional oversight
  • Department of the Interior
  • Land use and conservation
Related Bills
Major Actions
Introduced1/30/2017
Referred to Committee
Passed House2/07/2017
Passed Senate3/07/2017
Signed by President3/27/2017
Bill History
Chamber/CommitteeMotionDateResult
select this voteHouseH.J.Res. 44: Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Manage2/07/2017This bill PASSED the House
234 voted YES 186 voted NO 13 voted present/not voting
currently selectedSenateH.J.Res. 44: Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Manage3/07/2017This bill PASSED the Senate
51 voted YES 48 voted NO 1 voted present/not voting
ActionDateDescription
Introduced1/30/2017
1/30/2017Introduced in House
1/30/2017Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
2/06/2017Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 91 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.J. Res. 57 and H.J. Res. 58. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each joint resolution. Each joint resolution is closed to amendments and allowed one motion to recommit.
2/07/2017Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 91.
2/07/2017Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 44, H.J. Res. 57 and H.J. Res. 58. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each joint resolution. Each joint resolution is closed to amendments and allowed one motion to recommit.
2/07/2017DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 44.
2/07/2017The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
2/07/2017POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 44, the Chair put the question on passage and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Grijalva demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on passage until a time to be announced.
2/07/2017Considered as unfinished business.
2/07/2017Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
select this voteHouse Vote on Passage2/07/2017H.J.Res. 44: Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Manage
2/08/2017Received in the Senate, read twice.
3/06/2017Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
3/06/2017Measure laid before Senate by motion.
3/07/2017Considered by Senate.
3/07/2017Message on Senate action sent to the House.
currently selectedSenate Vote on Passage3/07/2017H.J.Res. 44: Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Manage
Presented to President3/16/2017Presented to President.
Signed3/27/2017Signed by President.
Enacted3/27/2017Became Public Law No: 115-12.
NumberSponsorDate OfferedStatus
scale for bar graph of contributions

Contributions

  1. November - December 2010 For $77,132 Against $46,903
  2. January - February 2011 For $225,050 Against $137,875
  3. March - April 2011 For $604,293 Against $321,150
  4. May - June 2011 For $584,203 Against $292,002
  5. July - August 2011 For $320,749 Against $119,285
  6. September - October 2011 For $594,430 Against $517,744
  7. November - December 2011 For $410,663 Against $382,524
  8. January - February 2012 For $325,459 Against $282,528
  9. March - April 2012 For $827,394 Against $572,480
  10. May - June 2012 For $874,368 Against $908,877
  11. July - August 2012 For $677,077 Against $685,998
  12. September - October 2012 For $1,472,458 Against $2,140,448
  13. November - December 2012 For $215,011 Against $175,939
  14. January - February 2013 For $124,220 Against $188,899
  15. March - April 2013 For $645,449 Against $384,858
  16. May - June 2013 For $561,864 Against $362,281
  17. July - August 2013 For $301,407 Against $122,446
  18. September - October 2013 For $613,275 Against $188,852
  19. November - December 2013 For $852,767 Against $220,594
  20. January - February 2014 For $578,399 Against $198,752
  21. March - April 2014 For $1,468,009 Against $367,811
  22. May - June 2014 For $1,160,019 Against $543,218
  23. July - August 2014 For $1,002,369 Against $312,164
  24. September - October 2014 For $2,984,027 Against $852,802
  25. November - December 2014 For $450,400 Against $60,820
  26. January - February 2015 For $280,621 Against $134,804
  27. March - April 2015 For $809,118 Against $500,080
  28. May - June 2015 For $846,165 Against $458,918
  29. July - August 2015 For $261,304 Against $221,903
  30. September - October 2015 For $530,424 Against $525,971
  31. November - December 2015 For $364,544 Against $567,593
  32. January - February 2016 For $309,453 Against $350,990
  33. March - April 2016 For $647,040 Against $780,302
  34. May - June 2016 For $924,205 Against $1,162,853
  35. July - August 2016 For $1,294,929 Against $972,267
  36. September - October 2016 For $1,655,721 Against $1,883,684
  37. November - December 2016 For $192,087 Against $135,615

Votes

22 Organizations Support and 21 Oppose; See Which Ones

Organizations that took a position on
Disapproving the Rule Submitted by the Department of the Interior Relating to Bureau of Land Management Regulations That Establish the Procedures Used to Prepare, Revise, or Amend Land Use Plans Pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.: H.J.Res. 44: Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Manage

22 organizations support this bill

American Energy Alliance
American Energy Alliance (2017, March 7). Key Vote: BLM Planning 2.0 CRA. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from American Energy Alliance.
American Exploration & Mining Association
Skaer, Laura (2017, January 30). Re: Congressional Review Act - BLM Planning 2.0. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
American Farm Bureau Federation
Undersigned organizations (2017, January 24). Farm Bureaus support Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
American Petroleum Institute
Gerard, Jack N. (2017, March 6). API SUPPORT LETTER TO SENATE ON BLM PLANNING 2.0 CRA. Retrieved March 8, 2017, from American Petroleum Institute.
American Sheep Industry Association
Undersigned organizations (2017, January 18). Agricultural Groups support Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Americans for Prosperity
Harbin, Chrissy (2017, February 6). AFP KEY VOTE: YES ON H.J. RES. 44. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from Americans for Prosperity.
Association of National Grasslands
Undersigned organizations (2017, January 18). Agricultural Groups support Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
California Cattlemen's Association
Undersigned organizations (2017, January 18). Agricultural Groups support Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
California Farm Bureau Federation
Undersigned organizations (2017, January 24). Farm Bureaus support Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
California Wool Growers Association
Undersigned organizations (2017, January 18). Agricultural Groups support Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Competitive Enterprise Institute
CEI (2017, February 6). CEI Supports Resolution to Undo Bureau of Land Management Planning 2.0 Rule. Retrieved February 7, 2017, from CEI.
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
Schatz, Tom (2017, February 7). Vote YES to CRA Resolutions. Retrieved February 8, 2017, from Council for Citizens Against Government Waste.
Independent Petroleum Association of America
Wagner, Esther & Naatz, Dan (2017, January 18). RE: BLM’s Final Rule on Resource Management Planning. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from Independent Petroleum Association of America.
National Association of Conservation Districts
Undersigned organizations (2017, January 26). State and local governments and public lands stakeholders support Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
National Association of Counties
NACO (2017, February 6). NACo Action Alert on BLM Planning 2.0. Retrieved February 7, 2017, from NACO.
National Association of State Departments of Agriculture
Undersigned organizations (2017, January 26). State and local governments and public lands stakeholders support Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
National Cattlemen's Beef Association
Public Lands Council & National Cattlemen's Beef Association (2017, January 31). Livestock Industry Supports Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from National Cattlemen's Beef Association.
National Mining Association
National Mining Association (2017, March 27). NMA Applauds President, Congress for Overturning BLM’S Muddled Planning 2.0 Rule. Retrieved March 29, 2017, from National Mining Association.
Public Lands Council
Public Lands Council & National Cattlemen's Beef Association (2017, January 31). Livestock Industry Supports Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from National Cattlemen's Beef Association.
Rural County Representatives of California
Undersigned organizations (2017, January 26). State and local governments and public lands stakeholders support Legislation to Address BLM Planning Rule. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Howard, Jack (2017, February 6). US Chamber Letter to Members of the US Congress. Retrieved February 7, 2017, from US Chamber of Commerce.
Western Energy Alliance
Sgamma, Kathleen M. (2017, January 26). Western Energy Alliance Letter in Support of Planning 2.0 CRA Resolution. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from Western Energy Alliance.

21 organizations oppose this bill

American Anthropological Association
Undersigned organizations (2017, February 6). Organizations committed to preserving our nation’s historic and cultural resources oppose H.J.Res. 44. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from National Trust for Historic Preservation.
American Cultural Resources Association
Undersigned organizations (2017, February 6). Organizations committed to preserving our nation’s historic and cultural resources oppose H.J.Res. 44. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from National Trust for Historic Preservation.
California Wilderness Coalition
California Wilderness Coalition (2017, February 3). ACTION ALERT: Protecting BLM’s New Planning 2.0. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from California Wilderness Coalition.
Center for American Progress
Center for American Progress (2017, March 7). STATEMENT: Congress Restricting American’s Input into Public Land Planning, Says CAP’s Nicole Gentile. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from Center for American Progress.
Center for Western Priorities
Center for Western Priorities (2017, March 7). Politicians Vote to Undermine Local Input on Land Use. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from Center for Western Priorities.
Conservation Lands Foundation
Undersigned organizations (2017, February 6). Organizations committed to preserving our nation’s historic and cultural resources oppose H.J.Res. 44. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from National Trust for Historic Preservation.
Defenders of Wildlife
Defenders of Wildlife (2017, February 6). Why You Should Care: The Congressional Review Act. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from Defenders of Wildlife.
League of Conservation Voters
Karpinski, Gene (2017, March 3). RE: OPPOSE THE RADICAL REPEAL OF THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT’S SENSIBLE “PLANNING 2.0” RULE. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from League of Conservation Voters.
National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers
Undersigned organizations (2017, February 6). Organizations committed to preserving our nation’s historic and cultural resources oppose H.J.Res. 44. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from National Trust for Historic Preservation.
National Parks Conservation Association
National Parks Conservation Association (2017, January 31). House Moves to Encourage Drilling in National Parks. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from National Parks Conservation Association.
National Trust for Historic Preservation
NTHP (2017, February 4). Oppose the Congressional Review Act Resolution. Retrieved February 7, 2017, from NTHP.
National Wildlife Federation
Undersigned organizations (2017, February 7). Sportsmen Blast Attacks on Public-Lands Management. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from National Wildlife Federation.
Natural Resources Defense Council
McEnaney, Bobby (2017, March 7). Congress Kills BLM’s Planning 2.0 Rule. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from Natural Resources Defense Council.
Nature Conservancy
Nature Conservancy (2017, March 7). Senate Votes to Overturn Bureau of Land Management Rule on Land Use Planning. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from Nature Conservancy.
Outdoor Alliance
Geltman, Louis (2017, February 3). PROTECT BLM LANDS FROM CONGRESSIONAL ASSAULT. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from Outdoor Alliance.
Pew Charitable Trusts
Rait, Ken (2017, February 13). Pew Charitable Trusts Oppose H. J. Res. 44. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from Pew Charitable Trusts.
Public Lands Foundation
Brady, Kristyn (2017, February 1). Congress Overreaches to Roll Back Americans’ Say in Public Land Management. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.
Society for American Archaeology
Undersigned organizations (2017, February 6). Organizations committed to preserving our nation’s historic and cultural resources oppose H.J.Res. 44. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from National Trust for Historic Preservation.
Society for Historical Archaeology
Undersigned organizations (2017, February 6). Organizations committed to preserving our nation’s historic and cultural resources oppose H.J.Res. 44. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from National Trust for Historic Preservation.
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership
Brady, Kristyn (2017, February 1). Congress Overreaches to Roll Back Americans’ Say in Public Land Management. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.
Trout Unlimited
Undersigned organizations (2017, February 7). Sportsmen Blast Attacks on Public-Lands Management. Retrieved February 15, 2017, from National Wildlife Federation.

Need proof?

View citations of support and opposition

Includes reported contributions to congressional campaigns of Senators in office on day of vote, from interest groups invested in the vote according to MapLight, November 29, 2010 – November 28, 2016.
Contributions data source: OpenSecrets.org

Contributions by Legislator

Namesort iconPartyState$ From Interest Groups
That Support
$ From Interest Groups
That Oppose
Vote
Andrew Lamar AlexanderRTN$63,266$26,300Yes
Tammy BaldwinDWI$8,811$732,736No
John BarrassoRWY$244,616$3,000Yes
Michael F. BennetDCO$110,398$1,176,724No
Richard BlumenthalDCT$7,200$88,429No
Roy BluntRMO$298,993$12,450Yes
Cory A. BookerDNJ$8,100$220,168No
John BoozmanRAR$89,367$3,350Yes
Sherrod BrownDOH$26,800$660,846No
Richard BurrRNC$255,440$13,700Yes
Maria CantwellDWA$14,916$184,351No
Shelley Moore CapitoRWV$347,607$8,500Yes
Ben CardinDMD$14,500$46,475No
Tom CarperDDE$8,200$22,600No
Bob CaseyDPA$37,200$89,404No
Bill CassidyRLA$729,935$47,100Yes
William Thad CochranRMS$104,703$17,700Yes
Susan M. CollinsRME$58,166$41,900Yes
Christopher A. CoonsDDE$4,373$93,779No
Bob CorkerRTN$145,136$10,500Yes
John CornynRTX$722,616$5,950Yes
Catherine Cortez MastoDNV$19,107$1,566,421No
Tom CottonRAR$1,526,598$14,800Yes
Mike CrapoRID$102,244$8,312Yes
Ted CruzRTX$2,719,916$9,850Yes
Steve DainesRMT$762,244$7,525Yes
Joe DonnellyDIN$23,000$91,915No
Tammy DuckworthDIL$17,325$1,037,728No
Dick DurbinDIL$12,200$115,136No
Mike EnziRWY$107,383$0Yes
Joni ErnstRIA$281,861$500Yes
Dianne FeinsteinDCA$23,500$41,222No
Deb FischerRNE$346,791$7,500Yes
Jeff FlakeRAZ$1,479,698$8,400Yes
Al FrankenDMN$12,340$349,383No
Cory GardnerRCO$1,069,359$17,650Yes
Kirsten E. GillibrandDNY$22,131$185,315No
Lindsey GrahamRSC$118,638$42,163Yes
Chuck GrassleyRIA$221,189$6,700Yes
Kamala D. HarrisDCA$8,823$445,033No
Margaret Wood HassanDNH$18,020$1,074,412No
Orrin G. HatchRUT$167,900$3,500Yes
Martin HeinrichDNM$98,533$456,922No
Heidi HeitkampDND$127,899$66,159No
Dean HellerRNV$315,957$11,000Yes
Mazie K. HironoDHI$2,750$125,214No
John HoevenRND$149,743$2,000Yes
Jim InhofeROK$322,224$5,800Yes
Johnny IsaksonRGA$103,745$2,500Not Voting
Ron JohnsonRWI$984,684$3,300Yes
Tim KaineDVA$40,433$690,424No
John KennedyRLA$93,400$1,000Yes
Angus S. King, Jr.IME$2,550$72,485No
Amy KlobucharDMN$16,616$50,657No
James LankfordROK$676,165$6,200Yes
Patrick J. LeahyDVT$4,450$112,608No
Mike LeeRUT$776,349$3,000Yes
Joe Manchin, IIIDWV$130,850$46,625No
Ed MarkeyDMA$17,700$592,523No
John McCainRAZ$262,620$12,475Yes
Claire McCaskillDMO$36,658$156,330No
Addison "Mitch" McConnellRKY$786,706$21,650Yes
Bob MenéndezDNJ$27,800$31,950No
Jeff MerkleyDOR$13,150$257,223No
Jerry MoranRKS$142,352$8,500Yes
Lisa MurkowskiRAK$333,996$23,200Yes
Chris MurphyDCT$5,200$409,559No
Patty MurrayDWA$11,025$335,883No
Clarence "Bill" NelsonDFL$41,074$162,275No
Rand PaulRKY$514,725$50Yes
David PerdueRGA$283,628$5,100Yes
Gary C. PetersDMI$12,150$700,109No
Rob PortmanROH$447,902$32,010Yes
John "Jack" ReedDRI$1,250$37,200No
Jim RischRID$101,837$1,000Yes
Charles "Pat" RobertsRKS$349,314$5,700Yes
Mike RoundsRSD$215,231$8,296Yes
Marco RubioRFL$1,116,563$34,313Yes
Bernie SandersIVT$1,950$374,962No
Ben SasseRNE$793,436$7,153Yes
Brian SchatzDHI$31,350$413,370No
Chuck SchumerDNY$17,700$253,001No
Tim ScottRSC$437,086$21,150Yes
Jeanne ShaheenDNH$8,050$346,154No
Richard C. ShelbyRAL$32,600$0Yes
Debbie StabenowDMI$54,544$111,285No
Luther StrangeRAL$0$0Yes
Dan SullivanRAK$834,058$11,400Yes
Jon TesterDMT$106,784$428,701No
John ThuneRSD$279,782$26,144Yes
Thom TillisRNC$403,584$24,850Yes
Patrick J. ToomeyRPA$1,525,645$6,100Yes
Tom UdallDNM$134,950$284,065No
Chris Van HollenDMD$14,150$187,877No
Mark R. WarnerDVA$20,800$110,524No
Elizabeth WarrenDMA$26,298$2,040,899No
Sheldon WhitehouseDRI$4,516$162,500No
Roger F. WickerRMS$70,066$5,500Yes
Ron WydenDOR$58,400$232,428No
Todd YoungRIN$282,515$3,500Yes

Add Data Filters:

Legislator Filters
Legislator Filters
NamePartyState$ From Interest Groups
That Support
$ From Interest Groups
That Oppose
Vote
Andrew Lamar AlexanderRTN$63,266$26,300Yes
Tammy BaldwinDWI$8,811$732,736No
John BarrassoRWY$244,616$3,000Yes
Michael F. BennetDCO$110,398$1,176,724No
Richard BlumenthalDCT$7,200$88,429No
Roy BluntRMO$298,993$12,450Yes
Cory A. BookerDNJ$8,100$220,168No
John BoozmanRAR$89,367$3,350Yes
Sherrod BrownDOH$26,800$660,846No
Richard BurrRNC$255,440$13,700Yes
Maria CantwellDWA$14,916$184,351No
Shelley Moore CapitoRWV$347,607$8,500Yes
Ben CardinDMD$14,500$46,475No
Tom CarperDDE$8,200$22,600No
Bob CaseyDPA$37,200$89,404No
Bill CassidyRLA$729,935$47,100Yes
William Thad CochranRMS$104,703$17,700Yes
Susan M. CollinsRME$58,166$41,900Yes
Christopher A. CoonsDDE$4,373$93,779No
Bob CorkerRTN$145,136$10,500Yes
John CornynRTX$722,616$5,950Yes
Catherine Cortez MastoDNV$19,107$1,566,421No
Tom CottonRAR$1,526,598$14,800Yes
Mike CrapoRID$102,244$8,312Yes
Ted CruzRTX$2,719,916$9,850Yes
Steve DainesRMT$762,244$7,525Yes
Joe DonnellyDIN$23,000$91,915No
Tammy DuckworthDIL$17,325$1,037,728No
Dick DurbinDIL$12,200$115,136No
Mike EnziRWY$107,383$0Yes
Joni ErnstRIA$281,861$500Yes
Dianne FeinsteinDCA$23,500$41,222No
Deb FischerRNE$346,791$7,500Yes
Jeff FlakeRAZ$1,479,698$8,400Yes
Al FrankenDMN$12,340$349,383No
Cory GardnerRCO$1,069,359$17,650Yes
Kirsten E. GillibrandDNY$22,131$185,315No
Lindsey GrahamRSC$118,638$42,163Yes
Chuck GrassleyRIA$221,189$6,700Yes
Kamala D. HarrisDCA$8,823$445,033No
Margaret Wood HassanDNH$18,020$1,074,412No
Orrin G. HatchRUT$167,900$3,500Yes
Martin HeinrichDNM$98,533$456,922No
Heidi HeitkampDND$127,899$66,159No
Dean HellerRNV$315,957$11,000Yes
Mazie K. HironoDHI$2,750$125,214No
John HoevenRND$149,743$2,000Yes
Jim InhofeROK$322,224$5,800Yes
Johnny IsaksonRGA$103,745$2,500Not Voting
Ron JohnsonRWI$984,684$3,300Yes
Tim KaineDVA$40,433$690,424No
John KennedyRLA$93,400$1,000Yes
Angus S. King, Jr.IME$2,550$72,485No
Amy KlobucharDMN$16,616$50,657No
James LankfordROK$676,165$6,200Yes
Patrick J. LeahyDVT$4,450$112,608No
Mike LeeRUT$776,349$3,000Yes
Joe Manchin, IIIDWV$130,850$46,625No
Ed MarkeyDMA$17,700$592,523No
John McCainRAZ$262,620$12,475Yes
Claire McCaskillDMO$36,658$156,330No
Addison "Mitch" McConnellRKY$786,706$21,650Yes
Bob MenéndezDNJ$27,800$31,950No
Jeff MerkleyDOR$13,150$257,223No
Jerry MoranRKS$142,352$8,500Yes
Lisa MurkowskiRAK$333,996$23,200Yes
Chris MurphyDCT$5,200$409,559No
Patty MurrayDWA$11,025$335,883No
Clarence "Bill" NelsonDFL$41,074$162,275No
Rand PaulRKY$514,725$50Yes
David PerdueRGA$283,628$5,100Yes
Gary C. PetersDMI$12,150$700,109No
Rob PortmanROH$447,902$32,010Yes
John "Jack" ReedDRI$1,250$37,200No
Jim RischRID$101,837$1,000Yes
Charles "Pat" RobertsRKS$349,314$5,700Yes
Mike RoundsRSD$215,231$8,296Yes
Marco RubioRFL$1,116,563$34,313Yes
Bernie SandersIVT$1,950$374,962No
Ben SasseRNE$793,436$7,153Yes
Brian SchatzDHI$31,350$413,370No
Chuck SchumerDNY$17,700$253,001No
Tim ScottRSC$437,086$21,150Yes
Jeanne ShaheenDNH$8,050$346,154No
Richard C. ShelbyRAL$32,600$0Yes
Debbie StabenowDMI$54,544$111,285No
Luther StrangeRAL$0$0Yes
Dan SullivanRAK$834,058$11,400Yes
Jon TesterDMT$106,784$428,701No
John ThuneRSD$279,782$26,144Yes
Thom TillisRNC$403,584$24,850Yes
Patrick J. ToomeyRPA$1,525,645$6,100Yes
Tom UdallDNM$134,950$284,065No
Chris Van HollenDMD$14,150$187,877No
Mark R. WarnerDVA$20,800$110,524No
Elizabeth WarrenDMA$26,298$2,040,899No
Sheldon WhitehouseDRI$4,516$162,500No
Roger F. WickerRMS$70,066$5,500Yes
Ron WydenDOR$58,400$232,428No
Todd YoungRIN$282,515$3,500Yes

Interest Groups that support this bill

$ Donated
Republican/Conservative$14,205,818
Independent oil & gas producers$5,288,722
Oil & Gas$2,659,025
Livestock$2,324,203
Mining$731,383
Chambers of commerce$362,426
Farm bureaus$170,148
Energy, Natural Resources and Environment$126,950
Public official (elected or appointed)$123,983
Fiscal & tax policy$55,350
Sheep and Wool Producers$17,845
Municipal & county government organizations$250

Interest Groups that oppose this bill

$ Donated
Democratic/Liberal$10,463,497
Environmental policy$6,497,094
Education$908,336
Native American Tribes$132,591
Hunting & wildlife$70,612
Fisheries & wildlife$10,100
Loading…
Date Range of Contributions
Enter a custom date range